i-manager Publications

i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology (JET)

Current Issue Vol. 21 Issue 2

Preventing Teacher and Counselor Burnout: Self-Care in Training Programs
A Study of Intervention Math Labs and STAAR Math Growth Scores in a South Texas Rural Middle School
Turkish EFL Teachers' Perceptions of their Pedagogical Digital Competence in an EFL Setting
Brief Report: Targeting the Social Communication Skills of an Autistic Adolescent with a Co-Occurring ADHD Diagnosis using Two Formats of a Social Story
The Effectiveness of GeoGebra Assisted Learning on Students' Mathematical Representation: A Meta-Analysis Study

Most Cited

Volume 19 Issue 3 October - December 2022

Research Paper

Revisiting the Modality and Redundancy Effect in an Augmented Reality-Based Language Learning Environment

Bora Demir* , Ceyhun Karabıyık, Muzaffer Özdemir*, Meltem Baturay****

, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Turkey.

Department of English Language Teaching, Ufuk University, Turkey.

**** Atılım University, Turkey.

Demir, B., Karabıyık, C., Özdemir, M., and Baturay, M. (2022). Revisiting the Modality and Redundancy Effect in an Augmented Reality-Based Language Learning Environment. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 19(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.19.3.19174

Abstract

This study examines the effect of modality and redundancy in an Augmented Reality (AR) based language learning environment for teaching vocabulary in a foreign language. The study aims to determine the effectiveness of the redundancy and modality principles, examine the relationship between cognitive load, satisfaction, anxiety, willingness, and achievement, identify predictors of achievement, and understand how students perceive AR-based vocabulary learning in three different presentation modes (animation + narration + text, animation + narration, and animation + text). The study used a pre- and post-test control group quasi-experimental design, with 97 Turkish-speaking undergraduate students from the Faculty of Education at a state university participating. The study participants were divided into three groups and practiced using the same AR-based flashcards in three different modalities (animation + narration + text, animation + narration, and animation + text). After completing a short distractive task during the practice session, the participants were given an achievement test. The analysis of the data revealed that while the group that used animation + narration outscored the other two groups, the difference was only significant between the animation + text group and the animation + narration group, which supported the modality principle. However, there was no significant difference between the animation + narration + text group and the animation + narration group, which did not support the redundancy principle. The study also included qualitative data from a focus group interview to support the quantitative findings. The conclusion of the study is that the principles of CTML (Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning) should be reconsidered in relation to the use of AR technology in instructional settings.

References

[1]. Acosta, B., Luis, J., Navarro, B., Margarita, S., Gesa, F., Ramon., Graf., Sabine., & Kinshuk. (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: A systematic review of research and applications. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 17(4), 133-149.

[2]. Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman & Hall, London.

[3]. Ari, F., Flores, R., Inan, F. A., Cheon, J., Crooks, S. M., Paniukov, D., & Kurucay, M. (2014). The effects of verbally redundant information on student learning: An instance of reverse redundancy. Computers & Education, 76, 199-204.

[4]. Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355-385.

[5]. Billinghurst, M., Kato, H., & Poupyrev, I. (2001). The MagicBook: a transitional AR interface. Computers & Graphics, 25(5), 745-753.

[6]. Buchner, J., Buntins, K., & Kerres, M. (2021). A systematic map of research characteristics in studies on augmented reality and cognitive load. Computers and Education Open, 2, 100036.

[7]. Buchner, J., Buntins, K., & Kerres, M. (2022). The impact of augmented reality on cognitive load and performance: A systematic review. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 38(1), 285-303.

[8]. Bujak, K. R., Radu, I., Catrambone, R., MacIntyre, B., Zheng, R., & Golubski, G. (2013). A psychological perspective on augmented reality in the mathematics classroom. Computers & Education, 68, 536-544.

[9]. Campen, C. A. K., Segers, E., & Verhoeven, L. (2018). The modality and redundancy effects in multimedia learning in children with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 24(2), 140-155.

[10]. Cevahir, H., Özdemir, M., & Baturay, M. H. (2022). The effect of animation-based worked examples supported with augmented reality on the academic achievement, attitude and motivation of students towards learning programming. Participatory Educational Research, 9(3), 226-247.

[11]. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293-332.

[12]. Chang, H. Y., Wu, H. K., & Hsu, Y. S. (2013). Integrating a mobile augmented reality activity to contextualize student learning of a socioscienti? c issue. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 95-99.

[13]. Chang, Y. J., Chen, C. H., Huang, W. T., & Huang, W. S. (2011, July). Investigating students' perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of English learning using augmented reality. In 2011 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

[14]. Chen, M. P., & Liao, B. C. (2015, July). Augmented reality laboratory for high school electrochemistry course. In 2015 IEEE 15th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (pp.132-136). IEEE.

[15]. Chen, M. P., Wang, L. C., Zou, D., Lin, S. Y., Xie, H., & Tsai, C. C. (2022). Effects of captions and English proficiency on learning effectiveness, motivation and attitude in augmented-reality-enhanced theme-based contextualized EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 35(3), 381-411.

[16]. Cheng, K. H. (2017). Reading an augmented reality book: An exploration of learners' cognitive load, motivation, and attitudes. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 53-69.

[17]. Christopoulos, A., Pellas, N., Kurczaba, J., & Macredie, R. (2022). The effects of augmented reality supported instruction in tertiary level medical education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 53(2), 307-325.

[18]. Chung, K. H., Shewchuk, J. P., & Williges, R. C. (1999). An application of augmented reality to thickness inspection. Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries, 9(4), 331-342.

[19]. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2011). E-Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. John Wiley & Sons.

[20]. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage publications.

[21]. Demir, B., & Özdemir, M. (2019). Investigating the Effect of Augmented Reality on Foreign Language Vocabulary Learning with Reference to Redundancy Principle.

[22]. Dewi, F. (2020). Augmented reality for young learners. In Proceedings of iTELL (Indonesia Technology Enhanced Language Learning) Conference (pp. 4-8).

[23]. Di Serio, Á., Ibáñez, M. B., & Kloos, C. D. (2013). Impact of an augmented reality system on students' motivation for a visual art course. Computers & Education, 68, 586-596.

[24]. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford University Press, New York.

[25]. Dunleavy, M., Dede, C., & Mitchell, R. (2009). Affordances and limitations of immersive participatory augmented reality simulations for teaching and learning. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18, 7-22.

[26]. Dünser, A., Grasset, R., Seichter, H., & Billinghurst, M. (2007). Applying HCI principles to AR systems design. Mixed Reality User Interfaces: Specification, Authoring, Adaptation (MRUI'07) Workshop Proceedings, (pp. 37-42).

[27]. Erbas, C., & Demirer, V. (2019). The effects of augmented reality on students' academic achievement and motivation in a biology course. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(3), 450-458.

[28]. Fonseca, D., Martí, N., Redondo, E., Navarro, I., & Sánchez, A. (2014). Relationship between student profile, tool use, participation, and academic performance with the use of Augmented Reality technology for visualized architecture models. Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 434-445.

[29]. Gangaiamaran, R., & Pasupathi, M. (2017). Review on use of mobile apps for language learning. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(21), 11242-11251.

[30]. Garrett, B. M., Anthony, J., & Jackson, C. (2018). Using mobile augmented reality to enhance health professional practice education. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning, 4(1), 224-247.

[31]. Goff, E. E., Mulvey, K. L., Irvin, M. J., & Hartstone- Rose, A. (2018). Applications of augmented reality in informal science learning sites: A review. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 27, 433-447.

[32]. Han, J., Jo, M., Hyun, E., & So, H. J. (2015). Examining young children's perception toward augmented realityinfused dramatic play. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63, 455-474.

[33]. Holden, C. L., & Sykes, J. M. (2011). Leveraging mobile games for place-based language learning. International Journal of Game-Based Learning (IJGBL), 1(2), 1-18.

[34]. Hsieh, M. C., & Lee, J. S. (2008). AR marker capacity increasing for kindergarten English learning. In Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists IMECS.

[35]. Hsu, T. C. (2017). Learning English with augmented reality: Do learning styles matter? Computers & Education, 106, 137-149.

[36]. Huang, T. C., Chen, C. C., & Chou, Y. W. (2016). Animating eco-education: To see, feel, and discover in an augmented reality-based experiential learning environment. Computers & Education, 96, 72-82.

[37]. Hwang, Y., & Huang, N. P. (2010). A study of efl college students' language anxiety in multimedia environments. International Journal of the Humanities, 8(2), 367-378.

[38]. Ibáñez, M. B., Di-Serio, Á., Villarán-Molina, D., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2015). Support for augmented reality simulation systems: The effects of scaffolding on learning outcomes and behavior patterns. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 9(1), 46-56.

[39]. Jamet, E., & Le Bohec, O. (2007). The effect of redundant text in multimedia instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(4), 588-598.

[40]. Kalyuga, S., Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1999). Managing split attention and redundancy in multimedia instruction. Applied Cognitive Psychology: The Official Journal of the Society for Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 13(4), 351-371.

[41]. Kaufmann, H., & Schmalstieg, D. (2003). Mathematics and geometry education with collaborative augmented reality, Computers & Graphics, 27(3), 339-345.

[42]. Klopfer, E., & Yoon, S. (2004). Developing games and simulations for today and tomorrow's tech savvy youth. TechTrends, 49(3), 33-41.

[43]. Koning, B. B., van Hooijdonk, C. M., & Lagerwerf, L. (2017). Verbal redundancy in a procedural animation: On-screen labels improve retention but not behavioral performance. Computers & Education, 107, 45-53.

[44]. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Sage Publications.

[45]. Küçük, S., Yilmaz, R., Baydas, Ö., & Göktas, Y. (2014b). Augmented reality applications attitude scale in secondary schools: Validity and reliability study. Egitim ve Bilim, 39(176), 383-392.

[46]. Küçük, S., Yýlmaz, R. M., & Göktaþ, Y. (2014a). Augmented reality for learning English: Achievement, attitude and cognitive load levels of students. Egitim ve Bilim, 39(176), 393-404.

[47]. Lai, A. F., Chen, C. H., & Lee, G. Y. (2019). An augmented reality based learning approach to enhancing students' science reading performances from the perspective of the cognitive load theory. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 232-247.

[48]. Lai, J. Y., & Chang, L. T. (2021). Impacts of augmented reality apps on first graders' motivation and performance in English vocabulary learning. Sage Open, 11(4), 1-13.

[49]. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174.

[50]. Lee, H., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). Fostering learning from instructional video in a second language. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 32(5), 648-654.

[51]. Lee, L. K., Chau, C. H., Chau, C. H., Ng, C. T., Hu, J. H., Wong, C. Y., ... & Wu, N. I. (2019). Improving the experience of teaching and learning kindergarten-level English vocabulary using augmented reality. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 25(2), 110-125.

[52]. Leslie, K. C., Low, R., Jin, P., & Sweller, J. (2012). Redundancy and expertise reversal effects when using educational technology to learn primary school science. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(1), 1-13.

[53]. Li, K. C., & Wong, B. T. M. (2021). A literature review of augmented reality, virtual reality, and mixed reality in language learning. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 15(2), 164-178.

[54]. Lin, T. J., Duh, H. B. L., Li, N., Wang, H. Y., & Tsai, C. C. (2013). An investigation of learners' collaborative knowledge construction performances and behavior patterns in an augmented reality simulation system. Computers & Education, 68, 314-321.

[55]. Liu, Y. (2019). Multimedia Input Modes, the Modality Principle, and the Redundancy Principle for University ESL Students' Learning (Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University).

[56]. Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.

[57]. Mahadzir, N. N., & Phung, L. F. (2013). The use of augmented reality pop-up book to increase motivation in English language learning for national primary school. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 1(1), 26-38.

[58]. Makransky, G., Terkildsen, T. S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). Adding immersive virtual reality to a science lab simulation causes more presence but less learning. Learning and Instruction, 60, 225-236.

[59]. Martínez, A. A., Benito, J. R. L., González, E. A., & Ajuria, E. B. (2017, November). An experience of the application of augmented reality to learn English in infant education. In 2017 International Symposium on Computers in Education (SIIE) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

[60]. Martín-Gutiérrez, J., & Contero, M. (2011). Improving academic performance and motivation in engineering education with augmented reality. In HCI International 2011–Posters' Extended Abstracts (pp. 509-513). Springer, Heidelberg.

[61]. Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1-19.

[62]. Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

[63]. Mayer, R. E. (2002). Multimedia learning. In Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 41, pp. 85-139). Academic Press.

[64]. Mayer, R. E. (2005). Cognitive theory of multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 31–48). Cambridge University Press.

[65]. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

[66]. Mayer, R. E., & Johnson, C. I. (2008). Revising the redundancy principle in multimedia learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 380-386.

[67]. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43-52.

[68]. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.

[69]. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications.

[70]. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments: Special issue on interactive learning environments: Contemporary issues and trends. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 309-326.

[71]. Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Cognitive principles of multimedia learning: The role of modality and contiguity. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 358-368.

[72]. Özdemir, M. (2017). Experimental studies on learning with augmented reality technology: A systematic review. Mersin University Journal of the Faculty of Education, 13(2), 609-632.

[73]. Paas, F. G. (1992). Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: a cognitiveload approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 429-434.

[74]. Paas, F. G., Van Merriënboer, J. J., & Adam, J. J. (1994). Measurement of cognitive load in instructional research. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 79(1), 419-430.

[75]. Paas, F., & Sweller, J. (2014). Implications of cognitive load theory for multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 27-42). Cambridge University Press.

[76]. Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42, 533-544.

[77]. Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step By Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS Program. McGraw-Hill Education, London.

[78]. Pastore, R., Asino, T. I., & Briskin, J. (2019). The effects of the multimedia, modality, and redundancy principles in a computer based environment on adult learners. Journal of Multimedia Processing and Technologies, 10(2), 49-61.

[79]. Pu, M., & Zhong, Z. (2018, May). Development of a situational interaction game for improving preschool children'performance in English-vocabulary learning. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Distance Education and Learning (pp. 88-92).

[80]. Redondo, B., Cózar-Gutiérrez, R., González-Calero, J. A., & Sánchez Ruiz, R. (2020). Integration of augmented reality in the teaching of English as a foreign language in early childhood education. Early Childhood Education Journal, 48(2), 147-155.

[81]. Reinders, H. (2014). Implementing mobile language learning with an augmented reality activity. Modern English Teacher, 23(2), 42-46.

[82]. Safar, A. H., Al-Jafar, A. A., & Al-Yousefi, Z. H. (2016). The effectiveness of using augmented reality apps in teaching the English alphabet to kindergarten children: A case study in the State of Kuwait. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(2), 417-440.

[83]. Sahin, N., & Ozcan, M. F. (2019). Effects of augmented reality in teaching old Turkish language mementoes on student achievement and motivation. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(2), 198-213.

[84]. Samur, Y. (2012). Redundancy effect on retention of vocabulary words using multimedia presentation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(6), E166-E170.

[85]. Santos, M. E. C., Lübke, A. I., & Taketomi, T. (2016). Augmented reality as multimedia: the case for situated vocabular y learning. Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, 11(4), 1-23.

[86]. Schrier, K. L. (2005). Revolutionizing History Education: Using Augmented Reality Games to Teach Histories (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Comparative Media Studies).

[87]. Solak, E., & Cakir, R. (2015). Exploring the effect of materials designed with augmented reality on language learners' vocabulary learning. Journal of Educators Online, 12(2), 50-72.

[88]. Sommerauer, P., & Müller, O. (2014). Augmented reality in informal learning environments: A field experiment in a mathematics exhibition. Computers & Education, 79, 59-68.

[89]. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257-285.

[90]. Sweller, J. (2005). The redundancy principle in multimedia learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 159–167). Cambridge University Press.

[91]. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage, London.

[92]. Teng, M. F., & Zhang, D. (2021). The associations between working memory and the effects of multimedia input on L2 vocabulary learning. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, (pp. 1-29).

[93]. Thomas, R. G., William John, N., & Delieu, J. M. (2010). Augmented reality for anatomical education. Journal of Visual Communication in Medicine, 33(1), 6-15.

[94]. Tsai, C. C. (2020a). An action research study exploring the effects of augmented reality for english vocabulary learning in an elementary school in Taiwan. The New Educational Review, 59, 163-174.

[95]. Tsai, C. C. (2020b). The effects of augmented reality to motivation and performance in EFL vocabulary learning. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 987-1000.

[96]. Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Kester, L. (2014). The fourcomponent instructional design model: Multimedia principles in environments for complex learning. In R. E. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 104–148). Cambridge University Press.

[97]. Wasko, C. W. (2013). Instructional Design Guidelines for Procedural Instruction Delivered via Augmented Reality (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University).

[98]. Wojciechowski, R., & Cellary, W. (2013). Evaluation of learners' attitude toward learning in ARIES augmented reality environments. Computers & Education, 68, 570-585.

[99]. Wu, H. K., Lee, S. W. Y., Chang, H. Y.& Liang, J. C. (2013). Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Computers & Education, 62, 41-49.

[100]. Yu, C. Y., Pu, J. N., Zheng, L. T., & Guan, S. Q. (2016). Different effects of augmented reality technology and traditional methods on memorizing english words among young children. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science), 37(9), 1250-1253.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Ontological Development of a Competency Based and Learning Objective Oriented Measurement Tool

Kemal Şimşek* , Aysun Aytaç, Jale İpek*

* Ministry of National Education, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.

Department of Mathematics, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.

* Department of Computer and Instructional Technologies Education, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.

Şimşek, K., Aytaç, A., and İpek, J. (2022). Ontological Development of a Competency Based and Learning Objective Oriented Measurement Tool. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 19(3), 22-31. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.19.3.18941

Abstract

This study aimed to define the concepts and learning objectives related to the polygons sub-learning area of the 7 - grade mathematics course as ontology-based and to develop a measurement tool based on this ontology within the framework of competency ontology. In this study, we determined and included the learning objectives in the ontology alongside the concepts and prerequisites. The most crucial difference that distinguishes this study from others is that it is objectively oriented. Throughout the study, we followed ontology development processes that met the system's requirements based on the ontology development. In this context, we saw that the ontology developed answered the intended competency questions. We think this study will make very important contributions in terms of bringing a different perspective to measurement and assessment in mathematics education.

References

[1]. Aggarwal, S., & Kaur, S. (2009). A Sharable Content Object Reference Model (SCORM) Initiation. INFLIBNET Centre.

[2]. Aksenov, A., Borisov, V., Shadrin, D., Porubov, A., Kotegova, A., & Sozykin, A. (2020, May). Competencies ontology for the analysis of educational programs. In 2020 Ural Symposium on Biomedical Engineering, Radioelectronics and Information Technology (USBEREIT) (pp. 368-371). IEEE.

[3]. Albano, G. (2011, July). Knowledge, skills, competencies: A model for mathematics e-learning. In International Conference on ICT in Teaching and Learning (pp. 214-225). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

[4]. Albano, G. (2012). A knowledge-skill-competencies e-learning model in mathematics. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 9(1), 306-319.

[5]. Allemang, D., & Hendler, J. (2011). Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist: Effective Modeling in RDFS and OWL. Elsevier.

[6]. Avenirovna, N. O., Vitalevich, K. A., Rafikovna, S. L., Konstantinovich, L. E., & Viktorovna, F. M. (2015). OntoMathEdu: Towards an Educational Mathematical Ontology.

[7]. Barana, A., Di Caro, L., Fioravera, M., Marchisio, M., & Rabellino, S. (2018, June). Ontology development for competence assessment in virtual communities of practice. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 94-98). Springer, Cham.

[8]. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The Semantic Web. Scientific American, 284(5), 34-43.

[9]. D'Amore, B. (2000). La complessità dell'educazione e della costruzione dei saperi. Riforma e Didattica, 4, 35-40.

[10]. Draganidis, F., Chamopoulou, P., & Mentzas, G. (2006, September). An ontology based tool for competency management and learning paths. In 6th International Conference on Knowledge Management (I-KNOW 06) (pp. 1-10).

[11]. Fazel-Zarandi, M., & Fox, M. S. (2012). An ontology for skill and competency management. In Formal Ontology in Information Systems (pp. 89-102). IOS Press.

[12]. Gladun, A., Rogushina, J., Garcı, F., Martínez-Béjar, R., & Fernández-Breis, J. T. (2009). An application of intelligent techniques and semantic web technologies in e-learning environments. Exper t Systems with Applications, 36(2), 1922-1931.

[13]. Gruber, T. R. (1993). A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition, 5(2), 199-220.

[14]. Hnida, M., Idrissi, M. K., & Bennani, S. (2018, April). Overview of CALEP: A competency based learning path generation system. In 2018 17th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training (ITHET) (pp. 1-6). IEEE.

[15]. IMS. (2002). 1EdTech Reusable Definition of Competency or Educational Objective Specification.

[16]. Jackson, S. E., & Schuler, R. S. (2003). Managing Human Resources through Strategic Partnerships. South- Western Pub.

[17]. Karalar, H., & Özdemir, S. (2013). Anlamsal web temelli öğretimde yönlendirmenin kazanıma ve kalıcılığa etkisi. International Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 2013(1), 1-16.

[18]. Kirillovich, A., Nevzorova, O., Falileeva, M. V., Lipachev, E. K., & Shakirova, L. R. (2019, July). OntoMathEdu: Towards an educational mathematical ontology. In CICM Workshops.

[19]. Ministry of Education. (n.d.).

[20]. Miranda, S., Orciuoli, F., Loia, V., & Sampson, D. (2017). An ontology-based model for competence management. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 107, 51-66.

[21]. Nahhas, S., Bamasag, O., Khemakhem, M., & Bajnaid, N. (2019). Bridging education and labor skills by a novel competency-based course linked-data model. IEEE Access, 7, 119087-119098.

[22]. Nevzorova, O. A., Zhiltsov, N., Kirillovich, A., & Lipachev, E. (2014). OntoMath PRO ontology: a linked data hub for mathematics. In Knowledge Engineering and the Semantic Web: 5th International Conference, KESW 2014, (pp. 105-119). Springer International Publishing.

[23]. Nevzorovaa, O., Shakirovaa, L., Falileevaa, M., Kirillovichb, A., Nevzorovc, V., & Lipacheva, E. (2020). OntoMath Edu educational mathematical ontology: Annotation of concepts. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, (pp. 1-12).

[24]. Niss, M. (2003, Januar y). Mathematical competencies and the learning of mathematics: The Danish KOM project. In 3rd Mediterranean Conference on Mathematical Education (pp. 115-124).

[25]. Noy, N. F., & McGuinness, D. L. (2001). Ontology Development 101: A Guide to Creating Your First Ontology.

[26]. Paquette, G. (2007). An ontology and a software framework for competency modeling and management. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 10(3), 1-21.

[27]. Rezgui, K., Mhiri, H., & Ghédira, K. (2017). Ontologybased e-Portfolio modeling for supporting lifelong competency assessment and development. Procedia Computer Science, 112, 397-406.

[28]. She, L., & Wang, S. Q. (2009, December). Geometry knowledge acquisition and representation on ontology. In 2009 International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Software Engineering (pp. 1-4). IEEE.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Investigation of the Opinions of Hearing Impaired Students on Digital Teaching Materials Prepared on the Decimal Breaking Operations

Sercan Ertaş* , Jale İpek**

*-** Department of Computer and Instructional Technologies Education Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.

Ertaş, S., and İpek, J. (2022). Investigation of the Opinions of Hearing Impaired Students on Digital Teaching Materials Prepared on the Decimal Breaking Operations. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 19(3), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.19.3.19098

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to determine the opinions of hearing-impaired students about the digital teaching material prepared for subtraction, which requires decimal breaking. To achieve this goal, a digital teaching material that includes decimal breaking operations was developed. The case study method, a qualitative research method, was used to determine the opinions about the developed material. Four secondary school students, two primary school students, one secondary school mathematics teacher, and one primary school mathematics teacher participated in the study during the 2020-2021 academic years. Documents, interview forms, system records, observations, and video recordings were used as data collection tools to contribute to the research. The data obtained from the data collection tools were analyzed using the techniques commonly used in qualitative research, including content analysis and descriptive statistics. The results of the research showed that the developed digital teaching material has a positive impact on students' learning, the absence of distracting elements on the material reduces students' distraction, and students showed interest and success in using the material. The teachers' opinions supported the students' opinions and once again demonstrated the effectiveness of the digital teaching material in the education of hearing-impaired students.

References

[1]. Adamo-Villani, N., & Wilbur, R. (2010). Software for math and science education for the deaf. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 5(2), 115-124.

[2]. Akbulut, Y. (2012). Veri çözümlemeteknikleri. A. Şimşek (Ed.) in Sosyal Bilimler de Araştırma Yöntemleri (pp. 162-195). Anadolu Üniversitesi Yayını, Eskişehir.

[3]. Bayrakdar, U., & Çuhadar, C. (2015). İşitme engelliler okullarında bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinin öğretim amaçlı kullanımının incelenmesi. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 5(2), 172-191.

[4]. Beal-Alvarez, J., & Cannon, J. E. (2014). Technology intervention research with deaf and hard of hearing learners: Levels of evidence. American Annals of the Deaf, 158(5), 486-505.

[5]. Bouzid, Y., Khenissi, M. A., Essalmi, F., & Jemni, M. (2016). Using educational games for sign language learning-a signwriting learning game: Case study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 129-141.

[6]. Burns, M., & Silbey, R. (2000). So You Have to Teach Math? Sound Advice for K-6 Teachers. Math Solutions.

[7]. Çakır, H., Çetin, Ş., & Baş, A. (2013). İşitme engellilere yönelik dinamik web sayfasının geliştirilmesi. Bilişim Teknolojileri Dergisi, 6(2), 1-9.

[8]. Cavkaytar, A., & Diken, İ. H. (2005). Özel Eğitime Giriş. KökYayıncılık, Ankara.

[9]. Chang, H. (2007). Visual feedback training to promote mandarin disyllabic tone perception and production in hearing-impaired children. Bulletin of Special Education, 32(4), 47-64.

[10]. Chiu, T. K., & Churchill, D. (2016). Design of learning objects for concept learning: Effects of multimedia learning principles and an instructional approach. Interactive Learning Environments, 24(6), 1355-1370.

[11]. Çoruk, H., & Çakir, R. (2017). The effect of multimedia usage on academic achievement and anxiety of primary school students. Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT), 8(1), 1-27.

[12]. Davis, S. M., & Kelly, R. R. (2003). Comparing deaf and hearing college students' mental arithmetic calculations under two interference conditions. American Annals of the Deaf, 148(3), 213-221.

[13]. Debevc, M., & Peljhan, Ž. (2004). The role of video technology in on-line lectures for the deaf. Disability and Rehabilitation, 26(17), 1048-1059.

[14]. Efe, A., & Karasu, P. (2017). Kaynaştırma eğitimine devam eden işitme engelli öğrencilerin yazdıkları öykülerin incelenmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Fakültesi Özel Eğitim Dergisi, 18(3), 329-354.

[15]. Engelbrecht, J., Llinares, S., & Borba, M. C. (2020). Transformation of the mathematics classroom with the internet. ZDM, 52, 825-841.

[16]. Engelli ve Yaşlı Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü. (2021). Engelli ve Yaşlı Istatistik Bülteni.

[17]. Ergül, C., Baydık, B., & Demir, Ş. (2013). Özel eğitim öğretmen adaylarının ve öğretmenlerinin zihin engelliler öğretmenliği lisans programı yeterliklerine ilişkin görüşleri. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Bilimleri, 13(1), 499-522.

[18]. Görhan, M. F., & Öncü, S. (2015). Öğretmen ve idareci gözünde etkileşimli tahta: kullanım kolaylığı ve yarar algısı üzerine bir durum çalışması. Journal of Teacher Education and Educators, 4(1), 53-77.

[19]. Güldür, F. (2005). İşitme Engelliler Ilköğretim Okuluna Devam Eden Öğrencilerin Dört Işleme Dayalı Matematik Problemlerini Çözme Davranışlarının Incelenmesi (Doctoral dissertation, Anadolu University (Turkey)).

[20]. Gürboğa, C., & Kargin, T. (2003). İşitme engelli yetişkinlerin farklı ortamlarda kullandıkları iletişim yöntemlerinin/becerilerinin incelenmesi. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 36(1), 51-64.

[21]. Hyde, M., Zevenbergen, R., & Power, D. (2003). Deaf and hard of hearing students' performance on arithmetic word problems. American Annals of the Deaf, 148(1), 56-64.

[22]. Johanson, J., Clark, L., Daytner, K., & Robinson, L. (2009). Results from Accessing Curriculum through Technology Tools (ACTTT), a Model Development Project. Center for Best Practices in Early Childhood Education.

[23]. Karal, H. (2016). Özel eğitimde öğretim teknolojilerinin kullanımı. In (Eds) K. Çağıltay, & Y. Göktaş. Öğretim Teknolojilerinin Temelleri: Teoriler, Araştırmalar, Eğilimler. PegemAkademi, Ankara.

[24]. Karal, H., & Çiftçi, E. (2008). İşitme engelli bireylerin eğitim sürecinde bilgisayar destekli animasyonlardan yararlanma. In 8th International Educational Technology Conference, 30(8).

[25]. Khouyibaba, S. (2010). Teaching mathematics with technology. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 638-643.

[26]. Kritzer, K. L. (2008). Family mediation of mathematically based concepts while engaged in a problem-solving activity with their young deaf children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 13(4), 503-517.

[27]. Kumaş, Ö. A., & Sümer, H. M. (2017). İşitme engelli olan ve olmayan öğrencilerin toplama ve çikarmadaki işlem hatalari. Uluslararası Eğitim Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 3(1), 1-12.

[28]. Kuzu, A., Odabaşı, H. F., & Girgin, M. C. (2011). Mobil teknolojilerin işitme engelli öğrencileri desteklemek amaciyla kullanilmasi: türkiye'den bir örnek. Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 1(2), 52-82.

[29]. Liu, C. C., Chou, C. C., Liu, B. J., & Yang, J. W. (2006). Improving mathematics teaching and learning experiences for hard of hearing students with wireless technology–enhanced classrooms. American Annals of the Deaf, 151(3), 345-355.

[30]. Masataka, N. (2006). Differences in arithmetic subtraction of nonsymbolic numerosities by deaf and hearing adults. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 11(2), 139-143.

[31]. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multi-Media Learning. Cambridge University Press.

[32]. MEB. (2017). Çocuk Gelişimi ve Eğitimi Işitme Engelliler.

[33]. MEB. (2018). Özel Eğitim Hizmetleri Yönetmeliği.

[34]. Muller, D. A., Bewes, J., Sharma, M. D., & Reimann, P. (2008). Saying the wrong thing: Improving learning with multimedia by including misconceptions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 144-155.

[35]. Nasibov, F., & Kaçar, A. (2005). Matematik ve matematik eğitimi hakkinda. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 13(2), 339-346.

[36]. Reitsma, P. (2009). Computer-based exercises for learning to read and spell by deaf children. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 14(2), 178-189.

[37]. Reuterskiöld, C., Ibertsson, T., & Sahlén, B. (2010). Venturing beyond the sentence level: Narrative skills in children with hearing loss. Volta Review, 110(3), 389-406.

[38]. Richter, J., Scheiter, K., & Eitel, A. (2016). Signaling text-picture relations in multimedia learning: A comprehensive meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 17, 19-36.

[39]. Stinson, M. S., Elliot, L. B., & Easton, D. (2014). Deaf/hard-of-hearing and other postsecondary learners' retention of STEM content with tablet computer-based notes. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 19(2), 251-269.

[40]. Techaraungrong, P., Suksakulchai, S., Kaewprapan, W., & Murphy, E. (2017). The design and testing of multimedia for teaching arithmetic to deaf learners. Education and Information Technologies, 22(1), 215-237.

[41]. Thomas, A. F., & Sondergeld, T. (2015). Investigating the impact of feedback instruction: Partnering preservice teachers with middle school students to provide digital, scaffolded feedback. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 15(4), 83-109.

[42]. Tiryaki, E. (2015). Ortaokulda öğrenim gören işitme engelli öğrencilerin Türkçe derslerinde kullanılan materyaller üzerine bir değerlendirme. Okuma Yazma Eğitimi Araştırmaları, 3(1), 1-8.

[43]. Traxler, C. B. (2000). The Stanford Achievement Test: National norming and performance standards for deaf and hard-of-hearing students. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 5(4), 337-348.

[44]. Tüik. (2010). Özürlülerin Sorun ve Beklentileri Araştırması.

[45]. Wilkens, C. P., & Hehir, T. P. (2008). Deaf education and bridging social capital: A theoretical approach. American Annals of the Deaf, 153(3), 275-284.

[46]. Word Health Organization. (2020). Disability.

[47]. Word Health Organization. (2021). Deafness.

[48]. Yıldız, S. (2010). Bilgi ve iletişim teknolojileri yoluyla özürlüler için geleceğe bir kapı açmak. The Journal of International Social Research, 3(11), 612-620.

[49]. Zainuddin, N. M. M., Zaman, H. B., & Ahmad, A. (2009, November). Learning science using AR book: A Preliminary study on visual needs of deaf learners. In International Visual Informatics Conference (pp. 844-855). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Effect of Coding-Based Instructional Interventions on Learners' Attitudes: A Mixed-Meta Study

Yunus Doğan* , Veli Batdi, Hülya Tüfekci*

* State University, Eastern Turkey.

Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Gaziantep University, Turkey.

* State School of Ministry of Education, İzmir, Turkey.

Doğan, Y., Batdi, V., and Tüfekci, H. (2022). Effect of Coding-Based Instructional Interventions on Learners' Attitudes: A Mixed-Meta Study. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 19(3), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.19.3.19267

Abstract

The concept of "21st century skills" has entered our lives in the recent past and has been used to describe the skills that our children should be equipped with while preparing them for the future world. Coding skill, in this regard, is seen as a new 21st century skill that is assumed to be a part of logical reasoning. The main purpose of the present research is to examine the use of coding-based interventions in learning environments from various perspectives and reveal their effects on student attitudes in detail with a research synthesis based on the mixed-meta method. Primarily, a quantitative metaanalysis was used to determine the effects of coding-based practises on student attitudes. Another process that will enrich the content reached in the study and add a qualitative dimension to it is the meta-thematic analysis stage. As a result of the meta-analysis, the effect size reached is moderate (g = 0.555), and the effect of the related practises on the learners' attitude scores is positive. As a result of the meta-thematic analysis carried out in order to further consolidate the findings of the meta-analysis, five major themes emerged: the effect of coding-based instruction on the cognitive dimension, its effect on the affective dimension, its contribution to 21st century skills, its contribution to personal and professional development, and difficulties encountered in coding-based instruction.

References

[1]. Abdüsselam, M. S., & Uzoğlu, M. (2020). Öğrencilerin kodlamaya yönelik tutumları: Bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 5818-5840.

[2]. Akkoyunlu, B., & Tuğrul, B. (2002). Okulöncesi çocukların ev yaşantısındaki teknolojik etkileşimlerinin bilgisayar okuryazarlığı becerileri üzerindeki etkisi. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 23(23), 12-21.

[3]. Akkuş, A., & Bilgin, E. A. (2021). Ortaokul öğrencilerinin kodlamaya yönelik tutumlarının incelenmesi. Pearson Journal of Social Sciences and Hümanities, 6(12), 21-30.

[4]. Akpınar, Y., & Altun, A. (2014). Bilgi toplumu okullarında programlama eğitimi gereksinimi. Elementary Education Online, 13(1).

[5]. Alkan, A. (2019). Özel yetenekli öğrencilerin bilgisayar oyunları destekli kodlama öğrenimine yönelik tutumları. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 48(223), 113-128.

[6]. Altay, G. (2019). Arduino Kullanımının Lise Öğrencilerinin Akademik Başarılarına Ve Programlamaya Yönelik Tutumlarına Olan Etkisi (Master's thesis, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü).

[7]. Avcı, E., Okuşluk, F., & Yıldırım, B. (2021). The effect of STEM-based robotic coding activities on gifted students' attitudes towards coding. Eğitim Kuram ve Uygulama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 7(2), 228-235.

[8]. Aytekin, A., Çakır, F. S., Yücel, Y. B., & Kulaözü, İ. (2018). Geleceğe yön veren kodlama bilimi ve kodlama öğrenmede kullanılabilecek bazı yöntemler. Avrasya Sosyal ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(5), 24-41.

[9]. Batdı, V. (2019). Meta-Tematik Analiz: Örnek Uygulamalar. Anı Yayıncılık, Ankara.

[10]. Batdı, V. (2020). İlköğretim ikinci kademede matematik dersinde oyunsal uygulamaların karma-meta ile analizi. In 4th Asıa Pacıfıc International Modern Sciences Congress (pp. 102-115).

[11]. Batdı, V. (2021). Yabancılarda dil öğretiminde teknolojinin kullanımı: Bir karma-meta yöntemi. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 50(1), 1213-1244.

[12]. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., & Rothstein, H. (2007). Introduction to Meta-Analysis.

[13]. Cevahir, H., & Özdemir, M. (2017). Programlama öğretiminde karşılaşılan zorluklara yönelik öğretmen görüşleri ve çözüm önerileri. Uluslararası Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Sempozyumu içinde, (pp. 320-335).

[14]. Ceylan, V. K., & Gündoğdu, K. (2018). Bir olgubilim çalışması: kodlama eğitiminde neler yaşanıyor? Eğitim Teknolojisi Kuram ve Uygulama, 8(2), 1-34.

[15]. Çavdar, D., & Şahan, H. H. (2019). Matematik dersinde akademik başarı, öz yeterlik ve matematik dersine yönelik tutum arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Necatibey Eğitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Eğitimi Dergisi, 13(2), 979-999.

[16]. Çetin, E. (2012). Bilgisayar Programlama Eğitiminin Çocukların Problem Çözme Becerilerine Etkisi (Yayınlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, Gazi Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Ankara).

[17]. Demirer, V., & Sak, N. (2016). Programming education and new approaches around the world and in Turkey. Eğitimde Kuram ve Uygulama, 12(3), 521-546.

[18]. Deniz, T. (2021). Farklı Görsel Programlarla Tasarlanan Kodlama Eğitiminin Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Akademik Başarı ile Kodlamaya Karşı Tutum ve Öz- Yeterliklerine Etkisi (Doctoral dissertation, Necmettin Erbakan University (Turkey)).

[19]. Dinçer, B. (2019). Eğitsel Robotik Uygulamalarıyla 7. Sınıf Öğrencilerinin Doğrusal Denklemlerde Cebirsel Akıl Yürütmenin Gelişimi: Bir Öğretim Deneyi (Yüksek lisans tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir).

[20]. Dönmez, M. C. (2020). Robotik Uygulamaların Aday Öğretmenlerin STEM Farkındalıkları, Fen Öğretmeye Yönelik Öz Yeterlikleri ve STEM'e Yönelik Tutumları Üzerine Etkileri (Unpublished master's thesis, Kırşehir Ahi Evran University).

[21]. Eğin, F. (2019). Bilişim Teknolojileri Öğretmenlerinin Kodlama Öğretimine İlişkin Görüşlerinin İncelenmesi (Doctoral dissertation, Ege Üniversitesi, İzmir).

[22]. El-Abd, M. (2017). A review of embedded systems education in the Arduino age: Lessons learned and future directions. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy, 7(2),79-93.

[23]. Emiroğlu, M. U. (2021). İlkokul Kodlama Eğitiminde Hikayenin Öğrencilerin Blok Temelli Kodlama Başarılarına, Kodlama Eğitimine Yönelik Tutumlarına ve Etkinlik Algılarına Etkisi (Yüksek lisans tezi). Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi, Lisansüstü Eğitim Enstitüsü, İstanbul.

[24]. Erol, A. S. (2010). Bilgi Toplumu Olma Sürecinde Bilginin Önemi ve Dijital Bilgi Merkezleri (Uzmanlık Tezi, Kültür ve Turizm Bakanlığı, Milli Kütüphane Başkanlığı).

[25]. Erten, E. (2019). Kodlama ve Robotik Öğretimi Üzerine bir Durum Çalışması (Master's thesis, Balıkesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü).

[26]. Esgil, M., & Gündüz, Ş. (2019). Kodlama etkinliklerinin öğrencilerin bilgisayara yönelik tutum ve bilişim dersine duyuşsal katılımları üzerine etkisi. Ahmet Keleşoğlu Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(2), 162-174.

[27]. Glass, G. V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and metaanalysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5(10), 3-8.

[28]. Güleryüz, B. G. (2019). Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Ders İçi Robotik Kodlama Etkinliklerinin Blok Tabanlı Programlamaya İlişkin Öz Yeterlilik Algısına Etkisi ve Robotik Kodlama Hakkındaki Görüşleri (Master's thesis, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü).

[29]. Karabak, D., & Güneş, A. (2013). Ortaokul birinci sinif öğrencileri için yazilim geliştirme alaninda müfredat önerisi. Eğitim ve Öğretim Araştırmaları Dergisi, 21(2-3), 163-169.

[30]. Keçeci, G., Burcu, A. L. A. N., & Zengin, F. (2017). Sınıf öğrencileriyle stem eğitimi uygulamaları. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Kırşehir Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 18, 1-17.

[31]. Keçeci, G., Burcu, A. L. A. N., & Zengin, F. K. (2016). Eğitsel bilgisayar oyunları destekli kodlama öğrenimine yönelik tutum ölçeği: geçerlilik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Education Sciences, 11(3), 184-194.

[32]. Kert, S. B., & Uğraş, T. (2009). Programlama eğitiminde sadelik ve eğlence: Scratch örneği. In The First International Congress of Educational Research, Çanakkale, Turkey.

[33]. Keskinsoy, A. (2010). Mesleki Liselerde Görsel Programlama Başarısını Etkileyen Faktörler (Doctoral dissertation, Marmara Universitesi (Turkey)).

[34]. Kiliç, Ş. (2019). Bilişim Teknolojileri ve Yazılım Dersi Kapsamında Kodlama Öğretiminin Öğretmen Görüşlerine Göre Değerlendirilmesi (Master's thesis, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü).

[35]. Konyaoğlu, C. (2019). Robotik Kodlama Eğitiminin Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Problem Çözme Becerilerine Etkileri ve Öğrencilerin Robotik Kodlama Etkinliklerine İlişkin Görüşleri (Unpublished master's thesis, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal University, Türkiye).

[36]. Koparan, E. T., Yüksel, B., & Koparan, T. (2021). Arduino ile Programlamanın öğrencilerin fen bilimlerine yönelik başarı, öz yeterlilik ve tutumlarına etkisi. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi, 11(1), 118-127.

[37]. Kuş, M. (2016). Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Kuvvet ve Hareket Ünitesinin Öğretiminde Robotik Modüllerin Etkisi (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İstanbul).

[38]. Mack, C. (2012). How to write a good scientific paper: acronyms. Journal of Micro/Nanolithography, MEMS, and MOEMS, 11(4), 040102-040102.

[39]. Natro. (2021). 2021'in En Popüler Programlama Dilleri.

[40]. Numanoğlu, M., & Keser, H. (2017). Programlama öğretiminde robot kullanımı-mbot örneği. Bartin Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 6(2), 497-515.

[41]. Otu, T., (2020). Kodlama Ortamlarının Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Başarı, Tutum ve Bilgi İşlemsel Düşünme Becerisine Etkisi (Yüksek lisans tezi, Bolu Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi, Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Ana Bilim Dalı, Bolu).

[42]. Ökte, A. (2019). Ön Lisans Öğrencilerinin Programlama Dili Öğretimine Yönelik Genel Görüşleri, Karşılaştıkları Zorluklar ve Önerilerinin İncelenmesi (Master's thesis, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü).

[43]. Özdoğru, E. (2013). Fiziksel Olaylar Öğrenme Alanı İçin Lego Program Tabanlı Fen ve Teknoloji Eğitiminin Öğrencilerin Akademik Başarılarına, Bilimsel Süreç Becerilerine ve Fen ve Teknoloji Dersine Yönelik Tutumlarına Etkisi (Doctoral dissertation, Dokuz Eylül ÜniversitesiEğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü).

[44]. Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2009). Curriculum and İnstruction: A 21st Century Skills İmplementation Guide.

[45]. Patrick, D. L., Cheadle, A., Thompson, D. C., Diehr, P., Koepsell, T., & Kinne, S. (1994). The validity of self-reported smoking: a review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 84(7), 1086-1093.

[46]. Ramazanoğlu, M. (2021). Robotik kodlama uygulamalarının ortaokul öğrencilerinin bilgisayara yönelik tutumlarına ve bilgi işlemsel düşünme becerisine yönelik öz yeterlilik algılarına etkisi. Türkiye Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 25(1), 163-174.

[47]. Saygıner, Ş., & Tüzün, H. (2017a). İlköğretim düzeyinde programlama eğitimi: Yurt dışı ve yurt içi perspektifinden bir bakış. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı, 1-5.

[48]. Saygıner, Ş., & Tüzün, H. (2017b). Programlama eğitiminde yaşanan zorluklar ve çözüm önerileri. Uluslararası Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Sempozyumu, İnönü Üniversitesi, (pp. 78-90).

[49]. Sayın, Z., & Seferoğlu, S. S. (2016). Yeni bir 21. yüzyıl becerisi olarak kodlama eğitimi ve kodlamanın eğitim politikalarına etkisi. Akademik Bilişim Konferansı, 3(5), 1-13.

[50]. Şahutoğlu, N. G. (2018). Eba Kodlama Modülü Kullanımının Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Programlamaya İlişkin Öz Yeterlik İnançlarına Etkisi ve Modüle İlişkin Öğrenci Görüşleri (Master's thesis, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü).

[51]. Totan, H. N. (2021). Blok Tabanlı Kodlama Eğitiminin Ortaokul Öğrencilerinin Bilgi İşlemsel Düşünme Becerileri ve Kodlama Öğrenimine Yönelik Tutumlarına Etkisi: Blocky Örneği (Doctoral dissertation, Necmettin Erbakan University (Turkey)).

[52]. Uzunboylar, O. (2017). Ortaokul Düzeyinde Kodlama Öğretimine İlişkin Öğretmen ve Öğrenci Görüşleri (Yüksek lisans tezi, Ege Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, İzmir).

[53]. Yalçın, S. (2018). 21. yüzyıl becerileri ve bu becerilerin ölçülmesinde kullanılan araçlar ve yaklaşımlar. Ankara University Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences (JFES), 51(1), 183-201.

[54]. Yaşar, H. (2021). Çevrimiçi ve Yüz Yüze Kodlama Eğitiminde Oyunlaştırma Ögeleri Kullanımının Akademik Başarı, Motivasyon ve Tutuma Etkisi (Doktora tezi, Sakarya Üniversitesi, Bilgisayar ve Öğretim Teknolojileri Eğitimi Ana Bilim Dalı, Sakarya).

[55]. Yecan, E., Özçınar, H., & Tanyeri, T. (2017). Bilişim teknolojileri öğretmenlerinin görsel programlama öğretimi deneyimleri. İlköğretim Online, 16(1).

[56]. Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2018). Sosyal Bilimlerde Nitel Araştırma Yöntemleri. Seçkin Yayıncılık, Ankara.

[57]. Yüksel, S. (2017). Scratch Programı Öğretiminde Ayrılıp Birleşme Tekniği Kullanımının Öğrencilerin Derse Yönelik Tutumuna Akademik Başarısına ve Kalıcılığa Etkisi (Master's thesis, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü).

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Incidental L2 Vocabulary Learning through Listening Vs. Viewing: The Role of Visual Aid

Ahmet Çekiç*

Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey.

Çekiç, A. (2022). Incidental L2 Vocabulary Learning through Listening Vs. Viewing: The Role of Visual Aid. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 19(3), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.19.3.19213

Abstract

There is limited research on the effectiveness of aural versus audiovisual input in incidental second language vocabulary learning (IVL). The current study aims to determine which mode of input, viewing or listening, is more conducive to IVL, and if the level of visual aid for the words leads to a significant difference in word gains. English Language Teaching majors (N=58) were randomly assigned to either watch animated educational videos or listen to the audio of the same videos. Both groups were given a pretest and posttest of meaning recognition and recall. The results suggest that both modes of input are equally effective for vocabulary learning and that the role of visual aids may not be as significant as previously thought. The study also found that prior vocabulary knowledge level positively correlated with vocabulary gains in the viewing group, but not in the listening group. The results are discussed in reference to the multimedia, temporal contiguity, and coherence principles of the cognitive theory of multimedia learning and the dual-coding theory.

References

[1]. Baddeley, A. (2007). Working Memory, Thought, and Action. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England.

[2]. Brown, R., Waring, R., & Donkaewbua, S. (2008). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading, readingwhile-listening, and listening to stories. Reading in a Foreign Language, 20(2), 136-163.

[3]. Çakmak, F., & Erçetin, G. (2018). Effects of gloss type on text recall and IVL in mobile-assisted L2 listening. ReCALL, 30(1), 24-47.

[4]. Cobb, T. (2007). Computing the vocabulary demands of L2 reading. Language Learning & Technology, 11(3), 38-63.

[5]. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Social Sciences. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale.

[6]. Fakhr, M. A., Farahani, D. B., & Farahani, A. A. K. (2020). IVL and retention from audiovisual input and factors affecting them. English Teaching & Learning, 167–188.

[7]. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A. G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175-191.

[8]. Feng, Y., & Webb, S. (2020). Learning vocabulary through reading, listening, and viewing: Which mode of input is most effective? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 42(3), 499-523.

[9]. Gillespie, I. (2020, December). The Myth of Loki and the Deadly Mistletoe.

[10]. Horst, M., Cobb, T., & Meara, P. (1998). Beyond a clockwork orange: Acquiring second language vocabulary through reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 11(2), 207-223.

[11]. Lindgren, E., & Muñoz, C. (2013). The influence of exposure, parents, and linguistic distance on young European learners' foreign language comprehension. International Journal of Multilingualism, 10(1), 105-129.

[12]. Marefat, F., & Hassanzadeh, M. (2014). Vodcast: A breakthrough in developing incidental vocabulary learning. Iranian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(2), 27-58.

[13]. Mayer, R. (2014). Introduction to multimedia learning. In R. Mayer (Ed.), The Cambridge Handbook of Multimedia Learning (pp. 1-24). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, England.

[14]. Mayer, R. E. (2021). Evidence-based principles for how to design effective instructional videos. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 10(2), 229-240.

[15]. Montero, M., Peters, E., Clarebout, G., & Desmet, P. (2014). Effects of captioning on video comprehension and incidental vocabulary. Language, Learning & Technology, 18(1), 118-141.

[16]. Nation, I. (2006). How large a vocabulary is needed for reading and listening? Canadian Modern Language Review, 63(1), 59-82.

[17]. Nation, P., & Beglar, D. (2007). A vocabulary size test. The Language Teacher, 31(7), 9-13.

[18]. Neuman, S. B., & Koskinen, P. (1992). Captioned television as comprehensible input: Effects of incidental word learning from context for language minority students. Reading Research Quarterly, 27(1), 95-106.

[19]. Paivio, A. (1990). Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach. Oxford university press.

[20]. Pellicer-Sánchez, A., & Schmitt, N. (2010). Incidental vocabulary acquisition from an authentic novel: Do things fall apart? Reading in a Foreign Language, 22(1), 31-55.

[21]. Perez, M. M., & Rodgers, M. P. (2019). Video and language learning. Language Learning Journal, 47(4), 403-406.

[22]. Peters, E. (2018). The effect of out-of-class exposure to English language media on learners' vocabulary knowledge. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 169(1), 142-168.

[23]. Peters, E. (2019). The effect of imagery and on screen text on foreign language vocabulary learning from audiovisual input. Tesol Quarterly, 53(4), 1008-1032.

[24]. Peters, E., & Webb, S. (2018). Incidental vocabulary acquisition through viewing L2 television and factors that affect learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 40(3), 551-577.

[25]. Peters, E., Heynen, E., & Puimège, E. (2016). Learning vocabulary through audiovisual input: The differential effect of L1 subtitles and captions. System, 63, 134-148.

[26]. Pucciarelli, D. (2017, March). The History of Chocolate.

[27]. Rodgers, M. P. (2013). English Language Learning Through Viewing Television: An Investigation of Comprehension, Incidental Vocabulary Acquisition, Lexical Coverage, Attitudes, and Captions (Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wellington).

[28]. Rodgers, M. P. (2018). The images in television programs and the potential for learning unknown words: The relationship between on-screen imagery and vocabular y. ITL-International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 169(1), 191-211.

[29]. Rodgers, M. P., & Webb, S. (2011). Narrow viewing: The vocabulary in related television programs. Tesol Quarterly, 45(4), 689-717.

[30]. Rodgers, M. P., & Webb, S. (2017). The effects of captions on EFL learners' comprehension of Englishlanguage television programs. Calico Journal, 34(1), 20-38.

[31]. Rodgers, M. P., & Webb, S. (2020). Incidental vocabulary learning through viewing television. ITLInternational Journal of Applied Linguistics, 171(2), 191-220.

[32]. Syodorenko, T. (2010). Modality of input and vocabular y acquisition. Language Learning & Technology, 14(2), 50-73.

[33]. Tekmen, E. A. F., & Daloglu, A. (2006). An investigation of incidental vocabulary acquisition in relation to learner proficiency level and word frequency. Foreign Language Annals, 39(2), 220-243.

[34]. Van Zeeland, H., & Schmitt, N. (2013). Incidental vocabulary acquisition through L2 listening: A dimensions approach. System, 41(3), 609-624.

[35]. Vidal, K. (2003). Academic listening: A source of vocabulary acquisition? Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 56-89.

[36]. Vidal, K. (2011). A comparison of the effects of reading and listening on incidental vocabular y acquisition. Language Learning, 61(1), 219-258.

[37]. Webb, S., & Nation, P. (2017). How Vocabulary is Learned. Oxford University Press.

[38]. Webb, S., & Rodgers, M. P. H. (2009). The lexical coverage of movies. Applied Linguistics, 30, 407-427.

[39]. Xiaoning, C., & Feng, T. (2017). Assessing the effects of word exposure frequency on incidental vocabulary acquisition from reading and listening. Chinese Journal of Applied Linguistics, 40(1), 56-73.

[40]. Yanagisawa, A., & Webb, S. (2022). Involvement load hypothesis plus: Creating an improved predictive model of incidental vocabulary learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 44(5), 1279-1308.

[41]. Zandan, N. (2014, November). The Language of Lying.

i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology (JET)

Current Issue Vol. 21 Issue 2

Most Read

Most Cited

Volume 19 Issue 3 October - December 2022

Revisiting the Modality and Redundancy Effect in an Augmented Reality-Based Language Learning Environment

Bora Demir* , Ceyhun Karabıyık**, Muzaffer Özdemir***, Meltem Baturay****

*,*** Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Turkey. ** Department of English Language Teaching, Ufuk University, Turkey. **** Atılım University, Turkey.

Demir, B., Karabıyık, C., Özdemir, M., and Baturay, M. (2022). Revisiting the Modality and Redundancy Effect in an Augmented Reality-Based Language Learning Environment. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 19(3), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.19.3.19174

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Ontological Development of a Competency Based and Learning Objective Oriented Measurement Tool

Kemal Şimşek* , Aysun Aytaç**, Jale İpek***

* Ministry of National Education, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey. ** Department of Mathematics, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey. *** Department of Computer and Instructional Technologies Education, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.

Şimşek, K., Aytaç, A., and İpek, J. (2022). Ontological Development of a Competency Based and Learning Objective Oriented Measurement Tool. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 19(3), 22-31. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.19.3.18941

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Investigation of the Opinions of Hearing Impaired Students on Digital Teaching Materials Prepared on the Decimal Breaking Operations

Sercan Ertaş* , Jale İpek**

*-** Department of Computer and Instructional Technologies Education Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.

Ertaş, S., and İpek, J. (2022). Investigation of the Opinions of Hearing Impaired Students on Digital Teaching Materials Prepared on the Decimal Breaking Operations. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 19(3), 32-44. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.19.3.19098

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Effect of Coding-Based Instructional Interventions on Learners' Attitudes: A Mixed-Meta Study

Yunus Doğan* , Veli Batdi**, Hülya Tüfekci***

* State University, Eastern Turkey. ** Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Gaziantep University, Turkey. *** State School of Ministry of Education, İzmir, Turkey.

Doğan, Y., Batdi, V., and Tüfekci, H. (2022). Effect of Coding-Based Instructional Interventions on Learners' Attitudes: A Mixed-Meta Study. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 19(3), 45-62. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.19.3.19267

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Incidental L2 Vocabulary Learning through Listening Vs. Viewing: The Role of Visual Aid

Ahmet Çekiç*

Sivas Cumhuriyet University, Sivas, Turkey.

Çekiç, A. (2022). Incidental L2 Vocabulary Learning through Listening Vs. Viewing: The Role of Visual Aid. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 19(3), 63-75. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.19.3.19213

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Bora Demir* , Ceyhun Karabıyık, Muzaffer Özdemir*, Meltem Baturay****

, Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Turkey.

Department of English Language Teaching, Ufuk University, Turkey.

**** Atılım University, Turkey.

Kemal Şimşek* , Aysun Aytaç, Jale İpek*

* Ministry of National Education, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.

Department of Mathematics, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.

* Department of Computer and Instructional Technologies Education, Ege University, İzmir, Turkey.

Yunus Doğan* , Veli Batdi, Hülya Tüfekci*

* State University, Eastern Turkey.

Department of Curriculum and Instruction, Gaziantep University, Turkey.

* State School of Ministry of Education, İzmir, Turkey.