Revisiting the Modality and Redundancy Effect in an Augmented Reality-Based Language Learning Environment

Bora Demir*, Ceyhun Karabıyık**, Muzaffer Özdemir***, Meltem Baturay****
*,*** Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart University, Turkey.
** Department of English Language Teaching, Ufuk University, Turkey.
**** Atılım University, Turkey.
Periodicity:October - December'2022


This study examines the effect of modality and redundancy in an Augmented Reality (AR) based language learning environment for teaching vocabulary in a foreign language. The study aims to determine the effectiveness of the redundancy and modality principles, examine the relationship between cognitive load, satisfaction, anxiety, willingness, and achievement, identify predictors of achievement, and understand how students perceive AR-based vocabulary learning in three different presentation modes (animation + narration + text, animation + narration, and animation + text). The study used a pre- and post-test control group quasi-experimental design, with 97 Turkish-speaking undergraduate students from the Faculty of Education at a state university participating. The study participants were divided into three groups and practiced using the same AR-based flashcards in three different modalities (animation + narration + text, animation + narration, and animation + text). After completing a short distractive task during the practice session, the participants were given an achievement test. The analysis of the data revealed that while the group that used animation + narration outscored the other two groups, the difference was only significant between the animation + text group and the animation + narration group, which supported the modality principle. However, there was no significant difference between the animation + narration + text group and the animation + narration group, which did not support the redundancy principle. The study also included qualitative data from a focus group interview to support the quantitative findings. The conclusion of the study is that the principles of CTML (Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning) should be reconsidered in relation to the use of AR technology in instructional settings.


Vocabulary Teaching, Augmented Reality, Redundancy Principle, Modality Principle, Cognitive Theory of Multimedia Learning.

How to Cite this Article?

Demir, B., Karabıyık, C., Özdemir, M., and Baturay, M. (2022). Revisiting the Modality and Redundancy Effect in an Augmented Reality-Based Language Learning Environment. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 19(3), 1-21.


[1]. Acosta, B., Luis, J., Navarro, B., Margarita, S., Gesa, F., Ramon., Graf., Sabine., & Kinshuk. (2014). Augmented reality trends in education: A systematic review of research and applications. Journal of Educational Technology and Society, 17(4), 133-149.
[2]. Altman, D. G. (1991). Practical Statistics for Medical Research. Chapman & Hall, London.
[12]. Chang, H. Y., Wu, H. K., & Hsu, Y. S. (2013). Integrating a mobile augmented reality activity to contextualize student learning of a socioscienti? c issue. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 95-99.
[20]. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. Sage publications.
[22]. Dewi, F. (2020). Augmented reality for young learners. In Proceedings of iTELL (Indonesia Technology Enhanced Language Learning) Conference (pp. 4-8).
[24]. Dörnyei, Z. (2007). Research Methods in Applied Linguistics. Oxford University Press, New York.
[26]. Dünser, A., Grasset, R., Seichter, H., & Billinghurst, M. (2007). Applying HCI principles to AR systems design. Mixed Reality User Interfaces: Specification, Authoring, Adaptation (MRUI'07) Workshop Proceedings, (pp. 37-42).
[29]. Gangaiamaran, R., & Pasupathi, M. (2017). Review on use of mobile apps for language learning. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 12(21), 11242-11251.
[30]. Garrett, B. M., Anthony, J., & Jackson, C. (2018). Using mobile augmented reality to enhance health professional practice education. Current Issues in Emerging eLearning, 4(1), 224-247.
[34]. Hsieh, M. C., & Lee, J. S. (2008). AR marker capacity increasing for kindergarten English learning. In Proceedings of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists IMECS.
[37]. Hwang, Y., & Huang, N. P. (2010). A study of efl college students' language anxiety in multimedia environments. International Journal of the Humanities, 8(2), 367-378.
[42]. Klopfer, E., & Yoon, S. (2004). Developing games and simulations for today and tomorrow's tech savvy youth. TechTrends, 49(3), 33-41.
[44]. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2000). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. Sage Publications.
[45]. Küçük, S., Yilmaz, R., Baydas, Ö., & Göktas, Y. (2014b). Augmented reality applications attitude scale in secondary schools: Validity and reliability study. Egitim ve Bilim, 39(176), 383-392.
[46]. Küçük, S., Yýlmaz, R. M., & Göktaþ, Y. (2014a). Augmented reality for learning English: Achievement, attitude and cognitive load levels of students. Egitim ve Bilim, 39(176), 393-404.
[55]. Liu, Y. (2019). Multimedia Input Modes, the Modality Principle, and the Redundancy Principle for University ESL Students' Learning (Doctoral dissertation, Syracuse University).
[56]. Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2005). Second Language Research: Methodology and Design. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey.
[57]. Mahadzir, N. N., & Phung, L. F. (2013). The use of augmented reality pop-up book to increase motivation in English language learning for national primary school. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 1(1), 26-38.
[68]. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks.
[69]. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook. SAGE Publications.
[77]. Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS Survival Manual: A Step By Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS Program. McGraw-Hill Education, London.
[78]. Pastore, R., Asino, T. I., & Briskin, J. (2019). The effects of the multimedia, modality, and redundancy principles in a computer based environment on adult learners. Journal of Multimedia Processing and Technologies, 10(2), 49-61.
[81]. Reinders, H. (2014). Implementing mobile language learning with an augmented reality activity. Modern English Teacher, 23(2), 42-46.
[86]. Schrier, K. L. (2005). Revolutionizing History Education: Using Augmented Reality Games to Teach Histories (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Comparative Media Studies).
[87]. Solak, E., & Cakir, R. (2015). Exploring the effect of materials designed with augmented reality on language learners' vocabulary learning. Journal of Educators Online, 12(2), 50-72.
[91]. Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of Mixed Methods Research: Integrating Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches in the Social and Behavioral Sciences. Sage, London.
[97]. Wasko, C. W. (2013). Instructional Design Guidelines for Procedural Instruction Delivered via Augmented Reality (Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University).
[100]. Yu, C. Y., Pu, J. N., Zheng, L. T., & Guan, S. Q. (2016). Different effects of augmented reality technology and traditional methods on memorizing english words among young children. Journal of Northeastern University (Natural Science), 37(9), 1250-1253.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.