References
[1]. Albanese, M.A., & Mitchell, S. (1993). Problem-based
Learning: A Review of Literature on Its Outcomes and
Implementation Issues. Academic Medicine. Volume 68,
No 1, 52-81. ISSN 1040-2446.
[2]. Ausubel, D. (1968). Educational psychology: A
cognitive view. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
[3]. Bruner, J. (1985). Vygotsky: A historical and
conceptual perspective. Teoksessa: J. Wertsch.(Ed).
Culture, communication, and cognition. Cambridge.
Cambridge University Press.
[4]. Bransford, J., Brown, A.L. & Cocking, R.R. (Eds.) (2000).
How people learn. Washington, D.C.: National Academy
Press.
[5]. Chandler, P. & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive Load Theory and the Format of instruction. Cognition and
instruction, Volume, 293-332. Hillsdale, New Jersey.
[6]. Chen, T. (2002). Design Considerations for Computerbased
Simulations in Education. In Proceedings of the EDMedia
2001 Conference, Tampere, Finland, June 2530,
293-294.
[7]. Cooper, G. (1998). Research into Cognitive Load
Theory and Instructional Design at UNSW. University of New
South Wales, Australia. [Online reference, see http://www.
gmp.usyd.edu.au/vguide/students/samplew/mscp/learn
ingtopics/Kk9HHkf.html, referred 22nd June, 2004]
[8]. Crawford, C. (1984). The art of Computer game
design. Berkley: USA, McGraw-Hill.
[9]. Farnill, D. (2001). Communication in a medical
emergency. Dept of Behavioural Sciences. University of
Sydney. [Online reference, see http://www.gmp.usyd.edu.
au/vguide/students/samplew/mscp/learningtopics/Kk9H
Hkf.html>, referred 12th February, 2003]
[10]. Galperin, P.I. (1989). Organisation of mind activity
and effectiveness of learning. Soviet Psychology, Volume
27, No 3, 65-82.
[11]. Galperin, P.I. (1992). The problem of activity in Soviet
Psychology. Journal of Russian and East European
Psychology, Volume 30, No 4, 37-59.
[12]. Gokhale , A. (1996). Effectiveness of Computer
Simulation for Enhancing Higher Order Thinking. Journal of
Industrial Teacher Education. 33(4). [Online reference,
see http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JITE/v33n4/jitev33n4.
gokhale.html>, referred 22nd June, 2004]
[13]. Gonzales, J.J., Reitman, L. & Stagno, T. (2001a). An
Interactive System for Teaching Electronics. Seminar
paper. ED-Media 2001 Conference, Tampere, Finland,
June 2530.
[14]. Gonzales, J.J., Reitman, L. & Stagno, T. (2001b). An
Interactive System for Teaching Electronics. In
Proceedings of the ED-Media 2001 Conference,
Tampere, Finland, June 2530, 608-612
[15]. Kangas, S. (1999). Mukautuvat käyttöliittymät
elektronisissa peleissä. In: Pelit, tietokone ja ihminen.
[Games, Computers and People]. (Ed.) T. Honkela. Suomen tekoälyseuran julkaisuja. Symposiosarja No 15.
University of Art and Design UIAH & Finnish Association of
Artificial Intelligence. Helsinki., pp.128-134.
[16]. Kaptelinin, V. & Nardi, B.A. (1997). Activity Theory:
Basic Concepts and Applications. [Online reference, see
http://www.acm.org/sigchi/chi97/proceedings/tutorial/bn
.htm, referred 22nd February, 2004]
[17]. Kimbell, R. (1987). Design and Technological Activity.
A Framework for Assessment. Department of Education
and Science. Assessment of Performance Unit. London.
Her Majesty's Stationary Office.
[18]. Kimbell, R. (1997). Assessing Technology.
International trends in curriculum and assessment.
London Open University Press.
[19]. Kimbell, R. (2000a). Design for Learning. Article and
Seminar paper based on article. Kajaani Kytke 2005
seminar 28.4.2000.
[20]. Kimbell. R. (2000b). Assessing Technology.
Technology Education from a problem to a solution.
Seminar presentation. Kajaani Kytke 2005 seminar
28.4.2000.
[21]. Koopal, W. (1993/1997). Instructional design for
computer simulations. Supervision: R. Min & J. Moonen.
[Online reference, see http://www.gmp.usyd.edu.au/
vguide/students/samplew/mscp/learningtopics/Kk9HHkf.
html>, referred 22nd June, 2004]
[22]. Jonassen, D. (2000). Computers as Mindtools for
Schools. Engaging Critical Thinking. 2nd ed. New Jersey.
Prentice Hall.
[23]. Jonassen, D. & Rohrer-Murphy, L. 1999. Activity
Theory as a Framework for Designing Constructivist
Learning Environments. Educational Technology:
Research and Development ETR & D Volume 47, No 1, 61-
79.
[24]. Lehtonen, M. (2002a). Toward the Information Age
Challenges in Technology Education. Modern learning
methods & learning media supported and mediated
learning processes as part of the new university
technology education curriculum. In: Looking at the
Future: technical work in context of technology
education. pp.99 119.Kantola, J. & Kananoja, T. (Eds.) University of Jyväskylä. Department of Teacher Education.
Research 76. Jyväskylä. Jyväskylä University Printing
House.
[25]. Lehtonen, M. (2002b). Simulaatioiden avulla
tapahtuvan oppimistoiminnan mallin ja sitä tukevien Webpohjaisten
välineiden kehittäminen teknisessä työssä ja
teknologiakasvatuksessa. []Long paper. ITK´02
Conference. Workshop of researchers. Organised by the
Ministery of Education and University of Tampere
Hypermedia Laboratory. 17.4.2002. Hämeenlinna.
[26]. Lehtonen, M. (2002c). Online Interactive Curriculum
Representation as One Key to well Structured Students
Learning Activity. In Proceedings of the ED-Media 2002
Conference, 2002 Denver, Colorado USA, June 2429,
1110-1115.
[27]. Miettinen, R. (2002). Varieties of Constructivism in
Education. Where do we stand? Lifelong Learning in
Europe. 1/2002, 41-48.
[28]. Min, R. (2003). Shortcomings of the monitor. The
problem of linear presentation media in learning
situations; the importance of parallelism in open learning
and working environments. [Online reference, see
http://projects.edte.utwente.nl/pi/Papers/Monitor.htm,
referred 22nd June, 2004]
[29]. Nardi, B.A. (1997). Context and consciousness.
Activity theory and human-computer interaction. 2nd pr.
Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
[30]. Nykänen, O. & Ala-Rantala, M. (1998). A Design for a
Hypermedia-Based Learning Environment. Education and
Information Technologies. Volume 3, 277-290.
[31]. Podolskij, A. (1997). Instructional Design for
Schooling. Developmental Issues. In: S. Dijkstra et al. (eds.)
Instructional Design. International perspectives. Vol. 2.
Mahwah, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.
[32]. Heli Ruokamo, Tuovinen, H., Tella, S., Vahtivuori, S. &
Tissari, V. (2002). Pedagogical Models in the Design and
Assessment of Network -Based Education. In Proceedings
of the ED-Media 2002 Conference, 2002 Denver,
Colorado USA, June 2429, 1676 -1681.
[33]. Sweller, J., & Chandler, P. (1994). Why some material
is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction, Volume 12, 185-233.
[34]. Talyzina, N. (I981). The Psychology of Learning.
Progress Publishers, Moscow.
[35]. Tella, S. & Mononen-Aaltonen, M. (1998).
Developing Dialogic Communication Culture in Media
Education: Integrating Dialogism and Technology.
University of Helsinki. Department of Teacher Education.
Media Education Centre. Media Education Publications
7. ERIC ED426620. [Also available online, see http:// www.
helsinki.fi/~tella/mep7.html, referred 22nd June, 2004]
[36]. Uljens, M. (1997). School didactics and learning.
Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.
[37]. Wertsch, J.V. (1985). Vygotsky and the social formation of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Press.
[38]. Wilson, B. & Cole, P. (1996). Improving Traditional
Instruction. Cognitive Load Theory. [Online reference, see
http://carbon.cudenver.edu/~bwilson/cog/sweller.html,
referred 22nd June, 2004]
[39]. Devedzic, V. & Harrer, A. (2002). Architectural
Patterns in Pedagogical Agents. In: S.A. Cerri, G.
Gouardères, and F. Paraguaçu (Eds.): ITS 2002, LNCS
2363, Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 8190.
[40]. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society. Cambridge.
Massachusetts. Harvard University Press.
