i-manager Publications

i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology (JET)

Current Issue Vol. 21 Issue 2

Preventing Teacher and Counselor Burnout: Self-Care in Training Programs
A Study of Intervention Math Labs and STAAR Math Growth Scores in a South Texas Rural Middle School
Turkish EFL Teachers' Perceptions of their Pedagogical Digital Competence in an EFL Setting
Brief Report: Targeting the Social Communication Skills of an Autistic Adolescent with a Co-Occurring ADHD Diagnosis using Two Formats of a Social Story
The Effectiveness of GeoGebra Assisted Learning on Students' Mathematical Representation: A Meta-Analysis Study

Most Cited

Volume 9 Issue 3 October - December 2012

Article

Doctoral Education Online: Challenging the Paradigm

Hank Radda* , B. Jean Mandernach**

*-** Ph. D, Grand Canyon University.

Hank Radda and B. Jean Mandernach (2012). Doctoral Education Online: Challenging The Paradigm. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.9.3.2059

Abstract

While doctoral education is well-established in traditional academic environments, the role, value and function of online doctoral education is less clear. Interwoven with concerns about the online delivery format is the changing focus of doctoral education. As a function of social, technological and economic pressures, doctoral programs are expanding the traditional emphasis on basic research to include more integrated, applied models of inquiry. Understanding the unique needs and educational objectives of a scholar-practitioner model shifts concerns about online doctoral education from an emphasis on mode of delivery to an awareness of how the mode of delivery aligns with the broader learning model. The issue is not online or face-to-face, but rather rests in alignment of the theoretical model with development of curriculum and academic support structures. This paper highlights specific strategies and theoretical approaches underlying the creation of a doctoral online learning model focused on maintaining academic excellence while adapting to meet the needs of modern learners.

References

[1]. Allen, I.E., and Seaman, J. (2005). Growing by degrees: Online education in the United States, 2005. Needham, MA: Sloan-C.

[2]. Boud, D., & Tennant, M. (2006). Putting doctoral education to work: Challenges to academic practices. Higher Education Research and Development, 25, 293–306.

[3]. Floresh-Scott, E.M., & Nerad, M. (2012). Peers in doctoral education: Unrecognized learning partners. New Directions for Higher Education, 2012(157), 73–83.

[4]. Golde, C., Jones, L., Bueschel, A., & Walker, G. (2006). The challenges of doctoral program assessment. In The Assessment of Doctoral Education, (Eds. P. Maki & N. Borkowski), 53–82. Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

[5]. Jones, E.A. (2010). Designing and implementing transparent assessments in doctoral education. Curriculum & Teaching Dialogue, 12(1), 153-161.

[6]. Lee, Y., & Nguyen, H. (2007). Get your degree from an educational ATM: An empirical study in online education. International Journal of E-Learning, 6(1), 31–40.

[7]. Leners, D., Wilson, V. W., & Sitzman, K.L. (2007). Twenty-first century doctoral education: Online with a Focus on Nursing Education. Nursing Education Perspectives, 28(6), 332-336.

[8]. Mah, D.M. (1986). The process of doctoral candidate attrition: A study of ABD phenomenon. Doctoral dissertation. University of Washington. Dissertation, Abstract International, 47(\2A).

[9]. Maxwell, T. (2003). From first to second generation professional doctorate. Studies in Higher Education, 28(3), 279–291.

[10]. McWilliam, E., Taylor, P., Thomson, P., Green, B., Maxwell, T., Wildy, H., & Simons, D. (2002). Research training in doctoral programs: What can be learned from professional doctorates?

[11]. Merriam, S. (Ed.) (2008). Third update on adult learning theory: New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

[12]. Mutsuddi, I., & Mutsuddi, R. (2008). Retaining talents: The key to knowledge organization. ICFAI Journal of Management Research, 7(7), 73-84.

[13]. Russell, T. L. (2010). No significant difference.

[14]. Neumann, R. (2005). Doctoral differences: Professional doctorates and Ph.D compared. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(2), 73–88.

[15]. Nyquist, J. 2002. The PhD: A tapestry of change for the 21st century. Change, November/December, 12–20.

[16]. Pedler, M., Burgoyne, J., & Boydell, T. (1997). The learning company: A strategy for sustainable Development, (2nd ed.). Berkshire: McGraw-Hill International (UK).

[17]. Scott, D., Brown, A., Lunt, I., & Thorne, L. (2004). Professional doctorates: Integrating professional and academic knowledge. Maidenhead: Open University Press, and McGraw-Hill Education.

[18]. Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. London: Random House.

[19]. Servage, L. (2009). Alternative and professional doctoral programs: what is driving the demand? Studies in Higher Education, 34(7), 765-779.

[20]. Tluczek, J. (1995). Obstacles and attitudes affecting graduate persistence in completing the doctoral dissertation. Doctoral dissertation, Wayne State University. Dissertation Abstract International, 56 (05A).

[21]. Walker, G.E., Golde, C.M., Jones, L., Bueschel, A.C., & Hutchings, P. (2008). The formation of scholars: Rethinking doctoral education for the twenty-first century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

[22]. Wellington, J., & P. Sikes, P. (2006). 'A doctorate in a tight compartment': Why do students choose a professional doctorate and what impact does it have on their personal and professional lives? Studies in Higher Education, 31, 723–34.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Article

Using ICT for Training Teachers in Design and Technology Education (TTDTE)

Gisli Thorsteinsson*

Associate Professor, Design and Craft, University of Iceland.

Gisli Thorsteinsson(2012). Using ICT For Training Teachers In Design And Technology Education (TTDTE). i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.9.3.2060

Abstract

The paper outlines the TTPTE project (2010-2011) which was based on the need for innovative and effective ideas for increasing the efficiency of teachers' in design and technology daily work. The project was aimed at finding new ways of how to support in-service teachers in design and technology education and how teachers themselves can upgrade their knowledge and teaching methods by using information and computer technology. The article recognises the development of pedagogy and its application for teaching, studying, and learning by using Virtual Learning Environments based on Computer Supported Cooperative Learning (CSCL). Virtual Learning Environments (VLE)have given rise to innovative ways to teach and learn. So far teaching and learning processes have been technologically driven as opposed to pedagogically led. This can be seen in the context of teachers in design and technology education, where it has been developed for the support of in-service teachers. The article promotes an understanding of the possibilities of implications of VLE technologies in education for in-service teachers in product design. It can be shown that when pedagogical considerations are given weight in the development of such technology-based learning services; improvements arise for all stakeholders.

References

[1]. Appelt, W., Mambrey, P. (1999). Experiences with the BSCW Shared Workspace System as the Backbone of a Virtual Learning Environment for Students. GMD - German National Research Centre for Information Technology.

[2]. Galperin, P.J. (1989). Organization of mental activity and effectiveness of learning. Soviet Psychology, Vol.27, No. 3, pp. 65–82.

[3]. Lehtonen, M., Thorsteinsson, G., Page, T., Ruokamo, H. (2005). ''A Virtual Learning Environment for the Support of Learning in Technology Education'', Advanced Technology for Learning, ACTA Press, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2005, pp. 129-139, ISSN 1710-2251.

[4]. Leontiev, A.N. (1978). Activity, consciousness, and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

[5]. Newman, D., Griffin, P., & Cole, M. (1989). The Construction Zone: Working for cognitive change in school. New York: Cambridge University Press.

[6]. Steuer J. (1992). Defining Virtual Reality: Dimensions Determining Telepresence. Journal of Communication. Vol. 42, No. 4.

[7]. Thorsteinsson, G., Page, T., and Niculescu, A. (2010). Adoption of ICT in Supporting Ideation Skills in Conventional Classroom Settings. Informatics and Control, Vol. 19, No. 3, pp. 309-318.

[8]. Vygotski, L.S. (1978). Mind in Society. The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

E-learning teacher training courses for differentiated instruction in multicultural classrooms: reflections upon the participants’ experiences

Catherine Dimitriadou* , Eirini Nari, Nektaria Palaiologou*

* Assistant Professor, School of Education, University of Western Macedonia.

Teacher, M.Sc in Education, B.Sc in Computer Engineering.

* Assistant Professor, School of Education, University of Western Macedonia.

Catherine Dimitriadou, Eirini Nari and Nektaria Palaiologou (2012). E-Learning Teacher Training Courses For Differentiated Instruction In Multicultural Classrooms: Reflections Upon The Participants' Experiences. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 14-26. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.9.3.2061

Abstract

The focus and purpose of this paper is to present an e-learning teacher training course, including its aims and main results from teachers' interviews. The case study presented here examines the effectiveness of an in-service training seminar which was targeted toward teachers at multicultural schools. It concerns qualitative research that stresses interpretative and subjective dimensions of texts which comprise multiple meanings, resulting from multiple readings and interpretations. The structure of the paper is set out in three parts: First, the educational framework within which the study was developed is presented, then, the methodology connected with its development is described, and finally, teachers' replies are presented and discussed. The e-learning teacher training course was created within the frame of an Intercultural Education programme, focusing on differentiated instruction. Participating teachers were asked to create teaching scenarios in the direction of Intercultural Education. Human rights posters were used as motivation for the teachers and the derived scenarios were used for an arts-informed narrative inquiry aimed at investigating the teachers’ knowledge on how to exploit resources as intercultural storytellers through media texts. The study also sets a framework for the development of visual literacy practices in multicultural classrooms, thus enhancing the intercultural competency of teachers.

References

[1]. Aragon, A., & Kaminski, K. (2012). Racist Facebook event against Native Americans: Preservice Teachers Explore Ethical and Critical Multicultural Implications. In: Technology, Education and Cultural Diversity. Special Issue. April-June, Vol. 9, No1, Journal of Educational Technology, pp.35-43, i-manager publications.

[2]. Ausubel, D. (1963). The Psychology of Meaningful Verbal Learning. New York: Grune and Stratton.

[3]. Bach, H. (2007). Composing a visual Narrative Inquiry. In Handbook of Narrative Inquiry. Mapping a Methodology, ed. D. J. Clandinin, 280-307. London: Sage.

[4]. Barron, B., & Darling-Hammond, L. (2008). Teaching for Meaningful Learning. A Review of Research on Inquiry-Based and Cooperative Learning. In R. Furger. San Franciso, CA: Jossey-Bass.

[5]. Barthes, R. (1977). Image-Music - Text. Trans. Stephen Heath. New York: Hill and Wang.

[6]. Basit, T.N. (2010). Conducting Research in Educational Contexts. London: Continuum.

[7]. Bernstein, B. (2000). Pedagogy, Symbolic Control and Identity: Theory, Research, Critique. Rev. ed. London: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.

[8]. Bruner, J. (1986). Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

[9]. Boyle-Baise, M. (2005). Preparing Community-Oriented Teachers. Reflections from a Multicultural Service-Learning Project. Journal of Teacher Education, 56(5): 446-58.

[10]. Campbell, C., Gillborn, D., Lunt, I., Sammons, P., Vincent, C., Warren, S., & Whitty, G. (2002). Strategies and issues for inclusive schooling. In: Developing Inclusive Schooling: Perspectives, policies and practices, ed. Campbell, C., pp. 150-65. London: Bedford Way Papers.

[11]. Chamberlin-Quinlisk, C. (2012). Teaching Language and Culture in Digital Age, pp. 6-14. In: Technology, Education and Cultural Diversity. Special Issue. April-June, Vol. 9, No.1, Journal of Educational Technology, pp. 6-14, i-manager publications.

[12]. Clandinin, J.D., Michael F., & Connelly, F.M. (2000). Narrative Inquiry: Experience and Story in Qualitative Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

[13]. Dimitriadou, C., Pougaridou, P., & Vrantsi, A. (2009). Intercultural Competence of Educators: a Meta-functional Analysis of their Needs and Attitudes. In: Proceedings of the International Conference of Intercultural Education, 'Intercultural Education: Paideia, Polity, Demoi', ed. N. Palaiologou, June 22-26, Athens, ISBN 978-960-98897-0-4 (GR), ISBN/EAN 978-9--814411-1-7 (NL).

[14]. Dimitriadou, C., Tamtelen, E., & Tsakou, E. (2011). Multimodal texts as instructional tools for intercultural education: A case study. Intercultural Education, Vol. 22, No 2, pp. 223-28.

[15]. Edwards, R., & Usher, R. (2000). Globalization and Pedagogy. Space, place and identity. London: Routledge.

[16]. Elkins, J. (2008). Introduction: The Concept of Visual Litercy, and Its Limitations. In: Visual Literacy, ed. J. Elkins, pp. 1-10. New York: Routledge.

[17]. Fairclough, N. (2003). Analyzing Discourse. Textual analysis and social research. New York: Routledge.

[18]. Gorski, P.C. (2009). Intercultural Education and social justice. Intercultural Education, Vol. 20, No 2, pp. 87-90.

[19]. Gundara, J.S. (2000). Intercultural Education and Inclusion. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.

[20]. Herman, D. (2009). Basic elements of narrative. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.

[21]. Jewitt, C., & Oyama, R. (2003). Visual Meaning: a Social Semiotic Approach. In: Handbook of Visual Analysis, eds. Leeuwen, T. V., Jewitt, C., pp. 135-56. London: Sage Publications.

[22]. Keegan, D. (2001). Basic elements of Open Distance Learning. Athens: Metaixmio.

[23]. Kesidou, A. (2004). Intercultural Education: Main Aims and Practices. In Intercultural Education in the Balkan Countries, Education and Pedagogy in Balkan Countries, 4, ed. Terzis, N. P., pp. 97-105. Thessaloniki: Kyriakidis.

[24]. Koutselini, M. (2008). Participatory teacher development at schools: Processes and issues: Action Research, Vol. 6, No 1, pp. 29-48.

[25]. Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the New Media Age, Oxon: Routledge.

[26]. Kress, G. (2001). Visual and verbal modes of representation in electronically mediated communication: the potentials of new forms of text. In Page to Screen. Taking literacy into the electronic era, ed. I. Snyder, pp. 53-79.

[27]. Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (2001). Multimodal Discourse: The Modes and Media of Contemporary Communication. London: Arnold.

[28]. Kress, G., & Van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading Images: the Grammar of Visual Design. London: RKP.

[29]. Ladson-Billings, G.J. (1999). Preparing Teachers for Diverse Student Populations: A Critical Theory Perspective. Review of Research in Education, Vol. 24, pp. 211-247.

[30]. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

[31]. Lankshear, C., Knobel, M. (2011). New Literacies. Everyday Practices and Social Learning, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw Hill.

[32]. Leander, K. (2001). Producing and hybridizing space-time contexts in pedagogical discourse. Journal of Literacy Research, Vol. 33, No 4, pp. 637-679.

[33]. McDrury, J., & Maxine A. (2003). Learning through Storytelling in Higher Education. London: Kogan-Page.

[34]. McLaren, P. (2003). Critical Pedagogy: A Look at the Major Concepts. In: The Critical Pedagogy Reader, eds. Darder, A., Baltodano, M., Torres, R. D., pp. 69-96. New York: Routledge Falmer.

[35]. Mello, D.M. (2007). The Language of Arts in a Narrative Inquiry Landscape. In: Handbook of Narrative Inquiry. Mapping a Methodology, ed. D. J. Clandinin, 203-223. London: SAGE Publications.

[36]. Moon, J. (1999). Reflection in Learning and Professional Development. London: Routledge.

[37]. New London Group (2000). A Pedagogy of Multi-literacies: Designing Social Futures. In Multi-literacies: Literacy Learning and the Designing Social Futures, eds. Cope, B., Kalantzis, M., pp. 9-37. London: Routledge.

[38]. Novak, J.D., & Cañas, A.J. (2008). The Theory Underlying Concept Maps and how to Construct and Use Them, Technical Report IHMC CmapTools, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition.

[39]. Palaiologou, N., & Evangelou, O. (2011). Intercultural Pedagogy. Athens: Pedio.

[40]. Palaiologou, N. (ed.). (2012). Technology, Education and Cultural Diversity. Special Issue. April-June, Vol. 9, No1, Journal of Educational Technology. i-manager publications.

[41]. Starr, D.R. (1998). Virtual education: current practices and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 1: 157–65.

[42]. Tomlinson, C. A., Brighton, C., Hertberg, H., Callahan, C. M., Moon, T. R., Brimijoin, K., Conover, L. A., & Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal of the Education of the Gifted, Vol. 27, issue 2/3, pp. 119–145.

[43]. Unsworth, L. (2001). Teaching multi-literacies across the curriculum. Changing contexts of text and image in classroom practice. Buckingham: Open University Press.

[44]. Van Leeuwen, T. (2005). Introducing Social Semiotics. London: Routledge.

[45]. Vygotsky, L.S. (1978). Mind and Society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[46]. Vygotsky, L.S. (1962). Thought and Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[47]. Wilson, V., & Harris, M. (2004). Creating change? A review of the impact of Design and Technology in schools in England. Journal of Technology Education, Vol. 15, No 2, pp. 46-65.

[48]. Zahner, J. (2002). Teachers Explore Knowledge Management and E-learning as Models for Professional Development. Tech Trends, Vol. 46, No 3, pp. 11-16.

[49]. Zgaga, P. (2008). Mobility and the European dimension in Teacher education. In: Teacher Education Policy in Europe: A Voice of Higher Education Institutions, eds. Hudson, B., Zgaga, P., pp. 17-41. Umea: University of Umea, Faculty of Teacher Education.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Quality Assurance in Distance and Open Learning

Mohammed Hasan Mahafzah*

Faculty of Information Technology, Computer Science Department, Philadelphia University, Amman, Jordan.

Mohammed Hasan Mahafzah (2012). Quality Assurance In Distance And Open Learning. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 27-31. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.9.3.2062

Abstract

E-learning has become an increasingly important teaching and learning mode in educational institutions and corporate training. The evaluation of E-learning, however, is essential for the quality assurance of E-learning courses. This paper constructs a three-phase evaluation model for E-learning courses, which includes development, process, and product evaluation, called the DPP evaluation model. Development evaluation includes, course material design, E-learning platform, course Web site design, learning resource, interactivity, assessment, and tutor support. Process evaluation includes technical support, Web site utilization, learning interaction, learning evaluation, learning support, and flexibility. Product evaluation includes student satisfaction, teaching effectiveness, learning effectiveness, and sustainability. This research uses the DPP model to evaluate a purely E-learning course in Distance and open Learning, developed by Philadelphia University. According to summative evaluation through a student E-learning experience survey, the majority of students were satisfied on all E-learning dimensions of an E-learning course. The majority of students thought that the learning effectiveness of this course was equivalent, even better, than face-to-face learning because of cross-border collaborative learning, sufficient learning support, and learning flexibility. This study shows that a high quality of teaching and learning might be assured by using the systematic DPP evaluation procedure. It is hoped that the DPP evaluation model can provide a benchmark for establishing a wider E-learning quality assurance mechanism in educational institutions.

References

[1]. Allen, I.E., & J. Seaman (2011), "Going the distance: Online education in the United States".

[2]. Endean, M., Bai, B., and Dui, R. (2010). "Quality standards in online distance education", International Journal of Continuing Education and Lifelong Learning, 3(1). PP 53-73.

[3]. Jung, I., & Latchem, C. (2007). "Assuring quality in Asian open and distance learning", Open Learning, 22 (3). PP 235-250.

[4]. Jung, I., Wong, T.M., Chen, L. (2011). Baigaltugs, S., and Belawati, T.," Quality assurance in Asian distance education: Diverse approaches and common culture". International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning,12(6). PP 63-83.

[5]. Norman, Geoff. (2010). “Likert scales, levels of measurement and the laws of statistics”, Advances in Health Science Education, 15(5). PP 625-632.

[6]. UNESCO Institute for Statistics (2011). “Global Education Digest, comparing Education statistics across the world”.

[7]. Zhang, W. (2009). "The theory and application of interaction-centered online interaction", Modern Distance Education Research, 2009(5). PP 10–13.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

A Study On The Role Of Web Technology In Enhancing Research Pursuance Among University Academia

Irshad Husain* , Muhammad Ismail Durrani**

* Associate Professor & Chairman Department of Educational Training, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

** Senior Headmaster, Government High School Sadiq Garh Palace Dera Nawab Sahib & Ph.D Scholar, Preston University Islamabad, Pakistan.

Irshad Hussain and Muhammad Ismail Durrani (2012). A Study On The Role Of Web Technology In Enhancing Research Pursuance Among University Academia. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.9.3.2064

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of web technologies in promoting research pursuance among university teachers, examine the use of web technologies by university teachers in conducting research and identify the problems of university academia in using web technologies for research. The study was delimited to academia of social sciences of universities located in the Punjab Province of Pakistan. The study consisted on two types of population: university teachers and their academic heads —deans and heads of departments. The subjects of study comprised 200 university teachers and 25 academic heads taken through random sampling technique. Two questionnaires were developed on 5-point (likert) scale for data collection. The research tools were validated through pilot testing. The researchers administered finalized research tools and collected data. The response rate was calculated to be 75% and 72% for university teachers and their academic heads respectively. The study revealed that university academia used web technologies for accessing to latest research related to their respective area/field of studies. They used such technologies for sharing their academic experiences and findings of research among their communities. It was determined that web technologies played a crucial role in promoting their access to open world-wide educational resources which otherwise were very difficult for them to access. The university teachers reported some minor problems in using web technologies like low bandwidth of internet and electricity break down/ load shedding.

References

[1]. Bhattacharya, I., & Sharma, K. (2007). India in the knowledge economy – an electronic Paradigm, International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 21 No. 6, pp. 543-568.

[2]. Bottino, R.M. (2003). ICT, national policies, and impact on schools and teachers' development 'CRPIT '03: Proceedings of the 3.1 and 3.3 working groups conference on International federation for information processing', Australian Computer Society, Inc., Darlinghurst, Australia, Australia, 3-6.

[3]. Casal, C.R. (2007). ICT for education and development, info ISSN: 1463-6697, Volume: 9 Issue: 4, 3 - 9.

[4]. Chandra, S., & Patkar, V. (2007). ICTS: A catalyst for enriching the learning process and library services in India, The International Information & Library Review, 39(1), 1-11.

[5]. Chickering, A. W., & Ehrmann, S.C. (1997). Implementing the Seven Principles: Technology as Lever.

[6]. Cross, M., & Adam, F. (2007). ICT Policies and Strategies in Higher Education in South Africa: National and Institutional Pathways, Higher Education Policy, 20(1), 73-95.

[7]. Feenberg, A. (1999). Whither Educational Technology? Peer Review, Vol. 1,No. 4, Summer 1999.

[8]. Government of Pakistan (2009). National Education Policy 2009. Islamabad, Ministry of Education.

[9]. Hussain, I. (2005). A study of emerging technologies and their impact on teaching learning process; An Unpublished Ph.D Thesis; Islamabad, Allama Iqbal Open University.

[10]. Hussain, I., and Reza, A. (2010). Country case study: Pakistan. In B. Vlaardingerbroek & N.Taylor (Eds.), Getting into varsity: comparability, convergence and congruence (pp. 117-126). Amherst, NY: Cambria Press.

[11]. Hussain, I. (2011). Role of internet technology in promoting research attitude among university academic. A paper presented in the “World Conference of Educational Technology Researches”, Organized by the Middle East University North Cyprus, July 04-07.

[12]. Mason, R. (2000). From distance education to online education, The Internet and Higher Education, 3(1-2), 63-74.

[13]. Mooij, T. (2007). Design of educational and ICT conditions to integrate differences in learning: Contextual learning theory and a first transformation step in early education, Computers in Human Behavior, 23(3), 1499--1530.

[14]. Plomp, T.; Pelgrum, W. J., & Law, N. (2007). SITES2006-International comparative survey of Pedagogical practices and ICT in education, Education and Information Technologies, 12(2), 83-92.

[15]. Sanyal, B.C. (2001). New functions of higher education and ICT to achieve education for all, Paper prepared for the Expert Roundtable on University and Technology-for- Literacy and Education Partnership in Developing Countries, International Institute for Educational Planning, UNESCO, September 10 to 12, Paris.

[16]. Sharma, R. (2003). Barriers in Using Technology for Education in Developing Countries, IEEE, 0-7803-7724-9103.

[17]. UNESCO (2002). Open and Distance Learning Trends, Policy and Strategy Considerations, Paris.

[18]. University of Sheffield (1996). Multimedia in Dentistry: Benefits of Computer Aided Learning, DERWeb, University of Sheffield.

[19]. Yuen, A.; Law, N., & Wong, K. (2003). ICT implementation and school leadership Case studies of ICT integration in teaching and learning', Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 41 No. 2, 158-170.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Creativity and Learning in the Virtual Sphere: Perspectives from Doctoral Students

Thalia M. Mulvihill* , Dr. Raji Swaminathan**

* Professor, Social Foundations of Education & Higher Education, Teachers College Ball State University, USA.

** Associate Professor, Educational Policy and Community Studies Director, University of Wisconsin, USA.

Thalia M. Mulvihill and Raji Swaminathan (2012). Creativity And Learning In The Virtual Sphere: Perspectives From Doctoral Students. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.9.3.2063

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to analyze the perspectives of doctoral students on creativity and learning in the virtual environment. The researchers investigated the following central research question: to what extent is creative thinking fostered in virtual environments? In addition, the paper also examined how creativity is practiced in virtual environments. The paper will share the results of a 10 item anonymous survey distributed to doctoral students and doctoral faculty regarding their experiences with virtual learning environments and their creative thinking activities. Descriptive statistics and open coding were used to analyze the survey results and to make recommendations for innovative doctoral-level virtual pedagogies meant to build and enhance creative thinking. The results provide educators with further insights about how to structure learning environments with a view toward fostering creativity.

References

[1]. Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Class Differences: Online Education in the United States. Sloan Consortium.

[2]. Amabile, T. (1998). How to kill creativity. Harvard Business Review, September, 77–87.

[3]. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: HarperCollins.

[4]. de Bono, Edward (1985). Six Thinking Hats: An Essential Approach to Business Management. Little, Brown, & Company.

[5]. Dellana, S. (2000). Online education in a management science course: Effectiveness and performance factors. Journal of Education for Business. September/October, 43-47.

[6]. Evans N., Mulvihill, T., Brooks, N. (2008). Mediating the Tensions of Online Learning with Second Life. Innovate, Special Issue on the Future of Education, Volume 4, Issue 6.

[7]. Greene, M. (1995). Releasing the imagination. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

[8]. Guilford, J.P. (1959). Traits of creativity. In H. H. Anderson (Ed.), Creativity and its cultivation(pp. Virtual Architecture - eCAADe 29 975142–161). New York: Harper

[9]. Hollenbeck, C. (2005). Distance learning trends and benchmarks: Lessons from an online MBA Program. Marketing Education Review. 15, 39-52.

[10]. Horng, J. (2005). Creative teachers and creative teaching strategies. International Journal of Consumer Studies. 29:4, 352-358.

[11]. Isaksen, S.G., Dorval, K.B., & Treffinger, D.J. (1994). Creative approaches to problemsolving. Dubuque, IA: Hunt.

[12]. Jackson, N., Oliver, M., Shaw, M., and Wisdom, J., eds. (2006). Developing creativity in higher education: an imaginative curriculum. Routledge Press.

[13]. Kop, R., and Carroll, F. (2012). Cloud Computing and Creativity: Learning on a Massive Open Online Course. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning (EURODL).

[14]. Muirhead, B. (2007). Integrating creativity into online university classes. Educational Technology and Society. 10:1, 1-13.

[15]. Mulvihill, T., and Swaminathan, R. (2012a). Nurturing the Imagination: Creativity Processes and Innovative Qualitative Research Projects Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 5., No. 4, pp. 1-8.

[16]. Mulvihill, T., and Swaminathan, R. (2012b). Creative Qualitative Inquiry: Innovative Graduate Level Pedagogies Shaped by Educational Technologies Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 8., No. 3., pp. 21-26.

[17]. Noller, R. B., & Parnes, S.J. (1972). Applied creativity: The creative studies project: Part III – The curriculum. Journal of Creative Behavior, 6(4), 275-294.

[18]. Osborn, Alex. (1953). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative thinking. New York: Scribners & Sons.

[19]. Powell, D. (2007). Student satisfaction with a distance learning MPA Program: A preliminary comparison of on-campus and distance learning students' satisfaction with MPA courses. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 3: 1.

[20]. Rogers, Carl. (1959). Toward a theory of creativity, 69-82. In Anderson, H. H. Ed. Creativity and its cultivation. New York: Harper & Brothers.

[21]. Rhodes, Mel. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42:305-310.

[22]. Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be Creative. UK: Capstone Publishers.

[23]. Robinson, K. (2006). “Ken Robinson says schools kill creativity” TEDTalk.

[24]. Robinson, K. (2011). Out of our minds: Learning to be creative. UK: Wiley

[25]. Runco, M. A. (2008) Creativity and Education. New Horizons in Education, 56(1).

[26]. Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. Oxford University Press.

[27]. Sternberg, R. J. (October 10, 2010). Teach Creativity, not memorization. Commentary. The Chronicle of Higher Education.

[28]. van Oech, R. (1992). Creative Whack Pack. United States Games Systems.

[29]. Warr, A. & O'Neill, E. (2005). Understanding Design as a Social Creative Process, Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Creativity and Cognition, London, UK, April 2005, pp118 – 127.

[30]. Welling, H. (2007). “Four Mental Operations in Creative Cognition: The Importance of Abstraction”, Creativity Research Journal, Volume 19, Issue 2 & 3, pp. 163–177.

i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology (JET)

Current Issue Vol. 21 Issue 2

Most Read

Most Cited

Volume 9 Issue 3 October - December 2012

Doctoral Education Online: Challenging the Paradigm

Hank Radda* , B. Jean Mandernach**

*-** Ph. D, Grand Canyon University.

Hank Radda and B. Jean Mandernach (2012). Doctoral Education Online: Challenging The Paradigm. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.9.3.2059

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Using ICT for Training Teachers in Design and Technology Education (TTDTE)

Gisli Thorsteinsson*

Associate Professor, Design and Craft, University of Iceland.

Gisli Thorsteinsson(2012). Using ICT For Training Teachers In Design And Technology Education (TTDTE). i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 9-13. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.9.3.2060

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

E-learning teacher training courses for differentiated instruction in multicultural classrooms: reflections upon the participants’ experiences

Catherine Dimitriadou* , Eirini Nari**, Nektaria Palaiologou***

* Assistant Professor, School of Education, University of Western Macedonia. ** Teacher, M.Sc in Education, B.Sc in Computer Engineering. *** Assistant Professor, School of Education, University of Western Macedonia.

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Quality Assurance in Distance and Open Learning

Mohammed Hasan Mahafzah*

Faculty of Information Technology, Computer Science Department, Philadelphia University, Amman, Jordan.

Mohammed Hasan Mahafzah (2012). Quality Assurance In Distance And Open Learning. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 27-31. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.9.3.2062

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

A Study On The Role Of Web Technology In Enhancing Research Pursuance Among University Academia

Irshad Husain* , Muhammad Ismail Durrani**

* Associate Professor & Chairman Department of Educational Training, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan. ** Senior Headmaster, Government High School Sadiq Garh Palace Dera Nawab Sahib & Ph.D Scholar, Preston University Islamabad, Pakistan.

Irshad Hussain and Muhammad Ismail Durrani (2012). A Study On The Role Of Web Technology In Enhancing Research Pursuance Among University Academia. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 32-40. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.9.3.2064

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Creativity and Learning in the Virtual Sphere: Perspectives from Doctoral Students

Thalia M. Mulvihill* , Dr. Raji Swaminathan**

* Professor, Social Foundations of Education & Higher Education, Teachers College Ball State University, USA. ** Associate Professor, Educational Policy and Community Studies Director, University of Wisconsin, USA.

Thalia M. Mulvihill and Raji Swaminathan (2012). Creativity And Learning In The Virtual Sphere: Perspectives From Doctoral Students. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 41-48. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.9.3.2063

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Catherine Dimitriadou* , Eirini Nari, Nektaria Palaiologou*

* Assistant Professor, School of Education, University of Western Macedonia.

Teacher, M.Sc in Education, B.Sc in Computer Engineering.

* Assistant Professor, School of Education, University of Western Macedonia.

* Associate Professor & Chairman Department of Educational Training, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

** Senior Headmaster, Government High School Sadiq Garh Palace Dera Nawab Sahib & Ph.D Scholar, Preston University Islamabad, Pakistan.

* Professor, Social Foundations of Education & Higher Education, Teachers College Ball State University, USA.

** Associate Professor, Educational Policy and Community Studies Director, University of Wisconsin, USA.