i-manager Publications

i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching (JELT)

Current Issue Vol. 14 Issue 4

Enhancing Bilingual Vocabulary in Government Secondary Schools: Challenges and Suggestions
The Impact of Mobile Learning Applications on the Motivation and Engagement of Iraqi ESP Medical Students in Vocabulary Learning
The Effect of Self-Assessment on High School Students' English Writing Achievement and Motivation
Novice ESL Teachers Experience with Online (E-Learning) Education
Language is Not Taught, It is Caught: Embracing the Communicative Approach in the Primary Classroom

Most Cited

Volume 11 Issue 2 April - June 2021

Research Paper

Needs Analysis in Higher Education: A Case Study for English Language Achievement

Edgar Emmanuell Garcia-Ponce* , Irasema Mora-Pablo, M. Martha Lengeling*

* English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, University of Birmingham, UK.

Applied Linguistics, University of Kent, UK.

* Language Studies, University of Kent, UK.

García-Ponce, E. E., Mora-Pablo, I., and Lengeling, M. M. (2021). Needs Analysis in Higher Education: A Case Study for English Language Achievement. i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching, 11(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.11.2.17476

Abstract

Due to globalization, many universities around the world have started to strengthen academic and research practices with the view to meeting international standards. However, the higher education context of the study has faced the challenge to provide our students with successful language learning to prepare them for the job market. This challenge was the motivation for this research: to better understand the needs of our students' language achievement for their future jobs. Therefore, in order to examine how English teaching and learning can be improved in this context, we adopted a need analysis approach by conducting focus groups with university authorities (36 participants), English teachers (31 participants) and learners (54 participants) from different disciplines in a state university in central Mexico. Based on the participants' responses, the findings suggest that in the present context English teaching and learning should be redesigned to include practices which allow learners to develop language skills for their future career. To do this, we suggest a top-down strategic plan which promotes the inclusion of two major components (i.e. a general English coordination and content-based instruction) as a way to address the stakeholders' needs concerning linguistic limitations in this setting. This paper shows the importance of conducting needs analysis in higher education to determine how to enhance English teaching and learning from a context-sensitive perspective.

References

[1]. Brinton, D., Snow, M. A., & Wesche, M. B. (2003). Content-Based Second Language Instruction. University of Michigan Press. https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.8754

[2]. Brown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum: A systematic approach to program development. Heinle & Heinle Publishers, (pp.272).

[3]. Brown, J. D. (2009). Foreign and second language needs analysis. The handbook of language teaching (pp. 269-293). Wiley-Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/ 9781444315783

[4]. Davies, P. (2009). Strategic management of ELT in public educational systems: Trying to reduce failure, increase success. TESL-EJ, 13(3), 1-22.

[5]. Garcia-Ponce, E. E., & Mora-Pablo, I. (2018). English language proficiency: A key to enhancing industrial recruitment and mobility in central Mexico. Retrieved from https://www.ugto.mx/conferencia-de-alfonso-pichardo/ campus-guanajuato/english-language-proficiency-a-keyto- enhancing-industrial-recruitment-and-mobility-incentral- mexico

[6]. Hutchinson, T., & Waters, A. (1987). English for specific purposes: A learning-centred approach. Cambridge University Press, (pp. 1-11).

[7]. IMCO (2015). Inglés ES Posible: Propuesta De Una Agenda Nacional. Retrieved from https://imco.org.mx /ingles-es-posible-propuesta-de-una-agenda-nacional/

[8]. Kaewpet, C. (2009). A framework for investigating learner needs: Needs analysis extended to curriculum development. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 6(2), 209-220.

[9]. Long, M. H. (2005). Methodological issues in learner needs analysis. Second Language Needs Analysis (pp. 19–76). Cambridge University Press.

[10]. López, A. M. R., Herrera, A. R., & Hernández, L. L. G. (2015). Visión de la ANUIES frente a las actuales necesidades de formación de profesionales. ANUIES, (pp 1-13).

[11]. Lynch, B. K. (1996). Language program evaluation: Theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.

[12]. McKillip, J. (1987). Needs Analysis: Tools for the human services and education. Sage Publications.

[13]. Navarro, R. F. (2006). Enseñanza del inglés en nivel medio superior: el inglés en el contexto escolar (Doctoral dissertation, Tesis de pregrado). Universidad Pedagógica Nacional, Ciudad de México).

[14]. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and rd evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage Publications, (pp. 83).

[15]. Pratt, D. (1980). Curriculum design and development. New York : Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.

[16]. Richards, J. C. (1990). The Language Teaching Matrix. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9 780511667152

[17]. Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum development in language teaching. Cambridge University Press. https:// doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667220

[18]. Stoller, F., & Grabe, W. (1997). The six-T's approach to content-based instruction. The contentbased classroom: perspectives on integrating language and content, (pp. 1- 13). Addison-Wesley Longman

[19]. West, R. (1994). Needs analysis in language teaching. Language teaching, 27(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S0261444800007527

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Baby Steps in a Research Community: A Case Study of Turkish Undergraduate Students' First Scholarly Research Experiences

Şakire Erbay-Çetinkaya*

Department of English Language and Literature, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.

Cetinkaya, S. E. (2021). Baby Steps in a Research Community: A Case Study of Turkish Undergraduate Students' First Scholarly Research Experiences. i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching, 11(2), 12-31. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.11.2.17366

Abstract

Research has gained a degree of recognition as a skill to develop at tertiary level, and a requirement to get a Bachelor's degree, for higher education is supposed to improve critical thinking, encourage innovation, thereby improving the quality of both teaching and research. Responding to the calls of earlier research to further explore students' attitudes towards various aspects of research, perceptions and experiences in other disciplines rather than solely arts, I captured my undergraduate English majoring students' personal research process with their attitudes, experiences and self-reported researcher identity to draw a holistic picture of the field both quantitatively and qualitatively with a case study. While the quantitative data came from a 33-item- scale to investigate attitudes towards research, the qualitative findings were reached by open-ended items. The findings show that they found research quite useful for their academic life, yet thought research could not be applied to daily life. Besides, most saw themselves as bad researchers due to lack of research experience and faced several research-related, affective, personality and health, technical, participant-related, timerelated and lecturer-related problems. Yet, they employed mostly indirect and also direct strategies in the process. The article ends with recommendations for satisfactory classroom implementations and informal classroom activities.

References

[1]. Adaboh, S., Akpalu, R., & Appiah, S. (2017). A study of student anxiety towards research in two undergraduate programmes in a Ghanaian university. International Journal of Humanities Social Sciences and Education (IJHSSE), 4(9),106-113. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349- 0381.0409013.

[2]. Belcher, W. L. (2009). Writing your journal article in 12 weeks: A guide to academic publishing success. London: Sage Publication.

[3]. Belgrave, K. L., & Jules, J. E. (2015). Students' attitudes towards research applying best practice principles through a student-centred approach. Paper Presented at the Regional Conference on Institutionalising Best Practice in Higher Education, UWI, St. Augustine, Trinidad and Tobago (pp. 24-26).

[4]. Brent, D. (2017). Senior students' perceptions of entering a research community. Written Communication, 34(3), 333-355. https://doi.org/10.1177/07410883177109 25

[5]. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (1997). Araştırmaya yönelik kaygı ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 12(12), 453-464.

[6]. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (1999). Araştırmaya yönelik kaygı ile cinsiyet, araştırma deneyimi ve araştırma başarısı arasındaki ilişki. Eğitim ve Bilim, 23(112), 29-34.

[7]. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York, NY: Routledge.

[8]. Creswell, J.W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousands Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.

[9]. Ekiz, D. (2006). Primary school teachers' attitudes towards educational research. Educational sciences: Theory & Practice, 6(2), 395-402.

[10]. Ersoy, A. (2015). Doktora ögrencilerinin ilk nitel arastirma deneyimlerinin günlükler araciligiyla incelenmesi. Pegem Egitim ve Ogretim Dergisi (Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction), 5(5), 549-568.

[11]. Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2009). How to design and evaluate research in education (8th ed.). Boston: McGraw-Hill.

[12]. Gastel, B., & Day, R. A. (2016). How to write and publish a scientific paper (8th ed.). California: Greenwood. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095026880003079X

[13]. Hartley, J. (2008). Academic writing and publishing: A practical handbook. New York, NY: Routledge.

[14]. Healey, M., Jordan, F., Pell, B., & Short, C. (2010). The research–teaching nexus: a case study of students' awareness, experiences and perceptions of research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(2), 235-246.https://doi.org/10.1080/14703291003718968

[15]. Hussain, T., & Ch, Q., Akhter, M., Abid, N. & Sabir, S. (2016). A study on attitude towards research among technology education students in Pakistan. Bulletin of Education and Research, 38(2), 113-122.

[16]. İlhan, N., Şekerci, A. R., Sözbilir, M., & Yıldırım, A. (2013). Eğitim araştırmalarına yönelik öğretmen tutum ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Batı Anadolu Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(8), 31-57.

[17]. Korkmaz, Ö., Şahin, A., & Yeşil, R. (2011). Öğretmenlerin bilimsel araştırmalara ve araştırmacılara ilişkin düşünceleri. Kuramsal Eğitimbilim Dergisi, 4(2), 109- 127.

[18]. Kumar, R. (2011). Research methodology: A step-bystep guide for beginners (3rd ed.). London: Sage Publication.

[19]. Kurt, A. A., İzmirli, Ö. Ş., Fırat, M., & İzmirli, S. (2011). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri dersine ilişkin bilgisayar ve öğretim teknolojileri eğitimi bölümü öğrencilerinin görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 30, 19-28.

[20]. Larson-Hall, J. (2010). A guide to doing statistics in second language research using SPSS. New York, NY: Routledge.

[21]. Lindsay, R., Breen, R., & Jenkins, A. (2002). Academic research and teaching quality: The views of undergraduate and postgraduate students. Studies in Higher Education, 27(3), 309-327. https://doi.org/10.1080/030750702200 00699

[22]. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage Publications.

[23]. Oguan, F. E., Bernal, M. M., & Pinca, M. C. D. (2014). Attitude and anxiety towards research, its influence on the students' achievement in the course. Asian Journal of Management Sciences & Education, 3(4), 165-172.

[24]. Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle and Heinle Publications.

[25]. Papanastasiou, E. C. (2005). Factor structure of the attitudes toward research scale. Statistics Education Research Journal, 4(1), 16-26.

[26]. Papanastasiou, E. C. (2014). Revised- attitudes toward research scale (R-ATR); A first look at its psychometric properties. Journal of Research in Education, 24(2), 146- 159.

[27]. Pekel, F. O., & Akçay, S. (2018). Are science teachers really aware of the importance of educational research? European Journal of Education Studies, 4(3), 196-214. https:// doi.org/10.46827/ejes.v0i0.1500

[28]. Saracaloğlu, A. S., Varol, S. R., & Ercan, İ. E.(2005). Lisansüstü eğitim öğrencilerinin bilimsel araştırma kaygıları araştırma ve istatistiğe yönelik tutumları ile araştırma yetenekleri arasındaki ilişki. Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi,17, 187-199.

[29]. Spronken-Smith, R., Mirosa, R., & Darrou, M. (2014). Learning is an endless journey for anyone': undergraduate awareness, experiences and perceptions of the research culture in a research-intensive university. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(2), 355-371. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/07294360.2013.832169

[30]. Taşdemir, M., & Taşdemir, A. (2011). Ögretmen adaylarinin bilimsel arastirmalari inceleme yeterlikleri. Selcuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, (26), 343- 353.

[31]. Turner, N.,Wuetherick, B., & Healey, M. (2008). International perspectives on student awareness, experiences and perceptions of research: Implications for academic developers in implementing research‐based teaching and learning. International Journal for Academic Development,13(3), 199-211. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 13601440802242333

[32]. Visser-Wijnveen, G. J., van der Rijst, R. M., & van Driel, J. H. (2016). A questionnaire to capture students' perceptions of research integration in their courses. Higher Education, 71(4), 473-488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10 734-015-9918-2

[33]. Visser-Wijnveen, G. J., van Driel, J. H., van der Rijst, R. M., Visser, A., & Verloop, N. (2012). Relating academics' ways of integrating research and teaching to their students' perceptions. Studies in Higher Education, 37(2), 219-234. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2010.536913

[34]. Walliman, R. (2011). Research methods: The basics. New York, NY: Routledge.

[35]. Yaşar, M. (2014). Developing an attitude scale related to scientific research methods course: Validity and reliability. Journal of Educational Sciences Research, 4(2), 109-129.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

A Model for Communicative Error Correction in Saudi EFL Freshman Students' Writing

Reima Al-Jarf*

King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Al-Jarf, R. (2021). A Model for Communicative Error Correction in Saudi EFL Freshman Students' Writing. i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching, 11(2), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.11.2.17719

Abstract

Many EFL teachers spend a lot of time marking students' written assignments and correcting their spelling, grammatical, punctuation, organization and idea generation errors in detail. The more mistakes students make the more meticulously they mark and correct mistakes. Despite meticulous error correction, students continue to make the same mistakes over and over again. Teachers' correction of written assignments does not seem to be effective in reducing students' errors and enhancing their ability to write correctly and effectively. The present study proposes a model for correcting students' errors effectively. In this model, students are encouraged to write for communication and not to worry about spelling, grammatical, punctuation or capitalization mistakes. Students do written assignments or part of them in the class. While doing the written exercises and writing their paragraphs, the teacher monitors students' work and provides individual help. She gives communicative feedback that focuses on meaning and highlights only errors related to rules or skills under study in a particular chapter. Feedback is provided on the occurrence and location of errors, but no correct forms are given. Self-editing and peer-editing are encouraged. Extra credit is given for good paragraphs every time the students write a paragraph in the class.

References

[1]. Allen, A. (2001). Error correction strategies in the editing performance of advanced and basic ESL native Englishspeaking writers. Dissertation Abstracts International: The Humanities and Social Sciences, 61(10).

[2]. Chan, A. Y., Kwan, B. S., & Li, D. C. (2002). An algorithmic approach to error correction: Correcting three common errors at different levels. JALT JOURNAL, 24(2), 201-216.

[3]. Chandler, J. (2003). The Efficacy of Various Kinds of Error Feedback for Improvement in the Accuracy and Fluency of L2 Student Writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 12, 267-296.

[4]. Ferris, D. (1999). The case for grammar correction in L2 writing classes: A response to Truscott (1996). Journal of Second Language Writing, 8(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S1060-3743(99)80110-6

[5]. Ferris, D., & Roberts, B. (2001). Error feedback in L2 writing classes: How explicit does it need to be? Journal of Second Language Writing, 10(3), 161-184. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/S1060-3743(01)00039-X

[6]. Ferris, D. R. (2004). The “grammar correction” debate in L2 writing: Where are we, and where do we go from here? Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(1), 49-62. https:// doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.04.005

[7]. Froc, M. L. (1995). Error correction in French immersion. Canadian Modern Language Review, 51(4), 708-717. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.51.4.708

[8]. Hendrickson, J. M. (1980). The treatment of error in written work. The Modern Language Journal, 64(2), 216- 221. https://doi.org/10.2307/325306

[9]. Herron, C., & Tomasello, M. (1988). Learning grammatical structures in a foreign language: Modelling versus feedback. The French Review, 61(6), 910-922.

[10]. Kepner, C. G. (1991). An experiment in the relationship of types of written feedback to the development of second-language writing skills. The Modern Language Journal, 75(3), 305-313. https://doi.org/10.2307/328724

[11]. Lee, I. (1997). ESL learners' performance in error correction in writing: Some implications for teaching. System, 25(4), 465-477. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346- 251X(97)00045-6

[12]. Lee, I. (2004). Error correction in L2 secondary writing classrooms: The case of Hong Kong. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 285-312. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.08.001

[13]. Lee, W. R. (1988). Dealing with Errors: What Is the Classroom Teacher to Do?. Praxis des Neusprachlichen Unterrichts, 36, 115-22.

[14].Leki, I. (1991). The preferences of ESL students for error correction in college‐level writing classes. Foreign Language Annals, 24(3), 203-218. https://doi.org/10.1111/ j.1944-9720.1991.tb00464.x

[15]. Li, D. C., & Chan, A. Y. (1999). Helping teachers correct structural and lexical English errors. Hong Kong Journal of Applied Linguistics, 4(1), 79-102.

[16]. Lyster, R., & Ranta, L. (1997). Corrective feedback and learner uptake: Negotiation of form in communicative classrooms. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(1), 37-66.

[17]. Pavlik, Cheryl, Segal, & Keenan, M. (2007). Chapter Themes and Writing Process Skills. Interactions I: Writing (Sliver Ed.). McGraw-Hill Higher Education.

[18]. Steed, J. (2000). Interactive letter writing: A new approach to self-expression. Ying Yu Yen Chiu Chi K'an/ Studies in English Literature and Linguistics, 26, 113-134.

[19]. Taniguchi, J. (1990). Who does what with errors? Cross Currents, 17(2), 171-175.

[20]. Truscott, J. (2004). Evidence and conjecture on the effects of correction: A response to Chandler. Journal of Second Language Writing, 13(4), 337-343. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jslw.2004.05.002

[21]. Wen, X. (1999). Error and corrective feedback. Journal of the Chinese Language Teachers Association, 34(3), 1- 22.

[22]. Woods, D. (1989). Error Correction and the Improvement of Language Form. TESL Canada Journal, 6(2), 60-72. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v6i2.552

[23]. Zawadzka, E. (1989). Error and error correctionremarks by a nonnative-language second-language teacher. Die Neueren Sprachen, 88(3), 235-246.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

The Cultural Dimension of a Foreign Language Curriculum: A Comparative Study on Turkey and Russia

Ceren Isikli*

Gendarmerie and Coast Guard Academy, Modern Languages Department, Ankara, Turkey.

Isikli, C. (2021). The Cultural Dimension of a Foreign Language Curriculum: A Comparative Study on Turkey and Russia. i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching, 11(2), 42-54. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.11.2.17589

Abstract

This study investigates cultural standards in the context of foreign language teaching from the perspective of two countries: Turkey and Russia. It compared both countries in terms of how they treat culture in foreign language education. The purpose was to identify commonalities and differences in cultural standards between the two countries. During the analysis of curricular documents, three domains of cultural standards were identified for each country: (1) Foreign culture domain, (2) Home culture domain, and (3) Intercultural relations domain. Document analysis was conducted based on online database materials from two primary sources: the Ministry of National Education of Turkey and the Ministry of National Education of Russia. As this study demonstrated the educational policies of the two countries whilst steered towards the attainment of culture-related competencies of foreign language learners, it revealed some important differences in how they define cultural standards according to the three categories of cultural standard domains. As a result, it appears Russia's foreign language curriculum outweighs that of Turkey in the domain of home culture and intercultural relations References.

References

[1]. Abdallah-Pretceille, M. (2017). L'éducation interculturelle. Universitaires de France, France. https://doi. org/10.3917/puf.pretc.2017.01

[2]. Akpinar, K. D., & Mete, F. (2013). Domain of culture in foreign language teachers' competency: A comparison of Turkey and China. Journal of Educational Sciences Research International E-Journal, 3(2), 91-106. https://doi. org/10.12973/jesr.2013.326a

[3]. Alessio, M., & Baude, O. (2010). La diversité des langues. Culture et Recherches, 124, (Pp. 4-5). Retrieved from https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-01184597

[4]. Arefyev, A. L. (2017). National and foreign languages in the Russian system of education. Social-Political Research Institution of the Russian Academy of Science. Retrieved from https://docplayer.ru/52654187-Nacionalnye-iinostrannye- yazyki-v-rossiyskoy-sisteme-obrazovaniya.html

[5]. Byram, M., & Planet, M. T. (1999). Social identity and the European dimension: Intercultural competence through foreign language learning. Council of Europe. Retrieved from https://www.ecml.at/Portals/1/documents/ECMLresources/ identityE.pdf?ver=2018-04-25-103552-150

[6]. Byram, M., (1989). Cultural studies in foreign language education. Multilingual Matters.

[7]. Canale, M., & Swain, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of com-municative approaches to second language teaching and testing. Applied linguistics, 1(1), 1-47.

[8]. CARLA. (2019). What is culture?. The Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition, University of Minnesota. http://carla.umn.edu/culture/definitions.html

[9]. Colles, L. (2013). Passing frontiers: Studies on intercultural education and French language teaching. Louvain University Press.

[10]. Council of Europe. (2001). Council for Cultural Cooperation. Education Committee. Modern Languages Division. Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: learning, teaching, assessment. Cambridge University Press.

[11]. Crozet, C., Liddicoat, A., & Lo Bianco, J. (1999). Striving for the third place: Intercultural competence through language education. Striving for the Third Place: Intercultural Competence through Language Education, 181-190.

[12]. Demirel, Ö. (2003). Foreign language education in Turkey in the context of European Union integration process. Language, Culture and Civilisation, 239-249. Hacettepe University, Ataturk and Revolution History Institute.

[13]. Girardet, J. (2011). Teaching French as a foreign language according to an action-based approach: some methodological propositions. Conference: Actes du XIIème colloque pédagogique de l'Alliance française de Sao Paolo, Brasil: Aliança Francesa São Paulo. Retrieved from http://aliancafrancesa.com.br

[14]. Gunday, R. (2013). Sociolinguistic approach to foreign language teaching in terms of multilingualism and multiculturalism. Turkish Studies – International Periodical for the Languages, Literature and History of Turkish and Turkic, 8(10), 313-330.

[15]. Köşker, G., & Gülmez, G. (2018). The role of the teacher in building intercultural communication skills in foreign language teaching: Teachers' views with examples from France and Turkey. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, 6(1), 157-171.

[16]. Mckay, S. L., & Homberger, N. H. (2010). Sociolinguistics and language education. Multilingual Matters.

[17]. Neuner, G., Parmenter, L., Starkey, H., and Zarate, G. (2003). Intercultural competence. University of Durham Language Policy Division DG IV – Directorate of School, Out-of-School and Higher Education Council of Europe. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/16806ad2dd

[18]. Oaster, B. (2017). Understanding culture is key to unlocking language. Day Translations. Retrieved from https://www.daytranslations.com/blog/understandingculture

[19]. Puren, C. (2006). Common European framework of reference and methodological reflection: retaking the field - teaching of languages and cultures. Association of Professors of Living Languages. http://www.aplvlangues modernes.org//spip.php?article35

[20]. Russian Academy of Education. (2017). The Project of scientific conceptualization of modernization of the content and technologies of foreign language teaching. Russian Academy of Education –Project of Modernization.

[21]. Russian Ministry of Education. (n.d.). The federal national educational standards for primary and secondary education. http://www.fgosreestr.ru

[22]. Russian Ministry of Education. (n.d.). Примерная основная образовательная программа [Model programs for primary and secondary education]. http://www.predmet concept.edu.ru http://www.fgosreestr.ru

[23]. Sitarov, V. A. (2019). Education history in Russia: Post- Soviet period. Problems of Pedagogy and Psychology, 2, 201-216.

[24]. Turkish Ministry of Education (n.d.). the Turkish Board of Education and Council (TBEC). Foreign language curriculums for primary and secondary education. Retrieved from https://ttkb.meb.gov.tr http://mufredat. meb.gov.tr/programlar.aspx

[25]. Turkish Ministry of Education. (n.d.). The basic law of national education. Retrieved from http://www.mevzuat. gov.tr/MevzuatMetin/1.5.1739.pdf

[26]. Useem, J., Useem, R., & Donoghue, J. (1963). Men in the middle of the third culture: The roles of American and non-western people in cross-cultural administration. Human Organization, 22(3), 169–179. https://doi.org/ 10.17730/humo.22.3.5470n44338kk6733

[27]. Windmüller, F. (2011). French as a foreign language: cultural and intercultural approach. Paris: Belin.

[28]. Zarate, G. (2004). Cultural mediation in language learning and teaching. European Centre for Modern Languages.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Teacher Written Feedback Preferences of University Prep-class Students in a Foreign Language Writing Course

Derya Tuzcu-Eken*

Department of Foreign Languages at KIrklareli University, K?rklareli, Turkey.

Tuzcu-Eken, D. (2021). Teacher Written Feedback Preferences of University Prep-class Students in a Foreign Language Writing Course. i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching, 11(2), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.11.2.17593

Abstract

The current paper is a mixed method study which aimed to find out teacher written feedback preferences of a group of prep-class students at a public university in Turkey. The written corrective feedback preferences of 37 students with high level of proficiency in English were examined via a questionnaire and an interview. The study lasted for two semesters. The findings of this long term study indicated that the students preferred the course teacher to provide feedback for each error in their assignments. Besides, the students believed that the feedback provided by their teacher enhanced their writing skill. However, most of the time, the students did not rewrite their texts in the light of the feedback provided to them when they were not instructed to do so. The generally preferred feedback type was form-focused direct feedback whereas the least preferred types were meaning-focused content related feedback and form-focused indirect feedback. Finally, the feedback preferences of the students did not change even if the practices of the course teacher changed over time. Instead, there was a decrease in the students' contentment of the teacher feedback as the practices of the course teacher changed from the first term to the second.

References

[1]. Aridah, A., Atmowardoyo, H., & Salija, K. (2017). Teacher practices and students' preferences for written corrective feedback and their implications on writing instruction. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(1), 112-125. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijel.v7n1p112

[2]. Biber, D., Nekrasova, T., & Horn, B. (2011). The effectiveness of feedback for L1‐English and L2‐writing development: A meta‐analysis. ETS Research Report Series, 2011(1), i-99. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504. 2011. tb02241.x

[3]. Bitchener, J., Young, S., & Cameron, D. (2005). The effect of different types of corrective feedback on ESL student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 14(3), 191-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2005.08.001

[4]. Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010a). The contribution of written corrective feedback to language development: A ten month investigation. Applied linguistics, 31(2), 193-214. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp016

[5]. Bitchener, J., & Knoch, U. (2010b). Raising the linguistic accuracy level of advanced L2 writers with written corrective feedback. Journal of Second Language Writing, 19(4), 207-217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2010.10.002

[6]. Brandl, K. K. (1995). Strong and weak students' preferences for error feedback options and responses. The Modern Language Journal, 79(2), 194-211. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1995.tb05431.x

[7]. Boermans, M. A., & Kattenberg, M. (2011). Estimating reliability coefficients with heterogeneous item weightings using Stata: A factor based approach. Utrecht School of Economics Tjalling C. Koopmans Research Institute Discussion Paper Series 11-19 (pp. 1-8). Utrecht, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2026433

[8]. Chen, J. (2012). Teachers' practices and student views of written feedback: A case of TCFL students. (Unpublished MA Thesis). Arizona State University, Arizona, USA. Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/79564116.pdf

[9]. Chiu, C. Y., & Savignon, S. J. (2006). Writing to mean: Computer-mediated feedback in online tutoring of multidraft compositions. Calico Journal, 97-114.

[10]. Corpuz, V. A. F. (2011). Error correction in second language writing: Teacher's beliefs, practices, and students' preferences. (Unpublished MA Thesis). Queensland University of Technology, Queensland, Australia.

[11]. Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (2001). Locus of feedback control in computer-based tutoring: impact on learning rate, achievement and attitudes. In Proceedings of ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computer Systems (pp. 245-252). ACM Press, New York. https://doi. org/10.1145/365024.365111

[12]. Dihoff, R. E., Brosvic, G. M., Epstein, M. L., & Cook, M. J. (2004). Provision of feedback during preparation for academic testing: Learning is enhanced by immediate but not delayed feedback. The Psychological Record, 54(2), 207-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03395471

[13]. Ellis, R. (2009). A typology of written corrective feedback types. English Language Teaching Journal, 63(2), 97-107. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn023

[14]. Eslami, E. (2014). The effects of direct and indirect corrective feedback techniques on EFL students' writing. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 445-452. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.438

[15]. Farid, S., & Samad, A. A. (2012). Effects of different kind of direct feedback on students' writing. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 66, 232-239. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.11.265

[16]. Farjadnasabh, A. H., & Khodashenas, M. R. (2017). The effect of written corrective feedback on EFL students' writing accuracy. International Journal of Research in English Education, 2(2), 30-42.

[17]. Ferris, D. R. (2003). Responding to writing. In B. Kroll (Ed.), Exploring the dynamics of second language writing (pp. 119-140). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524810.010

[18]. Ferris, D. (2007). Preparing teachers to respond to student writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(3), 165-193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2007.07.003

[19]. Ferris, D. R. (2012). Written corrective feedback in second language acquisition and writing studies. Language Teaching, 45(4), 446-459. https://doi.org/10. 1017/S0261444812000250

[20]. Ferris, D. R., & Hedgcock, J. S. (2005). Teaching ESL composition: Purpose, process, and practice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[21]. Göksoy, A. S., & Nazlı, Ö. P. (2017). The effect of direct and indirect written corrective feedback on students' writing. Uluslararası Liderlik Eğitimi Dergisi, 1(1), 16-25.

[22]. Haggarty, L. (1996). What is content analysis? Medical Teacher, 18(2), 99-101.

[23]. Hamidun, N., Hashim, S. H., & Othman, N. F. (2012). Enhancing students' motivation by providing feedback on writing: The case of international students from Thailand. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 2(6), 591-594.

[24]. Hamouda, A. (2011). A study of students and teachers' preferences and attitudes towards correction of classroom written errors in Saudi EFL context. English Language Teaching, 4(3), 128-141.

[25]. Hannum, M. C. (2016). Fault in our feedback: Students' experiences and preferences regarding corrective feedback. (Unpublished MA Thesis). The University of Toledo, Ohio, USA.

[26]. Harmer, J. (2004). How to teach writing. Edinburgh, England: Pearson Education Limited.

[27]. Hyland, F. (2003a). Focusing on form: Student engagement with teacher feedback. System, 31(2), 217- 230. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0346-251X(03)00021-6

[28]. Hyland, K. (2003b). Second language writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[29]. Hyland, K. & Hyland F. (2006). Feedback on second language students' writing. Language teaching, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 39(2), 83-101.

[30]. Irwin, B. (2017). Written Corrective Feedback: Student Preferences and Teacher Feedback Practices. IAFOR Journal of Language Learning, 3(2), 35-58.

[31]. Ivankova, N. V., & Creswell, J. W. (2009). Mixed methods. In Qualitative Research in Applied Linguistics: A Practical Introduction (pp. 135-161). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230239517

[32]. Jamalinesari, A., Rahimi, F., Gowhary, H., & Azizifar, A. (2015). The Effects of teacher-written direct vs. indirect feedback on students' writing. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 192, 116-123. https://doi.org/10.10 16/j.sbspro.2015.06.018

[33]. Kahraman, A., & Yalvaç, F. (2015). EFL Turkish university students' preferences about teacher feedback and its importance. Procedia - Social and Behavioural Sciences, 199, 73-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.489

[34]. Knoblauch, C. H., & Brannon, L. (1981). Teacher commentary on student writing: The state of the art. Freshman English News, 10(2), 1-4.

[35]. Lee, I. (2005). Error correction in the L2 writing classroom: What do students think? TESL Canada Journal, 22(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v22i2.84

[36]. Lee, I. (2008). Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms. Journal of second language writing, 17(3), 144-164. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001

[37]. Lee, D., & Lee, S. J. (2017). Effect of two types of feedback on accuracy development of L2 writing. Learner-Centred Curriculum Education, 17(17), 575-594.

[38]. Lemley, D., Sudweeks, R., Howell, S., Laws, R. D., & Sawyer, O. (2007). The effects of immediate and delayed feedback on secondary distance learners. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 8(3), 251-260.

[39]. Montgomery, J. L., & Baker, W. (2007). Teacher-written feedback: Student perceptions, teacher self-assessment, and actual teacher performance. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(2), 82-99. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jslw.2007.04.002

[40]. Müldür, M., & Yalçın, A. (2019). The effect of selfregulated writing instruction on middle school students' informative writing skills, self-regulated writing skills, and selfefficacy perception. Elementary Education Online, 18(4), 1779-1804.

[41]. Park, E. (2006). Review article on "The Effectiveness of Teacher's Written Feedback on L2 Writing." SNU Working Papers in English Linguistics and Language, 5, 61-73.

[42]. Saito, H. (1994). Teachers' practices and students' preferences for feedback on second language writing: A case study of adult ESL learners. TESL Canada Journal, 11(2), 46-70. https://doi.org/10.18806/tesl.v11i2.633

[43]. Schroth, M. L. (1992). The effects of delay of feedback on a delayed concept formation transfer task. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17(1), 78–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-476X(92)90048-4

[44]. Toegel, G., & Conger, J. A. (2003). 360-degree assessment: Time for reinvention. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 2(3), 297–311. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2003.10932156

[45]. Truscott, J. (2007). The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately. Journal of Second Language Writing, 16(4), 255-272. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jslw.2007.06.003

[46]. Van Beuningen, C. G., De Jong, N. H., & Kuiken, F. (2008). The effect of direct and indirect corrective feedback on L2 learner's written accuracy. ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 156(1), 279-296. https://doi. org/10.2143/ITL.156.0.2034439

[47]. Westmacott, A. (2017). Direct vs. indirect written corrective feedback: Student perceptions. Íkala, Revista de Lenguaje y Cultura, 22(1), 17-32.

[48]. Zhang, F., Ding, L., & Xiao, H. (2018). A study of students' self-regulated revision on writing. Practitioner Proceedings, 2193, 1-5.

i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching (JELT)

Current Issue Vol. 14 Issue 4

Most Read

Most Cited

Volume 11 Issue 2 April - June 2021

Needs Analysis in Higher Education: A Case Study for English Language Achievement

Edgar Emmanuell Garcia-Ponce* , Irasema Mora-Pablo**, M. Martha Lengeling***

* English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, University of Birmingham, UK. ** Applied Linguistics, University of Kent, UK. *** Language Studies, University of Kent, UK.

García-Ponce, E. E., Mora-Pablo, I., and Lengeling, M. M. (2021). Needs Analysis in Higher Education: A Case Study for English Language Achievement. i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching, 11(2), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.11.2.17476

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Baby Steps in a Research Community: A Case Study of Turkish Undergraduate Students' First Scholarly Research Experiences

Şakire Erbay-Çetinkaya*

Department of English Language and Literature, Karadeniz Technical University, Trabzon, Turkey.

Cetinkaya, S. E. (2021). Baby Steps in a Research Community: A Case Study of Turkish Undergraduate Students' First Scholarly Research Experiences. i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching, 11(2), 12-31. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.11.2.17366

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

A Model for Communicative Error Correction in Saudi EFL Freshman Students' Writing

Reima Al-Jarf*

King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Al-Jarf, R. (2021). A Model for Communicative Error Correction in Saudi EFL Freshman Students' Writing. i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching, 11(2), 32-41. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.11.2.17719

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

The Cultural Dimension of a Foreign Language Curriculum: A Comparative Study on Turkey and Russia

Ceren Isikli*

Gendarmerie and Coast Guard Academy, Modern Languages Department, Ankara, Turkey.

Isikli, C. (2021). The Cultural Dimension of a Foreign Language Curriculum: A Comparative Study on Turkey and Russia. i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching, 11(2), 42-54. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.11.2.17589

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Teacher Written Feedback Preferences of University Prep-class Students in a Foreign Language Writing Course

Derya Tuzcu-Eken*

Department of Foreign Languages at KIrklareli University, K?rklareli, Turkey.

Tuzcu-Eken, D. (2021). Teacher Written Feedback Preferences of University Prep-class Students in a Foreign Language Writing Course. i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching, 11(2), 55-68. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.11.2.17593

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Edgar Emmanuell Garcia-Ponce* , Irasema Mora-Pablo, M. Martha Lengeling*

* English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, University of Birmingham, UK.

Applied Linguistics, University of Kent, UK.

* Language Studies, University of Kent, UK.