i-manager Publications

i-manager's Journal on Educational Psychology (JPSY)

Current Issue Vol. 17 Issue 3

Creative Teaching: A Conceptual Framework
Examining Measurement Invariance of Different SWLS Measurement Models According to Gender
Sources of Geography Class Enjoyment and Boredom among Bhutanese Secondary School Students
The Emergence of a Large Disadvantaged Group after the Earthquake Disaster in Turkey on February 6, 2023, and Investigation of Inclusive Education Policy
Academic Stress among Higher Secondary School Adolescents during the Covid-19 Pandemic Context
Development and Validation of Emotional Competence Scale (ECS) for Upper Primary School Students

Most Cited

Volume 7 Issue 4 February - April 2014

Article

Challenges to the Concept “Partnership with Parents” in Special Needs Education

Mohaned Ghazi Abed*

* Program of Educational Graduate Studies, King Abdulaziz University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Abed , M. (2014). Challenges to the Concept “Partnership with Parents” in special needs Education. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 7(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.7.4.2651

Abstract

It is observed that professionals would meet the needs of individual children if they work closely with the child's parents [58]. The growing of a child is a continuous process which requires a coherent, close partnership between home and school, since the house is the first educational environment, and the first community in which a child lives and grows. Education, habits and trends are taken from these very first, essential experiences. Besides, when children begin their school life, they do not break the relationship to their family but remain under various, significant influences from the family members, including parents and siblings. Moreover, schools are considered as a main factor of the development of children's experiences. Therefore, it is not possible to categorise them as being less important than the experiences gained at home. Consequently, it is seen that they should complement each other.

References

[1]. Adesida, O., & Foreman, D. (1999). A Support Group for Parents of Children with Hyperkinetic Disorder: An Empowerment Model. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry. 4, 567-578.

[2]. Anning, A. (2000). New deals and old dilemmas: Lone parents of young children balancing work and parenthood. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, Cardiff.

[3]. Appleton Pl, & Minchom Pe. (1991). Models of parent partnership and child development centres. Child: Care, Health and Development. 17.

[4]. Armstrong, D. (1995). Power and partnership in education: parents, children, and special educational needs. London, Routledge.

[5]. Ball, C. (1994). Start right: the importance of early learning. London, Royal Society for the Encouragement of Arts, Manufactures & Commerce.

[6]. Ball, M. (1998). School inclusion: the school, the family and the community. York, Joseph Rowntree Foundation.

[7]. Barnett, D., Clements, M., Kaplan-estrin, M., & Fialka, J. (2003). Building New Dreams: Supporting Parents' Adaptation to Their Child With Special Needs. Infants and Young Children. 16, 184-200.

[8]. Bastiani, J. (1988). Parents and teachers. 2, From policy to practice. Windsor, NFER-Nelson.

[9]. Bastiani, J. (1993). UK directory of home-school initiatives. London, RSA. behaviors in family contexts. Baltimore: Brookes.

[10]. Beresford, B. (1994). Positively Parents: Caring for a severely disabled child. London: Social Policy Research Unit/HMSO.

[11]. Beveridge, S. (1989). Parents as teachers of children with special educational needs. In: D.SUGDEN (ed.) Cognitive Approaches in Special Education. Lewes: Falmer Press.

[12]. Beveridge, S. (1997). Implementing partnership with parents in schools. In: S.WOLFENDALE (ed.) Working with Parents of SEN Children after the Code of Practice. London: David Fulton.

[13]. Beveridge, S. (2004). Children, families and schools: developing partnerships for inclusive education. London, RoutledgeFalmer.

[14]. Brett, J. (2002). The experience of disability from the perspective of parents of children with profound impairment: is it time for an alternative model of disability?. Disability and Society 2002;17:825–43.

[15]. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1977). Towards an ecology of human development, American Psychologist,32, 513–531.

[16]. Bruce, E., & Schultz, C. (2002). Non-Finite Loss and Challenges to Communication between Parents and Professionals. British Journal of Special Education. 29, 9- 13.

[17]. Cairney, T. (1996). Developing Partnerships with Families in Literacy Learning. In: S. WOLFENDALE and K. TOPPING (Eds.) Family Involvement in Literacy. London: Cassell.

[18]. Caplan, N., Choy, M., & Whitmore, J. K. (1992). Indochinese refugee families and academic achievement. Scientific American, 36-42

[19]. Carlin, J., & Lenehan, C. (2006). Including Me: managing complex health needs in schools and early years settings. London: Council for Disabled Children/National Children's Bureau Publications. [Online at: http://www.ncb.org.uk/dotpdf/open_access_2/ including_me.pdf]

[20]. Carpenter, B. (2001). Enabling partnership: families and schools. In: B. Carpenter, R. Ashdown and K. Bovair (eds) Enabling Access: Effective teaching and learning for pupils with learning difficulties, London: David Fulton.

[21]. Carpentier, V., & Lall, M. (2005). Review of successful parental involvement practice for 'hard to reach' parents. London, Institution of Education, University of London.

[22]. Case, S. (2000). Refocusing on the Parent: what are the social issues of concern for parents of disabled children? Disability and Society. 15, 271-292.

[23]. Center For Educational Research and Innovation. (1997). Parents as partners in schooling. Paris, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).

[24]. Christenson, S. L. (1992). Family Factors and Student Achievement: An Avenue to Increase Students' Success. School Psychology Quarterly. 7, 178-206.

[25]. Crozier, G. (2000). Parents and Schools: partners or protagonists? British Journal of Educational Studies. 50, 401.

[26]. Crozier, G. (2001). Excluded Parents: The Deracialisation of Parental Involvement. Race Ethnicity and Education. 4, 329-41.

[27]. Cunningham, C., & Davis, H. (1985). Working with parents: frameworks for collaboration. Children with special needs series. Milton Keynes, Open University Press.

[29]. Davies, D. (1988). Benefits and barriers to parent involvement. Community Education Research Digest, 2(2), 11-19

[30]. Davies, S., & Hall, D. (2005). "Contact A Family": professionals and parents in partnership. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 90, 1053-1057.

[31]. Des (1967). Children and their Primary Schools (The Plowden Report). London: HMSO.

[32]. Desimone, L. (1999). Linking parent involvement with student achievements: do race and income matter?, Journal of Educational Research, 93(1), 11–30.

[33]. Deslandes, R., & Bertrand, R. (2005). Motivation of parent involvement in secondary-level schooling. Journal of Educational Research, 98(3), 164–175.

[34]. Dfes (2001). Special Educational Needs Code of Practice, London: DfES.

[35]. DfES (2003). Every Child Matters. London: The Stationery Office.

[36]. DfES (2004). Removing Barriers to Achievement—the Government's Strategy for Special Educational Needs. London: DfES.

[37]. Dfes/doh (2003). Together from the Start: Practical guidance for professionals working with young disabled children (birth to third birthday) and their families, Nottingham: DfES Publications.

[38]. Docking, J. W. (1990). Primary schools and parents: rights, responsibilities and relationships. London, Hodder and Stoughton.

[39]. Dunn, J. (1998). Young children's understanding of other people: evidence from observations within the family. In: M.WOODHEAD, D.FAULKNER ., & K.LITTLETON (eds) Cultural Worlds of Early Childhood. London: Routledge.

[40]. Dunst, C. J., Trivette, C. M., & Deal, A. G. (1988). Enabling and empowering families: principles and guidelines for practice. Cambridge, MA, Brookline Books.

[41]. Gascoigne, E. (1995). Working with parents as partners in SEN. Home and school--a working alliance. London, David Fulton Publishers.

Great Britain, & Warnock, M. (1978). Special educational needs: report of the Committee of Enquiry into the Education of Handicapped Children and Young People. London, H.M. Stationery Off.

[43]. Green, L. (1970). Parents and teachers: partners or rivals? London, Allen, Unwin.

[44]. Griffith, J. (1996). Relation of parental involvement, empowerment and school traits to student academic performance, Journal of Educational Research, 90(1), 33–41.

[45]. Halsey, P. A. (2005). Parent involvement in junior high schools: A failure to communicate. American Secondary Education, 34(1), 57–69.

[46]. Harris, A., & Goodall, J. (2007). Engaging parents in raising achievement do parents know they matter? : a research project commissioned by the Specialist Schools and Academies Trust. Research report (Great Britain. Dept. for Children, Schools and Families), DCSF-RW004. [London], Department for Children, Schools and Families. http://www.dcsf.gov.uk/research/data/uploadfiles/DCSFRW004. pdf.

[47]. Harris, A., & Goodall, J. (2008). Do parents know they matter? Engaging all parents in learning. Educational Research. 50, 277-289.

[48]. Hill, C. (2000). A Paediatrician's perspective. In: A. WHEAL, ed. Working with parents: learning from other people's experience. Lyme Regis, Dorset, Russell House Pub, pp. 143-152.

[49]. Hornby, G. (2000). Improving parental involvement. Cassell education. London, Cassell.

[50]. Hornby, G. (1995). The special educational needs coordinator's handbook: a guide for implementing the code of practice. London, Routledge.

[51]. Horowitz, A., & Bronte-tinkew, J. (2007). Building, Engaging, and Supporting Family and Parental Involvement in Out-of-School Time Programs. Researchto- Results Brief. Publication #2007-16. Child Trends.

[52]. Keyes, C. R. (2000). Parent-Teacher Partnerships: A Theoretical Approach for Teachers. For full text: http://ericeece.org/pubs/books/katzsym/keyes.pdf.

[53]. Lareau, A. (1989). Home advantage. Philadelphia, [53]. Lareau, A. (1989). Home advantage. Philadelphia,

[54]. Lucyshyn, J., Dunlap, G., & Albin, R. W. (2002). Families, family life, and positive behavior support: Addressing the challenge of problem behaviors in family contexts. Baltimore: Brookes

[55]. Macleod-brudenell, I. (2004). Advanced early years care and education. Oxford, Heinemann Educational.

[56]. Mcgaw, S. (1997). Practical support for parents with learning disabilities. In J. O'Hara & A. Sperlinger (Eds.), Adults with Learning Disabilities: A Practical Approach for Health Professionals (pp. 123-138). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

[57]. Mubarak, R. (1997). Helping mothers of young children with Cerebral Palsy in Bangladesh, Unpublished Master's Thesis, Centre for International Health, Institute of Child Health, University College of London, Sept.

[58]. Muller, C. (1998). Gender Differences in Parental Involvement and Adolescents ' Mathematics Achievement. Sociology of Education. 71, 336-56.

[59]. Ofsted (2001). Evaluating Educational Inclusion: guidance for inspectors and schools. London: OFSTED.

[60]. Oliver, M., & Barnes, C. (1998). Disabled people and social policy: from exclusion to inclusion. Longman social policy in Britain series. London, Longman.

[61]. Paige-smith, A. (1997). The Rise and Impact of the Parental Lobby: including Voluntary Groups and the Education of Children with Learning Difficulties or Disabilities. In S. WOLFENDALE (ed.) Working with Parents of SEN Children after the Code of Practice. London: David Fulton.

[62]. Pugh, G., & De'ath, E. (1989). Working towards partnership in the early years. London, National Children's Bureau.

[63]. Rescher, N. (1998). Predicting the future: an introduction to the theory of forecasting. Albany, State University of New York Press.

[64]. Russell, F. (2003). The Expectations of Parents of Disabled Children. British Journal of Special Education. 30, 144-49.

[65]. Russell, F. (2004). Partnership with parents of disabled children in research? Journal of Research In Special Educational Needs. 4, 74-81.

[66]. Shanahan, T., Mulhern, M., & Rodriguez-brown, F. (1995). Project FLAME: Lessons learned from a family literacy program for linguistic minority families. Reading Teacher. 48, 586.

[67]. Sheldon, S. B. (2003). Linking school-familycommunity partnerships in urban elementary schools to student achievement on state tests. The Urban Review, 35(2), 149–165.

[68]. Sheldon, S. B., & Epstein, J. L. (2005). Involvement Counts: Family and Community Partnerships and Mathematics Achievement. Journal of Educational Research. 98, 196.

[69]. Stevenson Dl, & Baker Dp. (1987). The family-school relation and the child's school performance. Child Development. 58, 1348-57.

[70]. Thurtle V, Cordle D, & Phillips N. (2003). Evaluation of a child development centre in a rural area. British Journal of Community Nursing. 8, 28-35.

[71]. Topping, K. (1996). Tutoring systems for family literacy. In: S. WOLFENDALE & K. TOPPING (Eds) Family involvement in literacy (London, Cassell).

[72]. Vincent, C. & Martin, J. (2000). School-based parents' groups a politics of voice and representation?, Journal of Education Policy, 15(5), 459–480.

[73]. Vincent, C. (1996). Parents and teachers: power and participation. London, Falmer Press.

[74]. Waller, W. (1961). The sociology of teaching. New York, Russell & Russell.

[75]. Wearmouth, J. (2004). Issues in Addressing Children's Difficulties in Literacy Development through Family-School Partnerships. Curriculum Journal. 15, 5-17.

[76]. White, K. R., Taylor, M. J., & Moss, V. D. (1992). Does Research Support Claims About the Benefits of Involving Parents in Early Intervention Programs? Review Of Educational Research. 62, 91.

[77]. Wolfendale, S. (1983). Parental participation in children's development and education. Special aspects of education, V. 3. New York, Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.

[78]. Wolfendale, S. (2000). Special needs in the early years: prospects for policy and practice, Support for Learning, 15 (4), 147?151.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Effects of Direct Instruction Rewards Program Strategies to Teach Separation Of Complex Words To Two High School Students with Disabilities

Lauren Mullaney* , Megan Baker, Katie Rutherford*, Jennifer Neyman**, T. F. McLaughlin*, Susan Stookey****

* University of Oregon, Eugene

*Aurora Public Schools, Aurora,Colorado..

_**_*_**** Gonzaga University.

Mullaney, L., Baker, M., Rutherford, K., Neyman, J. , McLaughlin ,T. F., and Stookey , S. (2014). Effects of Direct Instruction Rewards® Program Strategies to Teach Separation of Complex Words to Two High School Students with Disabilities. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 7(4), 12-18. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.7.4.2652

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of the Direct Instruction REWARDS® program on reading complex words of two fifteen-year-old boys in a reading resource room. Both participants had difficulty in reading and were diagnosed as learning disabled. During baseline, both participants had difficulty in syllabication. The results showed that through the REWARDS® program and by promoting generalization in phonemic reading, the program was successful and efficient. The students had stated that they felt more comfortable towards the end of the intervention with the ® REWARDS® program and produced large improvements in reading. The benefits of employing REWARDS were also discussed in this paper.

References

[1]. Adams, G., & Engelmann, S. (1996). Research on Direct Instruction: 25 years beyond DISTAR. Seattle, WA: Educational Achievement Systems.

[2]. Archer, A. L., Gleason, M. M., & Vachon, V. L. (2000). REWARDS®: Reading Excellence-word Attack And Rate Development Strategies- Multi-syllabic Word Reading Strategies. Seattle, WA: Sopris West.

[3]. Archer, A. L., Gleason, M. M., & Vachon, V. L. (2003). Archer, A. L., Gleason, M. M., & Vachon, V. L. (2003). Decoding and fluency: Foundation skills for struggling older readers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26, 89-101.

[4]. Blackwell, A., Stookey, S., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1996). The effects of using direct instruction and a re-reading contingency with precision teaching. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 13(2), 19-22.

[5]. Braze, D., Tabor, W., Shankweiler, D. P., & Mencl, W. E. (2007). Speaking up for vocabulary: Reading skill differences in young adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 226-243.

[6]. Gregory, A., McLaughlin, T. F., Weber, K. P., & Stookey, S., (2005). The effects of using direct instruction and a rereading contingency with a high school student. International Journal of Special Education, 20(1), 50-54. Retrieved from: http://www.internationaljournalofspeciale ducation.com/issues.cfm

[7]. Grossen, B. (2004). Success of a direct instruction model at a secondary level school with high-risk students. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 20, 161-178.

[8]. Holz, K. R., Peck, S. M., McLaughlin, T. F., & Stookey, S. (1996). The effects of using Direct Instruction reading and a re-reading contingency coupled with a reward and praise contingency with a high school sophomore. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 14 (1), 35- 40.

[9]. Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd. ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

[10]. McLaughlin, T. F. (1983). An examination and evaluation of single subject designs used in behavior analysis research in school settings. Educational Research Quarterly, 7, 35-42.

[11]. McLaughlin, T. F., Williams, B. F., Williams, R. L., Peck S. M., Derby K. M., Bjordahl J. M., Weber, K. P. (1999). Behavioral training for teachers in special education: The Gonzaga University program. Behavioral Interventions, 14, 83-134.

[12]. Moats, L. (2001). When older kids can't read. Educational Leadership, 58(6), 36-40.

[13]. Shippen, M. E., Houchins, D. E., Steventon, C., & Sartor, D. (2005). A comparison of two direct instruction reading programs for urban middle school students. Remedial and Special Education, 26(3), 175-182.

[14]. Snel, M. J., Terwel, J., Aarnoutse, C. A. J., & van Leeuwe, J. F. J. (2012). Effectiveness of guided coconstruction versus direct instruction for beginning reading instruction. Educational Research and Evaluation, 18, 353-374.

[15]. Vachon V., Gleason, M. M., Archer, A. L. (2001). The REWARDS® ® program. Seattle, WA: Voyagor-Sopris Learning.

[16]. Watkins, C. L. (1997). Project Follow Through: A case study of contingencie[1]. s influencing instructional practices of the educational establishment. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Effects of Employing the Text, SRA Decoding Strategies on the Word Recognition for a High School Student with Learning Disabilities

Alyson Lykken* , Julie Wakeman, Jennifer Neyman, T. F. McLaughlin, Kim Zumwalt

---Gonzaga University.

*Spokane Public School.

Lykken, A., Wakeman, J., Neyman, J., McLaughlin, T., & Zumwalt, K. (2014). Effects of Employing the Text, SRA Decoding Strategies on the Word Recognition for a High School Student with Learning Disabilities. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 7(4), 19-24. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.7.4.2653

Abstract

An objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of employing the SRA Decoding Strategies text on word recognition for a ninth grade male with a learning disability. The student was enrolled in a high school special education resource room in a large urban school district in the Pacific North west in a direct instruction reading resource room. A multiple baseline design across three sets of sight words was used to test the effectiveness of the decoding program. The overall results indicated that the program worked well with the participant. The decoding strategies generalized to novel words for which he had not received any training. The efficacy of employing direct instruction procedures with high school students with learning disabilities was discussed in this paper.

References

[1]. Adams, G., L., & Engelmann, S. (1996). Research on Direct Instruction: 25 Years beyond DISTAR. Seattle, WA: Education Achievement Systems.

[2]. Blackwell, A., Stookey, S., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1996). The effects of using direct instruction and a re-reading contingency with precision teaching. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 13(2), 19-22.

[3]. Cunningham, A. C., & Stanovich, K. E. (2001). What reading does for the mind. Journal of Direct Instruction, 1, 137–149.

[4]. Engelmann, S. (2000). About reading—A comparison of Reading Mastery and Horizons. Effective School Practices, 18(3), 15-26.

[5]. Engelmann, S., & Hanner, S., (1995). Reading mastery III. Worthington, OH: SRA Macmillian/McGraw-Hill.

[6]. Engelmann, S., Meyer, L., Carnine, L., Becker, W., Eisele, J., & Johnson, G. (1999). SRA Decoding strategies (DI Decoding Student Book) (3rd. ed.). Boston, MA: SRA/McGraw–Hill.

[7]. Gregory, A., McLaughlin, T. F., Weber, K. P., & Stookey, S., (2005). The effects of using direct instruction and a rereading contingency with a high school student. International Journal of Special Education, 20(1), 50-54. Retrieved from: http://www.internationaljournalofspecial education.com/issues.cfm

[9]. Jitendra, A. K., Cole, C. L., Hoppes, M. K., & Wilson, B. (1998). Effects of a direct instruction main idea summarization program and self-monitoring on reading comprehension of middle school students with learning disabilities. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 14, 379-387.

[10]. Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd. ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

[11]. Lynch, J. (2009). Print literacy engagement of parents from low-income backgrounds: Implications for adult and family literacy programs. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy,52, 509-521.

[12]. McLaughlin, T. F. (1983). An examination and evaluation of single subject designs used in behavior analysis research in school settings. Educational Research Quarterly, 7, 35-42.

[13]. McLaughlin, T. F., Williams, B. F., Williams, R. L., Peck, S. M., Derby, K. M., Bjordahl, J. M., & Weber, K. M. (1999). Behavioral training for teachers in special education: The Gonzaga University program. Behavioral Interventions, 14, 83-134.

[14]. Shippen, M. E., Houchins, D. E., Steventon, C., & Sartor, D. (2005). A comparison of two direct instruction reading programs for urban middle school students. Remedial and Special Education, 26, 175-182.

[15]. Swanson, H. L., Hoskyn, M., & Lee, C. (1999). Interventions for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of treatment outcomes. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

[16]. Torgesen, J. (2000). Individual differences in response to early interventions in reading: The lingering problem of treatment resisters. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15, 55–64.

[17]. U.S. Department of Education, National Institute of Literacy. (2013). U.S. Literacy Statistics. [Data File]. Retrieved from: http://www.statisticbrain.com/number-ofamerican- adults-who-cant-read/

[18]. Lerner, J., & Johns, B. (2011) Learning disabilities and related mild disabilities: Characteristics, teaching strategies, and new directions. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.

[19]. Greenwood, C. R. (1996). Research on the practices and behaviors of effective teachers the Juniper Gardens Children's Project: Implications for education of diverse learners. In D. L. Speece & B. K. Keogh (Eds.). Research on classroom ecologies: Implications for inclusion of children with learning disabilities (pp. 39-67). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates Publishers.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

A Study to Assess the Achievement Motivation of Higher Secondary Students In Relation to their Noise Sensitivity

Premalatha Jayachandra*

Assistant Professor, Christian College of Nursing, Neyyoor, Tamil Nadu, India.

Latha , P.(2014). A Study to Assess The Achievement Motivation of Higher Secondary Students in Relation to Their Noise Sensitivity. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 7(4), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.7.4.2654

Abstract

Disturbing sounds are often referred to as noise, and if extreme enough in degree, intensity or frequency, it is referred to as noise pollution. Achievement refers to a change in study behavior in relation to their noise sensitivity and learning in the educational sense by achieving results in changed responses to certain types of stimuli like noise sensitivity.It is the more specialized skills which are taught in school which depends greatly both on the effectiveness of instruction and practised on the students interest. This study is an attempt to explore the relationship between achievement motivation and noise sensitivity of higher secondary students. Data were collected from 200 Higher Secondary students which was selected through stratified random sampling from four schools in Kanyakumari District through questionnaire. Data were collected through survey method and were analyzed with the help of descriptive, correlational and regression analysis. Findings revealed that the achievement motivation of Higher Secondary students are highly related to their noise sensitivity and student with a positive attitude to the noise sensitivity tend to develop a high achievement motivation.

References

[1]. Belojevic G, Jakovljevic B, Slepcevic V. (2003). Noise and mental performance : Personality attributes and noise sensitivity. Noise Health ;6:77-89.

[2]. Ekehammar B and Dornic S (1990). Weinstein's noise sensitivity scale: reliability and construct validity. Percept Mot Skills, 70: 129-130

[3]. Gollowitzer, (1999). American Psychological Association Vol.54 No.7, Pg. 493 – 503.

[4]. James Williams, (1997). Educational Psychology, Pg.140

[5]. Karim Zimmer (1999). Journal of Environmental Psychology Volume 19, Issue 3, September Pgs 295–302

[6]. Kothari, C.R. (1999). Hand Book of Research Methodology, WishwaPrakashan Publications, New Delhi.

[7]. Leboyer (2003). Noise and mental performance : Personality attributes and noise sensitivity Vol. : 6, Issue 21, Pgs 77 - 89

[8]. P.S.S. Sunder Rao, Dr. Ph& J. Richard, (2003). An Introduction to Bio-Statistics A Manual for students in health education 3rd edition, Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi.

[9]. Polit D.F and Hungler B.P., (1999). Nursing Research, Principles and methods 5th edition, J.P. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia.

[10]. Shah, Beena, (1988). Development of Achievement Motivation Scale. Indian Journal of Psychometry& Education, Vol. 19(1), Jan, 35-40.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Constructivist Approach to Teacher Education: An Integrative Model for Reflective Teaching

S. N. Vijaya Kumari *

Associate Professor of Education, St. Ann's Cllege of Education(Autonomous), Mangalore University, Mangalore-575001.

Kumari , V. S.N. (2014). Constructivist Approach To Teacher Education: An Integrative Model For Reflective Teaching. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 7(4), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.7.4.2655

Abstract

The theory of constructivism states that learning is non-linear, recursive, continuous, complex and relational – Despite the difficulty of deducing constructivist pedagogy from constructivist theories, there are models and common elements to consider in planning new program. Reflective activities are a common feature of all the programs of constructivist Teacher Education .It is used at both Pre-service and In-service level of Teacher Education. Several studies have proved that, critical reflection upon experience continues to be an effective technique for professional development. The paper discussing the nature of constructivist approach to teacher education emphasizes the role of reflective activities in teacher training. Based on the results of the research reviews in the field of constructivist teacher education and reflective teaching, the findings of the study strongly suggests the integration of reflective teaching practice in the preservice teacher education curriculum and suggests a proposed integrative model for reflective teaching. The study investigated the effects of different methods of teaching science on the achievement, basic science process and skills and scientific attitude of standard six pupils with different achievement levels. The study revealed that methods have differential effects on different contexts, that is, different pre-achievement levels. These differences were due to differences in the process variables. The study suggests that to implement any method, the context needs to be considered for its effectiveness and hence student-teachers need to be trained in analyzing their teaching in terms of context variables to establish relationship between presage-context-process-product so that the student teacher can improve his/her teaching as a student and develop transformation learning as a professional. In this study effectiveness of these three methods on achievement, scientific attitude and basic science process skills were found out by establishing fidelity of each method. This could be done effectively through reflective teaching training. Hence the findings imply that student teachers need to be trained in reflective teaching so that they will be familiar with the different approaches of reflective teaching and tools and techniques used for observing and analyzing classroom interaction and improve upon their teaching skills.

References

[1]. Brooks, J.G., & Brooks, M. (2005). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classroom. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

[2]. Byo, S.J. (1999). Classroom teachers' and music specialist's perceived ability to implement the national standards for music education, Arts Education policy Review. 101 (5), 30 -35

[3]. Chaille, C. (2008). Constructivism across the curriculum: Big ideas as inspiration. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Allyn & Bacon

[4]. Darling – Hammond, L (2000). How teacher education matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 51 (3), 166-173 [5]. Flynn, P. (2005). Applying Standards based Constructivism: A two step guide for motivating elementary students. Larchmont, NY: Eye on Education.

[6]. Ghaith G., and Shaaban, K. (1999). The relationship between perceptions of teaching concerns, teacher efficiency and selected teacher characteristics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 487-496.

[7]. Gibbs G. (1988). Learning by Doing: A guide to teaching and learning methods. Further education. Unit Oxford Brokers University, Oxford.

[8]. Iredale, R. (1996). The significance of Teacher Education for International Education Development, In C. Brock (Ed.) Global Perspectives on teacher education (pp. 9-18) Oxfordshire: Triange Books.

[9]. Lieberman A. and Miller, L. (1999). Teachers Transforming their world and their work. New York: Teacher College Press. Little, J. Inside Teacher Community: Representations of Classroom practice Teacher College Record, 105 (6), 913-945.

[10]. Nonda Vijaya Kumari S. (2002). Effects of Different Methods of Teaching Science on the Achievement, Basic Science Process Skills and Scientific Attitude of Pupils with Different Achievement Levels, (Doctoral Dissertation), SNDT Women's University, Mumbai.

[11]. Rainer Dangel J. & Gruton E. (2004). The Emerging picture of Constructivist Teacher Education” The Constructivist Fall 2004, Vol. No. 15, No. 1.

[12]. Rainer, J. (Ed.) (2002). Reframing Teacher Education: Dimensions of a constructivist approach. Dubuque, IA: Kendal Hunts.

[13]. Richardson, V. (1997). Constructivist Teacher Education: Building a world of new understandings. London: Falmer Press.

[14]. Schon, D.a. (Ed.) (1993). The reflective Turn: Case studies in and on educational practice. New York Teachers College Press.

[15]. Simons, P.R.J. (1993). Constructive Language: The Role of Learner, In T.M. Oreffy, J. Lowyek & D.H. Jonassen (Eds). Designing environments for constructivist learning (pp 291-31). Berlin: New York: Springer – Velag. Student teachers' changing perceptions to their subject matter competence during an initial teacher training programme, Educational Research, 35 (1), 89-95

[16]. Temmerman, N (1997). An investigation of undergraduate music education curriculum content in primary teacher education programmes in Australia. International Journal of Music Education, 30, 26-34

[17]. Wood T. (1995). From Alternative espistemologies to practice in education: Rethinking what it means to teach and learn. In L. Sleffe & J. Gale (Eds.), Constructivism in education, (p.331-340). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[18]. UNESCO(1996) Learning the Treasure Within. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: Paris, France.

[19].Han E.P.(1995). Reflection is essential in teacher education. Child Education,51(4).228.

[20]. Kettle,B.B. Sellars,N.(1996). The development of student teachers practical theory of teaching, Teaching and Teacher Education,12(1),1-24.

[21]. Ojanen,S.(1993). A process in which personal pedagogical knowledge is created through he teacher education experience. Paper presented at the international Confeence in Education , Tel - Aviv,Israel.ED398200.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Review Paper

In Pursuit of Effective Schools: From Western Perspective

Anamika Rai* , Anand Prakash**

* Research Fellow, Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India..

** Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.

Rai , A., and Prakash, A. (2014). In Pursuit of Effective Schools: From Western Perspective. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 7(4), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.7.4.2656

Abstract

This review paper begins by asking what makes few schools outstanding. What makes them successful? What have we learned from last two decades of studying School Effectiveness (SE)? To answer those questions, this paper attempts to identify the patterns and trends of Studying School effectiveness from western perspective. The main purpose of this review study was to understand and fix the criteria of assessing SE. A brief literature review was carried out to bring those factors that contribute SE. The focus is on the substantive findings that emerged from the review. Literature gives an insight that educationists have given more importance to enrolment, retention, and dropout rates, whereas many have viewed SE in terms of classroom pedagogy or teaching and learning, the content aspect etc. The large section of effectiveness studies have focused exclusively on students' cognitive outcomes in the areas such as reading, mathematics or public examination results. However, there is less evidence about the studies on school processes indicators that are important in determining the schools' success. The results from reviewed literature reveals that many SE factors, three broad key process indicators have found to be the most frequent ones, i.e. effective leadership of school heads, positive school culture and environment of teaching and learning. The critical perspective of previous literature are useful in understanding how this set of key variables as a whole defines the quality of schools at all levels. Finally, it provides few recommendations for policy development to bring about improvement.

References

[1]. Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industry, military, and educational impact. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

[2]. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. NY: Harper and Row.

[3]. Brighouse, T. and Tomlinson, J. (1991). Successful schools. London: Institute of Public Policy Research.

[4]. Cameron, K. S. and Whetten, D. A. (1983). Organizational effectiveness: A comparison of multiple models. New York: Academic Press.

[5]. Cameron, K. S. and Ettington, D. R. (1988). The conceptual foundations of organizational culture. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, eds. J. C. Smart, pp. 356-396. New York: Agathon Press.

[6]. Cameron, K. S. and Whetten, D. A. (1996). Organizational effectiveness and quality: the second generation. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research, 11 eds, 265-306. New York: Agathon Press. http://webuser.bus.umich.edu/cameronk/PDFs/Organizat ional%20Effectiveness/Org%20Effectiveness%20Quality. pdf

[7]. Cheng, Y. C. (1993). Conceptualization and measurement of school effectiveness: An organizational perspective, Atlanta: AERA paper.

[8]. Cheng, Y. C. (1996). School effectiveness and schoolbased management: A mechanism for development. London, Washington, D. C. The Falmer Press.

[9]. Cohen, M. (1983). Instructional management and social conditions in effective schools, School finance and school improvement, Linkages in 1980s, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.

[10]. Coleman, J.S. et al. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity, Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.

[11]. Creemers, B. (1994). The effective classroom. London. New York, NY: Routledge.

[12]. Hoy, W. K. and Miskel, C. G. (1991). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice, 4th ed. New York: Random House.

[13]. Hoy, W. K. and Miskel, C. G. (1996). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice, 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

[14]. Iordanides, G., Lazaridou, A., and Babaliki, M. (2011). The principal's role in achieving school effectiveness , Conference paper . http://www.icsei.net/icsei2011/ Full%20Papers/0043.pdf

[15]. Mestry, R. and Grobler, B. R. (2004). The training and development of principals in managing schools effectively, Education as Change, 7(2): 126-146.

[16]. Mortimore, P., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Lewis, D. and Ecob, R. (1988). School matters: The junior years. Wells: Open Books.

[17]. Mott, P. (1972). The characteristics of effective organizations. New York: Harper and Row.

[18]. OFSTED. (1993). Access and achievement in urban education, London: HMSO. www.ofsted.gov.uk/resources/ access-and-achievement-urban-education

[19]. Ozgan, H. and Toprak, M. (2012). Classroom effects on the effectiveness of a school, Journal of Educational and Instructional Studies in the World, 2 (2), 102-109.

[20]. Reynolds, D., Sammons, P., Stoll, L., Barber, M., & Hillman, J. (1996). School effectiveness and school improvement in the United Kingdom. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 7(2), 133–158.

[21]. Reynolds, D. (1997). The study and remediation of ineffective schools: Some further reflections. In L. Stoll and K. Myers (eds.), No Quick Fixes: Perspectives on Schools in Difficulties, Lewes: Falmer Press, pp. 163-174.

[22]. Rutter, M., Maughan, B., Mortimore, P. and Ouston, J. (1979). Fifteen thousand hours: Secondary schools and their effects on children, London: Open Books.

[23]. Rutter, M. (1983). School effects on pupil progress: Research findings and policy implications. Child Development, 54, 1-29.

[24]. Sammons, P. (1999). School effectiveness: Coming of age in the twenty-first century, Swets and Zeitlinger Publishers.

[25]. Sammons, P. Hillman, J. and Mortimore, P. (1995). Key characteristics of effective schools: A review of school effectiveness research, Report by the Institute of Education, University of London, for the Office for Standards in Education, (OFSTED), 1-39.

[26]. Scheerens, J. (1992). Effective schooling: Research, theory and practice, London: Cassell.

[27]. Scheerens, J. (2000). Improving school effectiveness, Fundamentals of educational planning, UNESCO, International Institute for Educational Planning 1-137. http://www.unesco.org/iiep.

[28]. Schein, E.H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

[29]. Schlecty, P. (2005). Shaking up the school house: How to support and sustain educational innovation. Jossey Bass. http://catdir.loc.gov/catdir/samples/ wiley031/00009570.pdf

[30]. Smith, D. and Tomlinson, S. (1990). The school effect. In T. Brighouse and J. Tomlinson, J. 1991. Successful schools. London: Institute of Public Policy Research.

[31]. Steyn, G. M. (2008). The influence of school leadership preparation programmes: Identification of focus areas. South African Journal of Higher Education, 22 (4), 889-905.

[32]. Teddlie, C. and Reynolds, D., (eds) (2000). The international handbook of school effectiveness research. London: Falmer Press.

[33]. Uline, C.L., Miller, D.M., Tschannen-Moran, M. (1998). School effectiveness: The underlying dimensions, Educational Administration Quarterly, 34 (4), 462-483.

[34]. Willms, J.D. (1992). Monitoring school performance: A guide for educators, London: Falmer Press.

i-manager's Journal on Educational Psychology (JPSY)

Current Issue Vol. 17 Issue 3

Most Read

Most Cited

Volume 7 Issue 4 February - April 2014

Challenges to the Concept “Partnership with Parents” in Special Needs Education

Mohaned Ghazi Abed*

* Program of Educational Graduate Studies, King Abdulaziz University, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

Abed , M. (2014). Challenges to the Concept “Partnership with Parents” in special needs Education. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 7(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.7.4.2651

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Effects of Direct Instruction Rewards Program Strategies to Teach Separation Of Complex Words To Two High School Students with Disabilities

Lauren Mullaney* , Megan Baker**, Katie Rutherford***, Jennifer Neyman****, T. F. McLaughlin*****, Susan Stookey******

* University of Oregon, Eugene ***Aurora Public Schools, Aurora,Colorado.. **_****_*****_****** Gonzaga University.

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Effects of Employing the Text, SRA Decoding Strategies on the Word Recognition for a High School Student with Learning Disabilities

Alyson Lykken* , Julie Wakeman**, Jennifer Neyman***, T. F. McLaughlin****, Kim Zumwalt*****

*-**-***-****Gonzaga University. *****Spokane Public School.

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

A Study to Assess the Achievement Motivation of Higher Secondary Students In Relation to their Noise Sensitivity

Premalatha Jayachandra*

Assistant Professor, Christian College of Nursing, Neyyoor, Tamil Nadu, India.

Latha , P.(2014). A Study to Assess The Achievement Motivation of Higher Secondary Students in Relation to Their Noise Sensitivity. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 7(4), 25-30. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.7.4.2654

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Constructivist Approach to Teacher Education: An Integrative Model for Reflective Teaching

S. N. Vijaya Kumari *

Associate Professor of Education, St. Ann's Cllege of Education(Autonomous), Mangalore University, Mangalore-575001.

Kumari , V. S.N. (2014). Constructivist Approach To Teacher Education: An Integrative Model For Reflective Teaching. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 7(4), 31-40. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.7.4.2655

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

In Pursuit of Effective Schools: From Western Perspective

Anamika Rai* , Anand Prakash**

* Research Fellow, Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.. ** Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.

Rai , A., and Prakash, A. (2014). In Pursuit of Effective Schools: From Western Perspective. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 7(4), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.7.4.2656

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Lauren Mullaney* , Megan Baker, Katie Rutherford*, Jennifer Neyman**, T. F. McLaughlin*, Susan Stookey****

* University of Oregon, Eugene

*Aurora Public Schools, Aurora,Colorado..

_**_*_**** Gonzaga University.

Alyson Lykken* , Julie Wakeman, Jennifer Neyman, T. F. McLaughlin, Kim Zumwalt

---Gonzaga University.

*Spokane Public School.

* Research Fellow, Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India..

** Professor, Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.