Effects of Direct Instruction Rewards Program Strategies to Teach Separation Of Complex Words To Two High School Students with Disabilities

Lauren Mullaney*, Megan Baker**, Katie Rutherford***, Jennifer Neyman****, T. F. McLaughlin*****, Susan Stookey******
* University of Oregon, Eugene
***Aurora Public Schools, Aurora,Colorado..
**_****_*****_****** Gonzaga University.
Periodicity:February - April'2014
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.7.4.2652

Abstract

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the effects of the Direct Instruction REWARDS® program on reading complex words of two fifteen-year-old boys in a reading resource room. Both participants had difficulty in reading and were diagnosed as learning disabled. During baseline, both participants had difficulty in syllabication. The results showed that through the REWARDS® program and by promoting generalization in phonemic reading, the program was successful and efficient. The students had stated that they felt more comfortable towards the end of the intervention with the ® REWARDS® program and produced large improvements in reading. The benefits of employing REWARDS were also discussed in this paper.

Keywords

Reading, Rewards®, Syllables, High School, Learning Disabilities, Autism, Phonics, Reading Program

How to Cite this Article?

Mullaney, L., Baker, M., Rutherford, K., Neyman, J. , McLaughlin ,T. F., and Stookey , S. (2014). Effects of Direct Instruction Rewards® Program Strategies to Teach Separation of Complex Words to Two High School Students with Disabilities. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 7(4), 12-18. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.7.4.2652

References

[1]. Adams, G., & Engelmann, S. (1996). Research on Direct Instruction: 25 years beyond DISTAR. Seattle, WA: Educational Achievement Systems.
[2]. Archer, A. L., Gleason, M. M., & Vachon, V. L. (2000). REWARDS®: Reading Excellence-word Attack And Rate Development Strategies- Multi-syllabic Word Reading Strategies. Seattle, WA: Sopris West.
[3]. Archer, A. L., Gleason, M. M., & Vachon, V. L. (2003). Archer, A. L., Gleason, M. M., & Vachon, V. L. (2003). Decoding and fluency: Foundation skills for struggling older readers. Learning Disability Quarterly, 26, 89-101.
[4]. Blackwell, A., Stookey, S., & McLaughlin, T. F. (1996). The effects of using direct instruction and a re-reading contingency with precision teaching. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 13(2), 19-22.
[5]. Braze, D., Tabor, W., Shankweiler, D. P., & Mencl, W. E. (2007). Speaking up for vocabulary: Reading skill differences in young adults. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40, 226-243.
[6]. Gregory, A., McLaughlin, T. F., Weber, K. P., & Stookey, S., (2005). The effects of using direct instruction and a rereading contingency with a high school student. International Journal of Special Education, 20(1), 50-54. Retrieved from: http://www.internationaljournalofspeciale ducation.com/issues.cfm
[7]. Grossen, B. (2004). Success of a direct instruction model at a secondary level school with high-risk students. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 20, 161-178.
[8]. Holz, K. R., Peck, S. M., McLaughlin, T. F., & Stookey, S. (1996). The effects of using Direct Instruction reading and a re-reading contingency coupled with a reward and praise contingency with a high school sophomore. Journal of Precision Teaching and Celeration, 14 (1), 35- 40.
[9]. Kazdin, A. E. (2011). Single case research designs: Methods for clinical and applied settings (2nd. ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
[10]. McLaughlin, T. F. (1983). An examination and evaluation of single subject designs used in behavior analysis research in school settings. Educational Research Quarterly, 7, 35-42.
[11]. McLaughlin, T. F., Williams, B. F., Williams, R. L., Peck S. M., Derby K. M., Bjordahl J. M., Weber, K. P. (1999). Behavioral training for teachers in special education: The Gonzaga University program. Behavioral Interventions, 14, 83-134.
[12]. Moats, L. (2001). When older kids can't read. Educational Leadership, 58(6), 36-40.
[13]. Shippen, M. E., Houchins, D. E., Steventon, C., & Sartor, D. (2005). A comparison of two direct instruction reading programs for urban middle school students. Remedial and Special Education, 26(3), 175-182.
[14]. Snel, M. J., Terwel, J., Aarnoutse, C. A. J., & van Leeuwe, J. F. J. (2012). Effectiveness of guided coconstruction versus direct instruction for beginning reading instruction. Educational Research and Evaluation, 18, 353-374.
[15]. Vachon V., Gleason, M. M., Archer, A. L. (2001). The REWARDS® ® program. Seattle, WA: Voyagor-Sopris Learning.
[16]. Watkins, C. L. (1997). Project Follow Through: A case study of contingencie[1]. s influencing instructional practices of the educational establishment. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Center for Behavioral Studies.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.