i-manager Publications

i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology (JET)

Current Issue Vol. 21 Issue 2

Preventing Teacher and Counselor Burnout: Self-Care in Training Programs
A Study of Intervention Math Labs and STAAR Math Growth Scores in a South Texas Rural Middle School
Turkish EFL Teachers' Perceptions of their Pedagogical Digital Competence in an EFL Setting
Brief Report: Targeting the Social Communication Skills of an Autistic Adolescent with a Co-Occurring ADHD Diagnosis using Two Formats of a Social Story
The Effectiveness of GeoGebra Assisted Learning on Students' Mathematical Representation: A Meta-Analysis Study

Most Cited

Volume 16 Issue 2 July - September 2019

Research Paper

Characteristics of Leading Groups on a Professional Social Network

Smadar Bar-Tal* , Tami Seifert**

* Center for Innovation and Excellence in Teaching, Levinsky College, Israel.

** Kibbutzim College of Education, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Bar-Tal, S., and Seifert, T. (2019). Characteristics of Leading Groups on a Professional Social Network. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 16(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.16.2.15043

Abstract

"Shluvim" is a professional social network (hereinafter: PSN) in Israel. It serves as a space for educational professionals to collaborate and share knowledge, empower their professional development and receive emotional support. The authors aimed to characterize the groups operating in this network and the role played by the groups' leaders over the first four years of its operation, investigating motives for the groups' creation and the extent of group activity and created a model for policymakers and members of PSNs. Qualitative-phenomenological and quantitative data gathered from 16 semi-structured interviews, and a focus group indicated different rates of participation in the groups, distinguishing open and closed groups and identifying motives for their creation. The findings indicate the importance of social networking groups for members' personal and professional development, the importance of the group managers' activity, and reasons for a group's success or failure. Group members' were informed on the recommendations for successful group management.

References

[1]. Amin, A., & Roberts, J. (2008). Knowing in action: Beyond communities of practice. Research Policy, 37(2), 353-369.

[2]. Boyd, D. (2014). It's complicated: The social lives of networked teens. Connecticut, New Haven: Yale University Press.

[3]. Brown, R. E. (2001). The process of communitybuilding in distance learning classes. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 18-35.

[4]. Collison, G., Elbaum, B., Haavind, S., & Tinker, R. (2000). Facilitating online learning: Effective strategies for moderators. Madison, WI: Atwood Publishing.

[5]. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2017). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5^th Ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

[6]. Dreyfus, H. & Dreyfus, S., (1986). Mind over machine. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Education.

[7]. Ely, M., Vinz, R., Downing, M. & Anzul, M., (2001). On writing qualitative research: Living by words. London: Falmer Press.

[8]. Gairín-Sallán, J., Rodríguez-Gómez, D., & Armengol- Asparó, C. (2010). Who exactly is the moderator? A consideration of online knowledge management network moderation in educational organisations. Computers and Education, 55 (1), 304-312.

[9]. Garrison, R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical Inquir y in a text-based environment: computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87-105.

[10]. Gattiker, U. E. (2010). Why social networking groups fail.

[11]. Geertz, C., (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books Inc. Publishers.

[12]. Gray, B. (2004). Informal learning in an online community of practice. Journal of Distance, 19(1), 20-35.

[13]. Greenhow, C., Robelia, E., & Hughes, J. (2009). Research on learning and teaching with Web 2.0: Bridging conversations. Educational Researcher, 38(4), 280-283.

[14]. Gruda, D., McCleskey, J., & Berrios, R. (2018). Seems fair to me: Dyadic leader consensus mediates fairness and group performance. Small Group Research, 49(2), 195-225.

[15]. Hemmasi, M., & Csanda, C.M. (2009). The effectiveness of communities of practice: An empirical study. Journal of Managerial Issues. 21(2), 262-279.

[16]. Honeychurch, S., Bozkurt, A., Singh, L., & Koutropoulos, A. (2017). Learners on the periphery: Lurkers as invisible learners. European Journal of Open Distance and E- learning, 20(1),191-211.

[17]. Horrigan, J. B., & Rainie, L. (2001). Online communities: Networks that nurture long-distance relationships and local ties. Pew Internet and American Life Project.

[18]. Iriberri A., & Leroy, G. (2009). A life-cycle perspective on online community success. ACM Computing Surveys CSUR, 41(2), 11.

[19]. John, N. A. (2012). Sharing and Web 2.0: The emergence of a keyword. New Media and Society.15(2), 167-182.

[20]. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.

[21]. Keeves, J.P. (1988). Educational inspect methodology, as good as measurement: An international handbook. Oxford: Pergamon Press.

[22]. Kim, A. J. (2000). Community building on the web: Secret strategies for successful online communities. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc.

[23]. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

[24]. Lev-On, A., & Hardin, R. (2008). Internet-based collaborations and their political significance. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 4(2), 5-27.

[25]. Lin, F. R., & Huang, H. Y. (2013). Why people share knowledge in virtual communities? The use of Yahoo! Kimo Knowledge+ as an example. Internet Research, 23(2), 133-159.

[26]. Luan, K., Rico, R., Xie, X. Y., & Zhang, Q. (2016). Collective team identification and external learning. Small Group Research, 47(4), 384-405.

[27]. Mazman, S. G. & Usluel, Y. K. (2010). Modeling educational usage of Facebook. Computers and Education, 55(2), 444-453.

[28]. McDermott, R. (1999). Nurturing three-dimensional communities of practice. Knowledge Management Review, 26-29.

[29]. Rennie, F., & Morrison, T. (2012). E-learning and social networking handbook: Resources for higher education. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.

[30]. Ridings, C. M., & Gefen, D. (2004). Virtual community attraction: Why people hang out online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(1).

[31]. Salmon, G. (2000). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online. London: Kogan Page

[32]. Salmon, G. (2002). E-tivities: The key to active online learning. London: Kogan Page.

[33]. Sayan, H. (2016). Affecting higher students' learning activity by using Whatsapp. European Journal of Research and Reflection in Educational Sciences, 4(3), 88-93.

[34]. Seidman, I. E., (1998). Interviewing as qualitative research. New York: Teachers College Press.

[35]. Shluvim (n.d.). The professional-social network of the MofeT Institute.

[36]. Shoop, M. C. (2009). Public service employees experience in communities of practice (Doctoral dissertation) Antioch University, Ohio.

[37]. Tirado-Morueta, R., Maraver-López, P., & Hernando-Gómez, Á. (2017). Patterns of participation and social connections in online discussion forums. Small Group Research, 48(6), 639-664.

[38]. Weller, M. (2007). The distance from isolation: Why communities are the logical conclusion in e-learning. Computers & Education, 49(2), 148-159.

[39]. Wisker, G., (2008). The postgraduate research handbook. Palgrave Study Guides (2^nd Ed.). Basingstoke: palgrave.

[40]. Yin, R. K., (2008). Case study research: Design and methods (4^th Ed.). London: Sage Publishers.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Student Interactions with Prerequisite Knowledge Tools: How Students’ Daily-Usage Patterns Can Inform Pedagogy in Calculus I

James Folkestad * , Mary E. Pilgrim , Ben Sencindiver *, Priya Harindranathan ****

* School of Education, Colorado State University, USA.

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, San Diego State University, USA.

* Department of Mathematics at Colorado State University, USA.

**** Center for the Analytics of Learning and Teaching (C-ALT), Colorado State University, USA.

Folkestad, J. E., Pilgrim, M. E., Sencindiver, B., and Harindranathan, P. (2019). Student Interactions with Prerequisite Knowledge Tools: How Students’ Daily-Usage Patterns Can Inform Pedagogy in Calculus I. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 16(2), 14-34. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.16.2.15799

Abstract

Many factors play a role in a students' learning experience, but students' course interaction behaviors are particularly important toward fostering success. Instructors build learning tools (such as videos, online quizzes, etc.) that provide students with the opportunity to extend their learning outside the classroom. These tools require students to self-regulate their learning behaviors, taking initiative to incorporate them into their study routine. However, measuring how students actually use the tools is a challenge. In this paper, online tools were designed around Precalculus content and tested in the first two weeks of a introductory calculus course. Our intent was to identify students who may or may not be engaged in behaviors associated with self-regulation by collecting data on student interaction with online tools. If at-risk students could be identified early in a semester, then it might be possible to intervene in order to change engagement and behaviors. Data was partitioned into behavior-based clusters and interpreted based on course outcomes. This paper discuss about the cluster-based findings in relation to student performance measures and student self-assessments of self-efficacy for learning and performance in the course. This paper concludes with a discussion of how findings may inform pedagogical choices and future study.

References

[1]. Adesope, O. O., Trevisan, D. A., & Sundararajan, N. (2017). Rethinking the use of tests: A meta-analysis of practice testing. Review of Educational Research, 87(3), 659-701.

[2]. Alhadad, S. S. (2018). Visualizing data to support judgement, inference, and decision making in learning analytics: insights from cognitive psychology and visualization science. Journal of Learning Analytics, 5(2), 60-85.

[3]. Ahmed, W., van der Werf, G., Kuyper, H., & Minnaert, A. (2013). Emotions, self-regulated learning, and achievement in mathematics: A growth curve analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105(1), 150-161.

[4]. Agustin, M. & Agustin, M. (2009). Algebra and precalculus skills and performance in first-semester calculus. International Journal of Case Method Research & Application, 21(3), 232-236.

[5]. Bannert, M., Reimann, P., & Sonnenberg, C. (2014). Process mining techniques for analysing patterns and strategies in students' self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning, 9(2), 161-185.

[6]. Bressoud, D. M., Carlson, M. P., Mesa, V., & Rasmussen, C. (2013). The calculus student: Insights from the Mathematical Association of America national study. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 44 (5), 685-698.

[7]. Broadbent, J., & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1-13.

[8]. Brooks, C., Erickson, G., Greer, J., & Gutwin, C. (2014). Modelling and quantifying the behaviours of students in lecture capture environments. Computers & Education, 75, 282-292.

[9]. Caprara, G. V., Fida, R., Vecchione, M., Del Bove, G., Vecchio, G. M., Barbaranelli, C., & Bandura, A. (2008). Longitudinal analysis of the role of perceived self-efficacy for self-regulated learning in academic continuance and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), 525-534.

[10]. Cepeda, N. J., Pashler, H., Vul, E., Wixted, J. T., & Rohrer, D. (2006). Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin, 132(3), 354-380.

[11]. Chiu, T. K., & Churchill, D. (2015). Exploring the characteristics of an optimal design of digital materials for concept learning in mathematics: Multimedia learning and variation theory. Computers & Education, 82, 280- 291.

[12]. Cleary, T. J., Callan, G. L., Malatesta, J., & Adams, T. (2015). Examining the level of convergence among self-regulated learning micro analytic processes, achievement, and a self-report questionnaire. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 33(5), 439-450.

[13]. Colorado Department of Higher Education. (2018).

[14]. Dunlosky, J., Rawson, K. A., Marsh, E. J., Nathan, M. J., & Willingham, D. T. (2013). Improving students' learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 14(1), 4-58.

[15]. Echeverria, V., Martinez-Maldonado, R., & Shum, S.B. (2019, April). Towards collaboration translucence: giving meaning to multimodal group data. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (p. 39). ACM.

[16]. Ellis, J., Fosdick, B. K., & Rasmussen, C. (2016). Women 1.5 times more likely to leave STEM pipeline after calculus compared to men: Lack of mathematical confidence a potential culprit. PloS One, 11(7).

[17]. Ellis, J., Rasmussen, C., & Duncan, K. (2013, February). Switcher and persister experiences in Calculus 1. In Sixteenth Annual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. Denver, CO.

[18]. Fincham, O. E., Gasevic, D. V., Jovanovic, J. M., & Pardo, A. (2018). From study tactics to learning strategies: an analytical method for extracting interpretable representations. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[19]. Folkestad, J., & Burns, S. (2014). Predicting D, F, and withdrawals (Ws) from Calculus I at Colorado State University (Unpublished manuscript), Colorado State University.

[20]. Gillett, A., Hammond, A., & Martala, M. (2013). Inside track to successful academic writing. Pearson UK.

[21]. Hartigan, J. A., & Wong, M. A. (1979). Algorithm AS 136: A k-means clustering algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series C (Applied Statistics), 28(1), 100- 108.

[22]. Hartwig, M. K., & Dunlosky, J. (2012). Study strategies of college students: Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 19(1), 126-134.

[23]. Johns, C. (2018). Self-Regulation in Calculus I. In A. Weinberg, C. Rasmussen, J. Rabin, M. Wawro, & S. Brown (Eds.), Proceedings of the 21^stAnnual Conference on Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. (pp. 16-30). San Diego, CA.

[24]. Kabacoff, R. I. (2010). R in action. Shelter Island, New York: Manning Publications.

[25]. Karpicke, J. D., & Bauernschmidt, A. (2011). Spaced retrieval: absolute spacing enhances learning regardless of relative spacing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(5), 1250-1257.

[26]. Karpicke, J. D., Butler, A. C., & Roediger III, H. L. (2009). Metacognitive strategies in student learning: do students practise retrieval when they study on their own? Memory, 17(4), 471-479.

[27]. Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger III, H. L. (2007). Expanding retrieval practice promotes short-term retention, but equally spaced retrieval enhances longterm retention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 33(4), 704-719.

[28]. Kinnebrew, J., Biswas, G., Sulcer, B., & Taylor, R. (2013). Investigating self-regulated learning in teachable agent environments. In R. Azevedo & V. Aleven (Eds.), International handbook of metacognition and learning technologies (pp. 451-470). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Springer.

[29]. Koriat, A., Bjork, R. A., Sheffer, L., & Bar, S. K. (2004). Predicting one's own forgetting: the role of experiencebased and theor y-based processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(4), 643-656.

[30]. Logan, J. M., & Balota, D. A. (2008). Expanded vs. equal interval spaced retrieval practice: Exploring different schedules of spacing and retention interval in younger and older adults. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 15(3), 257-280.

[31]. Marzouk, Z., Rakovic, M., & Winne, P. H. (2016). Generating Learning Analytics to Improve Learners' Metacognitive Skills Using nStudy Trace Data and the ICAP Framework. In Proceedings of the LAK 2016 Workshop on Learning Analytics for Learners (pp. 11-16).

[32]. Mayfield, K. H., & Chase, P. N. (2002). The effects of cumulative practice on mathematics problem solving. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 35(2), 105-123.

[33]. Morehead, K., Rhodes, M. G., & DeLozier, S. (2016). Instructor and student knowledge of study strategies. Memory, 24(2), 257-271.

[34]. Pardo, A., Han, F., & Ellis, R. A. (2016, April). Exploring the relation between self-regulation, online activities, and academic performance: a case study. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp.422-429). Edinburgh, UsK.

[35]. Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.

[36]. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A., García, T., & McKeachie, W. J. (1991). A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ).

[37]. Reinholz, D. L. (2015). Peer-Assisted Reflection: A design-based intervention for improving success in calculus. International Journal of Research in Undergraduate Mathematics Education, 1(2), 234-267.

[38]. Riel, J., Lawless, K. A., & Brown, S. W. (2018). Timing Matters: Approaches for Measuring and Visualizing Behaviours of Timing and Spacing of Work in Self-Paced Online Teacher Professional Development Courses. Journal of Learning Analytics, 5(1), 25-40.

[39]. Roediger III, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011). The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(1), 20-27.

[40]. Roll, I., & Winne, P. H. (2015). Understanding, evaluating, and supporting self-regulated learning using learning analytics. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(1), 7- 12.

[41]. Sadler, P., & Sonnert, G. (2018). The path to college calculus: The impact of high school mathematics coursework. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(3), 292-329.

[42]. Solomon, L. J., & Rothblum, E. D. (1984). Academic procrastination: Frequency and cognitive-behavioral correlates. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(4), 503- 509.

[43]. Sonnenberg, C., & Bannert, M. (2015). Discovering the effects of metacognitive prompts on the sequential structure of SRL-processes using process mining techniques. Journal of Learning Analytics, 2(1), 72-100.

[44]. Susser, J. A., & McCabe, J. (2013). From the lab to the dorm room: Metacognitive awareness and use of spaced study. Instructional Science, 41(2), 345-363.

[45]. Winne, P. H. (2018). Theorizing and researching levels of processing in self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 9-20.

[46]. Winne, P. H., & Baker, R. S. (2013). The potentials of educational data mining for researching metacognition, motivation and self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 5(1), 1-8.

[47]. Winne, P. H. (2019). Enhancing self-regulated learning for information problem solving with ambient big data gathered by nStudy. Contemporary Technologies in Education (pp. 145-162). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.

[48]. Wise, A. F. (2014, March). Designing pedagogical interventions to support student use of learning analytics. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference On Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 203-211). Indianapolis.

[49]. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation. In Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P. R., & Zeidner, M (Eds.), Handbook of Self-Regulation (pp. 13-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

[50]. Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41(2), 64-70.

[51]. Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating selfregulation and motivation: historical background, methodological developments, and future prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166-183.

[52]. Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2014). Comparing students' self-discipline and self-regulation measures and their prediction of academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39(2), 145-155.

[53]. Zimmerman, B. J., Moylan, A., Hudesman, J., White, N., & Flugman, B. (2011). Enhancing self-reflection and mathematics achievement of at-risk urban technical college students. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 53(1), 141-160.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Video Annotated Technology: Exploring Teacher Candidates’ Adaptation to a New Tool in Student Teaching

Jillian Ardley * , Lisa Repaskey**

*-** Department of Early Childhood, Elementary, and Special Education (EESE), Norfolk State University (NSU), Virginia, USA.

Ardley, J., and Repaskey, L. (2019). Video Annotated Technology: Exploring Teacher Candidates’ Adaptation to a New Tool in Student Teaching. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 16(2), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.16.2.16195

Abstract

Web 2.0 technologies are very familiar to students who represent the group called the “millennials” in this society due to their birthdates. They are noted for their technological savvy and their ability to use new information and communication technologies without reservation. With this in mind, teacher educators who utilize culturally relevant practices modified a traditional practice of one-dimensional videotaping to support the proficiencies of the participating teacher candidates. The tool used to support traditional video recording was a video annotation software tool that allows the reviewer to type comments in synchronization with the viewed portion of a recording. This video annotation tool allowed the teacher candidates to: a) record their lessons via a smartphone application, b) invite their university supervisor to watch in real-time, c) send a link of the university's media storage location via a built-in compression tool, as well as d) receive text feedback/annotations from their university supervisor within the recording that was in synchronization with the reviewed behavior. Overall, teacher candidates saw the video annotation tool as an effective tool to support collaborations with their university supervisor. Challenges such as storage limitations on smart phones and sound quality are discussed as well as other possible implications in this pilot study.

References

[1]. Alexander, M., Williams, N.A., & Nelson, K.L. (2012). When you can't get there: using video self-monitoring as a tool for changing the behaviors of preservice teachers. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 31(4), 18-24.

[2]. Ardley, J., & Johnson, J. (2018). Video annotation software in teacher education: Researching university supervisor's perspective of a 21^st century technology. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 47(4), 479-499.

[3]. Au, K. H. (1998). Social constructivism and the school literacy learning of students of diverse backgrounds. Journal of Literacy Research, 30(2), 297-319.

[4]. Ausburn, L.J., Ellis, A.M., & Washburn, E. (2011). Predictions for the future of american education: voices from classrooms and communities. Scholar-Practitioner Quarterly, 5 (1), 20-38.

[5]. Bailey, A., Zanchetta, M., Pon, G., Velasco, D., Wilson- Mitchell, K.& Hassan, A. (2016). The audacity of critical awakening. In Waddell, J., Cooper, L., & Gingras, J. Teaching as Scholarship: Preparing Students for Professional Practice in Community Services. Centre for the Advancement of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning. Wilfrid Laurier Press. Toronto. Canada. 59-73.

[6]. Basile, C. G. (2009). Intellectual Capital: The Intangible Assets of Professional Development Schools. Albany: State University of New York Press.

[7]. Brewer, C. (2004). Near real-time assessment of student learning and understanding in biology. BioScience, 54 (11), 1034-1039.

[8]. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

[9]. Coco, M. I., Dale, R., & Keller, F. (2018). Performance in a collaborative search task: The role of feedback and alignment. Topics in Cognitive Science, 10(1), 55-79.

[10]. Coghlan, D. (2003). Practitioner research for organizational knowledge: mechanistic- and organisticoriented approaches to insider action research. Management Learning, 34(4), 451-463.

[11]. Daniel, G. R., Auhl, G., & Hastings, W. (2013). Collaborative feedback and reflection for professional growth: preparing first-year pre-service teachers for participation in the community of practice. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 41 (2), 159-172.

[12]. Danielowich, R. M., & McCarthy, M. J. (2013) Teacher educators as learners: How supervisors shape their pedagogies by creating and using classroom videos with their student teachers. Action in Teacher Education. 35(3), 147-164.

[13]. DuPaul, G.J., Weyandt, L.L., & Janusis, G.M. (2011). ADHD in the classroom: Effective intervention strategies. Theory into Practice, 50(1), 35-42.

[14]. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.

[15]. Gant, A. (2017). We are all in this together.

[16]. Gay, G. & Kirkland, K. (2003). Developing cultural critical consciousness and self-reflection in preservice teacher education. Theory into Practice, 42 (3), 181-187.

[17]. Glaser, B. G. & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago: Aldine.

[18]. Groff, J. (2013). Technology-rich innovative learning environments. In Proceedings from the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Information and Communication Technologies. Paris, France.

[19]. Grove, K.J. (2008). Student teacher ICT use: field experience placements and mentor influences. In Proceedings from the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, Information and Communication Technologies, and Teacher Training Expert Meeting. Paris, France.

[20]. Keene, D. L. & Handrich, R. R. (2010). Tattoos, tolerance, technology, and TMI: welcome to the land of the millennials. American Society of Trial Consultants, 22 (2), 33-46.

[21]. Kilian, T., Hennigs, N., & Langner, S. (2012). Do millennials read books or blogs? Introducing media usage typology of the internet generation. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29 (2), 114-124.

[22]. Kpanja, E. (2001). A study of the effects of video recording in microteaching training. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(4), 483-486.

[23]. Ladson-Billings, G. (2006a). From the achievement gap to the education debt: Understanding achievement in U.S. schools. Educational Research, 35 (7). 3-12.

[24]. Ladson-Billings, G. (2006b). "Yes, but how do we do it. Practicing culturally relevant pedagogy.”. In Landsman, J., & Lewis, C. W. (Eds.), White teachers/diverse classrooms: A guide to building inclusive schools, promoting high expectations, and eliminating racism. Sterling: Stylus.

[25]. McConnell, T.J., Lundeberg, M.A., Koehler, M.J., Urban-Lurain, M., Zhang, T., Mikeska, J., Parker, J., Zhang, M., & Eberhardt, J. (2008, January). Video-based reflection: What is the real effect on reflections of inservice teachers? In 2008 International Conference of the Association of Science Teacher Educators, Saint Louis, MO

[26]. McLoughlin, C. & Lee, M. J. W. (2008). Mapping the digital terrain: New media and social software as catalysts for pedagogical change. Proceedings ascilite Melbourne 2008.

[27]. Miles, M.B. & Huberman, A.M. (1994) Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2^nd. Ed). London: Sage.

[28]. Miller, M.J., & Carney, J. (2009). Lost in translation: using video annotation software to examine how a clinical supervisor interprets and applies a statemandated teacher assessment instrument. The Teacher Educator, 44(4), 217-231.

[29]. Norfolk State University. (2012). Norfolk State University Conceptual Framework. Norfolk: Norfolk State University.

[30]. Norfolk State University. (2018). Student teacher handbook. Norfolk, VA: Norfolk State University, School of Education.

[31]. Olivero, J. L. (1970). Microteaching: Medium for improving instruction. New York, NY. Charles E. Merrill and Company.

[32]. O' Reilly, T. (2005). What is web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software. Retrieved 7 July 2018 from http://www.oreillynet.com/lpt/a/6228/

[33]. Philip, T. M. & Garcia, A. D. (2013). The importance of still teaching the iGeneration: new technologies and the centrality of pedagogy. Harvard Educational Review, 83 (2), 300-319.

[34]. Rickes, P.C. (2009). Make way for milliennials! How today's students are shaping higher education space. The Journal for the Society of College and University Planning, 7-17.

[35]. Rooney, P. (2005). Researching from the inside, does it compromise validity: A discussion. Level 3, 3(1).

[36]. Santagata, R. (2009). Designing video-based professional development for mathematics teachers in low-performing schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 38-51.

[37]. Selwyn, N. (2010). Web 2.0 and the school of the future, today. In Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (eds.), Inspired by Technology, Driven by Pedagogy: A systemic approach to technology-based school innovation. OCED: Paris, France.

[38]. Sewall, M. (2009). Transforming supervision: Using video elicitation to support preservice teacher-directed reflective conversations. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(2), 11-30.

[39]. Sharp, L. A. (2016). ESEA reauthorization: An overview of the every child succeeds act. Texas Journal of Literacy Education, 4 (1), 9-13.

[40]. Smith, J. & Noble, H. (2014). Bias in research. Evidence Based Nursing. 17(4), 100-101.

[41]. Stapleton, J., Tschida, C., & Cuthrell, K. (2017). Partnering principal and teacher candidates: Exploring a virtual coaching model in teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25 (4), 495-519.

[42]. Stewart, T. A. (1999). Intellectual capital. New York, NY: Currency

[43]. Vygotsky, L.S. & Cole, M. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[44]. Zanchetta, M. S., Bailey, A., Kolisnyk, O., Baku, L., Schwind, J., Osino, E., ... & Hassan, A. (2017). Mentors' and mentees' intellectual-partnership through the lens of the transformative learning theory. Nurse Education in Practice, 25, 111-120.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Causes and Solution to Poor Involvement of Post Graduates in Research Publication Enterprise: Case of a Rural-Based University in South Africa

Ishmael Obaeko Iwara*

University of Venda, South Africa.

Iwara, I. O. (2019). Causes and Solution to Poor Involvement of Post Graduates in Research Publication Enterprise: Case of a Rural-Based University in South Africa. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 16(2), 62-76. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.16.2.16102

Abstract

This article was introduced due to a sharp decline in research publication output by 120.69 units at the University of Venda (UNIVEN). Because research publication output is necessary for income generation, ranking of an institution of higher learning and international networks for possible collaborations, UNIVEN may experience long run instabilities if the situation persist. Even though there might be several other issues responsible for the low output, suspicions have been on poor involvement of researchers in research publication enterprise of the University. Whereas this may be true, the reasons are yet unknown, which motivates the current study. The essence is to unpack issues around the phenomena with hopes of suggesting intervention measures. An exploratory sequential mixed research design was followed. A sample of 32 (Masters & PhD students) was drawn from the Institute for Rural Development (IRD) at the University. Data was collected using semi-structured and structured questionnaires of which thematic and descriptive analyses were performed through Atlas-ti v8 and Microsoft Excel 2013 statistical tool, respectively. The qualitative result yielded several issues clustered into three themes namely: student, supervisor and the management. The scores of the casual issues suggest 12 factors that should be taken into account. This include student rewards (17%), student conference attendance (13%), regulations on theft of student researches (11%), strengthening supervision ties (9%), research skills training (8%), and adequate service delivery (8%). Other factors fall between 7% and below.

References

[1]. Abiddin, N. Z., Ismail, A., & Ismail, A. (2011). Effective supervisory approach in enhancing postgraduate research studies. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(2), 206-217.

[2]. Adams, K. (2004). Modelling success: enhancing international postgraduate research students' self-efficacy for research seminar presentations. Higher Education research & development, 23(2), 115-130.

[3]. Alam, F., Alam, Q., & Rasul, M.G. (2013). A pilot study on postgraduate supervision. Procedia Engineering, 56, 875-881.

[4]. Aspland, T., Edwards, H., O'leary, J. and Ryan, Y. (1999). Tracking new directions in the evaluation of postgraduate supervision. Innovative Higher Education, 24(2), 127-147.

[5]. Banerijee, R. K. (2011). Potential Challenges to Face in Grad School. (Accessed 3 January 2019).

[6]. Belcher, W. L. (2009). Writing your journal article in twelve weeks: A guide to academic publishing success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

[7]. Benfield, J. R., & Feak. C. B. (2006). How authors can cope with the burden of English as an international language. Chest, 129 (6), 1728-1730.

[8]. Bentley, P., & Kyvik, S. (2011). Academic staff and public communication: a survey of popular science publishing across 13 countries. Public Understanding of Science, 20(1), 48-63.

[9]. Boice, R. (1990). Professors as writers: A self-help guide to productive writing. Stillwater, OK: New Forums Press.

[10]. Canagarajah, A. S. (2003). A somewhat legitimate and very peripheral participation. In C. P. Casanave and S. Vandrick, (Ed.) Writing for scholarly publication: Behind the scenes in language education (pp.197-210), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

[11]. Carter, K., & Aulette, J. (2016). Publish, Don't Perish: Ten Tips. English Teaching Forum, 54(1), 20-28.

[12]. Centre for Higher Education Trust (CHET), (2016). South African Higher Education Performance Indicators 2009-2016. Retrieved 5 Januar y 2019, from https://www.chet.org.za/data/sahe-open-data

[13]. Cuthbert, D., Spark, C., & Burke, E. (2009). Disciplining writing: The case for multi-disciplinary writing groups to support writing for publication by higher degree by research candidates in the humanities, arts and social sciences. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(2), 137-149.

[14]. De Maria, A.N. (2007). How do I get a paper accepted? Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 49(15), 1666-1667.

[15]. De Rond, M., & Miller, A.N. (2005). Publish or perish: bane or boon of academic life? Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(4), 321-329.

[16]. Farka, D. (2014). The five major challenges of graduate school and how you can overcome the biggest one. Retrieved 5 January 2019, from https://finishyourthesis.com/graduate-school-challenge/

[17]. Glover, M., Buxton, M., Guthrie, S., Hanney, S., Pollitt, A., & Grant, J. (2014). Estimating the returns to UK publicly funded cancer-related research in terms of the net value of improved health outcomes. BMC Medicine, 12(1), 99.

[18]. Goodson, P. (2013). Becoming an academic writer: 50 exercises for paced, productive, and powerful writing. Los Angeles: Sage.

[19]. Gulbrandsen, M., & Smeby, J. C. (2005). Industry funding and university professors' research performance. Research policy, 34(6), 932-950.

[20]. Harzing, A. -W. (2005). Australian research output in economics and business: high volume, low impact? Australian Journal of Management, 30(2), 183-200.

[21]. Harzing, A.W.K. (2010). The publish or perish book. Melbourne. Tarma software research.

[22]. Hashim, J. H. (2017). A Message to PHD Aspirants. Dimensions of Public Health. Retrieved 3 January 2019, from http://publichealthinnepal.blogspot.com/2017/04/message-to-phd-aspirants.html

[23]. Hill, S. (2016). Assessing (for) impact: Future assessment of the societal impact of research. Palgrave Communications, 2(1), 16073.

[24]. Hinrichs, S., Kamenetzky, A., Borjes, L., & Grant, J. (2015). The non-academic impact of international development research in UK Higher Education. King's College London.

[25]. Hoffman, D., Hill, K., Lobo, J., Charney, A., & Nadelhoffer, M. (2017). Study shows university research benefits regional economy. W. P. Carey School of Business and Eller College of Management. Arizona State University.

[26]. Institute for Rural Development (IRD), (2019a). Report to the DVC Academic, October 2018-28 February 2019. University of Venda.

[27]. Institute for Rural Development (IRD), (2019b). PhD in Rural Development Candidates 2^ndQuarter Progress Reports, 31 January 2019. University of Venda.

[28]. Iwara, I. O., Mwale, M., & Simbarashe, K. (2018). Factors inhibiting academic progress of postgraduate students at rural-based higher learning institutions. African Renaissance, 15(1), 197-220.

[29]. Iwara, I. O., Mwale, M., & Obadire, O. S. (2018). Inherent success characteristics of postgraduate students at rural-based higher learning institutions. Gender and Behaviour, 16(2), 11762-11772.

[30]. Kaene, C. (2017). When the federal budget funds scientific research, it's the economy that benefits. Retrieved 5 January 2019, from https://phys.org/news/2017-07-federal-funds-scientific-economy-benefits.html

[31]. Kamler, B., & Thomson, P. (2014). Helping doctoral students write: Pedagogies for supervision. Routledge.

[32]. Kirchhof, A. L. C., & Lacerda, M. R. (2012). Challenges and prospects for publishing articlesconsideration based on statements from authors and publishers. Texto & Contexto-Enfermagem, 21(1), 185- 193.

[33]. Lee, A., & D. Boud. (2003). Writing groups, change and academic identity: Research development as local practice. Studies in Higher Education 28 (2), 187-200.

[34]. Lee, H., & Lee, K. (2013). Publish (in international indexed journals) or perish: Neoliberal ideology in a Korean university. Language Policy, 12(3), 215-230.

[35]. Lessing, A.C., & Schulze, S. (2002). Postgraduate super vision and academic support: students' perceptions. South African Journal of Higher Education, 16(2),139-149.

[36]. Lexchin, J., Bero, L. A., Djulbegovic, B., & Clark, O. (2003). Pharmaceutical industry sponsorship and research outcome and quality: systematic review. Bmj, 326(7400), 1167-1170.

[37]. Man, J. P., Weinkauf, J. G., Tsang, M., & Sin, J. H. D. D. (2004). Why do some countries publish more than others? An international comparison of research funding, English proficiency and publication output in highly ranked general medical journals. European Journal of Epidemiology, 19(8), 811-817.

[38]. Manyike, T.V. (2017). Postgraduate supervision at an open distance e-learning institution in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 37(2). 1-11.

[39]. McCallin, A., & Nayar, S. (2012). Postgraduate research supervision: A critical review of current practice. Teaching in Higher Education, 17(1), 63-74.

[40]. McGrail, M.R., Rickard, C.M. & Jones, R. (2006). Publish or perish: A systematic review of interventions to increase academic publication rates. Higher Education Research & Development, 25(1), 19-35.

[41]. Milem, J. F., J. B. Berger., & Dey. E. L. (2000). Faculty time allocation: A study of change over twenty years. Journal of Higher Education, 71 (4), 454-475.

[42]. Molas-Gallart, J., & Tang, P. (2011). Tracing “productive interactions” to identify social impacts: An example from the social sciences. Research Evaluation, 20(3), 219-226.

[43]. Morss, K., & Murray., R. (2001). Researching academic writing within a structured programme: Insights and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education, 26 (1), 35-42.

[44]. Murray, R. and Mackay, G. (1998). Supporting academic development in public output: Reflections and propositions. International Journal for Academic Development, 3(1), 54-63.

[45]. Naicker, H. (2010). South Africa: Decline in PhD numbers a major problem University World News. The Global Window on Higher Education.

[46]. Quinton, S., & Smallbone, T. (2006). Postgraduate research in business: A critical guide. Sage.

[47]. Schramm-Possinger, M. E., & Powers, D. E. (2015). The first year of graduate study: Documenting challenges and informing ways to reduce attrition. ETS Research Memorandum Series.

[48]. Swales, J.M., & Feake, C.B. (2004). Academic writing for graduate students: Essential tasks and skills, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.

[49]. Thames, J. (2012). Top five reasons why students fail in school. Retrieved 3 January 2019, from http://www. howtolearn.com/2012/02/the-top-five-reasons-whystudents- fail-to-succeed-in-school/

[50]. The University of British Columbia (UBC), (2017). Some potential challenges. Retrieved 21 May 2019, from https://www.grad.ubc.ca/handbook-graduate-supervision/some-potential-challenges

[51]. UNIVEN, (2016). University of Venda Annual Report. Retrieved 27 June 2019, from http://www.univen.ac.za/ docs/Univen_ Annual%20Report_2016.pdf

[52]. UNIVEN, (2019). Institute for rural development. Retrieved 14 June 2019, from http://www.univen.ac.za/ school-of-agriculture/institute-for-rural-development/

[53]. Unsworth, K.L., Turner, N., Williams, H.M., & Piccin Houle, S. (2010). Giving thanks: the relational context of gratitude in postgraduate supervision. Studies in Higher Education, 35(8), 871-888.

[54]. Uzuner, S. (2008). Multilingual scholars' participation in core/global academic communities: A literature review. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 7 (4), 250–263.

[55]. Wallace, M. & Wray, A. (2016). Critical reading and writing for postgraduates. Sage.

[56]. Yamane, T., (1973). Statistics: An introduction analysis. Harper & Row.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

An Investigation of Faculty members’ Beliefs and Barriers to Successful ICT Integration into Teaching at Sultan Qaboos University

Abdelrahman Mohammed Ahmed* , Ahmed Yousif Abdelraheem , Zainab Asaid Al-Shedani *, Mohammed Sulaiman Al Aghbari****

*-**** Department of Instructional and learning Technologies, Sultan Qaboos University (SQU), Muscat, Oman.

Ahmed, A. M., Abdelraheem, A. Y., Al-Shedani, Z. A., and Al-Aghbari, M. S. (2019). An Investigation of Faculty Members’ Beliefs and Barriers to Successful ICT Integration into Teaching at Sultan Qaboos University. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 16(2), 50-61. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.16.2.16240

Abstract

There are many essential factors affecting the integration of information and communication technology (ICT) into teaching and faculty learning, including faculty members' beliefs regarding ICT integration. The present study examines the beliefs of (N= 220) faculty members from eight different colleges at Sultan Qaboos University (SQU) in Oman. A quantitative-qualitative design was used in this study, including an open-ended questionnaire asking teachers about their beliefs about integrating ICT into teaching and the barriers impeding ICT use in education. The findings show that the faculty members at SQU held positive beliefs regarding using ICT elements as tools for teaching and learning. However, this does not necessarily mean that they currently integrate ICT into their teaching processes. The results also showed that the faculty members perceived a moderate degree of barriers that were preventing them from integrating ICT in the classroom. No significant differences were found among the variables of gender and the year of experience. The ANOVA test indicated that there were no significant differences among the four academic ranks: lecturer, assistant professor, associate professor and professor on their beliefs on barriers to ICT integration. This result could be hypothetically attributed to the fact that SQU provides learning resources for all faculty members, including software, hardware, internet connectivity, training and administrative, and technical support.

References

[1]. Abdelraheem, A. Y., & Ahmed, A. M. (2018). The impact of using mobile social network applications on students' social-life. International Journal of Instruction, 11(2), 1-14.

[2]. Al Musawi, A. S., & Abdelraheem, A. Y. (2004). E-learning at Sultan Qaboos university: Status and future. British Journal of Educational Technology, 35(3), 363-367.

[3]. Al-Khanjari, Z., Al-Kindi, K., Al-Zidi, A., & Baghdadi, Y. (2014). M-Learning: The new horizon of learning at SQU. The Journal of Engineering Research [TJER], 11(2), 15-26.

[4]. Al-Senaidi, S., Lin, L., & Poirot, J. (2009). Barriers to adopting technology for teaching and learning in Oman. Computers & Education, 53(3), 575-590.

[5]. Balanskat, A., Blamire, R., & Kefala, S. (2007). The ICT impact report: A review of studies of ICT impact on schools in Europe. European Schoolnet, Brussels, Belgium.

[6]. Bhasin, B. (2012): Integration of information and communication technologies in enhancing teaching and learning. Contemporary educational technology, 3(2), 130-140.

[7]. Bingimlas, K.A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A Review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 5(3), 235-245.

[8]. Budiman, A. B., Rahmawati, R., & Ulfa, R. A. (2018). EFL teacher's belief and practice on integrating ICT in the classroom: A case study on the implementation of SAMR model in teaching reading descriptive text at Ma Assalam, Sukoharjo. Jurnal Penelıtıan Humanıora, 19(2), 39-51.

[9]. Cheok, M. L., Wong, S. L., Ayub, A. F. M., & Mahmud, R. (2016). Understanding teacher educators' beliefs and use of information and communication technologies in teacher training institute. In Envisioning the Future of Online Learning (pp. 11-21). Springer, Singapore.

[10]. Chowdhury, S., Arefin, Sh. & Rahaman, M. (2018). Impacts of ICT integration in the higher education classrooms: Bangladesh perspective. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(32). 82-86.

[11]. Drenoyianni, H., & Selwood, I. D. (1998). Conceptions or misconceptions? Primary teachers' perceptions and use of computers in the classroom. Education and information Technologies, 3(2), 87-99.

[12]. Dube, B., Nhamo, E. & Magonde, S. (2018). Factors affecting ICT integration in the teaching and learning of physical education in South Africa: A case of Johannesburg East cluster primary schools in the Gauteng Province. International Journal of Sport, Exercise and Health Research, 2(1), 88-92.

[13]. Eickelmann, B., & Vennemann, M. (2017). Teachers’ attitudes and beliefs regarding ICT in teaching and learning in European countries. European Educational Research Journal, 16(6), 733-761.

[14]. Gobbo, C., & Girardi, M. (2001). Teachers' beliefs and integration of information and communications technology in Italian schools. Journal of Information Techology for Teacher Education, 10(1-2), 63-85.

[15]. Goktas, Y., Gedik, N., & Baydas, O. (2013). Enablers and barriers to the use of ICT in primary schools in Turkey: A comparative study of 2005-2011. Computers & Education, 68, 211-222.

[16]. Gulbahar, Y., Guven, I. (2008): A survey on ICT usage and the perceptions of social studies teachers in Turkey. Educational Technology and Society, 11 (3), 37-51.

[17]. Habibi, A., Razak, R., Yusop, F., &Mukminin, M. (2019). Preparing future EFL teachers for effective technology integration: What do teacher educators say?, Asian EFL Journal Research Articles, 21(2), 1-30.

[18]. Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational technology research and development, 55(3), 223-252.

[19]. Husain, N. (2011). Integrating ICT in pre-service teacher education: The challenges of change, Journal of Education and Development, 1(2), 156-169.

[20]. Jimoyiannis, A. & Komis, V. (2007). Examining teachers' beliefs about ICT in education: Implications of a teacher preparation programme. Teacher Development, 11(2), 149-173.

[21]. Kamaruddin, K., Abdullah, C.A.C., Idris, M.N., & Nawi, M.N.M (2017). Teachers' level of ICT integration in teaching and learning: A survey in Malaysian private preschool. In AIP Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1891, No. 1, p. 020075). AIP Publishing.

[22]. Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Wachira, P. (2008). Computer technology integration and student learning: Barriers and promise. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(6), 560-565.

[23]. Kunda, D., Chembe, C., & Mukupa, G. (2018). Factors that influence Zambian higher education lecturer's attitude towards integrating ICTs in teaching and research. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 8(4), 360-384.

[24]. Laabidi, Y. & Laabidi, H. (2016). Barriers Affecting Successful Integration of ICT in Moroccan Universities, Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 1(3), 203-214.

[25]. Liu, X., & Pange, J. (2015). Early childhood teachers' perceived barriers to ICT integration in teaching: A survey study in Mainland China. Journal of Computers in Education, 2(1), 61-75.

[26]. Marbán, J. M., & Mulenga, E. M. (2019). Pre-service primary teachers' teaching styles and attitudes towards the use of technology in mathematics classrooms. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(2), 253-263.

[27]. Niederhauser, D. S., & Stoddart, T. (2001). Teachers' instructional perspectives and use of educational software. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(1), 15-31.

[28]. Nikolopoulou, K., & Gialamas, V. (2015). Barriers to the integration of computers in early childhood settings: Teachers' perceptions. Education and Information Technologies, 20(2), 285-301.

[29]. Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of educational research, 62(3), 307-332.

[30]. Partnership on Measuring ICT for Development (2011). Framework for a set of e-government core indicators.

[31]. Qasem, A.A., & Viswanathappa, G. (2016). Teacher perceptions towards ICT integration: Professional development through blended learning. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research, 15, 561- 575.

[32]. Rubang, T., Pa-alisbo, M. A. C., & Allanic, O. R. P. (2019). Factors influencing the adoption and integration of ICT in teaching among foreign teachers in Thailand. i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 16(1), 33-50.

[33]. Salehi, H., & Salehi, Z. (2012). Integration of ICT in language teaching: Challenges and barriers. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning (IC4E, 2012), IPEDR (Vol. 27, pp. 215-219).

[34]. Semerci, A. & Aydin, M.K. (2018). Examining high school teachers' attitudes towards ICT Use in education. International Journal of Progressive Education, 14(2), 93- 105.

[35]. Seraji, N.E., Ziabari, R.S., & Rokni, S.J.A. (2017). Teacher's attitudes towards educational technology in English language institutes. International Journal of English Linguistics, 7(2), 176-185.

[36]. Shaikh, Z., A., & Khoja, S. A. (2013). Higher education in Pakistan: An ICT integration viewpoint. International Journal of Computer Theory and Engineering, 5(3), 410- 413.

[37]. Sime, D., & Priestley, M. (2005). Student teachers' first reflections on information and communications technology and classroom learning: implications for initial teacher education. Journal of Computer assisted learning, 21(2), 130-142.

[38]. Steel, C., & Levy, M. (2009). Creativity and constraint: Understanding teacher beliefs and the use of LMS technologies. In Proceedings of ascilite Auckland (pp.1013-1022).

[39]. Suliman, A. A. E., Fie, D. Y. G., Raman, M., & Alam, N. (2008, May). Barriers for implementing ICT on higher education in underdeveloped countries "Sudan: Case Study". In CONF-IRM 2008 Proceedings (p. 12). Retreived 5 March 2011 from http://aisel.aisnet.org/confirm2008/12

[40]. Sultan Qaboos University (2018). About SQU.

[41]. Tomei, L. A. (2005). Taxonomy for the technology domain. USA: Information Science Publishing.

[42]. UNESCO (2002). Information and Communication Technology in Education: A Curriculum for Schools and Programme of Teacher Development. Paris: UNESCO

[43]. University of St Andrews (2012). Information & Communication Technology Strategy 2012-18. Retreived 13 April 2017 from https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/media/it-services/documents/ict-strategy.pdf

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

An Analysis of Alternative Digital Credential

Ajit Kumar N Shukla*

PSIT College of Engineering, Kanpur, India.

Shukla, A. K. N. (2019). An Analysis of Alternative Digital Credential. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 16(2), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.16.2.15757

Abstract

Higher Education Institutions (HEI) are facing a potential challenge at questioning the means and method as to how education is delivered and learning is credited. The leading agent for this change is online learning and transfer of credit for potential employment. The aim of this paper is to look into these questions by raising the questions locally and getting the response at RK University, Rajkot, India. The responses present an answer on how fast the University is growing, how an educational institution able to adapt to this change by incorporating necessary credit to the transcript, are students ready to pay extra for this, is it noticed by the potential employer as essential skill acquired, and is HEI working in the right direction? This study compares questions with the global trend and proposes a line of action. It seems that as the students are increasingly being hooked to social media, the presence is getting reflected in their public profile enhancing the perception of stated skill. The true reflection of this will be seen after few years, especially if it solves more problems than those created in society. There is no doubt that it is building a new social association, which could never be thought to be formed earlier and now it is getting commented. This accumulation of data helps us to develop new knowledge colonies for all of us. The most detrimental factor in all these is the cult of evaluation of a fake credential. It is considered that the wisdom will prevail even above truth.

References

[1]. Acclaim (2013). Open badges for Higher Education.

[2]. Christ, C. T. (2016). Small liberal arts colleges and enrollment capacity at public universities: Imagining a Consortium Approach. Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.2.16, University of California, Berkeley.

[3]. DeMilo, R. (2017). This will go on your permanent record! How blockchains can transform colleges in a networked world. The Evolllution.

[4]. Fong, J., Janzow, P., & Peck, K. (2016). Demographic shifts in educational demand and the rise of alternative credentials. Pearson Education and UPCEA.

[5]. Gaston, P. L. (2017). The not-so-little engine that can. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 49(5), 57-65.

[6]. Grech, A., & Camilleri, A. F. (2017). Blockchain in Education. JRC Science for Policy Report, European Commission.

[7]. Harris, A. (2011). Federal lawmakers begin new push for student outcomes data. The Chronicle of Higher Education.

[8]. Hickey, D. T. (2017). How open e-credentials will transform higher education. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 18.

[9]. Marklein, M.B. (2014). A cheaper, faster version of a College degree. USA Today.

[10]. Matkin, G. W. (2018). Alternative digital credentials: An imperative for higher education. CSHE Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE. 2.18. Center for Studies in Higher Education.

[11]. Orr, D., Weller, M., & Farrow, R. (2018). Models for online, open, flexible and technology enhanced higher education across the globe – a comparative analysis. International Council for Open and Distance Education.

i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology (JET)

Current Issue Vol. 21 Issue 2

Most Read

Most Cited

Volume 16 Issue 2 July - September 2019

Characteristics of Leading Groups on a Professional Social Network

Smadar Bar-Tal* , Tami Seifert**

* Center for Innovation and Excellence in Teaching, Levinsky College, Israel. ** Kibbutzim College of Education, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

Bar-Tal, S., and Seifert, T. (2019). Characteristics of Leading Groups on a Professional Social Network. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 16(2), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.16.2.15043

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Student Interactions with Prerequisite Knowledge Tools: How Students’ Daily-Usage Patterns Can Inform Pedagogy in Calculus I

James Folkestad * , Mary E. Pilgrim **, Ben Sencindiver ***, Priya Harindranathan ****

* School of Education, Colorado State University, USA. ** Department of Mathematics and Statistics, San Diego State University, USA. *** Department of Mathematics at Colorado State University, USA. **** Center for the Analytics of Learning and Teaching (C-ALT), Colorado State University, USA.

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Video Annotated Technology: Exploring Teacher Candidates’ Adaptation to a New Tool in Student Teaching

Jillian Ardley * , Lisa Repaskey**

*-** Department of Early Childhood, Elementary, and Special Education (EESE), Norfolk State University (NSU), Virginia, USA.

Ardley, J., and Repaskey, L. (2019). Video Annotated Technology: Exploring Teacher Candidates’ Adaptation to a New Tool in Student Teaching. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 16(2), 35-49. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.16.2.16195

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Causes and Solution to Poor Involvement of Post Graduates in Research Publication Enterprise: Case of a Rural-Based University in South Africa

Ishmael Obaeko Iwara*

University of Venda, South Africa.

Iwara, I. O. (2019). Causes and Solution to Poor Involvement of Post Graduates in Research Publication Enterprise: Case of a Rural-Based University in South Africa. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 16(2), 62-76. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.16.2.16102

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

An Investigation of Faculty members’ Beliefs and Barriers to Successful ICT Integration into Teaching at Sultan Qaboos University

Abdelrahman Mohammed Ahmed* , Ahmed Yousif Abdelraheem **, Zainab Asaid Al-Shedani ***, Mohammed Sulaiman Al Aghbari****

*-**** Department of Instructional and learning Technologies, Sultan Qaboos University (SQU), Muscat, Oman.

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

An Analysis of Alternative Digital Credential

Ajit Kumar N Shukla*

PSIT College of Engineering, Kanpur, India.

Shukla, A. K. N. (2019). An Analysis of Alternative Digital Credential. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 16(2), 77-86. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.16.2.15757

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

* Center for Innovation and Excellence in Teaching, Levinsky College, Israel.

** Kibbutzim College of Education, Tel-Aviv, Israel.

James Folkestad * , Mary E. Pilgrim , Ben Sencindiver *, Priya Harindranathan ****

* School of Education, Colorado State University, USA.

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, San Diego State University, USA.

* Department of Mathematics at Colorado State University, USA.

**** Center for the Analytics of Learning and Teaching (C-ALT), Colorado State University, USA.

Abdelrahman Mohammed Ahmed* , Ahmed Yousif Abdelraheem , Zainab Asaid Al-Shedani *, Mohammed Sulaiman Al Aghbari****