i-manager Publications

i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching (JELT)

Current Issue Vol. 14 Issue 4

Enhancing Bilingual Vocabulary in Government Secondary Schools: Challenges and Suggestions
The Impact of Mobile Learning Applications on the Motivation and Engagement of Iraqi ESP Medical Students in Vocabulary Learning
The Effect of Self-Assessment on High School Students' English Writing Achievement and Motivation
Novice ESL Teachers Experience with Online (E-Learning) Education
Language is Not Taught, It is Caught: Embracing the Communicative Approach in the Primary Classroom

Most Cited

Volume 12 Issue 2 April - June 2022

Research Paper

Insights from Virtual Practicum Observation Tasks in Turkey during Covid-19

Ceylan Yangin Ersanli* , Burçak Yilmaz Yakişik**

* Department of English Language Education, Ondokuz Mayis University, Turkey.

** Department of English Language Education, Gazi University, Turkey.

Ersanli, C. Y., and Yakişik, B. Y. (2022). Insights from Virtual Practicum Observation Tasks in Turkey during Covid-19. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 12(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.12.2.18482

Abstract

With the declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic in March 2020, primary and secondary schools were closed abruptly, and pre-service teachers had to attend virtual practicum through online platforms. The present study investigates the implementation of emergency remote teaching in a practicum. The study aims at providing an insight into regular observation tasks submitted by pre-service teachers so as to explore the effects of the pandemic and virtual practicum on their professional growth. The study was conducted with 23 pre-service English language teachers taking virtual practicum at two state universities in Turkey. The study employs a qualitative content analysis on observation reports submitted by participants during the School Experience Course, conducted as the first part of the practicum in the fall semester of 2020. The findings indicate that the virtualisation of courses at schools and the practicum at faculties of education has brought about serious problems in equity and the intended learning goals. The digital divide poses a serious problem, especially for the economically disadvantaged. Although mentor teachers in practicum schools appear to improve on how to teach online, in-service training and governmental or institutional support about materials and learning management systems are still needed. Based on the findings of the study, the authors suggested that all stakeholders should make the best out of the emergency remote teaching experience and learn how to cope with it rather than view it as a temporary situation, as the COVID-19 pandemic might not be the last pandemic the world might encounter.

References

[1]. Aspden, K. M. (2017). The complexity of practicum assessment in teacher education: An examination of four New Zealand case studies. Australian Journal of Teacher Education (Online), 42(12), 128-143.

[2]. Assunção Flores, M., & Gago, M. (2020). Teacher education in times of COVID-19 pandemic in Portugal: national, institutional and pedagogical responses. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 507-516. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1799709

[3]. Ekşi, G. Y., & Yeşilyurt, Y. E. (2018). Stakeholders' views about the FATIH Project: Smart EFL Classrooms. Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 14(1), 360-376.

[4]. Flores, M. A. (2016). Teacher education curriculum. In International Handbook of Teacher Education (pp. 187- 230). Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0366-0_5

[5]. Green, F. (2020). Schoolwork in Lockdown: New Evidence on the Epidemic of Educational Poverty. London: Centre for Learning and Life Chances in Knowledge Economies and Societies (LLAKES) UCL.

[6]. Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Hathaway, D. M. (2020). "We always make it work": Teachers' agency in the time of crisis. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 28(2), 239-250.

[7]. Higher Education Council. (2021). Higher Education Statistics 2019-2020. Retrieved from https://istatistik.yok.gov.tr/

[8]. Jæger, M. M., & Blaabæk, E. H. (2020). Inequality in learning opportunities during Covid-19: Evidence from library takeout. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 68, 100524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2020.100524

[9]. La Velle, L., Newman, S., Montgomery, C., & Hyatt, D. (2020). Initial teacher education in England and the Covid-19 pandemic: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 596-608. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1803051

[10]. Leacock, C. J., & Warrican, S. J. (2020). Helping teachers to respond to COVID-19 in the Eastern Caribbean: issues of readiness, equity and care. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 576-585. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1803733

[11]. Mohmmed, A. O., Khidhir, B. A., Nazeer, A., & Vijayan, V. J. (2020). Emergency remote teaching during Coronavirus pandemic: The current trend and future directive at Middle East College Oman. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 5(3), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41062-020-00326-7

[12]. Moyo, N. (2020). Covid-19 and the future of practicum in teacher education in Zimbabwe: Rethinking the 'new normal'in quality assurance for teacher certification. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 536-545. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1802702

[13]. Plunkett, M., & Dyson, M. (2011). Becoming a teacher and staying one: examining the complex ecologies associated with educating and retaining new teachers in rural Australia. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(1), 32-47.

[14]. Sahlberg, P. (2020). Will the pandemic change schools?. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 5(3/4), 359–365. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-05-2020-0026

[15]. Tabatadze, S., & Chachkhiani, K. (2021). Covid-19 and emergency remote teaching in the country of Georgia: Catalyst for educational change and reforms in Georgia?. Educational Studies, 57(1), 78-95. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131946.2020.1863806

[16]. UNICEF. (2020). Covid-19: Are Children Able to Continue Learning During School Closures? A Global Analysis of the Potential Reach of Remote Learning Policies. Retrieved from https://data.unicef.org/resources/remote-learning-reachability-factsheet/

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Relationship among EFL Reading Comprehension, Silent Reading Rate, Vocabulary, and Reading Motivation

Merve Savasci* , Ayşe S. Akyel**

* Department of Foreign Languages Education, Sakarya University, Turkey.

** Department of Foreign Language Education, Yeditepe University, Turkey.

Savasci, M. and Akyel, A. S. (2022). Relationship among EFL Reading Comprehension, Silent Reading Rate, Vocabulary, and Reading Motivation. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 12(2), 16-30. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.12.2.18440

Abstract

As a subset of the large-scale research on several issues related to EFL reading comprehension and instruction, this study investigates the potential relationship among English as a Foreign Language (EFL) reading comprehension, silent reading rate, vocabulary knowledge (i.e., receptive and productive vocabulary knowledge), and reading motivation (i.e., intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation), as well as the relative contribution of each of these factors to EFL reading comprehension. Data were collected through a reading comprehension and rate test, receptive and productive vocabulary tests, and a reading motivation questionnaire administered to university level EFL learners enrolled in a state university in Turkey. Findings indicated a positive, moderately significant correlation between receptive and controlled productive vocabulary knowledge (p < 0.05) and a weak but significantly positive correlation between silent reading rate and reading motivation (p < 0.05). Findings also showed that silent reading rate and intrinsic reading motivation significantly predicted EFL reading comprehension (p < 0.05). Implications for pedagogy and suggestions for future EFL reading research are discussed.

References

[1]. Alderson, J. C., & Urquhart, A. H. (1985). This test is unfair: I'm not an economist. In P. Haupman, R. LeBlanc, & M. B. Wesche (Eds.), Second Language Performance Testing (pp. 25-44). University of Ottawa Press.

[2]. Anderson, R. C., & Freebody, P. (1981). Vocabulary knowledge. In J. T. Guthrie, (ed), Comprehension and Teaching: Research Reviews (pp. 77–117). International Reading Association.

[3]. Bachman, L. F. (2004). Statistical Analyses for Language Assessment Book. Cambridge University Press.

[4]. Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Routledge, New York.

[5]. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4th ed.). Pearson.

[6]. Day, R. R., Bamford, J., Renandya, W. A., Jacobs, G. M., & Yu, V. W. S. (1998). Extensive reading in the second language classroom. RELC Journal, 29(2), 187-191. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829802900211

[7]. De Naeghel, J., Van Keer, H., Vansteenkiste, M., & Rosseel, Y. (2012). The relation between elementary students' recreational and academic reading motivation, reading frequency, engagement, and comprehension: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 1006–1021. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027800

[8]. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_3

[9]. Fujita, K., & Yamashita, J. (2014). The relations and comparisons between reading comprehension and reading rate of Japanese high school EFL learners. The Reading Matrix, 14(2), 34-49.

[10]. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6-10. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F074193258600700104

[11]. Grabe, W. (2008). Reading in a Second Language: Moving From Theory to Practice. Cambridge University Press.

[12]. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2020). Teaching and Researching Reading (3rd ed.). Routledge.

[13]. Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (1997). Reading engagement: A rationale for theory and teaching. In J. T. Guthrie & a Wigfield (Eds.), Reading Engagement: Motivating Readers through Integrated Instruction (pp. 1-12). International Reading Association.

[14]. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J. L., & Cox, K. E. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 231-256. https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_3

[15]. Hiebert, E. H., & Daniel, M. (2019). Comprehension and rate during silent reading: Why do some students do poorly?. Reading and Writing, 32, 1795–1818. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9917-7

[16]. Hu, M., & Nation, I. S. P. (2000). Unknown vocabulary density and reading comprehension. Reading in a Foreign Language, 13(1), 403–430.

[17]. Jeon, E. H., & Yamashita, J. (2014). L2 reading comprehension and its correlates: A meta analysis. Language Learning, 64(1), 160-212.

[18]. Kim, K. J. (2011). Reading motivation in two languages: An examination of EFL college students in Korea. Reading and Writing, 24(8), 861-881. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-010-9229-z

[19]. Kim, Y.-S. G., Quinn, J. M., & Petscher, Y. (2021). What is text reading fluency and is it a predictor or an outcome of reading comprehension? A longitudinal investigation. Developmental Psychology, 57(5), 718–732. https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001167

[20]. Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2008). Relationships of three components of reading fluency to reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(2), 310-321. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.310

[21]. Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2014). Comparing relations of motivation, engagement, and achievement among struggling and advanced adolescent readers. Reading and Writing, 28(2), 239–269. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-014-9523-2

[22]. Koda, K. (2005). Insights into Second Language Reading: A Cross-Linguistic Approach. Cambridge University Press.

[23]. Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2003). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(1), 3-21.

[24]. Kuhn, M. R., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Meisinger, E. B. (2010). Aligning theory and assessment of reading fluency: Automaticity, prosody, and definitions of fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 45(2), 230-251. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.45.2.4

[25]. Landi, N. (2010). An examination of the relationship between reading comprehension, higher-level and lower-level reading sub-skills in adults. Reading and Writing, 23(6), 701-717. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9180-z

[26]. Laufer, B. (1989). What percentage of text-lexis is essential for comprehension? In C. Lauren & M. Nordman (Eds.), Special Language: From Humans to Thinking Machines (pp. 316–323). Multilingual Matters.

[27]. Laufer, B., & Nation, I. S. P. (1999). A vocabulary-size test of controlled productive ability. Language Testing, 16(1), 33-51. https://doi.org/10.1177/026553229901600103

[28]. Nagy, W. E., & Herman, P. A. (1987). Breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge: Implications for acquisition and instruction. In M. G. McKeown & M. E. Curtis (Eds.), The Nature of Vocabulary Acquisition (pp. 19-35). Psychology Press.

[29]. Nation, I. S. P. (1990). Teaching and Learning Vocabulary. Newbury House.

[30]. Nation, I. S. P. (2001). Learning Vocabulary In Another Language. Cambridge University Press.

[31]. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

[32]. Newton, J., Ferris, D., Goh, C., Grabe, W., Stoller, F., & Vandergrift, L. (2018). Teaching English to second language learners in academic contexts. Teaching English to Second Language Learners in Academic Contexts, 5, 69-73.

[33]. Nuttall, C. (1996). Teaching Reading Skills in a Foreign Language (2nd ed.). Heinemann.

[34]. Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), Blackwell handbooks of developmental psychology. The science of reading: A handbook (p. 227–247). Blackwell Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470757642.ch13

[35]. Qian, D. (1999). Assessing the roles of depth and breadth of vocabular y knowledge in reading comprehension. Canadian Modern Language Review, 56(2), 282-308. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.56.2.282

[36]. Read, J. (2004). Plumbing the depths: How should the construct of vocabulary knowledge be defined? In P. Bogaards & B. Laufer (Eds.), Vocabulary in a Second Language (pp. 209-227). John Benjamins B.V.

[37]. Samuels, S.J. (2007). The DIBELS tests: Is speed of barking at print what we mean by reading fluency? Reading Research Quarterly, 42(4), 563–566.

[38]. Schaffner, E., & Schiefele, U. (2016). The contributions of intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation to the development of reading competence over summer vacation. Reading Psychology, 37(6), 917– 941. https://doi.org/10.1080/02702711.2015.1133465

[39]. Schaffner, E., Schiefele, U., & Ulferts, H. (2013). Reading amount as a mediator of the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(4), 369–385.

[40]. Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J., & Wigfeld, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4), 427–463. https://doi.org/10.1002/RRQ.030

[41]. Schiefele, U., Stutz, F., & Schaffner, E. (2016). Longitudinal relations between reading motivation and reading comprehension in the early elementary grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 51, 49-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.031

[42]. Schmitt, N. (2000). Vocabulary in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.

[43]. Schwanenflugel, P. J., Hamilton, A. M., Kuhn, M. R., Wisenbaker, J. M., & Stahl, S. A. (2004). Becoming a fluent reader: Reading skill and prosodic features in the oral reading of young readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 119-129. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.119

[44]. Soemer, A., & Schiefele, U. (2018). Reading amount as a mediator between intrinsic reading motivation and reading comprehension in the early elementary grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 67, 1-11.

[45]. Stahl, S. A. (1990). Beyond The Instrumentalist Hypothesis: Some Relationships between Word Meanings and Comprehension. University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign, IL: Center for the Study of Reading.

[46]. Stoller, F. L., Anderson, N. J., Grabe, W., & Komiyama, R. (2013). Instructional enhancements to improve students' reading abilities. English Teaching Forum, 51, 2–11.

[47]. Troyer, M., Kim, J. S., Hale, E., Wantchekon, K. A., & Armstrong, C. (2019). Relations among intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation, reading amount, and comprehension: A conceptual replication. Reading and Writing, 32(5), 1197-1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-018-9907-9

[48]. Wagner, R. K., Muse, A. E., & Tannenbaum, K. R. (Eds.). (2007). Vocabulary Acquisition: Implications for Reading Comprehension. Guilford Press.

[49]. Wang, J. H. Y., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between US and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 162-186. https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.39.2.2

[50]. Webb, S. (2008). Receptive and productive vocabulary sizes of L2 learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 30(1), 79-95. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263108080042

[51]. Wesche, M., & Paribakht, T. S. (1996). Assessing second language vocabulary knowledge: Depth versus breadth. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(1), 13-40. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.53.1.13

[52]. Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997a). Motivation for reading: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 32(2), 57-58.

[53]. Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997b). Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth or their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420-432. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.420

[54]. Wolf, M., & Katzir-Cohen, T. (2001). Reading fluency and its intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5(3), 211-239. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799XSSR0503_2

[55]. Yamaç, A., & Sezgin, Z. Ç. (2018). Relationships among fourth graders' reading anxiety, reading fluency, reading motivation, and reading comprehension. Eğitim ve Bilim, 43(194), 225-243. http://doi.org/10.15390/EB.2018.7555

[56]. Yildirim, K., Seyit, A. T. E. Ş., Çetinkaya, F. Ç., & Tosun, D. K. (2019). The Relations between Reading Comprehension and Reading Fluency: Their Reciprocal Roles as an Indicator and Predictor. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(2), 67-81.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Expats using English with Undergraduates in Saudi Arabian Universities: Issues and Solutions

Oveesa Farooq* , Aadil Amin Kak, Sumaya Jehangir*

*-*** Department of Linguistics, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, India.

Farooq, O., Kak, A. A. and Jehangir, S. (2022). Expats using English with Undergraduates in Saudi Arabian Universities: Issues and Solutions. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 12(2), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.12.2.18467

Abstract

English is a global language and is used in educational institutions in English and non-English-speaking countries. The quality and effect of English as a Foreign Language (EFL) instruction at the undergraduate level in Saudi Arabia is a kind of challenge for the students as well as the teachers. It is a fact that English is an internationally intelligible language and is used as a lingua franca in Gulf countries where expat teachers and students have different L1 (native language) and use English to communicate with each other. Taking EFL undergraduate students into consideration, English is the language which helps them to convey their message to the instructor and vice versa, particularly in an atmosphere where the instructor is not Arabic. English is a common means of communication. A majority of people show an interest in learning English in order to communicate on an international, professional level. The basic function of English is communication. Speaking English allows one to opt for foreign universities and an opportunity to work abroad where English is spoken. This piece of work focuses on the use of English as a medium of instruction in the English classes of undergraduate EFL students in Saudi Arabia and the communication problems faced by both the teachers and the students. The paper also discusses the perceptions or points of view from both teachers and students towards giving preferences for using English, Arabic, or both and their frustrations and positive responses towards using English as a medium of instruction. The data was collected from 50 participants, of whom 30 were students and 20 were teachers. Undergraduate students and their English teachers responded to a questionnaire which was administered to know their perceptions about using English as a Medium of Instruction and the effect of the Arabic on their English. The paper finally discusses some solutions according to the data perceived by teachers and students for using English as a medium of instruction and also gives some recommendations which will improve their English learning skills at an early stage.

References

[1]. Arthur, B., Weiner, R., Culver, M., Lee, Y. J., & Thomas, D. (1980). The register of impersonal discourse to foreigners: Verbal adjustments to foreign accent. Discourse Analysis in Second Language Research, (pp. 124).

[2]. Bhela, B. (1999). Native language interference in learning a second language: Exploratory case studies of native language interference with target language usage. International Education Journal, 1(1), 22-31.

[3]. Boughton,G., Brumfit, C., Flavell, R., Hill, P. & Pincass, A. (1978). Teaching English as a Foreign Language. Routledge education books, New York, (pp. 257).

[4]. Chomsky,N. A.(1969). Linguisticsand Philosophy. New York university press.

[5]. Coleman, J. A. (1996). Studying Languages: A Survey of British and European Students. London: CILT.

[6]. Cook, V. (2001). Using the first language in the classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(3), 402-423. https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.57.3.402

[7]. Crystal, D. (2003). English as a Global Language. Cambridge university press.

[8]. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: pergamonpress.

[9]. Lado, R. (1957). Linguistics across cultures. University of michigan press,Ann Arbor.

[10]. Ringborn, H. (1987). The Role of the First Language in Foreign Language Learning. Multilingual matters limited. (pp.186).

[11]. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts. (pp. 178). https://doi.org/10.1037/11256-000

[12]. Stern, H. H. (1983). Fundamental Concepts of Language Teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford university press.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Can Asynchronous Video-Mediated Oral Book Reports be the Solution for Foreign Language Speaking Anxiety?

Sevcan Bayraktar Çepni* , Neslihan Keleş, Gökhan Çepni*

*-*** Department of English Language Teaching, Trabzon University, Turkey.

Çepni, S. B., Keleş N. and Çepni, G. (2022). Can Asynchronous Video-Mediated Oral Book Reports be the Solution for Foreign Language Speaking Anxiety? i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 12(2), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.12.2.18630

Abstract

This study investigates the potential of asynchronous video-mediated oral book report assignments to enhance learners' spoken performance and decrease their speaking anxiety. The participants were 42 B1 level preparatory students from the English Language Teaching department who were taking skills-based intensive English education in Turkey. The participants carried out extended speaking tasks in the form of oral book reports within two weeks over 12 weeks (6 oral book reports in total) in the fall term of the academic year 2021/2022. The assigned oral book report videos were analyzed in relation to five categories in the narration rubric, including scores for characters, setting, cohesion or transition, grammar, and pronunciation. In addition, two structured open-ended questionnaires were used to investigate the participants' perceptions of the task's value, their changing performance in the tasks, and perceived changes in their anxiety level over time. Semi-structured interviews were also held to shed more light on the potential of such assignments for language classes. The results indicated that regular video-mediated asynchronous oral book reports helped the participants develop their speaking performance and decrease their speaking anxiety over time. Overcoming time limitations, such assignments have the potential to be used in language classes where teachers can empower every voice.

References

[1]. Al-Nouh, N. A., Abdul-Kareem, M. M., & Taqi, H. A. (2015). EFL College Students' perceptions of the difficulties in oral presentation as a form of assessment. International Journal of Higher Education, 4(1), 136-150.

[2]. Alptekin, C. (2002). Towards intercultural communicative competence in ELT. English as an International Language Journal, 56(1), 57-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/56.1.57

[3]. Alsied, S. M., & Pathan, M. M. (2013). The use of computer technology in EFL classroom: Advantages and implications. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies (IJ-ELTS), 1(1), 44-51.

[4]. Al-Tamimi, N. O. M. (2014). Public speaking instruction: abridge to improve English speaking competence and reducing communication apprehension. International Journal of Linguistics and Communication, 2(4), 45-68. https://doi.org/10.15640/ijlc.v2n4a4

[5]. Amirulloh, D. N. K. S., Damayanti, I. L., & Citraningrum, E. (2020). Flipgrid: A pathway to enhance students' speaking per formance. CONAPLIN Proceeding: Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research, 56, 90-95.

[6]. Arslan, R. Ş. (2013). An investigation of prospective English language teachers' spoken communication skills: A case from Turkey. Hacettepe Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 28(1), 27-40.

[7]. Bayraktar-Çepni, S., & Çepni, G. (2021). The effects of asynchronous online oral book reports on public speaking anxiety. First International Congress of Foreign Language Education, Full text proceeding, 3, 198-204.

[8]. Bayraktar-Çepni, S., Çepni, G., & Keleş, N. (2021). The changing role of teachers with the current trends in material development for english language teaching and some suggested web tools for language teaching. In E. Tokdemir-Demirel (Ed.), Challenge, Create, Innovate Voices of ELT Professionals from the Virtual Classroom, (pp. 215-229). Livre de Lyon Press.

[9]. Belcher, D. D. (2017). On becoming facilitators of multimodal composing and digital design. Journal of Second Language Writing, 38, 80-85. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSLW.2017.10.004

[10]. Bhela, B. (1999). Native language interference in learning a second language: Exploratory case studies of native language interference with target language usage. International Education Journal, 1(1), 22-31.

[11]. Butler, N. D. (2017). Learning to speak in the digital age: an examination of instructional conditions for teaching public speaking online. Voice and Speech Review, 11(1), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.1080/23268263.2017.1370805

[12]. Bygate, M. (2006). Areas of research that influence L2 speaking instruction. Current trends in the development and teaching of the four language skills, 29.

[13]. Carr, J. (2020). Teacher candidate perceptions on alternative asynchronous online discussion boards. Journal of Educational Technology and Online Learning, 3(3), 288-310. https://doi.org/10.31681/jetol.752283

[14]. Chang, C. C., Yan, C. F., & Tseng, J. S. (2012). Perceived convenience in an extended technology acceptance model: Mobile technology and English learning for college students. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5), 809–826. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.818

[15]. Chiang, M. C. (2012). The relationship between foreign language anxiety and foreign language speaking proficiency among elementary school students in Taiwan. (Doctoral dissertation, Ming Chuan University).

[16]. Choney, S. (2018). Microsoft and Flipgrid Unite to Bring Social Learning to Students Around the World. Retrieved from https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2018/06/18/microsoft-and-flipgrid-unite-to-bring-sociallearning- to-students-around-the-world/

[17]. De Jong, N. H., & Mora, J. C. (2019). Does having good articulatory skills lead to more fluent speech in first and second languages?. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 41(1), 227-239. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263117000389

[18]. Demirezen, M. (2009). An analysis of the problem-causing elements of intonation for Turkish teachers of English. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 2776-2781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2009.01.492

[19]. Edwards, C. R., & Lane, P. N. (2021). Facilitating student interaction: The role of Flipgrid in blended language classrooms. Computer Assisted Language Learning Electronic Journal, 22(2), 26-39.

[20]. Evans, S., & Green, C. (2007). Why EAP is necessary: A survey of Hong Kong tertiary students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 6(1), 3-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2006.11.005

[21]. Flipgrid (2021). Official Website. Retrieved from https://info.flipgrid.com/

[22]. Forsythe, E., & Raine, P. (2019). Bring the Back-row Students to the Front of the Class with Flipgrid. Language Teacher, 43, 23.

[23]. Galasso, J. (2002). Interference in second language acquisition: A review of the fundamental difference hypothesis. Transferring the 'Pro-drop'Parameter from Spanish to English. Northridge: California State University, (pp. 1-21).

[24]. Gardner, R. C., & MacIntyre, P. D. (1993). A student's contributions to second-language learning. Part II: Affective variables. Language Teaching, 26(1), 1-11.

[25]. Gardner, R. C., Day, J. B., & Maclntyre, P. D. (1992). Integrative motivation, induced anxiety, and language learning in a controlled environment. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 14(2), 197-214. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263100010822

[26]. Girard, T., Pinar, M., & Trapp, P. (2011). An exploratory study of class presentations and peer evaluations: Do students perceive the benefits. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 15(1), 77-94.

[27]. Granger, C. A. (2004). Silence in Second Language Learning. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters LTD, Series: Second Language Acquisition (6).

[28]. Green, T. D., Besser, E. D., & Loretta C. Donovan, L. C. (2021). More than amplifying voice and providing choice: Educator perceptions of flipgrid use in the classroom. Tech Trends, 65, 785–795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00635-3

[29]. Hashim, H. U., Yunus, M. M., & Hashim, H. (2019). 3- minutes pitching with flip grid: An antidote of innovation for speaking anxiety. International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 8(7), 1798-1801.

[30]. Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.2307/327317

[31]. Huang, H. (2004). The relationship between learning motivation and speaking anxiety among EFL non-English major freshmen in Taiwan. Unpublished master's thesis, Chaoyang University of Technology.

[32]. Hymes, D. (1982). Narrative form as a "grammar" of experience: Native Americans and glimpse of English. The Journal of Education, 164(2), 121–142.

[33]. Iglesias, M. (2021). Learning EFL online through Blogger and Flipgrid in higher education: A collaborative project in times of pandemic. University of South Florida M3 Center Publishing, 3, 26. https://doi.org/10.5038/9781955833042

[34]. Innes, A. R. B. (2020). Student evaluation of Flipgrid at a Japanese university: Embarrassment and connection. Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature, 44(3), 151-166.

[35]. Kern, R. (2014). Technology as Pharmakon: The promise and perils of the Internet for foreign language education. The Modern Language Journal, 98(1), 340–357.

[36]. Khan, I. A. (2011). An analysis of learning barriers: The Saudi Arabian context. International Education Studies, 4(1), 242-247.

[37]. King, J. (2002). Preparing EFL learners for oral presentations. Dong Hwa Journal of Humanistic Studies, 4, 401–418.

[38]. Kirkgoz, Y. (2011). A Blended Learning Study on Implementing Video Recorded Speaking Tasks in Task- Based Classroom Instruction. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 10(4), 1-13.

[39]. Koizumi, R., & In'nami, Y. (2013). Vocabulary knowledge and speaking proficiency among second language learners from novice to intermediate levels. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 4, 900–913

[40]. Krashen, S. D. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition. Oxford: Pergamon.

[41]. Krashen, S. D. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and Implications. London: Longman.

[42]. Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

[43]. Leong, L. M., & Ahmadi, S. M. (2016). An analysis of factors influencing learner's english speaking skill. International Journal Research in English Education, 2(1), 34-41.

[44]. Lightbown, P. M., & Spada, N. (2008). How Languages are Learned?. Oxford University Press.

[45]. Liu, M. (2006). Anxiety in Chinese EFL students at different proficiency levels. System, 34(3), 301-316.

[46]. Lowenthal, P. R., & Moore, R. L. (2020). Exploring student perceptions of Flipgrid in online courses. Online Learning, 24(4), 28-41.

[47]. Mak, B. (2011). An exploration of speaking-in-class anxiety with Chinese ESL learners. System, 39(2), 202-214.

[48]. Mango, O. (2019, March). Students' Perceptions and Attitudes toward the use of Flipgrid in the Language Classroom. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1970- 1973). Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

[49]. Mango, O. (2021). Flipgrid: Students' perceptions of its advantages and disadvantages in the language classroom. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science (IJTES), 5(3), 277-287. https://doi.org/10.46328/ijtes.195

[50]. Miles, R. (2009). Oral presentations for English proficiency purposes. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 8(2), 103-110.

[51]. Murphy, E., Rodríguez Manzanares, M. A., & Barbour, M. (2011). Asynchronous and synchronous online teaching: Perspectives of Canadian high school distance education teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42(4), 583-591. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01112.x

[52]. Muslem, A. (2015). The effects of immersive multimedia learning with peer support on speaking skill among male and female students. Studies in English Language and Education, 2(2), 103-117.

[53]. Öztürk, G., & Gürbüz, N. (2014). Speaking anxiety among Turkish EFL learners: The case at a state university. Journal of language and Linguistic Studies, 10(1), 1-17.

[54]. Richards, J. (2009). Teaching Speaking Theories and Methodologies. Retrieved from https://www.fltrp.com/ DOWNLOAD/0804010001.pdf

[55]. Richardson, W. (2006). Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts, and Other Powerful Web Tools for Classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

[56]. Saville-Troike, M. (2006). Introducing Second Language Acquisition. New York, USA: Cambridge University Press.

[57]. Shanks, D. (2021). Technology-facilitated oral homework: leveraging technology to get students speaking outside the classroom. In T. Beaven & F. Rosell- Aguilar (Eds), Innovative Language Pedagogy Report, (pp. 69-75). https://doi.org/10.14705/rpnet.2021.50.1238

[58]. Shin, J. L. K., & Yunus, M. M. (2021). The attitudes of pupils towards using flipgrid in learning English speaking skills. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(3), 151-168. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.3.10

[59]. Stapa, M., Murad, N. A., & Ahmad, N. (2014). Engineering technical oral presentation: Voices of the stakeholder. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 118, 463-467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.02.063

[60]. Tokoz-Goktepe, F. (2014). Speaking problems of 9th grade high school Turkish learners of L2 English and possible reasons for those problems: Exploring the teachers and students' perspectives. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 1875-1879. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.487

[61]. Tsou, W. (2005). Improving speaking skills through instruction in oral classroom participation. Foreign Language Annals, 38(1), 46-55. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02452.x

[62]. Tuyet, T. T. B., & Khang, N. D. (2020). The influences of the flipgrid app on vietnamese EFL high school learners'speaking anxiety. European Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 5(1), 128–149. https://doi.org/10.46827/ejfl.v5i1.3264

[63]. Uchihara, T., & Clenton, J. (2020). Investigating the role of vocabulary size in second language speaking ability. Language Teaching Research, 24(4), 540–556. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168818799371

[64]. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. London: Harvard University Press.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Can You See What Is Missing? Printed Corpus-Based Teaching Materials Can Help Out With Identifying L2 English Substitution and Ellipsis

Ufuk Girgin* , Zeynep Ölçü Dinçer**

* Department of English Language Teaching, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.

** Department of English Language Teaching, Hakkari University, Hakkari, Turkey

Girgin, U., and Dinçer, Z. Ö. (2022). Can you see what is Missing? Printed Corpus-Based Teaching Materials can Help Out with Identifying L2 English Substitution and Ellipsis. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 12(2), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.12.2.18400

Abstract

One of the inspirational forms of integrating technology into Second Language (L2) teaching is using 'corpora'. In this study, corpora were used to develop printed instructional materials to teach grammatical cohesive devices that are not sufficiently represented in L2 English course books. Specifically, the aim was to understand whether the indirect Data- Driven Learning (DDL) application through teacher-prepared corpus-based materials could help out 56 learners with identifying L2 English substitution and ellipsis and also how they would reflect on their experiences by studying with such sources. The change in the learners' proficiencies was measured by comparing their pre and post test scores. In addition, the learners wrote reflections. These reflections were thematically analyzed. Results indicated that the learners improved their skills in identifying L2 English substitution and ellipsis. Considering the subcategories of substitution and ellipsis, it was found that the highest levels of development were observed in substitution clauses and ellipsis verbs. Reflections showed that the learners benefitted from using the printed materials in the learning of the structures. However, they also revealed some pitfalls, such as text difficulty and a lack of thematic cohesion. Some practical suggestions were discussed to promote L2 English learning through printed corpus-based teaching materials.

References

[1]. Abdul Rahman, Z. A. A. (2013). The use of cohesive devices in descriptive writing by Omani student-teachers. SAGE Open, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244013506715

[2]. Abdulrahman, N. (2018). Substitution and ellipsis in the first year university students' English essay writing. Journal for Researching Education Practice and Theory (JREPT), 1(2), 30-40.

[3]. Abid, R. A. S., & Ridha, N. S. A. (2008). A study of coherence in the writings of EFL advanced Iraqi learners. Journal of Basrah Researches (Humanities Series), 31(1), 51-75.

[4]. Abu-Ayyash, E. A. S. (2017). Research practices in cohesive devices' studies: Benefiting from chaos. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(6), 409-418. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.0706.01

[5]. Alarcon, J. B., & Morales, K. N. S. (2011). Grammatical cohesion in students' argumentative essay. International Journal of English and Literature, 2(5), 114-127.

[6]. Ali, M. E. E. (2016). Using cohesive devices during the course of lectures “the lectures' role”. International Research Journal of Social Sciences, 5(5), 33-36.

[7]. Bahaziq, A. (2016). Cohesive devices in written discourse: A discourse analysis of a student's essay writing. English Language Teaching, 9(7), 112-119. https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v9n7p112

[8]. Barabadi, E., & Khajavi, Y. (2017). The effect of datadriven approach to teaching vocabulary on Iranian students' learning of English vocabulary. Cogent Education, 4(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1283876

[9]. Bernardini, S. (2002). Exploring new directions for discovery learning. In Teaching and learning by doing corpus analysis (pp. 165-182). Brill.

[10]. Biber, D., & Reppen, R. (2002). What does frequency have to do with grammar teaching?. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 199-208. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272263102002048

[11]. Boulton, A. (2009). Testing the limits of data-driven learning: Language proficiency and training. ReCALL, 21(1), 37-54.

[12]. Boulton, A. (2010). Data-drivenlearning: Taking the computer out of the equation. Language Learning, 60(3), 543-572. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00566.x

[13]. Carter, R. (1998).Orders of reality: CANCODE, communication and culture, and reply to Guy Cook. ELT Journal, 52(1), 43-64. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/52.1.43

[14]. Chambers, A. (2007). Integrating corpora in language learning and teaching. ReCALL, 19(3), 249-251. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344 007000134

[15]. Chan, T. P., & Liou, H. C. (2005). Effects of web-based concordancing instruction on EFL students' learning of verb–noun collocations. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(3), 231-251. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588220500185769

[16]. Chao, P. Y. (2010). A study of collocation learning of junior high students in Taiwan via concordance. In International Conference on English Teaching, Kaohsiung, Taiwan (pp. 129-154).

[17]. Chujo, K., Utiyama, M., & Miura, S. (2006). Using a Japanese-English parallel corpus for teaching English vocabulary to beginning-level students. English Corpus Studies, 13, 153-172.

[18]. Cook, G. (1998). The uses of reality: A reply to Ronald Carter. ELT Journal, 52(1), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/52.1.57

[19]. Cox, B. E., Shanahan, T., & Sulzby, E. (1990). Good and poor readers' use of cohesion in writing. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(1), 47-65. https://doi.org/10.2307/747987

[20]. David, W. C. (2000). Psychology of Language. Beijing: Foreign Teaching and Research Press.

[21]. Davies, M. (n.d.). The Corpus of Contemporary American English (COCA): 560 million words (1990-2017). Retrieved from http://www.americancorpus.org

[22]. Dikilitaş, K. (2012). The effect of some learner variables and the use of cohesive devices on Turkish nonnative writers' writing quality. Journal of Theory and Practice in Education, 8(1), 3-19.

[23]. Gandón-Chapela, E. (2020). On Invisible Language in Modern English: A Corpus-based Approach to Ellipsis. Retrieved from https://www.bloomsbur y.com/in/oninvisible-language-in-modern-english-9781350064539/

[24]. Garner, J. R. (2013). The use of linking adverbials in academic essays by non-native writers: How data-driven learning can help. CALICO Journal, 30(3), 410-422.

[25]. Gaskell, D., & Cobb, T. (2004). Can learners use concordance feedback for writing errors? System, 32(3), 301-319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.04.001

[26]. Gilmore, A. (2009). Using online corpora to develop students' writing skills. ELT Journal, 63(4), 363-372. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccn056

[27]. Goksun, T., Roeper, T., Hirsh-Pasek, K., & Golinkoff, R. M. (2011). From nounphrase ellipsis to verbphrase ellipsis: The acquisition path from context to abstract reconstruction. Occasional Working Papers in Linguistics, 38, 53-74.

[28]. Granger, S., & Tribble, C. (1998). Learner corpus data in the foreign language classroom: Form-focused instruction and data-driven instruction and data-driven learning. In S. Granger (Ed.), Learner English on computer (pp. 199-209). New York: Longman.

[29]. Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

[30]. Hill, J. (2000). Revising priorities: From grammatical failure to collocational success. Teaching collocation: Further Developments in the Lexical Approach, 47-69.

[31]. Hunston, S. (2022). Corpora in Applied Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.

[32]. Johns, T. (1991). Should you be persuaded: Two examples of data-driven learning. ELR Journal, 4, 1-16.

[33]. Kennedy, G. (2003). Structure and meaning in English. Pearson Educated Limited.

[34]. Koosha, M., & Jafarpour, A. A. (2006). Data-driven learning and teaching collocation of prepositions: The case of Iranian EFL adult learners. Asian EFL Journal, 8(4), 192-209.

[35]. Larson-Hall, J. (2010). A Guide to Doing Statistics in Second Language Research using SPSS. New York Routledge.

[36]. McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse Analysis for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[37]. McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (1995). Spoken grammar: What is it and how can we teach it? ELT Journal, 49(3), 207-218. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/49.3.207

[38]. Paker, T., & Ergül-Özcan, Y. (2017). The effectiveness of using corpus-based materials in vocabulary teaching. International Journal of Language Academy, 5(1), 62-81. https://doi.org/10.18033/ijla.3494

[39]. Prodromou, L. (1996). Correspondence. ELT Journal, 50(1), 88-89. https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccr021

[40]. Saud, W. I. (2015). Cohesion in the descriptive writing of EFL undergraduates. International Journal of Humanities and Cultural Studies, 2(2), 440-450.

[41]. Simpson-Vlach, R., & Ellis, N. C. (2010). An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 487–512. https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amp058

[42]. Smart, J. (2014). The role of guided induction in paper-baseddata-drivenlearning. ReCALL, 26(2), 184-201. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344014000081

[43]. Thornbury, S. (2006). An A-Z of ELT. Oxford: Macmillan Education.

[44]. Uçar, S., & Yükselir, C. (2015). The effect of corpus based activities on verb-noun collocations in EFL classes. TOJET: The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 14(2), 195–205.

[45]. Vannestål, M. E., & Lindquist, H. (2007). Learning English grammar with a corpus: Experimenting with concordancing in a university grammar course. ReCALL, 19(3), 329-350. https://doi.org/10.1017/S095834400700 0638

[46]. Yang, W., & Sun, Y. (2012). The use of cohesive devices in argumentative writing by Chinese EFL learners at different proficiency levels. Linguistics and Education, 23(1), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.linged.2011.09.004

[47]. Yoon, H., & Hirvela, A. (2004). ESL student attitudes toward corpus use in L2 writing. Journal of second language writing, 13(4), 257-283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2004.06.002

i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching (JELT)

Current Issue Vol. 14 Issue 4

Most Read

Most Cited

Volume 12 Issue 2 April - June 2022

Insights from Virtual Practicum Observation Tasks in Turkey during Covid-19

Ceylan Yangin Ersanli* , Burçak Yilmaz Yakişik**

* Department of English Language Education, Ondokuz Mayis University, Turkey. ** Department of English Language Education, Gazi University, Turkey.

Ersanli, C. Y., and Yakişik, B. Y. (2022). Insights from Virtual Practicum Observation Tasks in Turkey during Covid-19. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 12(2), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.12.2.18482

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Relationship among EFL Reading Comprehension, Silent Reading Rate, Vocabulary, and Reading Motivation

Merve Savasci* , Ayşe S. Akyel**

* Department of Foreign Languages Education, Sakarya University, Turkey. ** Department of Foreign Language Education, Yeditepe University, Turkey.

Savasci, M. and Akyel, A. S. (2022). Relationship among EFL Reading Comprehension, Silent Reading Rate, Vocabulary, and Reading Motivation. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 12(2), 16-30. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.12.2.18440

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Expats using English with Undergraduates in Saudi Arabian Universities: Issues and Solutions

Oveesa Farooq* , Aadil Amin Kak**, Sumaya Jehangir***

*-*** Department of Linguistics, University of Kashmir, Srinagar, India.

Farooq, O., Kak, A. A. and Jehangir, S. (2022). Expats using English with Undergraduates in Saudi Arabian Universities: Issues and Solutions. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 12(2), 31-38. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.12.2.18467

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Can Asynchronous Video-Mediated Oral Book Reports be the Solution for Foreign Language Speaking Anxiety?

Sevcan Bayraktar Çepni* , Neslihan Keleş**, Gökhan Çepni***

*-*** Department of English Language Teaching, Trabzon University, Turkey.

Çepni, S. B., Keleş N. and Çepni, G. (2022). Can Asynchronous Video-Mediated Oral Book Reports be the Solution for Foreign Language Speaking Anxiety? i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 12(2), 39-52. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.12.2.18630

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Can You See What Is Missing? Printed Corpus-Based Teaching Materials Can Help Out With Identifying L2 English Substitution and Ellipsis

Ufuk Girgin* , Zeynep Ölçü Dinçer**

* Department of English Language Teaching, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey. ** Department of English Language Teaching, Hakkari University, Hakkari, Turkey

Girgin, U., and Dinçer, Z. Ö. (2022). Can you see what is Missing? Printed Corpus-Based Teaching Materials can Help Out with Identifying L2 English Substitution and Ellipsis. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 12(2), 53-66. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.12.2.18400

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

* Department of English Language Education, Ondokuz Mayis University, Turkey.

** Department of English Language Education, Gazi University, Turkey.

* Department of Foreign Languages Education, Sakarya University, Turkey.

** Department of Foreign Language Education, Yeditepe University, Turkey.

Oveesa Farooq* , Aadil Amin Kak, Sumaya Jehangir*

Sevcan Bayraktar Çepni* , Neslihan Keleş, Gökhan Çepni*

* Department of English Language Teaching, Erciyes University, Kayseri, Turkey.

** Department of English Language Teaching, Hakkari University, Hakkari, Turkey