i-manager Publications

i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology (JSCH)

Current Issue Vol. 19 Issue 2

ChatGPT as an Empowering Catalyst: Unveiling the Impact on Political Awareness and Civic Education
Demand for Private Coaching: Stakeholder's Perspective and Consequences
Revisiting Flipped Class Model Effectiveness on Learning Performance: A Meta-Analysis of Meta Analyses
Unlocking Learning Potential: An Experimental Study on the Impact of TPACK-Enhanced Flipped Learning in Mathematics Education
Effectiveness of Flipped Classroom (FC) Model in Learning Economics Subject: A Quasi-Experimental Study

Most Cited

Volume 16 Issue 1 June - August 2020

Research Paper

A Study for Improving the Reliability and Ethicality of Offline Assessment

Mustafa Erdemir * , Halil Ibrahim Akyuz **

* Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Kastamonu University, Turkey.

** Department of Computer and Instructional Technologies Education, Kastamonu University, Turkey.

Erdemir, M., and Akyuz, H. I. (2020). A Study for Improving the Reliability and Ethicality of Offline Assessment. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, 16(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.16.1.17339

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to reduce ethics violations such as tricking and cheating that may occur in the offline assessment of undergraduate level Physics-II (Electricity) course subjects. The study is significant for the reliable and ethical evaluation of the Internet and computer-based educational process. Thirty-eight pre-service teachers participated in the study by using the Internet and computer. The offline assessment exam consisted of 18 conceptual and operational (problems) questions concerning the subjects covered in the Physics-II course, and the exam duration was 60 minutes. Ethics violations in the exam were determined by analyzing the exam results based on five criteria: time passed in the exam, the number of right and wrong answers, the distribution of right and wrong answers, the distribution of unanswered questions, offline exam mark, and in-class academic success score. Based on these criteria, 23 pre-service teachers were seen to have violated ethics, while 15 pre-service teachers did not engage in such violations. This can be used as a criterion for maintaining the reliability and ethicality of offline Physics-II exams conducted over the Internet. Besides the application of such criteria, question pools containing a great number of questions and various exams with high reliability that are made up of these questions may be created, and the constraints of the Internet and computer-based exams may be decreased, thereby rendering them more reliable.

References

[1]. Aisbitt, S., & Sangster, A. (2005). Using internet-based on-line assessment: A case study. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 14(4), 383-394. https://doi.org/10. 1080/06939280500346011

[2]. Alruwais, N., Wills, G., & Wald, M. (2018). Advantages and challenges of using e-assessment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(1), 34- 37.

[3]. Arkorful, V. & Abaidoo, N. (2014). The role of e-learning, advantages, and disadvantages of its adoption in higher education. International Journal of Education and Research, 2(12), 397–410. https://ijern.com/journal/2014/ December-2014/34.pdf

[4]. Balta, Y. & Türel, Y. K. (2013). Çevrimiçi uzaktan eğitimde kullanılan farklı ölçme değerlendirme yaklaşımlarına ilişkin bir inceleme. Turkish Studies, 8(3), 37-45. http://www.acarin dex.com/dosyalar/makale/acarindex-1423933010.pdf

[5]. Bawarith, R., Basuhail, A., Fattouh, A., & Gamalel-Din, S. (2017). E-exam cheating detection system. (IJACSA) International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications. 8(4),176–181.

[6]. Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2007). Teaching for Quality Learning at University (3^rd ed.). Berkshire: Open University Press.

[7]. Cabi, E. (2016). Uzaktan Eğitimde E-Değerlendirme Üzerine Öğrenci Algıları. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi. 6(1), 94-101. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2016.146

[8]. Crisp, G. (2007). The e-Assessment Handbook. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.

[9]. Dommeyer, C. J., Baum, P., Hanna, R. W., & Chapman, K. S. (2004). Gathering faculty teaching evaluations by inclass and online surveys: Their effects on response rates and evaluations. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29(5), 611–623. https://doi.org/10.1080/0260 2930410001689171

[10]. Fagbola, T. M., Adigun, A. A., & Oke, A. O. (2013). Computer-Based test (Cbt) system for university academic enterprise examination. International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, 2(8), 336-342.

[11]. Gibbs, G., & Simpson, C. (2005). Conditions under which assessment supports students' learning. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education, (1), 3-31. http://eprints. glos.ac.uk/3609/

[12]. Hartshorne. R, & Ajjan, H. (2009). Examining student decision to adopt web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests. Journal of computing in higher education, 21(3), 183-198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-009-9023-6

[13]. Lewis, D. J. A. & Sewell, R. D. (2007). Providing formative feedback from a summative computer aided assessment. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 71(2), 33.

[14]. Llamas-Nistal, M., Fernández-Iglesias, M. J., González-Tato, J. & Mikic-Fonte, F. A. (2013). Blended eassessment: Migrating classical exams to the digital world. Computers & Education, 62(1), 72-87 https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.compedu.2012.10.021

[15]. Nicol, D. (2007). Principles of good assessment and feedback: Theory and practice. In REAP International Online Conference on Assessment Design for Learner Responsibility (pp. 29-31).

[16]. Questionmark, (2020). Five steps to better tests: Free White Paper. https://support.questionmark.com/content/5- steps-better-tests-free-white-paper

[17]. Ridgway, J., McCusker, S., & Pead, D. (2004). Literature review of e-assessment. https://telearn.archivesouvertes. fr/hal-00190440/

[18]. Rossi. P. G. (2009). Learning environment with artificial intelligence elements. Journal of e-learning and Knowledge Society, 5(1), 191-199. http://www.je-lks.org/ ojs/index.php/Je-LKS_EN/article/view/306/120

[19]. Rytkönen, A. & Myyry, L. (2014). Student experiences on taking electronic exams at the University of Helsinki. In J. Viteli & M. Leikomaa (Eds.), Proceedings of EdMedia 2014- World Conference on Educational Media and Technology (pp. 2114-2121). Tampere, Finland: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https:// www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/147766/

[20]. Shuey, S. (2002). Assessing Online Learning in Higher Education. Journal of Instruction Delivery Systems, 16(2),13- 18.

[21]. Smedley, J.K. (2010). Modelling the impact of knowledge management using technology. OR Insight, 23(4), 233–250. https://doi.org/10.1057/ori.2010.11

[22]. Osuji, U.S.A. (2012). The use of e-assessments in the Nigerian higher education system. Turkish Online Journal Distance Education, 13(4), 140–152.

[23]. Whitelock, D. M.,& Brasher, A. (2006). Developing a Roadmap for e-Assessment: Which WayNow? In: Danson, th Myles (Ed.) Proceedings of the 10 CAA International Computer Assisted Assessment Conference. Lough borough, UK: Professional Development, Loughborough University, 487–501. https://oro.open.ac.uk/11950/1/CA A_Conf_06_roadmap_paperfv .pdf

[24]. Williams, J. B., & Wong, A. (2009). The efficacy of final examinations: A comparative study of closed-book, invigilated exams and open-book, open-web exams. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(2), 227-236. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00929.x

[25]. Young, J. R. (1997). Rethinking the Role of the Professor in an Age of High-Tech Tools. Chronicle of Higher Education, 44(6), A26-A28. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ55 2453

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Using Simulations to Improve Achievements and Motivation in ICT Studies

Orit Zeichner*

Kibbutzim College of Education, Technology and the Arts, Israel.

Zeichner, O. (2020). Using Simulations To Improve Achievements And Motivation In ICT Studies. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, 16(1), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.16.1.17426

Abstract

This study examined the effect of learning in a computerized environment that includes simulations on the students' achievements and motivation, and is based on models that show that learning through simulation has more potential to promote the comprehension of abstract principles and concepts than traditional learning does. The theoretical background describes studies on technology in teaching, simulations and their role in teaching, learning motivation, and achievements. To examine the relationship between learning through simulation and achievements in the learning of operation systems in Information and Communications Technology (ICT) classes, we developed five simulations on a FLASH platform for each unit in the study program. The simulations were accompanied by interactive activity pages. This is a mixed-methods (quantitative and qualitative) research. The tools included preliminary and summary questionnaires. The sample included 151 high school students, who were divided randomly into two groups: experiment group – learned through online simulations (N=74); control group – learned without simulations (N=77). The findings indicated that students in the experiment group significantly improved their achievements. Also, integrating simulations in learning increased the students' motivation to learn ICT, and improved their comprehension of the study topics. The participants in the experiment group noted that learning ICT was important, and should be learned at school, as it is closely linked to their everyday lives.

References

[1]. Ames, C. (1992). Achievement goals and the classroom motivational climate. Student Perceptions in the Classroom, 1, 327-348.

[2]. Anderson, J., Van Weert, T., & Duchâteau, C. (2002). Information and Communication Technology in Education: A Curriculum for Schools and Programme of Teacher Development. UNESCO.

[3]. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York: W. H. Freeman.

[4]. Barak, M. (2017). Science teacher education in the twenty-first century: A pedagogical framework for technology-integrated social constructivism. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 283-303.

[5]. Beauchamp, G., & Kennewell, S. (2013). Transition in pedagogical orchestration using the interactive whiteboard. Education and Information Technologies, 18(2), 179-191.

[6]. Bevan, B. (2017). The promise and the promises of Making in science education. Studies in Science Education, 53(1), 75-103.

[7]. Blue, E., & Tirotta, R. (2011). The benefits and drawbacks of integrating cloud computing and interactive whiteboards in teacher preparation. TechTrends, 55(3), 31-39.

[8]. Cayvaz, A., Akcay, H., & Kapici, H. O. (2020). Comparison of simulation-based and textbook-based instructions on middle school students' achievement, inquiry skills and attitudes. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 8(1), 34-43.

[9]. Charsky, D., & Ressler, W. (2011). “Games are made for fun”: Lessons on the effects of concept maps in the classroom use of computer games. Computers & Education, 56(3), 604-615.

[10]. Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2016). E-learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for consumers and designers of multimedia learning. John Wiley & Sons.

[11]. Collins, A., & Halverson, R. (2018). Rethinking education in the age of technology: The digital revolution and schooling in America. Teachers College Press.

[12]. Cunningham, C. A. (2009). Transforming schooling through technology: Twenty-first-century approaches to participatory learning. Education and Culture, 25(2), 46-61.

[13]. Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P. (1996). Assending students' motivation and learning strategies in the classeoom context: The motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. In M. Birenbaum & F. J. R. C. Dochy (Eds.). Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge (pp. 319-339). Boston, MA: Kluwer

[14]. Garneli, V., & Chorianopoulos, K. (2018). Programming video games and simulations in science education: Exploring computational thinking through code analysis. Interactive Learning Environments, 26(3), 386-401.

[15]. Gray, L., Thomas, N., & Lewis, L. (2010). Educational Technology in U.S. Public Schools: Fall 2008 (NCES 2010- 034). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.

[16]. Halverson, R., & Smith, A. (2010). How new technologies have (and have not) changed teaching and learning in school. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 26(2).

[17]. Honey, M. (2001). Testimony before the Labor, HHS, and Education Appropriations Subcommittee. United States Senate, Retrieved from http://main.edc.org/newsro om/features/mhtestimony.asp

[18]. Karsenti, T. (2016). The interactive whiteboard: Uses, benefits, and challenges: A survey of 11,683 students and 1,131 teachers. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 42(5).

[19]. Keller, J., & Kopp, T. (1987). Application of the ARCS model of motivational design. In C.M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional theories in action: Lessons illustrating selected theories and models. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[20]. Kohen, Z. (2019). Informed integration of IWB technology, incorporated with exposure to varied mathematics problem-solving skills: Its effect on students' real-time emotions. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 50(8), 1128-1151.

[21]. Kramarski, B., & Zeichner, O. (2001). Using technology to enhance mathematical reasoning: Effects of feedback and self-regulation learning. Educational Media International, 38(2-3), 77-82.

[22]. Kulik, J. A., & Fletcher, J. D. (2016). Effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems: A meta-analytic review. Review of Educational Research, 86(1), 42-78.

[23]. Lin, H. H., Yen, W. C., & Wang, Y. S. (2018). Investigating the effect of learning method and motivation on learning performance in a business simulation system context: An experimental study. Computers & Education, 127, 30-40.

[24]. Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Pintrich, P. R. (2006). Dynamic relation between achievement, goal orientations and affect. (Unpublished.)

[25]. Liou, H. H., Yang, S. J., Chen, S. Y., & Tarng, W. (2017). The influences of the 2D image-based augmented reality and virtual reality on student learning. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(3), 110-121.

[26]. Manny-Ikan, E., Dagan, O., Tikochinski, T., & Zorman, R. (2011). Using the interactive white board in teaching and learning: An Evaluation of the smart classroom pilot project. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning and Learning Objects, 7(1), 249-273.

[27]. Mayer, R. E. (2017). Using multimedia for e-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 403-423.

[28]. McFarland, J., Hussar, B., De Brey, C., Snyder, T., Wang, X., Wilkinson-Flicker, S., ... & Bullock Mann, F. (2017). The Condition of Education 2017. NCES 2017-144. National Center for Education Statistics.

[29]. McKagan, S. B., Handley, W., Perkins, K. K., & Wieman, C. E. (2009). A research-based curriculum for teaching the photoelectric effect. American Journal of Physics, 77(1), 87 –94.

[30]. Merriam, S. B., & Baumgartner, L. M. (2020). Learning in Adulthood: A Comprehensive Guide. John Wiley & Sons.

[31]. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M.J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record, 108(6), 1017–1054.

[32]. Ormanci, U., Cepni, S., Deveci, I., & Aydin, O. (2015). A thematic review of interactive whiteboard use in science education: Rationales, purposes, methods and general knowledge. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(5), 532-548.

[33]. Pintrich, P., Smith, D., Garcia, T. & McKeachie, W. (1991). A Manual for the Use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). National Center for Research to Improve Post-secondary Teaching and Learning.

[34]. Rutten, N., Van Joolingen, W. R., & Van Der Veen, J. T. (2012). The learning effects of computer simulations in science education. Computers & Education, 58(1), 136-153.

[35]. Sarı, U., Hassan, A. H., Güven, K., & Şen, Ö. F. (2017). Effects of the 5E teaching model using interactive simulation on achievement and attitude in physics education. International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 25(3), 20-35.

[36]. Schacter, J. (1999). The Impact of Education Technology on Student Achievement: What the Most Current Research has to Say. Santa Monica, CA: Milken Exchange on Education Technology.

[37]. Schunk, D. H., & DiBenedetto, M. K. (2020). Motivation and social cognitive theory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 60, 1-46.

[38]. Schunk, D. H., & Usher, E. L. (2019). Social Cognitive Theory and Motivation. In Ryan, RM (Ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Human Motivation.

[39]. Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26(1), 65–73.

[40]. Shieh, R. S., Chang, W. J., & Tang, J. (2010). The impact of implementing technology-enabled active learning (TEAL) in university physics in Taiwan. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19(3), 401–415.

[41]. Siahaan, P., Suryani, A., Kaniawati, I., Suhendi, E., & Samsudin, A. (2017, February). Improving students' science process skills through simple computer simulations on linear motion conceptions. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 812, No. 1, p. 012017). IOP Publishing.

[42]. Sitzmann, T. (2011). A meta-analytic examination of the instructional effectiveness of computer-based simulation games. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 489-528.

[43]. Steenbergen-Hu, S., & Cooper, H. (2014). A metaanalysis of the effectiveness of intelligent tutoring systems on college students' academic learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(2), 331.

[44]. Stern, L., Barnea, N., & Shauli, S. (2008). The effect of a computerized simulation on middle school students' understanding of the kinetic molecular theory. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(4), 305–315.

[45]. Tinto, V. (2019). Learning Better Together. In Jones, A., Olds, A., & Lisciandro, J. G. (Eds.). Transitioning Students in Higher Education: Philosophy, Pedagogy and Practice Routledge.

[46]. Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2017). The effect of games and simulations on higher education: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 14(1), 1-33.

[47]. Wen, C. T., Liu, C. C., Chang, H. Y., Chang, C. J., Chang, M. H., Chiang, S. H. F., ... & Hwang, F. K. (2020). Students' guided inquiry with simulation and its relation to school science achievement and scientific literacy. Computers & Education, 149, 1-14. https://doi.org/10. 1016/j.compedu.2020.103830

[48]. Widiyatmoko, A. (2018). The effectiveness of simulation in science learning on conceptual understanding: A literature review. Journal of International Development and Cooperation, 24(1), 35-43.

[49]. Zeichner, O. (2018). The impact of cognitive and noncognitive feedback on students' achievement in a distance learning environment. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 14(4), 13-27.

[50]. Zeichner, O. (2019a). The impact of safe internet intervention programs on pupils. i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology, 16(3), 34-43. https://doi.org/10. 26634/jet.16.3.16572

[51]. Zeichner, O. (2019b). The relationship between extrovert/introvert attributes and feedback on students' achievements. International Journal of Distance Education Technologies (IJDET), 17(2), 1-17.

[52]. Zeichner, O., & Zilka, G. (2016). Feelings of challenge and threat among pre-service teachers studying in different learning environments--virtual vs. blended courses. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 7-19.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Development of a Software Package Capable of Teaching Numbers and Words to Children between the Ages of 2-5 Years

Adeleke Raheem Ajiboye* , Roseline Oluwaseun Ogundokun , Peter O. Sadiku*, Olufunke O. Kayode****

, Department of Computer Science, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria.

Department of Computer Science, Landmark University Omu Aran, Kwara State, Nigeria.

**** Chapel Secondary School, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria.

Ajiboye, A. R., Ogundokun, R. O., Sadiku, P. O., and Kayode, O. O. (2020). Development of a Software Package Capable of Teaching Numbers and Words to Children between the Ages of 2-5 Years. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, 16(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.16.1.17149

Abstract

The application of computer science is fast-growing and things change day by day; with this there is a necessity to adapt to the changes as software applications are powerful tools that herald significant development in diversified fields including education. Adoption of the computer systems in various operations of schools (primary, secondary and tertiary), as well as individual homes, has come to replace the earlier method of lightening the burden of teaching and learning. With this background, the aim of this study was to develop a software application for teaching and learning of words for children between the age of 2 to 5 years and this involves the learning of two to four letter words along with numbers 0 to 9. This aim will be achieved by developing a software package capable of teaching numbers and words to children between the ages of 2 to 5 years, The designed software will be user-friendly and a reliable instructional material to teach in a short period of time and increase knowledge development of the child. As the teaching method uses computer aided method, pupil will be able to understand it better and will be more focused. Recognition of the word with the background of accompanying visuals, the understanding process will assist teachers and pupils alike, in improving the methods of teaching and learning basic words. Since the system is through media, there is more possibility that the pupils will learn faster and more efficiently. It will also help the pupils to identify the communicated words appropriately and effectively and effortlessly.

References

[1]. Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to Read: Thinking and Learning About Print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED315740.pdf

[2]. Adams, M. J., & Bruck, M. (1993). Word recognition: The interface of educational policies and scientific research. Reading and Writing, 5(2), 113-139. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/BF01027480

[3]. Amazon, (2019). Educational software. https://www. amazon.com/s?k=educational+software+for+kids& crid=3373UF38P6N5D&sprefix=educational+software+ %2Caps%2C413&ref=nb_sb_ss_i_1_21

[4]. Awotunde, J. B., Ogundokun, R. O., Ayo, F. E., Ajamu, G. J., Adeniyi, E. A., & Ogundokun, E. O. (2019, September). Social media acceptance and use among university students for learning purpose using UTAUT model. In International Conference on Information Systems Architecture and Technology (pp. 91-102). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30440-9_10

[5]. Best App for Kids. Word recognition. www.bestapps forkids.com/tag/word-recognition

[6]. Blease, C., Ecklund, K., & Hitzman, M. (1999). Improving Word Recognition among First Grade Students. Retrieved from https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED433503

[7]. Chall, (1967). Learning to read: The Great Debate. Retrieved from https://www.weber.edu/wsuimages/ jmitchell/MEDUC%206355/The%20Great%20Debate.pdf

[8]. Erion, J., & Ronka, C. S. (2004). Improve Reading Fluency with Parent Tutoring. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 1(2), n2.

[9]. Hagen, A., Pellom, B., Van Vuuren, S., & Cole, R. (2004). Advances in children's speech recognition within an interactive literacy tutor. In Proceedings of HLT-NAACL 2004: Short Papers (pp. 25-28).

[10]. Li, X., Deng, L., Ju, Y. C., & Acero, A. (2008). Automatic children's reading tutor on hand-held devices. In Ninth Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, 1733-1736.

[11]. Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Barros, R. (2012). The development of word recognition and its significance for comprehension and fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 959–973. https://doi.org/10.1037/ a0027412

[12]. Ogundokun, R. O., Adebiyi, M. O., Abikoye, O. C., Oladele, T. O., Lukman, A. F., Adeniyi, A. E., ... & Akande, N. O. (2019). Evaluation of the scholastic performance of students in 12 programs from a private university in the south-west geopolitical zone in Nigeria. F1000Research, 8, pp.154. https://doi.org/10.12688%2Ff1000research. 16762.2

[13]. Schiola, E. (2017). The best apps for kids, Digitaltrends. Retrieved from https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/bestapps- for-kids/

[14]. Snow, C., Bums, M., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ ED416465.pdf

[15]. Techopedia, (2020). Computer system. Retrieved from https://www.techopedia.com/definition/593/

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Awareness of Video Conferencing among the Prospective Teachers in Present Scenario

D. R. Robert Joan* , Y. Sheeja **

* Department of Mathematics, Christian College of Education, Marthandam, Tamilnadu, India.

** Department of Mathematics, James College of Education, Mannavilai, Karungal, Tamilnadu, India.

Joan, D. R. R., and Sheeja, Y. (2020). Awareness of Video Conferencing among the Prospective Teachers in Present Scenario. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, 16(1), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.16.1.17059

Abstract

In the present scenario video conferencing plays a vital role in education, political, spiritual, transportation, communication, medical and so on. In education, online courses are fulfill by the assist of video conferencing. Through video conferencing the experts are teaching and the learners are listening to the classes through any electronic device. In medical field also video conferencing takes an advantage by asking the suggestions from the experts as a consultation. Now a days our political leaders also inaugurate the new buildings or implement the new scheme for the society through online with the assist of video conferencing. Electronic devices are very popular in this digital world. Some companies or individual are introducing a lot of applications for mobile phones and computers. One of the most useful option in some application is video conferencing (video call). So it is familiar to the society even though there exists a ignorance among the next generation. The prospective teachers are the ones who mould the future citizens. The author aims to find the awareness of video conferencing among prospective teachers. For that, the investigator used the survey method to determine awareness of video conferencing among prospective teachers. The present study consists of 64 samples from a college of education. The investigator has used a tool “Awareness Checklist for video conferencing” to collect the data for the present study. The researchers concluded that the locality of residence is not essential, the essential things are the facility provided and the eagerness to learn. It will develop the awareness among any individual. So, the facility for video conferencing should be provided in all type of institution and should be made use to enhance knowledge of the learner. Thus the teachers and teacher educators are requested to motive the future generation in a positive way and help them to achieve an eternal goal.

References

[1]. Beal, V. (2020). Video Conferencing. Retrieved from https://www.webopedia.com/TERM/V/videoconferencing. html

[2]. Best, J.W., & Kahn, J.V. (2005). Research in Education (8^th ed.). New Delhi: Prentice Hall of India.

[3]. Garrett, H. E. (2005). Statistics in Psychology and Education. New Delhi: Paragon International Publishers.

[4]. Gaudin, C., & Chaliès, S. (2015). Video viewing in teacher education and professional development: A literature review. Educational Research Review, 16, 41-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2015.06.001

[5]. Gemmell, J., Toyama, K., Zitnick, C.L., Kang, T., & Seitz, S. (2000). Gaze awareness for video-conferencing: A software approach. Multimedia, IEEE. 7, 26-35. https:// doi.org/10.1109/93.895152

[6]. Gillies, D., & Sgm, F. (2008). Student perspectives on video conferencing in teacher education at a distance. Distance Education, 29, 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 01587910802004878

[7]. Kagan, J. (2019). Video Conferencing. Investopedio, Retrieved from https://www.investopedia.com/terms/v/ video-conferencing.asp

[8]. Krutka, D.G., & Carano, K.T. (2016). Video conferencing for Global Citizenship Education: Wise Practices for Social Studies Educators. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 7(2), 109-136.

[9]. Olson, K. (2013). How Video Calling Technology Will Change the Face of Social Media. Social Media Today, Retrieved from https://www.socialmediatoday.com/ content/how-video-calling-technology-will-change-facesocial- media

[10]. Santrock, J. W. (2006). Educational Psychology. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill Publications.

[11]. Slovak, P. (2007). Effect of video conferencing environments on perception of communication. Cyber Psychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 1(1), Article 8. Retrieved from https://cyber psychology.eu/article/view/4205/3246.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Review Paper

Social and Ethical Views on Critical Technology Element and Its Effect on Ethnomethodology

Annamma George*

Christukula Mission College, Satna, Madhya Pradesh, India.

George, A. (2020). Social and Ethical Views on Critical Technology Element and its Effect on Ethnomethodology. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, 16(1), 40-50. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.16.1.17445

World Health Organization : COVID-19 - Global literature on coronavirus disease

https://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/global-literature-on-novel-coronavirus-2019-ncov/resource/en/covidwho-963191

ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-963191

Abstract

Majority of schools and other higher educational institutions have rushed to procure the best application in the recent days to deliver content to their students in the best possible manner without wasting time during the course of the new academic year as the threat for Covid-19 arose at around the end of the year 2019. Critical Technology Element, a new or novel technology that a platform or system depends on to achieve successful development or production or to successfully meet a system operational threshold requirement, has come to its aid. This has slowly become the part of life of all households mostly irrespective of each one’s financial status, and thus a part of life for the majority of school going population. This in turn, especially the use of technology and social media in the pretext of education has shown both positive and negative impacts on the society and the young generation. Now when everything gets back to normal, how are the students going to handle the transition. Would they find their old traditional classroom and evaluation techniques worthy enough? This paper throws light on the possibilities of the transition and hence the impact on Ethnomethodology.

References

[1]. Alford, B., & Kroll, K. (2020, July 12). Post-Pandemic Education Must Move Beyond Mere Job Training. Truth Out. Retreived from https://truthout.org/articles/post-pandemiceducation- must-move-beyond-mere-job-training/

[2]. Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2010). Class Differences: Online Education in the United States. Online Learning. Babson Survey Research Group, USA.

[3]. Anand, S. (2020, June 24). Post-Pandemic Schooling. India Today Insight. Retreived from https://www.indiatoday. in/india-today-insight/story/post-pandemic-schooling- 1692370-2020-06-24

[4]. Anderson, M. L., & Taylor, H. F. (2009). Sociology: The Essentials. Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.

[5]. Blakey, E., & Spence, S. (1990). Thinking for the future. Emergency Librarian, 17(5), 11-14.

[6]. Cano, Y., & Venuti, F. (2020). Online Learning Can Still Be Social. Retrieved from https://hbsp.harvard.edu/inspiri ng-minds/online-learning-can-still-be-social

[7]. Chadha, M. (2020, June 17). Equitable Access for the Education Sector in a Pandemic-Stricken India. Observer Research Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.orfonl ine.org/expert-speak/equitable-access-for-the-educatio- 68011n-sector-in-a-pandemic-stricken-india-68011/

[8]. Crossman, A. (2007). Using Ethnomethodology to Understand Social Order. ThoughtCo. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-ethnomethodology- 3026553

[9]. Deasy, J. (2020). Reality Check: What Will it Take to Reopen Schools Amid the Pandemic? 6 Experts Weigh in on the Looming Fiscal Crisis and What Services Districts Should (and Should n’t) Cut. The 74. Retrieved from https:/ /www.the74million.org/article/reality-check-what-will-ittake- to-reopen-schools-amid-the-pandemic-6-expertsweigh- in-on-the-looming-fiscal-crisis-and-what-servicesdistricts- should-and-shouldnt-cut/

[10]. Edventures. (2009) Managing Change on Campus: Academic Program Development and Assessment. Retrieved from https://wwww.immagic.com/eLibrary/ ARCHIVES/GENERAL/ACPTR_US/A110923F.PDF

[11]. Fr D'Souza, Z. (2020, July 13). COVID-19 and Educational Scenario – I. Herald. Retrieved from https://ww w.heraldgoa.in/Goa/Citizen-Herald/COVID19-and-educational-scenario-%E2%80%93-I/162918

[12]. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

[13]. Garrison, D. R. (1999). Will distance disappear in distance studies? A reaction. Journal of Distance Education, 14(2), 10-13.

[14]. George, A. (2013). Effectiveness of web based instruction in learning scientific skills among higher secondary students (Doctoral dissertation), Karunya University, Coimbatore. http://shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in.

[15]. George, A., & Kappan, M. D. (2011). Metacognition through technology and teaching. Journal on Educational Psychology, 4(3), 32-38. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.4.3. 1245 https://www.washingtonpost.com/education/202 0/07/09/why-calls-reinvent-schooling-response-pandemic -are-wrong/

[16]. Kelly, É. (2020, July 9). Universities prepare for the new post-pandemic world. Science Business. Retrieved from https://sciencebusiness.net/covid-19/news/universitiesprepare- new-post-pandemic-world

[17]. Kolata, G (2020). How Pandemics End. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/10/health/cor onavirus-plague-pandemic-history.html

[18]. Lin, X., Hmelo, C., Kinzer, C. K., & Secules, T. J. (1999). Designing technology to support reflection. Educational Technology Research and Development, 47(3), 43-62.

[19]. Luthra, P., & Mackenzie, S. (2020, March 30). 4 Ways COVID-19 Could Change How We Educate Future Generations. World Economic Forum. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/03/4-ways-covid- 19-education-future-generations/.

[20]. Mandelbaum, J. (2007). Using technology readiness assessments (TRAS) to assess the maturity of life-cycle related technologies. In National Defense Industrial rd Association 23 Annual National Test & Evaluation Conference. Retrieved from https://ndiastorage.blob.co re.usgovcloudapi.net/ndia/2007/test/Mandelbaum_SessionD1.pdf

[21]. Maynard , D. W., & Weathersbee, E. (2007). Ethnomethodology, The Blackwell Encyclopedia of Sociology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781405165518.wbeo se071

[22]. Rickard, W. (2010). The Efficacy (and Inevitability) of Online Learning in Higher Education. Pearson. Retrieved from www.pearsonlearningsolutions.com/onlinelearning/ downloads/Online%20Learning%20Whitepaper.pdf.

[23]. Sharma, K. (2020, July 11). Peeping parents, sleeping students, bullying – Online classes are a nightmare for teachers. The Print. Retrieved from https://theprint.in/india/ education

[24]. Spencer, G. (2020, June 17). Schools after COVID-19: From a Teaching Culture to a Learning Culture. News Microsoft. Retrieved from https://news.microsoft.com/apa c/features/technology-in-schools-from-a-teachingculture- to-a-learning-culture/

[25]. Strauss, V. (2020, July 9). Why calls to 'reinvent schooling' in response to the pandemic are wrong. The Washington Post. Retrieved from https://www.washington post.com/education/2020/07/09/why-calls-reinventschooling- response-pandemic-are-wrong/

[26]. Sudarshan, A. (2020, June 24). Rethinking Campuses: Post Pandemic, Colleges Must Put Human Interaction at the Heart of Education. Scroll In. Retrieved from https://s croll.in/article/964758/rethinking-campuses-post-pande mic-colleges-must-put-human-interaction-at-the-heartof- education

[27]. Swan, K. (2003). Learning effectiveness: What the research tells us. In J. Bourne & J. C. Moore (Eds.). Elements of quality online education, practice and direction. Needham, MA: Sloan Center for Online Education, 13-45.

[28] Glenn, M. (2008). The future of higher education: How technology will shape learning (pp. 1-27). The New Media Consortium, The Economist. Retrieved from https://files.eric. ed.gov/fulltext/ED505103.pdf

i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology (JSCH)

Current Issue Vol. 19 Issue 2

Most Read

Most Cited

Volume 16 Issue 1 June - August 2020

A Study for Improving the Reliability and Ethicality of Offline Assessment

Mustafa Erdemir * , Halil Ibrahim Akyuz **

* Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Kastamonu University, Turkey. ** Department of Computer and Instructional Technologies Education, Kastamonu University, Turkey.

Erdemir, M., and Akyuz, H. I. (2020). A Study for Improving the Reliability and Ethicality of Offline Assessment. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, 16(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.16.1.17339

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Using Simulations to Improve Achievements and Motivation in ICT Studies

Orit Zeichner*

Kibbutzim College of Education, Technology and the Arts, Israel.

Zeichner, O. (2020). Using Simulations To Improve Achievements And Motivation In ICT Studies. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, 16(1), 11-24. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.16.1.17426

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Development of a Software Package Capable of Teaching Numbers and Words to Children between the Ages of 2-5 Years

Adeleke Raheem Ajiboye* , Roseline Oluwaseun Ogundokun **, Peter O. Sadiku***, Olufunke O. Kayode****

*,*** Department of Computer Science, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria. ** Department of Computer Science, Landmark University Omu Aran, Kwara State, Nigeria. **** Chapel Secondary School, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria.

Ajiboye, A. R., Ogundokun, R. O., Sadiku, P. O., and Kayode, O. O. (2020). Development of a Software Package Capable of Teaching Numbers and Words to Children between the Ages of 2-5 Years. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, 16(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.16.1.17149

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Awareness of Video Conferencing among the Prospective Teachers in Present Scenario

D. R. Robert Joan* , Y. Sheeja **

* Department of Mathematics, Christian College of Education, Marthandam, Tamilnadu, India. ** Department of Mathematics, James College of Education, Mannavilai, Karungal, Tamilnadu, India.

Joan, D. R. R., and Sheeja, Y. (2020). Awareness of Video Conferencing among the Prospective Teachers in Present Scenario. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, 16(1), 33-39. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.16.1.17059

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Social and Ethical Views on Critical Technology Element and Its Effect on Ethnomethodology

Annamma George*

Christukula Mission College, Satna, Madhya Pradesh, India.

George, A. (2020). Social and Ethical Views on Critical Technology Element and its Effect on Ethnomethodology. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, 16(1), 40-50. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.16.1.17445

World Health Organization : COVID-19 - Global literature on coronavirus disease

ProQuest Central | ID: covidwho-963191

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

* Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Kastamonu University, Turkey.

** Department of Computer and Instructional Technologies Education, Kastamonu University, Turkey.

Adeleke Raheem Ajiboye* , Roseline Oluwaseun Ogundokun , Peter O. Sadiku*, Olufunke O. Kayode****

, Department of Computer Science, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria.

Department of Computer Science, Landmark University Omu Aran, Kwara State, Nigeria.

**** Chapel Secondary School, Ilorin, Kwara State, Nigeria.

* Department of Mathematics, Christian College of Education, Marthandam, Tamilnadu, India.

** Department of Mathematics, James College of Education, Mannavilai, Karungal, Tamilnadu, India.