Encouraging innovativeness through Computer-Assisted Collaborative Learning

Gisli Thorsteinsson*, Tom Page**
University of Iceland
Loughborough University
Periodicity:December - February'2012
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.7.3.1671

Abstract

This article puts forward a three related case study series, using a Virtual Reality Learning Environment (VRLE) with a view to supporting the development of students' ideation skills in conventional primary and secondary education. This learning environment is fairly new and therefore it is necessary to examine its educational uses and determine if the new learning environment will meet teachers’ expectations. Therefore, the overall goal for this research was twofold: a) to explore the ways in which idea generation was developed during students’ work and b) to assess the way VRLE affects student idea generation work. The data collected was qualitative and the analysis was based on grounded theory principles and an interpretive paradigm.

Keywords

Idea generation, collaborative learning, computer-assisted learning, Virtual Reality Learning Environment, pedagogy, ideation process.

How to Cite this Article?

Thorsteinsson, G. and Page, T . (2012). Encouraging Innovativeness Through Computer-Assisted Collaborative Learning.i-manager’s Journal on School Education Technology, 7(3), 22-30. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.7.3.1671

References

[1]. Blom, J.O. and Monk, A.F. (2003). A theory of personalisation of appearance: why users personalise their PCs and mobile phones. Human-Computer Interaction , Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 193-228.
[2]. Bricken, M. (1991). Virtual reality learning environments: Potentials and challenges. Computer Graphics, Vol. 25, No. 3, pp. 178-184.
[3]. Chiu, M.M. (2000). Group problem solving processes: Social interactions and individual actions. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, Vol. 30, No. 1, pp. 27-50.
[4]. Cohen, L., Manion, L. and Morrison, K. (2005). Research methods in education (5th ed.). London: Taylor & Francis e-Library.
[5]. Creswell, J.W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[6]. Demerest, M. (1997). Understanding knowledge management, Journal of Long Range Planning, Vol. 30, No. 3, pp. 374-84.
[7]. Denzin, N.K. (1984). The research act. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[8]. Denzin, N.K. and Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds), (1994). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
[9]. Dillenbourg, P. (1999). Collaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches. Advances in Learning and Instruction Series. New York, NY: Elsevier Science, Inc.
[10]. Ellis, C.A., Gibbs, S.J. and Rein, G.L. (1991). G r o u p w a r e : S o m e i s s u e s a n d e x p e r i e n c e s. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 34, No. 1, pp. 38-58.
[11]. Glaser, B.G. and Strauss, A.L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
[12]. Guilford, J.P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, Vol. 5, No. 9, pp. 444-454.
[13]. Gunnarsdottir, R. (2001). Innovation Education: Defining the Phenomenon. Unpublished doctoral thesis.Leeds: University of Leeds.
[14]. Hamburg, I., Lindecke, C. and Thij, H.T. (2003). Social aspects of e-learning and blending learning methods. In Proceedings of the 4th European conference E-commline. Bucharest.
[15]. Hauber, J., Regenbrecht, H., Hills, A.,Cockburn, A. and Billinghurst, M. (2005). Social Presence in two- and three-dimensional Videoconferencing. London: Proceedings Presence Workshop.
[16]. Hennessey, S. and Deaney, R. (2004). Sustainability and evolution of ICT supported classroom practice. Retrieved (5.April 2009) from http://131.111.153. 52/istl/SAE041.doc.
[17]. Henry, J. (1991). Creative Management, London: Sage Publications.
[18]. Hussain, H., Embi, Z.C. and Hashim, S. (2003). A Conceptualized Framework for Edutainment. Informing Science: InSite - Where Parallels Intersect, pp. 1077-1083.
[19]. Johnson, A., Moher, T., Choo, Y., Lin, Y.J. and Kim, J. (2002). Augmenting elementary school education with VR. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, March/April, pp. 6-9.
[20]. Jonassen, D. (2006). A constructivist'sperspective on functional contextualism. Educational Technology Research & Development, Vol. 54, No. 1, pp. 43-47.
[21]. Loiselle, J., St. Louis, M. and Dupuy-Walker, L. (1998). Giving professional help to pre-service teachers through computer-mediated communication. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Association of Teacher Educators, Dallas
[22]. McLellan, H. (1996). Virtual reality.In Jonassen D. (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, pp. 457-487. MA: Kluwer-Nijhoff Publishing.
[23] O'Quin K. and Derks, P. (1999). Humour and creativity: A review of the empirical literature. In: Runco, M. (Editor), Creativity research handbook, Vol. 1, pp. 223-252. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
[24]. Ogle, T. (2002). The Effects of Virtual Environments on Recall in Participants of Differing Levels of Field Dependence.PhD Dissertation.Virginia Polytechnic and State University. Blacksburg, VA.
[25]. Osberg, K.M. (1993). Virtual reality and education: A look at both sides of the sword.
[26]. Osborn, A.F. (1967). Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem Solving (Third Revised Edition). NY: Charles Scribner's Sons.
[27]. Oulasvirta, A. and Blom, J. (2008). Motivations in personalisation behaviour. Interacting with Computers, Vol. 20, No.1, pp.1-16.
[28]. Passey, D., Rogers, C., Machell, J. and McHugh, G. (2004). The Motivational Effect of ICT on Pupils. Department of Educational Research Lancaster University.
[29]. Patton, M.Q. (1990). Qualitative Evaluation and Research[1]. Methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
[30]. Paulus, P.B., Larey, T.S. and Ortega, A.H. (1995). Performance and perceptions of brainstormers in an organizational setting. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 17, No. 1-2, pp. 249-265.
[31]. Prensky, M. (2005). Engage Me or Enrage Me: What Today's Learners Demand. Educause Review, Vol. 40, pp. 6 0 - 6 5 . R e t r i e v e d ( 1 2 . A u g u s t, 2 0 0 9 ) f r o m http://www.hitl.washington.edu/publications/r-93-7/
[32]. Rickards, T. and Freedman, B. (1978). Procedures for management in idea-deficient situations: an examination of brainstorming approaches. The Journal of Management Studies, Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 43-55.
[33]. Romiszowski, A.J. & Mason, R. (1996). Computermediated communication. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 438-456).New York: Simon & Schuster Macmillan.
[34]. Schrum, L. & Berenfeld, B. (1997). Teaching and learning in the information age: A guide to educational tele- communications. Needham Heights: Allyn&Bacon.
[35]. Smith, G.F. (2003). Towards a Logic of Innovation. The International Handbook on Innovation. Elsevier Science Ltd.
[36]. Stahl, G., Koschmann, T. & Suthers, D. (2006). Computer-supported collaborative learning: An historical perspective. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 409-426). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
[37]. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
[38]. Taylor, D.W., Berry, P.C. and Block C.H. (1958). Does Group Participation When Using Brainstorming Facilitate or Inhibit Creative Thinking? Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 23-47.
[39]. Taylor, R. (1980). The Computer in the school: tutor, tool, tutee. New York: Teachers College Press.
[40]. The Oxford Dictionaries Online (2011). Retrieved (5. April, 2011) from http://oxforddictionaries.com.
[41]. Thompson, L. (2008). Making the team: A guide for managers (3rd ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
[42]. Thorsteinsson, G, Page, T. and Niculescu, A. (2010). Adoption of ICT in supporting ideation skills in conventional classroom settings', Journal of Studies in Informatics and Control, Vol. 193, pp. 309-318, ISSN 1200-1766.
[43]. Thorsteinsson, G. and Denton, H. (2003). The development of Innovation Education in Iceland: a pathway to modern pedagogy and potential value in the UK. The Journal of Design and Technology Education, Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 172-179.
[44]. Thorsteinsson, G., Denton, H.G., Page, T. and Yokoyama, E. (2005). Innovation Education within the Technology Curriculum in Iceland. Bulletin of Institute of Vocational and Technical Education, pp 1-9. Graduate School of Education and Human Development. Japan: Nagoya University. ISSN 1348-4893.
[45]. Thorsteinsson, G. and Denton, H.G. (2006). Ideation in a Virtual Learning Environment: A Pilot Project from Iceland in Innovation Education. In Norman, E.W.L., Spendlove, D. and Owen-Jackson, G. (Eds), The Design and Technology Association International Research Conference book 2006. Telford, July 2006, pp. 155-164, Wellesbourne: The Design and Technology Association.
[46]. Thorsteinsson, G. and Denton, H.G. (2008). Developing an understanding of the pedagogy of using a Virtual Reality Learning Environment (VRLE) to support Innovation Education (IE) in Iceland: a literature survey. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 15-26, ISBN 1360-1431.
[47]. Thorsteinsson, G., Page, T. and Niculescu, A. (2010). U s i n g V i r t u a l R e a l i t y f o r D e v e l o p i n g D e s i g n Communication. Journal of Studies in Information and Thorsteinsson, G. and Denton, H.G. (2008). Control, Vol. 19, No. 1, pp. 93-106, ISBN 1220-1766.
[48]. Thurlow, C.,Lengel, L. & Tomic, A. (2004). Computer Mediated Communication: Social Interaction and the Internet. London: Sage.
[49]. Titus, P. (2000). Marketing and the creative problemsolving process. Journal of Marketing Education, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 225-35.
[50]. Van de Ven, A., Angle, V. and Poole, M.S. (2000). Research on the Management of Innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.