i-manager Publications

i-manager's Journal on Mathematics (JMAT)

Current Issue Vol. 13 Issue 2

Mathematical Modeling of Higher Overtone Vibrational Frequencies in Dichlorine Monoxide
Some Types of Generalized Closed and Generalized Star Closed Sets in Topological Ordered Spaces
Optimizing Capsule Endoscopy Detection: A Deep Learning Approach with L-Softmax and Laplacian-SGD
Kernel Ideals in Semigroups
Modeling the Dynamics of Covid-19 with the Inclusion of Treatment, Vaccination and Natural Cure
Calculation of Combined Vibrational Frequencies in Cl₂O using Lie Algebraic Method

Most Cited

Volume 2 Issue 3 July - September 2013

Article

Pairing Figure Skating and Mathematics

Diana Cheng* , Tetyana Berezovski**

* Assistant Professor, Towson University, Maryland, USA.

** Associate Professor, St. Joseph's University, Pennsylvania, USA.

Cheng, D., and Berezovski, T. (2013). Pairing Figure Skating and Mathematics. i-manager’s Journal on Mathematics, 2(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.26634/jmat.2.3.2456

Abstract

In light of the Winter Olympic Games, a modeling problem is presented in the context of pair’s figure skating. Prospective and in-service high school teachers used related rates to solve the problem that involved differentiating the Pythagorean theorem and a trigonometric equation. Student work is analyzed and discussed.

References

[1]. Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI). (2010). Common Core State Standards for Mathematics. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices and the Council of Chief State School Officers. http://www.corestandards.org/assets/

[2]. Kerrigan, Nancy & Spencer, Mary. (2003). Artistry on Ice: Figure Skating Skills and Style, Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL.

[3]. United States Figure Skating Association. (1998). The official book of figure skating, Simon & Shuster Editions: New York, NY.

[4]. Martin, Tami. (2000). “Calculus Students' Ability to Solve Geometric Related-Rates Problems,”Mathematics Education Research Journal, 12:2, 74-91.

[5]. Teuscher, Dawn, and Robert E. Reys. (2010). “Slope, Rate of Change, and Steepness: Do Students Understand These Concepts?”, Mathematics Teacher, 103:7, 519-24.

[7]. Weber, Keith. (2005). “Students' Understanding of Trigonometric Functions,” Mathematics Education Research Journal, 17:3, 94–115.

[8]. White, Paul, and Michael Mitchelmore. (1996). “Conceptual Knowledge in Introductory Calculus,”Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27:1, 79-95.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Article

Some Characterization of Curves of Constant Breadth According to Bishop Frame in E3 Space

Hülya Gün Bozok* , Handan Öztekin**

* Department of Mathematics, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Osmaniye, Turkey.

** Department of Mathematics, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.

Bozok, H.G., and Öztekin, H. (2013). Some Characterization of Curves of Constant Breadth 3 According to Bishop Frame in E3 Space. i-manager’s Journal on Mathematics, 2(3), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.26634/jmat.2.3.2457

Abstract

In this paper, some characterizations of curves of constant breadth according to Bishop frame in E are presented.

References

[1]. A. Magden and Ö. Köse, (1997). On the curves of constant breadth in E space, Turkish J. Math. 21, No.3, 277-284.

[2]. A. P. Mellish, (1931). Notes on differential geometry, Ann. of Math. (2) 32, No. 1, 181- 190.

[3]. Bükcü B, Karacan MK (2009). "The Slant Helices According to Bishop Frame." Int. J. Comput. Math. Sci., 3(2): 67-70.

[4]. D. J. Struik, (1931). Differential geometry in the large, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. 37, no. 2, 49-62.

[5]. E. Barbier, (1860). J. de Math. 2. No. 5, 272-286.

[6]. F. Reuleaux, (1963). The Kinematics of Machinery, Trans. by, A. B. W. Kennedy, Dover Pub, New York.

[7]. Gluck, H., (1966). Higher curvatures of curves in Euclidean space, Amer. Math. Monthly, 73, 699-704.

[8]. H. H. Hacisalihoglu, (2000). Differential Geometry, Ankara University Faculty of Science.

[9]. H. H. Hacisalihoglu and R. Öztürk, On the Characterization of Inclined Curves in E I. Tensor, N.S. Vol. 64, pp.163-170.

[10]. H. Tanaka, (1976). Kinematics Design of Cam Follower Systems, Doctoral Thesis, Columbia Univ.

[11]. L.R. Bishop, (1975). There is More Than one way to Frame a Curve, Am. Math. Monthly, 82(3): 246-251.

[12]. L. Euler, De curvis triangularibus, Acta Acad. Prtropol. (1778), (1780), 3-30.

[13]. M. Fujivara, On Space Curves of Constant Breadth, Tohoku Math. J. 5 (1914), 179-184.

[14]. M. Kazaz, M. Önder, and H. Kocayit, (2008). Space like curves of constant breadth in Minkowski 4-space, Int. J. Math. Anal. (Ruse) 2, No. 21-24, 1061-1068.

[15]. M. Sezer, (1989). Differential equations characterizing space curves of constant breadth and a criterion for these curves, Doga Mat. 13, No. 2, 70-78.

[16]. N. H. Ball, (1930). On Ovals, Amer. Math. Monthly 37, No. 7, 348-353.

[17]. Ö. Köse, (1986). On space curves of constant breadth, Doga Mat. 10 (1986), No. 1, 11{14.21, No. 3, 277-284

[18]. W. Blaschke, (1915). Konvexe Bereiche gegebener konstanter Breite und kleinsten Inhalts, Math. Ann. 76, No. 4, 504-513.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Applied Mathematical Statistical Modeling to Determine the Validity and Reliability of Independent Instructional Measures

James Edward Osler II* , Mahmud A. Mansaray**

* North Carolina Central University.

** Research Analyst, Department of Research, Evaluation and Planning, North Carolina Central University.

Osler, J. E., II. and Mansaray, M.A. (2013). Applied Mathematical Statistical Modeling to Determine The Validity And Reliability of Independent Instructional Measures. i-manager’s Journal on Mathematics, 2(3), 12-31. https://doi.org/10.26634/jmat.2.3.2458

Abstract

Most universities and colleges in United States and elsewhere use student ratings of instruction for summative (e.g. faculty promotion, etc.) and formative (e.g. instructional improvement, etc.) evaluation purposes. This research examines the reliability and validity of the rating instrument used to evaluate teaching effectiveness and student learning outcomes. The sample consisted of 7,919 students of Historic Black College and University [HBCU] who completed the 2012 spring semester. Student Ratings of Instruction [SRI] survey (a measurement instrument used by students to assess instruction in courses in which they are currently enrolled) was used. The application of the Cronbach's Alpha Reliability Model, in the study helps to find strong internal reliability [consistency] of the rating instrument used to comprehensively assess teaching quality. At the same time, the application of Principal Component Factor Analysis with Varimax Rotation also finds strong construct validity of the assessment tool used to evaluate faculty.

References

[1]. Agbetsiafa, D. (2010). Evaluating effective teaching in college level Economics using student ratings of instruction: A factor analytic approach, Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 7(5), 57-66.

[2]. Anastasiadou, S. D. (2011). Reliability and validity testing of a new scale for measuring attitudes toward learning statistics with technology. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 4(1), 1-10.

[3]. Anderson, J., Brown, G., & Spaeth, S. (2006). Online student evaluations and response rates reconsidered. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 2(6). Retrieved from https://rugby.ou.edu/content/dam/provost/documents/evaluations/ evaluate-Online- Student-Evaluations-and-Response-Rates.pdf

[4]. Barry, R. A. (2010). Teaching effectiveness and why it matters. Marylhurst University and the Chalkboard Project, Retrieved from http://chalkboardproject.org/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/teacher-effectiveness-and-why-it-matters.pdf

[5]. Beran, T., & Rokosh, J. (2009). Instructors' perspectives on the utility of student ratings of instruction. Instructional Science, 37(2), 171-184. doi:10.1007/s11251-007-9045-2.

[6]. Beran, T., Violato, C., Kline, D., & Frideres, J. (2009). What do students consider useful about student ratings?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(5), 519-527.

[7]. Beran, T., Violato, C., & Kline, D. (2007). What's the "Use" of student ratings of instruction for administrators? One university's experience. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 37(1), 27-43.

[8]. Berk, R. A. (2005). Survey of 12 strategies to measure teaching effectiveness. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 48-62.

[9]. Bland, J., & Altman, D. G. (1997). Cronbach's Alpha . BMJ: British Medical Journal (International Edition), 314(7080), 572.

[10]. Bo, Z., Johnston, L., & Kilic, G. (2008). Assessing the reliability of self- and peer rating in student group work. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 329-340. doi:10.1080/02602930701293181.

[11]. Chen, G., & Watkins, D. (2010). Stability and correlates of student evaluations of teaching at a Chinese university. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35(6), 675-685. doi:10.1080/02602930902977715.

[12]. Clayson, D. E. (2009). Student evaluations of teaching: Are they related to what students learn?. Journal of Marketing Education, 31(1), 16-30.

[13]. Donnon, T., Delver, H., & Beran, T. (2010). Student and teaching characteristics related to ratings of instruction in medical sciences graduate programs, Medical Teacher, 32(4), 327-332. doi:10.3109/01421590903480097.

[14]. El Hassan, K. (2009). Investigating substantive and consequential validity of student ratings of instruction. Higher Education Research & Development, 28(3), 319-333. doi:10.1080/07294360902839917.

[15]. Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using spss. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.

[16]. Fitzpatrick, J. L., & Miller-Stevens, K. (2009). A case study of measuring outcomes in an MPA program. Journal of Public Affairs Education, 15(1), 17-31.

[17]. Frick, T., Chadha, R., Watson, C., Wang, Y., & Green, P. (2009). College student perceptions of teaching and learning quality. Educational Technology Research & Development, 57(5), 705-720. doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9079-9.

[18]. Gillmore, G. M., Kane, M. T., & Naccarato, R. W. (1978). The generalizability of student ratings of Instruction: Estimation of the teacher and course components. Journal of Educational Measurement, 15, 1-13.

[19]. Goe, L., Bell, C., & Little, O. (2008). Approaches to evaluating teacher effectiveness: A research synthesis. National Comprehensive Center for Teacher Quality, Retrieved from http://www.tqsource.org/publications/EvaluatingTeach Effectiveness.pdf

[20]. Gravestock, P., & Gregor-Greenleaf, E. (2008). Student course evaluations: Research, models and trends. Toronto, ON: Higher Education Quality Council of Ontario. Retrieved from http://www.heqco.ca/SiteCollectionDocuments/Student%20 Course%20Evaluations.pdf

[21]. Haladyna, T. M., & Amrein-Beardsley, A. (2009). Validation of a research-based student survey of instruction in a college of education. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(3), 255-276. doi:10.1007/s11092-008-9065-8.

[22]. Hassel, B. C. (2009). How should state define teacher effectiveness?. Center for American Progress, Retrieved from http://publicimpact.com/publications/PublicImpact-How_Should_States_Define_Teacher_Effectiveness.pdf

[23]. Héfer, B. (2009). Teaching effectiveness, course evaluation, and academic performance: The role of academic delay of gratification. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20(2), 326-355.

[24]. Hogan, T. P. (1973). Similarity of student ratings across instructors, courses, and time. Research in Higher Education, 1, 149-154.

[25]. Hunsaker, S. L., Nielsen, A., & Bartlett, B. (2010). Correlates of teacher practices influencing s t u d e n t o u t c ome s i n reading instruction for advanced readers. Gifted Child Quarterly, 54(4), 273-282. doi:10.1177/0016986210374506.

[26]. Ibrahim, A. (2011). Using generalizability theory to estimate the relative effect of class size and number of items on the dependability of student ratings of instruction. Psychological Reports, 109(1), 252-258. doi:10.2466/03.07.11.PR0.109.4.252-258.

[27]. Jones, B. (2010). An examination of motivation model components in face-to-face and online instruction. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 8(3), 915-944.

[28]. Keeley, J., Furr, R., & Buskist, W. (2010). Differentiating psychology students' perceptions of teachers using the teacher behavior checklist. Teaching of Psychology, 37(1), 16-20. doi:10.1080/00986280903426282.

[29]. Kneipp, L. B., Kelly, K. E., Biscoe, J. D., & Richard, B. (2010). The impact of instructor's personality characteristics on quality of instruction. College Student Journal, 44(4), 901-905.

[30]. Kozub, R. M. (2010). Relationship of course, instructor, and student characteristics to dimensions of student ratings of teaching effectiveness in business schools. American Journal of Business Education, 3(1), 33-40.

[31]. Leech, N. A., Barrett, K. C., Morgan, G. A. (2011). IBM: SPSS for intermediate statistics use and interpretation. (4th ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.

[32]. Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2006). Reliability and agreement of student ratings of the classroom environment: A reanalysis of TIMSS data. Learning Environments Research, 9(3), 215-230. doi:10.1007/s10984-006-9014-8.

[33]. Madden, T. J., Dillon, W. R., & Leak, R. L. (2010). Students' evaluation of teaching: Concerns of item diagnosticity. Journal of Marketing Education, 32(3), 264-274. doi:10.1177/0273475310377759.

[34]. Marsh, H. W. (1982). The use of path analysis to estimate teacher and course effects in student rating's of instructional effectiveness, Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 47-59.

[35]. Marsh, H. W. (2007). Students' evaluations of university teaching: Dimensionality, reliability, validity, potential biases, and usefulness. In R. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 319-383). Netherlands: Springer.

[36]. Marsh, H. W., Ginns, P., Morin, A. S., Nagengast, B., & Martin, A. J. (2011). Use of student ratings to benchmark universities: Multilevel modeling of responses to the Australian Course Experience Questionnaire (CEQ). Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(3), 733-748. doi:10.1037/a0024221.

[37]. McKeachie, W. J. (2007). Good teaching makes a difference—And we know what it is. In R. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective (pp. 457-474). Netherlands: Springer.

[38]. Perry, R. & Smart, J. C. (2007). The scholarship of teaching and learning in higher education: An evidence-based perspective. Netherlands: Springer.

[39]. Pounder, J. (2007). Is student evaluation of teaching worthwhile? An analytical framework for answering the question. Quality Assurance in Education, 18(1), 47-63.

[40]. Roche, L. A., & Marsh, H. W. (2000). Multiple dimensions of university teacher selfconcept. Instructional Science, 28(5), 439-468.

[41]. Safavi, S., Bakar, K., Tarmizi, R., & Alwi, N. (2012). The role of student ratings of instruction from perspectives of the higher education administrators. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(9), 233-239.

[42]. Schrodt, P., Witt, P. L., Myers, S. A., Turman, P. D., Barton, M. H., & Jernberg, K. A. (2008). Communication Education, 57(2), 180-200. doi:10.1080/03634520701840303.

[43]. Skowronek, J., Friesen, B., & Masonjones, H. (2011). Developing a statistically valid and practically useful student evaluation instrument, International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 5(1), 1-19.

[44]. Spooren, P. P., Mortelmans, D. D., & Denekens, J. J. (2007). Student evaluation of teaching quality in higher education: Development of an instrument based on 10 Likert-scales, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 32(6), 667-679. doi:10.1080/02602930601117191.

[45]. Sprinkle, J. E. (2008). Student perceptions of effectiveness: An examination of the influence of student biases, College Student Journal, 42(2), 276-293.

[46]. Stowell, J. R., Addison, W. E., & Smith, J. L. (2012). Comparison of online and classroom-based student evaluations of instruction, Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(4), 465-473. doi:10.1080/02602938.2010.545869.

[47]. Theall, M. (2010). Evaluating teaching: From reliability to accountability, New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2010(123), 85-95. doi:10.1002/tl.412.

[48]. Titus, J. (2008). Student ratings in a consumerist academy: Leveraging pedagogical control and authority, Sociological Perspective, 51, 397-422.

[49]. Vogt, W. (1984). Developing a teacher evaluation system, Spectrum, 2(1), 41-46.

[50]. Young, S., & Shaw, D. G. (1999). Profiles of effective college and university teachers, Higher Education, 70(6), 670-686.

[51]. Zerbini, T., & Abbad, G. (2009). Reação aos procedimentos instrucionais de um curso via internet: Validação de uma escala. Estudos De Psicologia, 26(3), 363-371. doi:10.1590/S0103-166X2009000300009.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Another Locus Property of the Thomson Cubic

Mikhail Goldenberg* **

* Department of Mathematics, The Ingenuity Project Baltimore Polytechnic Institute 1400 W, Cold Spring Lane Baltimore.

** Adjunct Professor, Department of Mathematics, Towson University, York Road Towson.

Goldenberg, M., and Kaplan, M. (2013). Another Locus Property of The Thomson Cubic. i-manager’s Journal on Mathematics, 2(3), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.26634/jmat.2.3.2459

Abstract

Generalizing the concept of the symmedian point of a triangle we introduce the point called quasi-symmedian point and prove that the locus of quasi-symmedian points is the Thomson cubic.

References

[1]. Coxeter, H. S. M. (1993). The Real Projective Plane (3rd ed.). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press, p. 103.

[2]. Cundy, H. M., Parry, C. F. (1995). Some Cubic Curves Associated with a Triangle. Journals of Geom. 53, 41-66.

[3]. Gibert, B. (2012, June 25). Thomson Cubic. St Etienne, France: Cubics in the Triangle Plane. Retrieved from http://perso.wanadoo.fr/bernard.gibert/Exemples/k002.html

[4]. Honsberger, R. (1995). Episodes in Nineteenth and Twentieth Century Euclidean Geometry. Washington, DC: Math. Assoc. Amer, pp. 98-124.

[5]. Kimberling, C. (1994). Central Points and Central Lines in the Plane of a Triangle. Math. Mag., 67, 163-187.

[6]. Kimberling, C. (1998). Triangle Centers and Central Triangles. Congr. Numer., 129, 1-295.

[7]. Rubio, P. (1989). Cubic Lines Relative to a Triangle. Journals of Geom. 34, 152-171.

[8]. Sigur, S. (2005). Where are the Conjugates? Forum Geom. 5, 1-15.

[9]. Wells, D. (1991). The Penguin Dictionary of Curious and Interesting Geometry. London, England: Penguin, pp. 190-191.

[10]. Yiu, P. (2000). The uses of homogeneous barycentric coordinates in plane euclidean geometry. Int. Journals of Math. Educ. Sci. Technol., 31, 569 – 578.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Article

Collections Of Statements Related To Point-Set Domination Numbers In Graphs

D. R. Robert Joan*

Assistant Professor, M.Ed. Department, M.E.T. College of Education, Chenbagaramanputhoor, Tamilnadu, India.

Joan, D.R.R. (2013). Collections of Statements Related to Pointset Domination Numbers in Graphs. i-manager’s Journal on Mathematics, 2(3), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.26634/jmat.2.3.2460

Abstract

Let G be a connected graph. A set D V(G) is a point-set dominating set (psd-set) of G if for every set S V – D, there exists a vertex v D such that the subgraph induced by S {v} is connected. The point-set domination number γ (G) p of G is the minimum cardinality of a psd-set. This paper provides a comprehensive treatment of point set domination in graphs. First introduce the point-set domination number of a graph G, and determine this number for various known graphs. The relationship between set domination number with r point set domination number, point-set domination number and also few results regarding point-set are given as statements. Also In this paper the investigator say about global set-domination number γ and global point-set domination number γ of a graph G and determine these sg pg numbers for various known graphs and obtain some bounds for the graph G of diameters 3 and 4 in terms of γ. Finally the concept of the strong point-set domination number of a graph G is introduced, and its exact value is determined for some known graphs.

References

[1]. Acharya, B. D., and Gupta, P. (2005). On Point-Set Domination in Graphs II: Minimum PSD-Sets. 2(2), 87 - 98.

[2]. Garey., Michael, R., Johnson., & David, S. (1979). Computers and Intractability: A Guide to the Theory of NP-Completeness. ISBN 0-7167-1045-5, 190.

[3]. Sampathkumar, E., and Latha, L.P. (1993). Point-Set Domination Number of a graph, Indian Journal of pure applied Mathematics, 24(4), 225 - 229.

[4]. Sampathkumar, E., and Latha, L.P. (1994). The Global Set-Domination Number of a Graph, Indian Journal of pure applied Mathematics, 25(10), 1053-1057.

[5]. Sampathkumar, E. (1989). The Global Domination Number of a Graph, The Journal of mathematics, 23(5), 377 - 385.

[6]. Swaminathan., and Poovazhaki, R. (2003). Global Strong Point-Set Domination Number of a Graph. Proceedings of the KMA, National Seminar on Discrete Mathematics and Applications, St. Thomas College, Kozhencherry, 107 - 112.

[7]. Swaminathan., and Poovazhaki, R. (2002). Strong point-set domination number of graphs, Proceedings of the KMA, National Seminar on Graph Theory, St. Mary's College, Thrissur, 131 - 143.

[8]. Kulli, V.R., and Janakiram, B. (2005). Global non split domination in graphs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India, 11-12.

[9]. Haynes., Teresa, W., Hedetniemi., Stephen., Slater., and Peter. (1998). Fundamentals of Domination in Graphs. Marcel Dekker, Madison Avenue, New York , 10016 ISBN 0-8247-0033-3, OCLC 37903553 INC., 270.

i-manager's Journal on Mathematics (JMAT)

Current Issue Vol. 13 Issue 2

Most Read

Most Cited

Volume 2 Issue 3 July - September 2013

Pairing Figure Skating and Mathematics

Diana Cheng* , Tetyana Berezovski**

* Assistant Professor, Towson University, Maryland, USA. ** Associate Professor, St. Joseph's University, Pennsylvania, USA.

Cheng, D., and Berezovski, T. (2013). Pairing Figure Skating and Mathematics. i-manager’s Journal on Mathematics, 2(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.26634/jmat.2.3.2456

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Some Characterization of Curves of Constant Breadth According to Bishop Frame in E3 Space

Hülya Gün Bozok* , Handan Öztekin**

* Department of Mathematics, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Osmaniye, Turkey. ** Department of Mathematics, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.

Bozok, H.G., and Öztekin, H. (2013). Some Characterization of Curves of Constant Breadth 3 According to Bishop Frame in E3 Space. i-manager’s Journal on Mathematics, 2(3), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.26634/jmat.2.3.2457

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Applied Mathematical Statistical Modeling to Determine the Validity and Reliability of Independent Instructional Measures

James Edward Osler II* , Mahmud A. Mansaray**

* North Carolina Central University. ** Research Analyst, Department of Research, Evaluation and Planning, North Carolina Central University.

Osler, J. E., II. and Mansaray, M.A. (2013). Applied Mathematical Statistical Modeling to Determine The Validity And Reliability of Independent Instructional Measures. i-manager’s Journal on Mathematics, 2(3), 12-31. https://doi.org/10.26634/jmat.2.3.2458

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Another Locus Property of the Thomson Cubic

Mikhail Goldenberg* **

* Department of Mathematics, The Ingenuity Project Baltimore Polytechnic Institute 1400 W, Cold Spring Lane Baltimore. ** Adjunct Professor, Department of Mathematics, Towson University, York Road Towson.

Goldenberg, M., and Kaplan, M. (2013). Another Locus Property of The Thomson Cubic. i-manager’s Journal on Mathematics, 2(3), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.26634/jmat.2.3.2459

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Collections Of Statements Related To Point-Set Domination Numbers In Graphs

D. R. Robert Joan*

Assistant Professor, M.Ed. Department, M.E.T. College of Education, Chenbagaramanputhoor, Tamilnadu, India.

Joan, D.R.R. (2013). Collections of Statements Related to Pointset Domination Numbers in Graphs. i-manager’s Journal on Mathematics, 2(3), 38-49. https://doi.org/10.26634/jmat.2.3.2460

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

* Assistant Professor, Towson University, Maryland, USA.

** Associate Professor, St. Joseph's University, Pennsylvania, USA.

* Department of Mathematics, Osmaniye Korkut Ata University, Osmaniye, Turkey.

** Department of Mathematics, Firat University, Elazig, Turkey.

* North Carolina Central University.

** Research Analyst, Department of Research, Evaluation and Planning, North Carolina Central University.

* Department of Mathematics, The Ingenuity Project Baltimore Polytechnic Institute 1400 W, Cold Spring Lane Baltimore.

** Adjunct Professor, Department of Mathematics, Towson University, York Road Towson.