i-manager Publications

i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching (JELT)

Current Issue Vol. 13 Issue 4

Stephen Krashen's Theory of SLA: A Conceptual Framework
The Need for using English for Professional & Global Communication Today: A Critical Review
A Meta-Synthesis of Research on In-Service EFL Teachers' Needs for Inset Programs in Türkiye
A Study of Pre-Service English Language Teachers' Engagement with Faculty-School Collaboration at the English Fest
Assessing Self-Directed English Language Learning Strategies of YouTube Content Creators

Most Cited

Volume 5 Issue 1 January - March 2015

Research Paper

The Relationship Between Iranian EFL Learners' BeliefsAbout Language Learning And Language Learning Strategy Use

Abbas Ali Zarei* , Hanieh Rahmani**

* Associate Professor, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.

** MA, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.

Zarei, A. A., and Rahmani, H. (2015). The Relationship Between Iranian Efl Learners' Beliefs About Language Learning And Language Learning Strategy Use. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 5(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.5.1.3131

Abstract

The present study investigated the relationship between Iranian EFL learners' beliefs about language learning and language learning strategy use. A sample of 104 B.A and M.A Iranian EFL learners majoring in English participated in this study. Three instruments, the Michigan Test of English Language Proficiency (MTELP), Beliefs about Language Learning Inventory (BALLI), and the Strategy Inventory for Language Learning (SILL) were used for data collection. Multiple Regression analysis showed that meta-cognitive strategies were significant predictors of "foreign language aptitude", "nature of foreign language learning", "learning and communication strategies", and "motivation and expectation". Affective strategies also turned out to be predictors of "the nature of foreign language". Another finding was that cognitive strategies were negative predictors of "learning and communication strategies". The findings of the present study may have significant, theoretical and pedagogical implications for learners and teachers.

References

[1]. Chamot, A. U. (2004). “Issues in language learning strategy research and teaching”. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, Vol. 1(1), pp.14-26.

[2]. Chamot, A.U., & El-Dinary, P.B. (1999). “Children's learning strategies in immersion classrooms”. The Modern Language Journal, Vol.83(3), pp319-341.

[3]. Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1987). “The cognitive academic language learning approach: A bridge to the mainstream”. TESOL quarterly, Vol.21(2), pp.227-249.

[4]. Dörnyei, Z. (2005). “The psychology of the language learner: Individual Differences in Second Language Acquisition”. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[5]. Ehrman, M., & Oxford, R. L. (1989). “Effects of sex differences, career choice, and psychological type on adult language learning strategies”. Modern Language Journal, Vol.73, pp.1-13.

[6]. Green, J. M., & Oxford, R. (1995). “A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender”. TESOL Quarterly, Vol.29(2), pp.261-297.

[7]. Hong, k. (2006). “Beliefs about language learning and language learning strategy use in an EFL context: a comparison study of monolingual Korean and bilingual Korean- Chinese University students”. Dissertation for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy. University of North Texas.

[8]. Horwitz, E. K. (1987). “Surveying student beliefs about language learning. In A. Wenden, & J. Rubin (Eds.), Learner Strategies in Language Learning”, Cambridge, Prentice- Hall, pp. 119-129.

[9]. Horwitz, E. K. (1988). “The beliefs about language learning of beginning university foreign language students”. Modern Language Journal, Vol.72(3), pp.283- 294.

[10]. Horwitz, E.K. (1999). “Cultural and situational influences on foreign language learners' beliefs about language learning: A review of BALLI studies”. System, Vol. 27(4), pp.557-576.

[11]. Horwitz, E. (2007). “Becoming a language teacher: A practical guide to second language learning and teaching”. Hong Kong: Pearson.

[12]. Khaffafi Azar, F., & Saeidi, M. (2011). “The relationship between Iranian EFL learners' beliefs about language learning and their use of learning strategies”. English Language Teaching. Vol. 6(11), pp.167-174.

[13]. Kim, H. J. (2001). “Language learning strategies, learning styles and beliefs about language learning of Korean university students”. Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 5(1), pp.31-46.

[14]. Kunt, N. (1997). “Anxiety and beliefs about language learning: a study of Turkish-speaking University students learning English in north Syprus”. Dissertation abstracts International, Vol.59 (01, 111A. (UMI NO. 9822635)

[15]. Mori, Y. (1999). “Epistemological beliefs and language learning beliefs: What do language learners believe about their learning?” Language Learning, Vol.49(3), pp.377- 415.

[16]. Nyikos, Martha & Rebecca Oxford (1993). “A factor Analytic Study of Language- Learning Strategy Use: Interpretations from Information-Processing Theory and Social Psychology”, The Modern Language Journal, Vol.77, pp.11-22.

[17]. O'Malley, J. M., Chamot, A. U., Stewner-Manzanares, G., Kupper, L., & Russo, R. P. (1985). “Learning strategies used by beginning and intermediate ESL students”. Language Learning, Vol.35, pp.21-46.

[18]. Oxford, R. L. (1990). “Language learning strategies: What Every Teacher Should Know”. New York: Newbury House/Harper and Row.

[19]. Oxford, R., L. (1992). “Who are our students?: A synthesis of foreign and second language research on individual differences with implications for instructional practice”. TESL CANADA Journal, Vol.9(2), pp.30-49.

[20]. Oxford, R. L., & Burry-Stock, J. (1995). “Assessing the use of language learning strategies worldwide with the ESL/EFL version of the strategy inventory of language learning (SILL)”. System, Vol.23, pp.1-23.

[21]. Oxford, R. L., & Ehrman, M. E. (1995). “Adult's language learning strategies in an intensive Foreign language program in the United States”, System, Vol.23(3), pp.359-386.

[22]. Oxford, R. L., & Nyikos, M. (1989). “Variables Affecting Choice of Language Learning Strategies by University Students”. Modern Language Journal, Vol.73, pp.291-300.

[23]. Oxford, R.L., Park-Oh, Y., Ito, S., & Sumrall, M. (1993). “Japanese by satellite: Effects of motivation, language learning styles and strategies, gender, course level, and previous language learning experiences on Japanese language achievement”. Foreign Language Annals, Vol.26, pp.359-371.

[24]. Park, G.P., (1997). “Language learning strategies and English proficiency in Korean University”. Foreign Language Annals, Vol.30 (2), pp.211–221.

[25]. Politzer, R. (1983). “An exploratory study of selfreported language learning behaviors and their relation to achievement”. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, Vol.6, pp.54-65.

[26]. Politzer, R. & McGroarty, M (1985). “An exploratory study of learning behaviors and their relationship to gains in linguistic and communicative competence”, TESOL Quarterly, Vol.19, pp.103-123.

[27]. Rad, N. (2010). “Evaluation of English Students' Beliefs about Learning English as Foreign Language: A Case of Kerman Azad University”. ICT for Language Learning Conference Proceedings 2010 3rd Edition. Simonelli Editore.

[28]. Radwan, A. A. (2011). “Effects of L2 proficiency and gender on choice of language learning strategies by University students majoring in English”. Asian EFL Journal, Vol.13(1), pp.114-162.

[29]. Rezaei, A. A., & Almasian, M. (2007). “Creativity, language learning strategies and language proficiency”. Pazhuhesh-e Zabanha-ye Khareji, Vol.32,pp. 65-76.

[30]. Sheikhi, Leili (2012). “The Relationship between Learning Styles, Language Learning Strategies and Field of Study of Intermediate EFL Students”. In: 2nd International Conference on Foreign Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics (FLTAL'12), Vol.4-6, Sarajevo. International Burch University.

[31]. Sheorey, R. (1999). “An examination of language learning strategy use in the setting of an indigenized variety of English”, System, Vol.27, pp.173-190.

[32]. Suanarak, k. (2012). “English language learning beliefs, learning strategies and achievement of Masters of students in Thiland”. From: http://www.tesol.org.au/files/files/ 275_ kasma_suwanarak.pdf

[33]. Takeuchi, O. (2003). “What can we learn from good foreign language learners? A qualitative study in the Japanese foreign language context”, System, Vol.31(3), pp.385-392.

[34]. Vann, R. J., & Abraham, R. G. (1990). “Strategies of unsuccessful language learners”. TESOL Quarterly, Vol.24, pp.177–198.

[35]. Wang, S. (1996). “A study of Chinese English majors' beliefs about language learning and their learning strategies”. Dissertation Abstracts International, Vol. 57(12), 5021A. (UMI No. 9716564).

[36]. Wenden, A.L. (1986). “Helping language learners think about learning”. English Language Teaching Journal, Vol.40, pp.3-12.

[37]. Wenden, A.L.(1987). “How to be a successful language learner: insights and prescriptions from L2 learners”. In: Wenden, A.L., Rubin, J. (Eds.), Learner Strategies in Language Learning. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp. 103-118.

[38]. Wharton, G. (2000). “Language learning strategy use of bilingual foreign language learners in Singapore”. Language Learning, Vol.50(2), pp.203-244.

[39]. Yang, M. N. (2007). “Language learning strategies for junior college students in Taiwan: Investigating Ethnicity and proficiency”. Asian EFL Journal, Vol.9(2), pp.35-57.

[40]. Yang, N. D. (1999). “The relationship between EFL learners' beliefs and learning strategy use”, System, Vol.27(4), pp.515-535.

[41]. Zare, P. (2010). “An Investigation into Language Learning Strategy Use and Gender among Iranian Undergraduate Language Learners”, World Applied Sciences Journal, Vol.11 (10), pp.1238-1247.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

English As Second Language: Students' Awareness Of Learning Strategies Used In Reading Comprehension

Irshad Husain* , Muhammad Javed, Parveen Munshi*

* Associate Professor and Chairman, Department of Educational Training, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

Lecturer, Department of Educational Training, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

* Dean, Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Hyderabad, Pakistan.

Husain, I., Javed, M., and Munshi, P. (2015). English As Second Language: Students' Awareness Of Learning Strategies Used In Reading Comprehension. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 5(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.5.1.3132

Abstract

This study investigated reading strategies used by adult learners' to read materials in English language for their studies. The population of the study consisted of students of Universiti Sains Malaysia. A sample of 80 (40 postgraduate and 40 undergraduate) TESOL students enrolled in the University was selected randomly. The data were collected by administering a piloted questionnaire and analyzed through SPSS. The results of the study revealed that TESOL students used different strategies in reading textual materials. The main reading strategies appeared to be adjusting reading speed;focusing on typographical features; summarizing; re-reading the text; taking notes; reviewing the text; underlining or circlingimportant information; using tables, figures, pictures and contextual clues, and guessing the meaning of unknown words and/ or phrases. The study further demonstrated that in spite of using the mentioned reading strategies; the learners need to know how to use dictionaries, pauses, visualization and critical evaluation of the text. Based on findings of the study preparation of proper guidelines and their effective use by TESOL students, teachers and researchers to enhance reading comprehension were recommended.

References

[1]. Aarnoutse, C. A. J., & Schellings, G. (2003). “Eenonderzoeknaar destimulering van lees strategie ënenlees motivatie in probleem gestuurde leeromgevingen [Studying the stimulation of reading strategies and reading motivation in problem-based learning environments]”. Pedagogische Studiën, Vol. 80, pp.110-126.

[2]. Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). “Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies”. The Reading Teacher, Vol.61(5), pp.364-373.

[3]. Almasi, J. F. (1996). “The nature of fourth graders' sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussion of literature”, Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 30, pp.314- 351.

[4]. Alvermann, D. E. (2000).”Classroom talk about texts: Is it dear, cheap or a bargain at any price? In B. M. Taylor, M. F. Graves, & P. Van Den Broek (Eds.)”, Reading for meaning: Fostering comprehension in the middle grades, pp.170-192. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

[5]. Alvermann, D. E., Fitzgerald, J., & Simpson, M. (2006). “Teaching and learning in reading. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Wine (Eds.)”, Handbook of Educational Psychology, pp. 427-455. Mawhwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

[6]. Cazden, C. B. (1986). “Classroom discourse. In M. C. Wittrock (Ed.)”, Handbook of Research on Teaching, pp. 432-463. New York, NY: Macmillan.

[7]. Dole, J. A. (2000). “Explicit and implicit instruction in comprehension. In B. M. Taylor, M. F. Graves, & P. Van Den Broek (Eds.)”, Reading for Meaning, Fostering Comprehension in the Middle Grades, pp. 52-69. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

[8]. Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). “Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup, & S. J. Samuels (Eds.)”, What research has to say about reading instruction, pp. 205-242. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

[9]. Ehrlich, M. F., Kurtzcostes, B., &Loridant, C. (1993). “Cognitive and motivational determinants of reading comprehension in good and poor readers”. Journal of Reading Behavior, Vol. 25, pp. 365-381.

[10]. Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2000). “Building student capacity to work productively during peer-assisted reading activities. In Hartman, H. J. (Ed.)”, Meta-cognition in Learning and Instruction, pp. 33-68. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

[11]. Gourgey, A. F. (2001). Meta-cognition in basic skills instruction. Metacognition in Learning and Instruction (pp. 17-32). Springer Netherlands.

[12]. Hartman, H. J. (Ed.). (2001). “Developing students' metacognitive knowledge and skills”. In Meta-cognition in Learning and Instruction, pp. 33-68. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.

[13]. Hussain, I. (2013). “A study of learners' reflection on andragogical skills of distance education tutors”. International Journal of Instruction, Vol. 6(1), pp. 123-138.

[14]. Hussain, I. and Munshi, P. (2011). “Identifying reading preferences of secondary school students”. Creative Education, Vol.5(2), pp. 418-428.

[15]. Hussain, I. (2007a). “A Study of Students' Attitude towards Virtual Education in Pakistan”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education-TOJDE, Vol. 8(2), pp. 69-79.

[16]. Hussain, I. (2007b). “Transnational Education: Concept and Methods”. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education (TOJDE), Vol.8(1), pp. 163-173.

[17]. Hussain, I. (1999). “A Study of problems faced by distance education tutors in Bahawalpur Region”. An Unpublished M.Phill Thesis. Islamabad, Allama Iqbal Open University.

[18]. Hyönä, J., Leach JR, R. F., & Kaakinen, J. K. (2002). “Individual differences in reading to summarize expository text: Evidence from eye fixation patterns”. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 94(1), pp. 44.

[19]. Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (1996). “Reciprocal teaching of reading comprehension strategies for students with learning disabilities who use English as a second language”. The Elementary School Journal, Vol. 96, pp. 275-293.

[20]. Mason, L. (2004). “Explicit self-regulated strategy development versus reciprocal questioning: effects on expository reading comprehension among struggling readers”. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 96, pp. 283-296.

[21]. Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1997). “Best practices in promoting reading comprehension in students with learning disabilities”. Remedial & Special Education, Vol. 18, pp. 197-214.

[22]. Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., &Graetz, J. E. (2003). “Reading comprehension instruction for secondary students: challenges for struggling students and teachers”. Learning Disability Quarterly, Vol. 26, pp. 103-116.

[23]. Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). “Assessing students' metacognitive awareness of reading strategies”. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol.94 (2), pp. 249.

[24]. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehensionmonitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, Vol.1, pp. 117-175.

[25]. Palincsar, A. S., David, Y. M., Winn, J. A., & Stevens, D. D. (1991). “Examining the context of strategy instruction”. Remedial and Special Education, Vol.12, pp.43-53.

[26]. Pressley, M. (2000). “Comprehension instruction in elementary school: A quarter-century of research progress”. In Taylor, B. M.,Graves, M. F., & Den Broek, P. V. (Eds.), Reading for meaning. Fostering comprehension in the middle grades, pp.32-51. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

[27]. Pressley, M., &Allington, R. (1999). “What should reading instructional research be the research of?” Issues in Education, Vol.5, pp.1-35.

[28]. Pressley, M., & Harris, K. R. (2006). “Cognitive strategies instruction: From basic research to classroom instruction. In Alexander, P. A. & Wine, P. H. (Eds.)”, Handbook of educational psychology, pp.265-286. Mahway, NJ: Erlbaum.

[29]. Pressley, M., Wharton-McDonald, R., Hampston, J. M., & Echevarria, M. (1998). “The nature of literacy instruction in ten grade-4/5 classrooms in upstate New York”. Scientific Studies of Reading, Vol. 2, pp.159-191.

[30]. Proctor, C. P., Carlo, M., August, D., & Snow, C. (2005). “Native Spanish-Speaking Children Reading in English: Toward a Model of Comprehension”. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol.97 (2), pp.246.

[31]. Sheorey, R., Amp, & Mokhtari, K. (2001). “Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers”. System, Vol.29 (4), pp. 431-449.

[32]. Taberski, S. (2000). “On Solid Ground: Strategies for Teaching Reading K-3:ERIC”.

[33]. Tierney, R. J., & Readence, J. E. (2000). “Reading strategies and practices: A compendium: ERIC”.

[34]. Van Den Broek, P., & Kremer, K. E. (2000). “The mind in action: What it means to comprehend during reading”. In Taylor, B. M., Graves, M. F., & Van Den Broek, P.(Eds.), Reading for meaning. Fostering comprehension in the middle grades, pp.1-31. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

[35]. Van Keer, H. (2004). “Fostering reading comprehension in fifth grade by explicit instruction in reading strategies and peer tutoring”. British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol.74, pp.37-70.

[36]. Van Keer, H., &Verhaeghe, J. P. (2005). “Effects of explicit reading strategies instruction and peer tutoring in second and fifth graders' reading comprehension and selfefficacy perceptions”. The Journal of Experimental Education, Vol.73, pp. 291-329.

[37]. Vellutino, F. R. (2003). “Individual differences as sources of variability in reading comprehension in elementary school children”. In Sweet, A. P.& Snow, C. E.(Eds.), Rethinking read.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Comparing Hypertext Reading In L1 And L2: The Case Of Filipino Adults

Gruspe Michael Angelo M* , MariÌ±as Christian Joshua L., Villanueva Ariel Josephe Therese R., Villasin, Marren Nicole F., Camilla J. Vizconde

- College of Education, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.

Research Cluster for Culture, Education and Social Issues, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.

Gruspe, M. A. M., Joshua, L. M. C., Villanueva, A. J. T. R., Villasin, M. N. F., and Vizconde, C. (2015). Comparing Hypertext Reading In L1 And L2: The Case Of Filipino Adults. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 5(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.5.1.3133

Abstract

This research probed into the reading experiences of adult readers in their first language (L1) and second language (L2). Qualitative in nature, the investigation focused on twelve (12) adult readers , six (6) males and six (6) females, whose first language is Filipino. Data were gathered through interviews and focus-group discussions. Based on the data gathered, the participants are motivated to read when the materials given are in line with their interest (e.g. self-help and current events). They are also inclined to read L2 materials over L1. The participants' interests are not simply limited to the topics but also to the language of the material. They feel strongly that a material written in L2 is more accessible and reliable. Although the reading process is highly personal, the participants showed that they adapt similar reading strategies when reading hypertexts which they modify to fit their needs, interest, exposure, and strategies.

References

[1]. Anderson, J. C. (1984). “Reading in a foreign language: A reading or a language problem? In C. J. Anderson & A. H. Urquhart (Eds.)”, Reading in a foreign language (pp. 1-24). London: Longman

[2]. Anderson, R. C. (1996). “Research foundations to support wide reading. In V. Greaney (Ed.), Promoting reading in developing countries: Views on making reading materials accessible to increase literacy levels”, pp. 55-57. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

[3]. Angus K. &Greenbaum, J. (2003). “Position statement on rights of adult readers and learners”. Journal of College Reading and Learning, Vol.33(2), pp.122-130.

[4]. Barfield, A. (1995). “Extensive reading: from graded to authentic text”. Language Learning, Vol.2(1), pp.32–36.

[5]. Becker, H.S. & Geer, B.(1957). “Participant observation and interviewing: a rejoinder”. Human Organization, Vol.16, pp 39–40. Reprinted in Filstead (Ed.) 1970, p 150 ff.

[6]. Berg, B. (2001). “Qualitative research methods for the social sciences”. Long Beach: California State University.

[7]. Boeree, C. George.(n.d.). “Qualitative methods workbook”. Shippensburg, PA: Shippensburg University.

[8]. Bossers, B. (1991). “On thresholds, ceilings and shortcircuits: The relation between L1 reading, L2 reading and L2 knowledge”. AILA Review, Vol.8(1), pp.45-60.

[9]. Burt, M. &Peyton, J. (2003). “Reading and adult English language learners: the role of the first language”. National Center for ESL Literacy Education.

[10]. Chavez, A. (2014, January 10). “What Asia can learn from Philippines about English Education”. Retrieved November 16, 2014, from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ amy-chavez/what-asia-can-learn-from-_b_4572991.html

[11]. Chun, D. (2001). “L2 Reading on the web: strategies for accessing information in hypermedia”. Computer- Assisted Language Learning, Vol.14(5), pp.367-403.

[12]. Cummins, J. (1994). “Knowledge, power, and identity in teaching English as a second language”. In Fred Genesee (Ed.), Educating Second Language Children: The whole child, the whole curriculum, the whole community (pp.33-58). USA: Cambridge University Press.

[13]. Cummins, J. (2001). “Bilingual children's mother tongue: why is it important for education?”, Sprogforum, Vol.7(19), pp.15-20.

[14]. Daniel, J. (2012). “Choosing the type of probability sampling”. In Sampling essentials: practical guidelines for making sampling choices, pp.126-127. USA: SAGE Publications, Inc.

[15]. Day, R. &Bamford, J. (1998). “Extensive reading in the second language classroom”. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[16]. Denzin, N. K. (1978). “The research act:theoretical introduction to sociological method (2nded.)”. New York: McGraw-Hill.

[17]. DeWalt, K. and DeWalt, B. (2002). “Participant observation: aguide for fieldworkers”. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.

[18]. Diamond, T. (1992). “Making Gray Gold: Narratives of Nursing Home Care”. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

[19]. Drew, C.J., Hardman, M., &Hosp, J. (2008). “Designing and conducting education research”. Los Angeles, CA: Sage Publications.

[20]. Edmunds,H. (1999). “The focus group research handbook”. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

[21]. Elley, W. (1996). “Using Book Floods to raise literacy levels in developing countries”. InV. Greaney (Ed.), Promoting reading in developing countries: Views on making reading materials accessible to increase literacy levels pp. 148-163. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

[22]. Fedyk, C. (2007). “Reading and L2 acquisition”. Retrieved from http://www.teyl.org/article5.html in October 2014.

[23]. Frankfort-Nachmias, C, & Nachmias, D. (1996). Research methods in the Social Sciences (5th ed). New York: St. Martin's Press.

[24]. Goodman, K. S. (1967). “Reading: apsycholinguistic guessing game”. Journal of the Reading Specialist, Vol.6(1), 126-135.

[25]. Gorden, R L. (1987). Interviewing (4th ed). Chicago: DorseyPress.

[26]. Gough, P. B. (1972). “One second of reading”. In J. F. Kavanagh & I. G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by ear and by eye, pp. 331-365. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

[27]. Greaney, V. (1996). “Promoting reading in developing countries: Views on making reading materials accessible to increase literacy levels”. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

[28]. Guthrie, J. &Wigfield, A. (2000). “Engagement and motivation in reading“. Handbook of Reading Research (pp. 403-406). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Elbaum Associates, Inc, Publishers

[29]. Harashima, M. (2008). “Hypertext literacy: reading strategies and comprehension on the internet“. In Hawaii TESOL working papers, Vol.6(2), pp.1-13.

[30]. Kawulich, Barbara B. (2005). “Participant observation as a data collection method“. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, Vol.6(2), Art. 43, Retrieved from http://nbn-resolving.de/urn: nbn:de: 0114-fqs0502430in October 2014.

[31]. Kong, A. (2006). Connections between L1 and L2 Readings: reading strategies used by four Chinese adult readers“. , Vol.6(2), pp.19-45.

[32]. Krashen, S. (1988). “Second language acquisition and second language learning“. USA: Prentice-Hall International.

[33]. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). “Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading“. Cognitive Psychology, Vol.6(1), pp.193-323.

[34]. Lee, S. (2010). “A study of the effects of two reading environments on L2 readers' strategic behaviors toward unknown words“. Unpublished dissertation. Ohio State University: Ohio, USA.

[35]. Lee, M. J. &Tedder, C. M. (2003). “The effect of three different computer texts on readers' recall: based on working memory capacity“. Computers in Human Behavior, Vol.19(1), pp.767-783.

[36]. Lester, S (1999). “An introduction to phenomenological research“. Taunton, UK: Stan Lester Developments

[37]. Leu,D.J., Jr., Kinzer, C.K., Coiro, J., &Cammack, D. (2004). Towards a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other ICT.In R.B. Ruddell& N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th Edition). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

[38]. Maximum, A. (2014). “The Philippines: areading people. Retrieved from Hubpages: http://maximuma“. hubpages.com/hub/The-Philippines-A-Reading-People

[39]. Miall, D.,& Dobson, T. (2001). “Reading hypertext and the experience of literature“. Journal of Digital Information, Vol.2(1)

[40]. Naumann, J., Richter, T., Christmann, U., &Groeben, N. (2008). “Working memory capacity and reading skill moderate the effectiveness of strategy trainings in learning from hypertext“. Learning and Individual Differences, Vol.18(1),pp.197-213.

[41]. Nielsen, J. (2006). “F-shaped pattern for reading web content“. Retrieved from http://www.nngroup.com/articles/ f-shaped-pattern-reading-web-content/ in September 2014.

[42]. Nieswiaciarny, R M. (1993). Foundations of nursing nd research (2 ed). Norwalk, cr. Appleton dLange.N.p.

[43]. Opfermann, M., Gerjets, P., &Scheiter, K. (2006). How does hypermedia support learning? The role of different representational formats and varying levels of learner control for the applicability of multimedia design principles“. In L. Markauskaite, P. Goodyear, & P. Reimann (Eds.), The 23rd Annual Conference of the Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education: Who's Learning? Whose Technology? pp. 615-622. Sydney: Sydney University Press.

[44]. Palinscar, A. S. & Brown, A. L. (1984). “Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehensionmonitoring activities“. Cognition and Instruction, Vol.1, pp.117-175.

[45]. Parlangeli, O., Marchigiani, E., Bagnara, S. (1999). “Multimedia systems in distance education: effects of usability on learning“. Interacting with computers, Vol.12 (1), pp.37-49.

[46]. Patterson, N. G. (1999). “Making connections: hypertext and research in a middle school classroom“. English Journal, Urbana.

[47]. Pepito, D. (2005). “8 out of 10 Filipinos functionally literate. TODAY newspaper”. Retrieved in October 2014 from http://teachersdigest.wikispaces.com/How+Many+ Can+Read%3F.

[48]. Polkinghorne, D. (2005). “Language and meaning: data collection in qualitative research“. Journal of Counseling Psychology, Vol.52(2), pp.137-145.

[49]. Purves, A. (1998). “Files in the web of hypertext”. In Reinking, D., McKenna, C. M., Labbo, D. L., & Kieffer, D. R. (Eds.),Handbook of literacy and the technology: Transformations in a post-typographic world (pp. 235-251). “ USA: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

[50]. Rubio, H.,& Rubin, I. S. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: the art of hearing data“. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

[51]. Rumelhart, D. E. (1977). “Toward an interactive model for reading“. In W. Otto (Ed.), Reading problems. Boston, MA:Addison-Wesley.

[52]. Salmerón, L., Cañas, J.J., Kintsch, W., &Fajardo, I. (2005). “Reading strategies and hypertext comprehension“. Discourse Processes, Vol.40(3), pp.171- 191.

[53]. Son, J.-B. (1998). “Understanding hypertext: a discussion for TEFL“. English Teaching, Vol.53 (3), pp.113- 124.

[54]. Sotelo, Y. (2012). “Catching the reading fever. Philippine Daily Inquirer”. Retrieved in October 2014 from. http://newsinfo.inquirer.net/inquirerheadlines/learning/view /20100228-255883/Catching-the-reading-fever.

[55]. Srivastava, P. and S. Gray.(2012). “Computer-based and paper-based reading comprehension in adolescents with typical language development and languagelearning disabilities“. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, Vol.43(1), pp.424-437.

[56]. Schwandt, T. A. (2001). Qualitative inquiry: A nd dictionary of terms (2 ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

[57]. Schutt, R. (2009). The practice of research and social nd work (2 ed.). USA: Sage Publications Inc.

[58]. Tseng, M. (2010). “Factors that influence online reading: an investigation into EFL students' perceptions“. The Reading Matrix, Vol.10(1), pp.96-105.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

The Semantic Implications Of Media Reports On Violence In Nigeria

Abochol, Simon Itine* , Adegboye, Oluseye Olusegun**

* Senior Lecturer, Department of English and Literary Studies, University of Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria.

** Lecturer, Department of Linguistics and African Languages, University of Abuja, Nigeria.

Itine, A. S., and Olusegun, A. O. (2015). The Semantic Implications Of Media Reports On Violence In Nigeria. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 5(1), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.5.1.3134

Abstract

This article is on semantics of words and expressions of various grammatical constructions that make reference to violence as reported in the Nigerian media, particularly, the newspaper where such words and sentences about violence are prominent. Twenty-four (24) headlines/captions on violence were randomly selected from Nigeria dailies for data analysis. Semantic roles were used to analyse the different words and expressions that made up the headlines/captions. Halliday's Scale and Category theory showing how text boundaries can be split have been employed to facilitate the analysis. The items (instruments) used for violence are meant to cause damage, havoc and loss of lives. The events (eventive) of violence are devastating and can enhance more restiveness in any society. The analysis of the data, show that semantic implications for the media, journalists and the Nigerian State is that most of the citizens in the Nigerian state become afraid or worried at the sight of newspaper captions/headlines carrying violent expressions. Also, other people in other countries who read Nigerian dailies carrying violent expressions/words are discouraged to visit Nigeria because of safety concerns. Lastly, certain locations in Nigeria which are prone to violent activities are avoided by both Nigerians and visitors to Nigeria.

References

[1]. Abochol, S. I. (2001). “Time Preposition in Sports Column: The Case of NewNigerian Newspaper“. An unpublished M.A. Dissertation, Department of English and Literary Studies, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria.

[2]. Aidoghie, P. Why I didn't Support Ribadu – El-Rufai. (2011, May 21). SaturdaySun, pp. 13-15.

[3]. Alofetekun, A. (2011). Presidential Poll: 50 Corp Members Escape Death. DailySun, pp.12.

[4]. Balarabe, S. (2003). “The Effect of Language of Violence in Newspaper Reporting: A Research Note”. Zaria Journal of Educational Studies, Vol.5, pp.98-100.

[5]. Defleur, L.M.,& Dennis, E.E. (1994). Understanding Mass Communication“. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.

[6]. Emewu, I. (2011). “Bin Laden: Al-Qaeda Declares War“. SaturdaySun, pp. 12, 56.

[7]. Eya, W. and Olusola, B. (2011). “Anxiety over Ministerial List“. Sunday Sun, pp. 7.

[8]. Ganagan, M. (2011). “Boko Haram's Hit List”. Saturday Sun, pp. 5, 8, 22-23.

[9]. Okpaga, A.,& Ansah, A.B. (2008). “Tackling Psychological Violence in the home: An alternative Approach“. The Journal of Family Development, Vol.3, pp.310-325. Makurdi: A Publication of the Centre for Family Development.

[10]. Omachonu, G. S. (2011). (Eds.), “NSUK TEXTS in General Linguistics“, 1. Enugu: Rossen Publications Ltd.

[11]. Omotoso, G. (2011). “ProQuattara Forces Clash in Ivory Coast“. The Nation, pp. 60.

[12]. Omotoso, G. (2011). “Afghan Pilot Kills Eight US Troops at Kabul Airport”, The Nation, pp. 60.

[13]. Tsa, G. Buhari Moves against Jonathan, (2011). “CPC Challenges President's Victory at Presidential Election Tribunal“, Saturday Sun, pp. 11.

[14]. Violence. (2014). Retrieved May 12, 2014 from Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary website, http:// www. merriam-webster.com/violence.html

[15]. Violence. (2014). Retrieved May 12, 2014 from Wikipedia: The Free Encyclopaedia website, http:// en. wikipedia.org/wiki/violence.html

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Effectiveness Of Mind Mapping In English TeachingAmong VIII Standard Students

D. Hallen* , N. Sangeetha**

* Assistant Professor, Department of English, Dr.Sivanthi Aditanar College of Education, Tiruchendur.

** Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Dr.Sivanthi Aditanar College of Education, Tiruchendur.

Hallen, D., and Sangeetha, N. (2015). Effectiveness Of Mind Mapping In English Teaching Among Viii Standard Students. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 5(1), 45-50. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.5.1.3135

Abstract

The aim of the study is to find out the effectiveness of mind mapping technique over conventional method in teaching English at high school level(VIII), in terms of Control and Experimental group. The sample of the study comprised, 60 VIII Standard students in Tiruchendur Taluk. Mind Maps and Achievement Test (Pre-test & Post-test) were developed by the investigator. Two equivalent group Pretest-Posttest Experimental Design was employed for this study. In analysis Mean, S.D. and 't'values were computed and the present study reveals, that the Mind Mapping Technique is more effective than the Conventional method.

References

[1]. Kessler, Cristy, Zuercher, Deborah K, Wong, Caroline S. (2013). “Thinking Maps: Research-Based Instructional Strategy in a PDS”, School-University Partnerships, Vol.6 (1), pp.33-46.

[2]. Renu Raj and Sweta Dvievedi (2010). “Concept Mapping as a Technologica Tool to Facilitate teacher Education Programme and Enhance e–Learning”, University News, Vol.48(32), pp.14-18.

[3]. Thangarajathi, S (2008). “Effectiveness of Mind Mapping Technique in Teaching Mathematics”, Edutracks, Vol.8 (3), pp.26-29.

[4]. Zipp, Genevieve Pinto, Maher, Cathy, D'Antoni, Anthony V. (2009). “Mind Maps: Useful Schematic Tool for Organizing and Integrating Concepts of Complex Patient Care in the Clinic and Classroom”, Journal of College Teaching & Learning, Vol.6(2), pp.59-68.

[5]. http://www.mind – mapping.co.uk

[6]. http://www.mind – mapping.org

[7]. http://www.eric.ed.gov/www.jcu.edu.au/office/tld/ learning Skills/mind map/ index. html

i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching (JELT)

Current Issue Vol. 13 Issue 4

Most Read

Most Cited

Volume 5 Issue 1 January - March 2015

The Relationship Between Iranian EFL Learners' BeliefsAbout Language Learning And Language Learning Strategy Use

Abbas Ali Zarei* , Hanieh Rahmani**

* Associate Professor, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran. ** MA, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.

Zarei, A. A., and Rahmani, H. (2015). The Relationship Between Iranian Efl Learners' Beliefs About Language Learning And Language Learning Strategy Use. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 5(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.5.1.3131

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

English As Second Language: Students' Awareness Of Learning Strategies Used In Reading Comprehension

Irshad Husain* , Muhammad Javed**, Parveen Munshi***

* Associate Professor and Chairman, Department of Educational Training, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan. ** Lecturer, Department of Educational Training, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan. *** Dean, Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Hyderabad, Pakistan.

Husain, I., Javed, M., and Munshi, P. (2015). English As Second Language: Students' Awareness Of Learning Strategies Used In Reading Comprehension. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 5(1), 11-18. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.5.1.3132

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Comparing Hypertext Reading In L1 And L2: The Case Of Filipino Adults

Gruspe Michael Angelo M* , MariÌ±as Christian Joshua L.**, Villanueva Ariel Josephe Therese R.***, Villasin, Marren Nicole F.****, Camilla J. Vizconde*****

*-**** College of Education, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines. ***** Research Cluster for Culture, Education and Social Issues, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.

Gruspe, M. A. M., Joshua, L. M. C., Villanueva, A. J. T. R., Villasin, M. N. F., and Vizconde, C. (2015). Comparing Hypertext Reading In L1 And L2: The Case Of Filipino Adults. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 5(1), 19-34. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.5.1.3133

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

The Semantic Implications Of Media Reports On Violence In Nigeria

Abochol, Simon Itine* , Adegboye, Oluseye Olusegun**

* Senior Lecturer, Department of English and Literary Studies, University of Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria. ** Lecturer, Department of Linguistics and African Languages, University of Abuja, Nigeria.

Itine, A. S., and Olusegun, A. O. (2015). The Semantic Implications Of Media Reports On Violence In Nigeria. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 5(1), 35-44. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.5.1.3134

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Effectiveness Of Mind Mapping In English TeachingAmong VIII Standard Students

D. Hallen* , N. Sangeetha**

* Assistant Professor, Department of English, Dr.Sivanthi Aditanar College of Education, Tiruchendur. ** Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Dr.Sivanthi Aditanar College of Education, Tiruchendur.

Hallen, D., and Sangeetha, N. (2015). Effectiveness Of Mind Mapping In English Teaching Among Viii Standard Students. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 5(1), 45-50. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.5.1.3135

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

* Associate Professor, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.

** MA, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin, Iran.

Irshad Husain* , Muhammad Javed, Parveen Munshi*

* Associate Professor and Chairman, Department of Educational Training, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

Lecturer, Department of Educational Training, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

* Dean, Faculty of Education, University of Sindh, Hyderabad, Pakistan.

Gruspe Michael Angelo M* , MariÌ±as Christian Joshua L., Villanueva Ariel Josephe Therese R., Villasin, Marren Nicole F., Camilla J. Vizconde

- College of Education, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.

Research Cluster for Culture, Education and Social Issues, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines.

* Senior Lecturer, Department of English and Literary Studies, University of Abuja, Abuja, Nigeria.

** Lecturer, Department of Linguistics and African Languages, University of Abuja, Nigeria.

* Assistant Professor, Department of English, Dr.Sivanthi Aditanar College of Education, Tiruchendur.

** Assistant Professor, Department of Economics, Dr.Sivanthi Aditanar College of Education, Tiruchendur.