Move Sequences In Graduate Research Paper Introductions And Conclusions

Marilu Rañosa Madrunio*
*Full Professor of English, University of Santo Tomas, Manila, Philippines
DOI : https://doi.org/

Abstract

Graduate students submit academic papers at the end of the term as part of their coursework. Such papers contain introduction moves which may be troublesome and conclusion moves which may contain sub-moves not really required. This paper is aimed at assessing what particular moves are employed in the introduction and conclusion sections of 21 graduate research papers submitted in one leading university in Manila.  Ten of these were written by MA students while 11 were written by Ph.D. students.  The study employed the framework proposed by Swales and Feak (1994) pertaining to moves in research paper introductions and Yang and Allison’s (2003) framework for analyzing the conclusion section.

Findings revealed that in the Introduction section, all MA and PhD students employed Move 1 with majority employing 2-3 sub-moves. With regard to Move 2, 10 of the 21 papers employed the sub-move Indicating a gap; three employed the sub-move Counter-claiming; the rest did not employ any sub-move at all. With respect to Move 3, results showed that the most commonly used sub-moves were Outlining purposes and Announcing present research. Finally with regard to the Conclusion section, most writers employed Moves 1, 3 and 2, in that order. However, the sub-move Evaluating methodology was not at all utilized as part of Move 2.

Keywords

introduction move, conclusion move, sub-move

How to Cite this Article?

Madrunio, M. R. (2012). Move Sequences in Graduate Research Paper Introductions and Conclusion. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 2(1), 1-14.

References

[1]Bhatia, V. (1993). Analyzing genre: Language in professional settings. New York: Addison Wesley Longman, Inc.
[2]Dudley-Evans, T. (1994). Genre Analysis: an approach to text analysis for ESP. In M.Coulthard (Ed.), Advances in written text analysis (pp.219-228) London: Routledge.
[3]Han, Z. (2007). Pedagogical Implications. Genuine or pretentious? TESOL QUARTERLY (41) 2,387-393.
[4]Hyland, K. (2001). Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles. English for Specific Purposes. 20, 207-226.
[5]Kuo, C. (1999). The use of personal pronouns: Role relationships in scientific journal articles. English for Specific Purposes, 18, 121-138..
[6]Peacock, M. (2002). Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System, 30, 479-497.
[7]Samraj, B. (2008). A discourse analysis of master's theses across disciplines with a focus on introduction. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, (7), 55-67.
[8]Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge University Press.
[9]Swales, J.Feak, C. (1994). Academic writing for nd graduate students (2 ed.). USA: University of Michigan Press.
[10]Yang, R. Allison, D. (2003). Research articles in applied linguistics: Moving from results to conclusions. English for Specific Purposes,(22), 365-385.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article
Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

USD EUR INR
Print 35 35 200
Online 35 35 200
Print & Online 35 35 400