i-manager Publications

i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology (JET)

Current Issue Vol. 20 Issue 4

Most Cited

Volume 12 Issue 4 January - March 2016 [Open Access]

Article

Neuro-Holistic Learning©: An Integrated Kinesthetic Approach to Cognitive Learning© Using Collaborative Interactive Thought Exchange© in a Blended Environment to Enhance the Learning of Young African American Males

James Edward Osler II* , Mark Anthony Wright**

*-** North Carolina Central University, USA.

Osler, J. E., II. and Wright, M.A. (2016). Neuro-Holistic Learning©: An Integrated Kinesthetic Approach to Cognitive Learning© Using Collaborative Interactive Thought Exchange© in a Blended Environment to Enhance the Learning of Young African American Males. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.12.4.4838

Abstract

This paper is part two of the article entitled, “Dynamic Neuroscientific Systemology: Using Tri–Squared Meta–Analysis and Innovative Instructional Design to Develop a Novel Distance Education Model for the Systemic Creation of Engaging Online Learning Environments.” published in the July–September 2015 issue of i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology. The aim of this paper is to introduce three novel problems–solving conceptual solutions which are: (1) Neuro-Holistic Learning as an; (2) “Integrated Kinesthetic Approach to Cognitive Learning ”using a (3) “Collaborative Interactive Thought Exchange ” as a dialogue and discussion procedure. The purpose of this original and novel st instructional methodology is to conceptually addresses the four main challenges faced by 21 century African American high school and college students, particularly African American males, who are attempting to succeed in life and in their future professional careers. As an instructional methodology, Neuro-Holistic Learning provides an active solution that addresses the needs of Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs) who are actively seeking novel methods to aid in the achievement of their respective academic goals, increase student retention, meet their institutional graduation objectives. The results of this dynamic and engaging approach to learning determinedly responds to HBCU high standards of academic excellence and collaborative goals to produce dynamic global citizens and actively responsive alumni.

References

[1]. Adkins, S. S. (2004). “Beneath the Tip of the Iceberg”. T + D, Vol.58(2), pp.28-33.

[2]. American College Health Association, (2012). “American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment II: Reference Group Executive Summary Spring 2012”.

[3]. Beane, J.A., Toepfer, C. F., J.R, & Alessi, S.J, (1986). Curriculum Planning and Development. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

[4]. BPS (2009). “U.S. Department of Education, 2003-04 Beginning Post-Secondary Students Longitudinal Study, Second Follow-up (BPS:04/09)”. Computation by NCES Power Stats. Washington, National Center for Education Statistics.

[5]. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, (2009). Overweight and Obesity. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Retrieved on November 16, 2009, from http://www.cdc.gov/obesity/index.html

[6]. Cohen, S., & Herbert, T.B. (1996). “Health Psychology: Psychological factors and Physical disease from the perspective of human psychoneuroimmunology”. Annual Review of Psychology, Vol.47, pp.113-142.

[7]. Dettmer, P. (2006). “New blooms in established fields: Four domains of learning and doing”. Roeper Review, Vol.28(2), pp.70-78.

[8]. Digest of Education Statistics (2012). “U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Post-Secondary Education Data System (IPEDS)”, Fall 2001 and Spring 2007 through Spring 2012, Graduation Rates component.

[9]. Fannin, J.L. & Williams, R. (2012). “Leading-Edge neuroscience reveals significant correlations between beliefs, the whole-brain state, and psychotherapy”.

[10]. Gage, N. L., & Berliner, D. C. (1988). Educational Psychology. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin Company.

[11]. Graham, K. and Burke, K. (2014). “Students' perceptions on a blended and flipped classroom”. International Journal of Process Education, Vol. 6(1).

[12]. Harvard Health Publications, (2011). How to Prevent and Manage Stress.

[13]. Kenney, J. and Newcombe, E. (2011). “Adopting a blended learning approach: Challenges Encountered and lessons learned in an action research study”. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol. 15(1). pp. 52.

[14]. Lamberg, Lynne (2007). "The Brain-Body Loop- The Dana Guide. The Dana Guide to Brain Health”. The Dana Foundation.

[15]. Lindsey, Robert, Saeedah Reed, Robert Lyons, Denisha Hendricks, Antonia Mead, and Karen Butler, (2011). "Sources of Stress among Gender and Classification for African American College Students." College Student Journal-Project Innovation.

[16]. Martinez , M.E. (2003). “A Biocultural model of aging”. The International Journal of Systems and Cybernetics. Vol.32(5/6), pp.653-657.

[17]. Martinez , M.E. (2015). Biocognitive Science Institute. Exploring the Causes of Health in Cultural Contexts.

[18]. Negga, E, Applewhite, S., & Livingston, I. (2007). “African American College students and stress: School racial composition, self-esteem, and social support”. College Student Journal, Vol.41(4), pp.823-830.

[19]. Nora, A., & Cabrera, A. E (1996). “The role of perceptions of prejudice and discrimination on the adjustment of minority student to college”. Journal of Higher Education, Vol.67, pp.119-148.

[20]. Osuagwu, C. C. (2011). “Predictors of obesity in african american college students”. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. Walden University.

[21]. Perlmutter, D. (2011). “Regenerating the Brain”. The Well Being Journal. Vol.20(3), pp.3-10.

[22]. Pink, D., (2005). A Whole New Mind City. Riverhead Hardcover.

[23]. Ratey, John J. (2008). Spark: The Revolutionary New Science of Exercise and the Brain. Little, Brown and Company, Kindle Edition.

[24]. Royal Society (2011). Neuroscience: Implications for Education and Lifelong Learning (Brain Waves Module 2). London: The Royal Society.

[25]. Sawyer, R. K. (2003). “Creative Teaching: Collaborative Discussion as Disciplined Improvisation”. Educational Researcher, Vol. 33(2), pp,12-20.

[26]. Sawyer, R. K., (2011). “The Need for a Deeper Exploration and Conceptual Understanding: The Critical Role of Creativity and Collaboration in Real-World Learning”. Learning Landscapes Mind, Brain, and Education: Implications for Educators, Autumn 2011, Vol. 5 No. 1.

[27]. Shaver, J. (2008). “Brain builders: Exercise plays a critical role in brain health, but few fitness facilities are promoting its cognitive benefits or developing brainrelated programming”.

[28]. Zaltman, G. (2003). How Customers Think: Essential Insights into the Mind of the Market. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Social Media Use in Academics: Undergraduate Perceptions and Practices

Mark Ciampa* , Evelyn H. Thrasher, Mark A. Revels*

- Associate Professor, Information Systems, Gordon Ford College of Business, Western Kentucky University, USA.

Assistant Professor, Computer Information Technology, Ogden College of Science and Engineering, Western Kentucky University, USA.

Ciampa,M., Thrasher,E.H., and Revels,M. A. (2016). Social Media Use in Academics: Undergraduate Perceptions and Practices. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.12.4.4840

Abstract

The aim of this research was to elicit student perceptions and practices regarding the use of social media in the academic setting. More specifically, the objectives of this study were to (1) assess student perceptions of technology use in an academic setting and to rank their preferences; (2) determine which resources and communication options available to students and faculty are preferred by students; (3) determine if those preferences change depending upon the reason for communication; and (4) determine if students want to use social media in an academic setting, and if so, in what ways and for what purposes. Using an electronic survey instrument, undergraduate students at a regionally accredited Mid-South university in the United States were asked to rank their preferences regarding the use of eight different communication resources as part of a college course. In addition, students were asked to identify the social media tools they currently use and for what purpose(s), both in and out of the classroom.The results showed that, overall, Facebook was the most commonly used technology, that students use social media primarily for communicating with friends, and email is the preferred method for sending and receiving class-wide and individual communication, and that a learning management system is the preferred method for submitting class assignments and examinations. However, students generally do not want to use social media for academic activities.

References

[1]. Educause, (2006). 7 Things You Should Know About Facebook.

[2]. Brooks, G., & Brooks, M. (2001). In Search of Understanding: The Case for Constructivist Classrooms. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

[3]. Conole, G., de Laat, M., Dillon, T., & Darby, J. (2008). “Disruptive technologies', 'pedagogical innovation': What's new? Findings from an in-depth study of students' use and perception of technology”. Computers & Education, Vol. 50, pp. 511-524.

[4]. Duhaney, D.C. (2005). “Technology and higher education: Challenges in the halls of academe”. International Journal of Instructional Media, Vol. 32(1), pp. 7-15.

[5]. Elsaadani, M. (2012). “Exploration of teaching staff and students' preferences of information and communication technologies in private and academic lives”. International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol. 9(2), pp.396-402.

[6]. Foley, J., & Ojeda, C. (2008). “Teacher beliefs, best practice, technology usage in the classroom: A problematic relationship”. Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference, pp. 4110–4117. Chesapeake, VA: AACE.

[7]. Head, B. (2007). “The D generation: Leading the emerging generation of digital natives calls for a light touch”. AFR Boss.

[8]. Keane, J. (2002). “Teacher vs. Computer: Where Educators Stand in the Technology Revolution”. T.H.E. Journal, Vol.30(1), pp.38-40.

[9]. Kitsantas, A., & Chow, A. (2007). “College students' perceived threat and preference for seeking help in traditional, distributed and distance learning environments”. Computers and Education, Vol. 48(3), pp. 383-395.

[10]. Layzell, P., Brereton, O., & French, A. (2000). “Supporting collaboration in distributed software engineering teams”. Proceedings of the Seventh Asia- Pacific Software Engineering Conference, pp.38-45. Singapore: IEEE Computer Society.

[11]. Leech, R. (2006). “Teaching the digital natives”. Teacher: The National Education Magazine, pp. 6–9.

[12]. Lightfoot, J. (2006). “A comparative analysis of e-mail and face-to-face communication in an educational environment”. Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 9, pp. 217-227.

[13]. Lohnes, S., & Kinzer, C. (2007). “Questioning assumptions about students' expectations for technology in college classrooms”. Innovate, Vol. 3(5).

[14]. Longanecker, D. (2004). “The perfect storm in higher education”. Spectrum, Vol.77(4), pp. 22-25.

[15]. Lorenzetti, J. (2004). “Transformative assessment in higher education”. Academic Leader, Vol. 20(4), pp. 4-8.

[16]. Lorenzo, G., Oblinger, D., & Dzluban, C. (2007). “How choice, co-creation, and culture are changing what it means to be net savvy”. EDUCAUSE Quarterly, Vol. 30(1), pp. 6-12.

[17]. Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance Education: A Systems View. 2nd Edition, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

[18]. Newton, R. (2003). “Staff attitudes to the development and delivery of e-learning”. New Library World, Vol.104(1193), pp.412–425.

[19]. Panda, S., & Mishra, S. (2007). “E-Learning in a mega open university: Faculty attitude, barriers and motivators”. Educational Media International, Vol.104(10), pp.323– 338.

[20]. Philip, D. (2007). “The knowledge building paradigm: A model of learning for net generation students”. Innovate, Vol.3(5).

[21]. Salaway, G., Borreson, J., & Nelson, M. (2007). “The ecar study of undergraduate students and information technology”. Boulder, CO, EDUCAUSE, Center for Applied Research.

[22]. Salaway, G., Caruso, J., & Nelson, M. (2008). “The ecar study of undergraduate students and information technology”. Boulder, CO, EDUCAUSE, Center for Applied Research.

[23]. Sapp, D. (1996). “Too much technology”. MEA Voice, Vol.74(2), pp.5.

[24]. Selwyn, N. (2007). “The use of computer technology in university teaching and learning: A critical perspective”. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol.23(2), pp.83–94.

[25]. Sproull, R. (1991). “New ways of working in the networked organization”. A Lesson in Electronic Mail. Boston: MIT Press.

[26]. Toledo, C. (2007). “Digital culture: Immigrants and tourists responding to the natives' drumbeat”. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Vol.19(1), pp.84–92.

[27]. Weaver, D., Spratt, C., & Nair, S. C. (2008). “Academic and student use of a learning management system: Implications for quality ”. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, Vol.24(1), pp.30–41.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

B.Ed. Trainees Opinion on Usage of Internet in Preparation of their Projects – A Study

Venu Madhav K* , Mahender Reddy Sarsani**

* Research Scholar, University College of Education, Kakatiya University, Warangal, Telengana, India.

** Professor and Dean, Faculty of Education, Kakatiya University, Warangal, Telengana, India.

Madhav,k.V., and Sarsani,M.R. (2016). B.Ed. Trainees Opinion on Usage of Internet in Preparation of their Projects – A Study. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.12.4.4841

Abstract

This research article focus is particularly on the usage of internet for preparation of B.Ed projects for the teacher trainees under Kakatiya University region of Telangana State, India. For this, the investigators used the Normative Survey method of research. For data collection, the researchers used the well prepared questionnaire developed by the researchers. The stratified random sampling technique was used for selection of sample of 288 Teacher trainees comprises both male and female from different teaching methodologies. The data is systematically classified and tabulated according to the established objectives of the study. The results revealed that, majority of the teacher trainees are using the internet to identify the social mapping, information of different societies in the world, extract logos, cultural symbols, dance / art / festivals / classical music, to know the diseases, games, sports and physical education etc. And also, the trainees use the internet for case sheet, psychological tests and treatments, school and student development activities and cocurricular activities.

References

[1]. Becker, H.J., Worg, Y.T., and Ravitz, J.L. (1999). “Computer use and Technology in Co-NECT Schools, A Comparative Study : Teaching Learning and Computing”. National Survey in 1998, Special Report of University of California, Irvine, December, 1999.

[2]. Bhalla, J. (2013). “Computers Use by School Teachers in Teaching-Learning Process”. Journal of Education and Training Studies, Vol.1(2).

[3]. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), (1999). “How Do Teachers Use Computers and the Internet at School?”. US Department of Education.

[4]. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), (2000). “Teacher Use of Computers and the Internet in Public Schools”. US Department of Education: Statistical Report.

[5]. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), (2006). “How do Teachers direct their Students to use Computers and the Internet”. US Department of Education.

[6]. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES), (2003). “Computer and Internet use by children and adolescents in 2001”, US Department of Education: Statistical Report.

[7]. Means, B. (1995). “Technology's role in education reform: Findings from a national study of innovating schools”. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education.

[8]. McClintock, R. (1988). “Introduction; Marking the Second Frontier”. In Robert.O.McClintock (Ed.) Computing and Education. The Second Frontier New York : Teacher College Press.

[9]. Rajalakshmi, M. and Anandan, K. (2010). “Opinion of the Teacher Trainees towards ICT”. Journal of Community Guidance & Research, Vol.27,No.1, pp. 47-52. ISSN 0970-1346.

[10]. Sarasani, M.R. and Laxma Reddy, G. (2005). “An assessment of learning resources for teaching of computer education at B.Ed level-a case study”. In M. S.Talwar(Ed). Teacher Education and Globalization Bangalore: Cauvery Prakasana, pp.115-116.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Review Paper

Advancing Theory in Developing the Practice of Becoming a Citizen Leader

Craig McCoy* , Carol Schubert**

*-** Faculty Member, Kaplan University, USA.

Coy, C. M., and Schubert,C. (2016). Advancing Theory in Developing the Practice of Becoming a Citizen Leader. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.12.4.4842

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the literature from key contemporary authors in the study of leadership who offer insights on the phenomenon of citizen leadership. Additionally, this paper examines two real world examples in which citizen leadership is being demonstrated with regard to strengths and weaknesses, as well as personality traits and motivations. Commonalities exist, and suggest that further study might be useful to determine if citizen leadership can be taught in institutions of higher learning. The intent in this paper is to lay the foundation for future study that qualitatively captures the language patterns in becoming a citizen leader.

References

[1]. Ayto, J. (1990). Dictionary of Word Origins. New York: Arcade Publishing, Inc.

[2]. Bass, Bernard M. (1981). Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership - A Survey of Theory and Research. New York: The Free Press.

[3]. Bono, J. E., Shen, W., & Snyder, M. (2010). “Fostering integrative community leadership”. The Leadership Quarterly, Vol.21(2), pp.324-335.

[4]. Born, P. D. (2000). Leadership Communities: A study in Community Leadership.

[5]. Crawford, C.B., Brungardt, C., Maughan, M. (2000). Understanding Leadership Theories and Concepts. Longmount, CO: Rocky Mountain Press.

[6]. Gardiner, J. (2009). “Transcendent Leadership: Board metrics for profits, people, and planet”. Scholarly paper presented at The Annual Meeting of the International Leadership Association, Prague, Czech Republic. November 12, 2009.

[7]. Heater, D. B. (2002). World Citizenship: Cosmopolitan Thinking and its Opponents. New York: Continuum.

[8]. Heifetz, R. (2002). Leadership on the Line - Staying Alive through the Dangers of Leading. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

[9]. Heifetz, R. (1994). Leadership without Easy Answers. Cambridge: The Belknap Press.

[10]. History of the Grand (2015).

[11]. Kelly, J. G. (1999). “Contexts and community leadership: Inquiry as an ecological expedition”. American Psychologist, Vol.54(11), pp.953-961.

[12]. Kingwell, M. (2001). The World We Want: Restoring Citizenship In a Fractured Age. Landham, Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

[13]. Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (1995). The Leadership Challenge: How to Keep Getting Extraordinary Things Done in Organizations, 2nd edition. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

[14]. Kouzes, J., & Posner, B. (2006). “It's not just the leader's vision”. The Leader of the Future 2: Visions, Strategies, and Practices for the New Era. pp. 207-212 Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA.

[15]. McCoy, C. (2012). “Awakening students' sociological imagination”. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, Second Quarter, Vol. 5, No. 2.

[16]. McIntyre-Mills, J. J. (2000). Global Citizenship and Social Movements: Creating Transcultural Webs of Meaning for the New Millennium. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.

[17]. Mills, C.W. (1959). The Sociological Imagination. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.

[18]. Phillips, B. S. (1972). Worlds of the Future - Exercises in the Sociological Imagination. Columbus, Ohio: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company.

[19]. Senge, P. M. (1990). The Fifth Discipline - The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Doubleday.

[20]. Strauss, A.L. (1987). Qualitative Analysis for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[21]. Wheatley, M. (1997). “Goodbye, Command and Control”. Leader to Leader, Vol.5.

[22]. Wheatley, M. (1992). Leadership and the New Science: Learning about Organizations from an Orderly Universe. San Francisco: Berrett-Koeler Publishing.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Opinion Paper

Marketing Needed to Make Universities Globally Competitive

Naik B.M*

Board Member, Government College of Engineering, Aurangabad, India.

Naik, B. M. (2016). Marketing Needed to Make Universities Globally Competitive. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.12.4.4843

Abstract

The article aims at improving the quality of higher and technical education in India to world class standard. Institutions in knowledge economy are reckoned to be the drivers of development. Indian institutions are making efforts, investing money, appointing professors, students are studying hard but due to the lack of marketing strategy, their efforts do not bring the expected results. Industries do not get new knowledge, new technology from the institutes, and they remain uncompetitive in the global market. Thousands of students with degree in hand are jobless, 25 % of people live below poverty line, India remains a low income economy, with Human Development Index as low as 135. Purpose of the article is to drive deep in the minds of key people, global the winds of change. The institutions are expected to be extrovert, benchmarking the world best institutions. Professors and students have high potential and it can be developed by adopting marketing strategies. The article recommends that we should adopt them without any delay and bring fruits of development to Indian people.

References

[1]. Government of India, (2006). National Knowledge Commission Report, 2006.

[2]. Government of India, (2009). Yeshpal Committee Report, 2009.

[3]. B.M Naik & W.S Kandlikar, (2010). Higher & Technical Education: Book of knowledge. Gyan Publications,

[4]. Frank H.T. Rhodes, (2001). The Role of American University, the Creation of the Future. Cornell University Press.

[5]. Green Paper of European Union on Innovation and Technological Transfer Enterprise, Unit DG, EUFO, pp. 2295- 2920, Luxemburg.

[6]. Fang Zaho, (2004). “Academic Entrepreneurship: Case study of Australian universities”. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, pp. 91-97, IP Publishing Ltd, Vol.5, No.2.

[7]. B.M Naik, (2015). “Role of Universities and Colleges in Nurturing Future Leaders”. Education & Leadership, Atlantic publishers, New Delhi, 2015.

[8]. James Duderstadt, (2005). An University of 21 Century, The university of Michigan Press, 2005.

[9]. US Academy of Sciences Report, (2007). Rising Above the Gathering Storm.

[10]. B. M. Naik (2011).”A University/ College, In Competitive World, Need to Be Enterprising, Emphasising On Effective Extended Outreach, Knowledge/Technology Transfer & Marketing - Some Strategies”, i-manager’s Journal on Future Engineering Technology, Vol.7 No.1, pp.1-9.

i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology (JET)

Current Issue Vol. 20 Issue 4

Most Read

Most Cited

Volume 12 Issue 4 January - March 2016 [Open Access]

Neuro-Holistic Learning©: An Integrated Kinesthetic Approach to Cognitive Learning© Using Collaborative Interactive Thought Exchange© in a Blended Environment to Enhance the Learning of Young African American Males

James Edward Osler II* , Mark Anthony Wright**

*-** North Carolina Central University, USA.

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Social Media Use in Academics: Undergraduate Perceptions and Practices

Mark Ciampa* , Evelyn H. Thrasher**, Mark A. Revels***

*-** Associate Professor, Information Systems, Gordon Ford College of Business, Western Kentucky University, USA. *** Assistant Professor, Computer Information Technology, Ogden College of Science and Engineering, Western Kentucky University, USA.

Ciampa,M., Thrasher,E.H., and Revels,M. A. (2016). Social Media Use in Academics: Undergraduate Perceptions and Practices. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 10-19. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.12.4.4840

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

B.Ed. Trainees Opinion on Usage of Internet in Preparation of their Projects – A Study

Venu Madhav K* , Mahender Reddy Sarsani**

* Research Scholar, University College of Education, Kakatiya University, Warangal, Telengana, India. ** Professor and Dean, Faculty of Education, Kakatiya University, Warangal, Telengana, India.

Madhav,k.V., and Sarsani,M.R. (2016). B.Ed. Trainees Opinion on Usage of Internet in Preparation of their Projects – A Study. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 20-29. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.12.4.4841

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Advancing Theory in Developing the Practice of Becoming a Citizen Leader

Craig McCoy* , Carol Schubert**

*-** Faculty Member, Kaplan University, USA.

Coy, C. M., and Schubert,C. (2016). Advancing Theory in Developing the Practice of Becoming a Citizen Leader. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 30-36. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.12.4.4842

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Marketing Needed to Make Universities Globally Competitive

Naik B.M*

Board Member, Government College of Engineering, Aurangabad, India.

Naik, B. M. (2016). Marketing Needed to Make Universities Globally Competitive. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 12(4), 37-47. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.12.4.4843

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Mark Ciampa* , Evelyn H. Thrasher, Mark A. Revels*

- Associate Professor, Information Systems, Gordon Ford College of Business, Western Kentucky University, USA.

Assistant Professor, Computer Information Technology, Ogden College of Science and Engineering, Western Kentucky University, USA.

* Research Scholar, University College of Education, Kakatiya University, Warangal, Telengana, India.

** Professor and Dean, Faculty of Education, Kakatiya University, Warangal, Telengana, India.