i-manager Publications

i-manager's Journal on Software Engineering (JSE)

Current Issue Vol. 18 Issue 2

Most Cited

Volume 12 Issue 4 April - June 2018

Article

Designing a Software Test Automation Framework for Windows Application using Coded UI in Visual Studio Tool and Page Object Design

Manoj G.* , Johnson, K. R. Prakash*

* M.Tech Graduate, The National Institute of Engineering, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.

Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The National Institute of Engineering, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.

* Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, The National Institute of Engineering, Mysuru, Karnataka, India.

Manoj, G., Beeranur, R. K., Prakash, K. R. (2018). Designing a Software Test Automation Framework for Windows Application using Coded UI in Visual Studio Tool and Page Object Design. i-manager's Journal on Software Engineering, 12(4), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.26634/jse.12.4.14703

Abstract

Software environment is a testing environment where in the different test cases are executed to check the correctness, reliability and performance of the developed framework. In manual testing functionalities of a specific version of the application is tested manually through specific test cases. Test automation is an important technique for testing large scale applications using an automation tool. This paper deals with the different test automation frameworks, also discuss how to develop a framework using coded UI and Page Object Model for windows based application.

References

[1]. Amaricai, S., & Constantinescu, R. (2014). Designing a Software Test Automation Framework. Informatica Economica, 18(1), 152-161.

[2]. Hanna, M., El-Haggar, N., & Sami, M. (2014). A review of scripting techniques used in automated software testing. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), 5(1), 194-202.

[3]. Klammer, C., & Ramler, R. (2017, July). A Journey from manual Testing to Automated Test Generation in an Industry Project. In Software Quality, Reliability and Security Companion (QRS-C), 2017 IEEE International Conference on (pp. 591-592). IEEE.

[4]. Klammer, C., Ramler, R., & Stummer, H. (2016, August). Harnessing automated test case generators for GUI testing in industry. In Software Engineering and th Advanced Applications (SEAA), 2016 42 Euromicro Conference on (pp. 227-234). IEEE.

[5]. Leotta, M., Clerissi, D., Ricca, F., & Spadaro, C. (2013, March). Improving test suites maintainability with the page object pattern: An industrial case study. In Software Testing, Verification and Validation Workshops (ICSTW), 2013 IEEE Sixth International Conference on (pp. 108- 113). IEEE.

[6]. Memon, A. M., Pollack, M. E., & Soffa, M. L. (1999, May). Using a goal-driven approach to generate test cases for GUIs. In Software Engineering, 1999. Proceedings of the 1999 International Conference on (pp. 257-266). IEEE.

[7]. Memon, A. M., Pollack, M. E., & Soffa, M. L. (2001). Hierarchical GUI test case generation using automated planning. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 27(2), 144-155.

[8]. Niranjana, S., & Balamurugan, A. (2016). Automation Testing using Coded UI Test. IJSEAS, 2(4), 190-194.

[9]. Yuan, X., & Memon, A. M. (2007, May). Using GUI runtime state as feedback to generate test cases. In th Proceedings of the 29 International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 396-405). IEEE Computer Society.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Article

Providing Confidentiality using Bio Metrics

Tella Prameela* , Tejasree Samakoti**

* Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science, Siddhartha Educational Academy Group of Institutions, Andhra Pradesh, India.

** Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science, VEMU Institute of Technology, Pakala, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Prameela, T., Samakoti, T. (2018). Providing Confidentiality Using Bio Metrics i-manager's Journal on Software Engineering, 12(4), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.26634/jse.12.4.14670

Abstract

Now-a-days, every organization and institution provides security for their users. There are different systems are available for providing security and identifying of employees of the desired organization. No one is stick on one system for providing security. Every system having some disadvantages. Compared to the other systems most of the confidential organizations uses the biometric system for providing security and recognition. This paper depicts about the biometric system clearly with many types, steps involved in this system, advantages and disadvantages and finally applications.

References

[1]. Application of Biometric Technology Solutions to Enhance Security. (n.d.). In www.chemicalprocessing. com. Retrieved from https://www.chemicalprocessing. com/assets/Media/MediaManager/FingerprintsIncrease Security.pdf

[2]. Bonneau, J., & Schechter, S. E. (2014, August). Towards reliable storage of 56-bit secrets in human memory. In USENIX Security Symposium (pp. 607-623).

[3]. Chang, H. B., & Schroeter, K. G. (2010). Creating safe and trusted social networks with biometric user authentication. In Ethics and Policy of Biometrics (pp. 89-95). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

[4]. Counter, P. B. (2014). The biometric social network and keystroke authentication. In findbiometrics.com. Retrieved from https://findbiometrics.com/the-biometricsocial- network-and-keystroke-authentication-01241401/

[5]. Cyber security community by TATA group of companies (n.d.). Retrieved from https://security community.tcs.com/infosecsoapbox/

[6]. Deans, D. H. (n.d). How biometric authentication apps enhance security. In socialmediatoday.com. https:// www.socialmediatoday.com/ users/david-h-deans/

[7]. Jain, A. K., Ross, A., & Prabhakar, S. (2004). An introduction to biometric recognition. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology, 14(1), 4-20.

[8]. Prabhakar, S., Pankanti, S., & Jain, A. K. (2003). Biometric recognition: Security and privacy concerns. IEEE Security & Privacy, (2), 33-42.

[9]. Samakoti, T., Naseera, S., & Pramila, T. (2016). Perception of trend topic in twitter: A case study. i-manager's Journal on Software Engineering, 11(4), 12-17.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

An Empirical Study of Bad Smells during Software Evolution Using Designite Tool

Mamdouh Alenezi* , Mohammad Zarour**

* Chief Information & Technology Officer (CITO), Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

** Faculty Member, Computer and Information Sciences, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Alenezi, M., Zarour, M.(2018). An Empirical Study of Bad Smells during Software Evolution Using Designite Tool. i-manager's Journal on Software Engineering, 12(4), 12-27. https://doi.org/10.26634/jse.12.4.14958

Abstract

Bad smells are not uncommon in software systems. Such problems arise as a result of incomplete, inconsistent or incorrect requirements followed, accordingly, by bad design decisions which travel to the construction phase ending up with malfunctioning software. Such problems are expected to be handled and resolved during the evolution of the software which may result in more complicated systems that are difficult to maintain, and the software starts aging. Various tools are available to help in uncovering, analyzing and visualizing various bad smells. Once the bad smells are uncovered, a remedial action should be taken such as refactoring. One of the new tools to detect and measure a big number of bad smells is Designite. In this paper, we use Designite to analyze six open source systems and see if bad smells are resolved while software is evolving or systems keep stinking. We found that software quality, in terms of resolving bad smells, gained less focus as the software evolves on the expense of focusing on adaptive and corrective actions and that would keep the software stinking. We also discussed some recommendations on how to reduce bad smells during the software process and some other recommendations to enhance the Designite tool.

References

[1]. Alenezi, M. (2016). Software architecture quality measurement stability and understandability. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), 7(7), 550-559.

[2]. Alenezi, M., & Abunadi, I. (2015). Evaluating software metrics as predictors of software vulnerabilities. International Journal of Security and Its Applications, 9(10), 231-240.

[3]. Alenezi, M., & Zarour, M. (2016). Does software structures quality improve over software evolution? Evidences from open-source projects. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Security, 14, 61-75.

[4]. Ayewah, N., Hovemeyer, D., Morgenthaler, J. D., Penix, J., & Pugh, W. (2008). Using static analysis to find bugs. IEEE Software, 25(5), 22-29.

[5]. Bass, L., Clements, P., & Kazman, R. (2013). Software Architecture in Practice. Addison-Wesley.

[6]. Bertran, I. M. (2011). Detecting architecturallyrelevant code smells in evolving software systems. In Proceedings of the 33^rdInternational Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 1090-1093). ACM.

[7]. Campbell, G. A., & Papapetrou, P. P. (2014). SonarQube in Action, 1^st Edition. Manning Pub.

[8]. Chatzigeorgiou, A., & Manakos, A. (2010). Investigating the evolution of bad smells in object- oriented code. In International Conference on the Quality of Information and Communications Technology (pp. 106-115). IEEE.

[9]. de Andrade, H. S., Almeida, E., & Crnkovic, I. (2014). Architectural bad smells in software product lines: An exploratory study. In Proceedings of the WICSA 2014 Companion Volume (p. 12). ACM.

[10]. De Silva, L., & Balasubramaniam, D. (2012). Controlling software architecture erosion: A survey. Journal of Systems and Software, 85(1), 132-151.

[11]. Flanagan, C., Leino, K. R. M., Lillibridge, M., Nelson, G., Saxe, J. B., & Stata, R. (2002). Extended Static Checking for Java. Pldi, pp. 234-245.

[12]. Fontana, F. A., Pigazzini, I., Roveda, R., Tamburri, D., Zanoni, M., & Di Nitto, E. (2017). Arcan: A tool for architectural smells detection. In 2017 IEEE International Conf. on Software Architecture Workshops, ICSA Workshops 2017 (pp. 282-285). IEEE.

[13]. Fowler, M., & Beck, K. (1999). Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison-Wesley.

[14]. Ganesh, S. G., Sharma, T., & Suryanarayana, G. (2013). Towards a Principle-based Classification of Structural Design Smells. Journal of Object Technology, 12(2), 1-29.

[15]. Girba, T., Ducasse, S., & Lanza, M. (2004). Yesterday's weather: Guiding early reverse engineering efforts by summarizing the evolution of changes. In Software Maintenance, 2004. Proceedings. 20^th IEEE International Conference on (pp. 40-49). IEEE.

[16]. Guimaraes, E., Garcia, A., & Cai, Y. (2014). Exploring Blueprints on the prioritization of architecturally relevant code anomalies-A controlled experiment. In Computer Software and Applications Conference (COMPSAC), 2014 IEEE 38^th Annual (pp. 344-353). IEEE.

[17]. International Organization for Standardization, International Electrotechnical Commission, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, and IEEE-SA Standards Board. Systems and software engineering: Architecture description = Ingenieérie des systeèmes et des logiciels: description de l'architecture. ISO, 2011.

[18]. Iqbal, S., Khalid, M., & Khan, M. N. A. (2013). A Distinctive suite of performance metrics for software design. International Journal of Software Engineering and its Applications, 7(5), 197-208.

[19]. Johnson, B., Song, Y., Murphy-Hill, E., & Bowdidge, R. (2013). Why don't software developers use static analysis tools to find bugs? In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 672-681). IEEE Press.

[20]. Kim, S., & Ernst, M. D. (2007). Which warnings should i fix first? In Proceedings of the 6^th Joint Meeting of the European Software Engineering Conference and the ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (pp. 45-54). ACM.

[21]. Le, D. M., Carrillo, C., Capilla, R., & Medvidovic, N. (2016). Relating architectural decay and sustainability of software systems. In Software Architecture (WICSA), 2016 13^thWorking IEEE/IFIP Conference on (pp. 178-181). IEEE.

[22]. Lippert, M., & Roock, S. (2006). Refactoring in Large Software Projects: Performing Complex Restructurings Successfully. John Wiley & Sons.

[23]. Lozano, A., Wermelinger, M., & Nuseibeh, B. (2007). Assessing the impact of bad smells using historical information. In Ninth International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution: In Conjunction with the 6^th ESEC/FSE Joint Meeting (pp. 31-34). ACM.

[24]. Maneerat, N., & Muenchaisri, P. (2011). Bad-smell prediction from software design model using machine learning techniques. In Computer Science and Software Engineering (JCSSE), 2011 Eighth International Joint Conference on (pp. 331-336). IEEE.

[25]. Marinescu, R. (2001). Detecting design flaws via metrics in object-oriented systems. In Technology of Object-Oriented Languages and Systems, 2001. TOOLS 39. 39^th International Conference and Exhibition on (pp. 173-182). IEEE.

[26]. Marinescu, R. (2004). Detection strategies: Metricsbased rules for detecting design flaws. In Software Maintenance, 2004. Proceedings. 20^th IEEE International Conference on (pp. 350-359). IEEE.

[27]. Martin, R. C. (2013). Agile Software Development, Principles, Patterns, and Practices, First Edition. Pearson.

[28]. Moha, N., Gueheneuc, Y. G., & Duchien, A. F. (2010). Decor: A method for the specification and detection of code and design smells. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (TSE), 36(1), 20-36.

[29]. Munro, M. J. (2005). Product metrics for automatic identification of “bad smell” design problems in java source-code. In Software Metrics, 2005. 11^th IEEE International Symposium. IEEE.

[30]. Palomba, F., Bavota, G., Di Penta, M., Oliveto, R., De Lucia, A., & Poshyvanyk, D. (2013). Detecting bad smells in source code using change history information. In Proceedings of the 28^th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (pp. 268-278). IEEE Press.

[31]. Parnas, D. L. (1994). Software aging. In Proceedings of 16^th International Conference on Software Engineering (pp. 279-287).

[32]. Pérez, P. M., Filipiak, J., & Sierra, J. M. (2011). LAPSE+ static analysis security software: Vulnerabilities detection in java EE applications. In Future Information Technology (pp. 148-156). Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.

[33]. Ratzinger, J., Sigmund, T., & Gall, H. C. (2008). On the relation of refactorings and software defect prediction. In Proceedings of the 2008 International Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (pp. 35-38). ACM.

[34]. Riel, A. J. (1996). Object-oriented Design Heuristics. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc..

[35]. Rutar, N., Almazan, C. B., & Foster, J. S. (2004). A comparison of bug finding tools for Java. In Null (pp. 245- 256). IEEE.

[36]. Sharma, T., Mishra, P., & Tiwari, R. (2016). Designite: A software design quality assessment tool. In Proceedings of the 1^st International Workshop on Bringing Architectural Design Thinking into Developers' Daily Activities (pp. 1-4). ACM.

[37]. Slinger, S., & Moonen, I. L. M. F. (2005). Code Smell Detection in Eclipse. Delft University of Technology, Department of Software Technology.

[38]. Suryanarayana, G., Samarthyam, G., & Sharma, T. (2014). Refactoring for Software Design Smells: Managing Technical Debt. Morgan Kaufmann.

[39]. Tahvildari, L., & Kontogiannis, K. (2003). A metric-based approach to enhance design quality through meta-pattern transformations. In Software Maintenance and Reengineering, 2003. Proceedings. Seventh European Conference on (pp. 183-192). IEEE.

[40]. Taylor, R. N., Medvidovic, N., Eric, E. M., & Dashofy, M. (2010). Software Architecture: Foundations, Theory, and Practice. Wiley.

[41]. Travassos, G., Shull, F., Fredericks, M., & Basili, V. R. (1999). Detecting defects in object-oriented designs: Using reading techniques to increase software quality. In Proceddings of the 14^th Conference on Object-Oriented Programming Systems, Languages, and Applications (OOPSLA) (pp. 47-56).

[42]. Trifu, A., & Marinescu, R. (2005). Diagnosing design problems in object oriented systems. In Reverse Engineering, 12^th Working Conference on (pp. 155-164). IEEE.

[43]. Van Emden, E., & Moonen, L. (2002). Java quality assurance by detecting code smells. In Reverse Engineering, 2002. Proceedings. Ninth Working Conference on (pp. 97-106). IEEE.

[44]. Vidal, S. A., Marcos, C., & Díaz-Pace, J. A. (2016a). An approach to prioritize code smells for refactoring. Automated Software Engineering, 23(3), 501-532.

[45]. Vidal, S., Guimaraes, E., Oizumi, W., Garcia, A., Pace, A. D., & Marcos, C. (2016b). Identifying architectural problems through prioritization of code smells. In Software Components, Architectures and Reuse (SBCARS), 2016 X Brazilian Symposium on (pp. 41- 50). IEEE.

[46]. Vidal, S., Guimaraes, E., Oizumi, W., Garcia, A., Pace, A. D., & Marcos, C. (2016c). On the criteria for prioritizing code anomalies to identify architectural problems. In Proceedings of the 31^stAnnual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing (pp. 1812-1814). ACM.

[47]. Wong, S., Cai, Y., Kim, M., & Dalton, M. (2011). Detecting software modularity violations. In Software rd Engineering (ICSE), 2011 33^rd International Conference on (pp. 411-420). IEEE.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Top Hill Method – A new Sorting Approach to Reduce Execution Time

Debabrat Bharali* , Sandeep Kumar Sharma**

* Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Asam Down Town University, Guwahati, Assam, India.

** Assistant Professor, Poornima University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Bharali, D., Sharma, S. K. (2018). Top Hill Method – A new Sorting Approach to Reduce Execution Time. i-manager's Journal on Software Engineering, 12(4), 28-31. https://doi.org/10.26634/jse.12.4.14588

Abstract

The main objective of the proposed Top Hill method is to decrease the time of insertion. Sorting is done by using the pivot method of quick sort, binary searching, and doubly linked list. By using all these method in a combination, the proposed method can sort real time data and increase the size of the list with the worst case of O(n).

References

[1]. Deitel, H & Deitel, P. (2007). C++ How to Program. Prentice Hall.

[2]. Insertion Sort. (n.d). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insertion_sort

[3]. Linked List. (n.d). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from https://github.com/trekhleb/javascript-algorithms/tree/ master/src/data-structures/linked-list

[4]. Pandey, R. C. (2008). Comparison of Various Sorting Algorithms. Computer Science and Engineering.

[5]. Sareen, P. (2013). Comparison of sorting algorithms (on the basis of average case). International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science and Software Engineering, 3(3), 522-532.

[6]. Seymour Lipschutz, (n.d). In wikipedia. Retrieved from https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seymour_Lipschutz

[7]. Sipser, M. (2006). Introduction to the Theory of Computational. Boston: Thomson Course Technology, 2.

[8].What is a linked list and how it works? What are advantages and disadvantages of linked lists? (2016). Dev. Interview. Retrieved from http://developerinterview. com/p/algorithms/what-is-a-linked-list-and-how-it-workswhat- are-advantages-and-disadvantages-of-linkedlists- 39

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Performance Analysis of WRW Background Model Based GMM with other Algorithms for Tracking Humans in Surveillance Videos

Harihara Santosh Dadi* , Gopala Krishna Mohan Pillutla, Madhavi Latha Makkena*

* Associate Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Aditya Institute of Technology, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Institute of Aeronautical Engineering, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.

* Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Telangana, India.

Santosh, H. D., Mohan, G.K., Makkena, M. L. (2018). Performance Analysis of WRW Background model based GMM with other algorithms for tracking humans in surveillance videos. i-manager's Journal on Software Engineering, 12(4), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.26634/jse.12.4.14827

Abstract

A new algorithm for tracking humans in surveillance videos is introduced in this paper. The human head and foot point are first identified by using color and shape based human detection algorithm. These annotations are taken as input for the proposed tracking algorithm. The number of past pixels taken for modelling the present pixel in Gaussian Mixture Model (GMM) is modified in this algorithm. The Weighted Running Window (WRW) is used in choosing the past pixels. The number of past pixels is limited and also more weightages is given to the immediate past pixel, thereby reducing the time taken for tracking. Different tracking parameters are used for comparing the proposed algorithm with other existing algorithm. Performance results show that the proposed algorithm is out performing when compared with the other existing algorithms for human tracking. Performance Evaluation of Tracking and Surveillance (PETS) 2009 View 1 dataset is taken for conducting the experiment.

References

[1]. Andriyenko, A., Schindler, K., & Roth, S. (2012, June). Discrete-continuous optimization for multi-target tracking. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2012 IEEE Conference on (pp. 1926-1933). IEEE.

[2]. Chau, D. P., Thonnat, M., Bremond, F., & Corvee, E. (2014). Online parameter tuning for object tracking algorithms. Image and Vision Computing, 32(4), 287- 302.

[3]. Dadi, H. S., Mohan, P. G. K., & Latha M. M. (2018a). Color and shape based automatic detection of pedestrians in surveillance videos. In i-manager’s Journal on Image Processing, 5(1), 1-11.

[4]. Dadi, H. S., Pillutla, G. K. M., & Makkena, M. L. (2018b). Face recognition and human tracking using GMM, HOG and SVM in Surveillance Videos. In Annals of Data Sciences, 5(2), 157-179.

[5]. Dadi, H. S., Pillutla, G. K. M., & latha Makkena, M. (2017a). Human tracking under severe occlusions. imanager's Journal on Software Engineering, 12(1), 29-37.

[6]. Dadi, H. S., Pillutla, G. K. M., & Makkena, M. (2017b). Human tracking using weighted running window background model based GMM. Journal on Software Engineering, 12(2), 44-54.

[7]. Ellis, A., & Ferryman, J. (2010, August). PETS2010 and PETS2009 evaluation of results using individual ground truthed single views. In Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance (AVSS), 2010 Seventh IEEE International Conference on (pp. 135-142). IEEE.

[8]. Han, B. (2014). Appearance-based human tracking. In Computer Vision (pp. 38-40). Springer, Boston, MA.

[9]. McLaughlin, N., Del Rincon, J. M., & Miller, P. (2015, January). Enhancing linear programming with motion modeling for multi-target tracking. In Applications of Computer Vision (WACV), 2015 IEEE Winter Conference on (pp. 71-77). IEEE.

[10]. Nebehay, G. (2012). Robust object tracking based on Tracking-Learning-Detection (Masters Thesis, Faculty & Informatics, TU Vienna).

[11]. Santosh, D. H., & Mohan, P. K. (2014, April). Tracking manifold objects in motion using Gaussian mixture model and blob analysis. In IEEE International Conference on Convergence of Technology-2014 (pp. 1-7).

[12]. Santosh, D. H., & Mohan, P. K. (2015). Multiple human tracking and prediction under severe occlusions using GMM and Kalman filter. IJAER, 10(11), 29385-29404.

[13]. Sladojević, S., Anderla, A., Ćulibrk, D., Stefanović, D., & Lalić, B. (2017). Integer arithmetic approximation of the HoG algorithm used for pedestrian detection. Computer Science and Information Systems, 14(2), 329- 346.

[14]. Wu, Z., Thangali, A., Sclaroff, S., & Betke, M. (2012, June). Coupling detection and data association for multiple object tracking. In 2012 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 1948- 1955). IEEE.

[15]. Zhang, J., Presti, L. L., & Sclaroff, S. (2012, September). Online multi-person tracking by tracker hierarchy. In Advanced Video and Signal-Based Surveillance (AVSS), 2012 IEEE Ninth International Conference on (pp. 379-385). IEEE.

[16]. Zhu, G., Porikli, F., & Li, H. (2016, November). Modelfree multiple object tracking with shared proposals. In Asian Conference on Computer Vision (pp. 288-304). Springer, Cham.

i-manager's Journal on Software Engineering (JSE)

Current Issue Vol. 18 Issue 2

Most Read

Most Cited

Volume 12 Issue 4 April - June 2018

Designing a Software Test Automation Framework for Windows Application using Coded UI in Visual Studio Tool and Page Object Design

Manoj G.* , Johnson**, K. R. Prakash***

Manoj, G., Beeranur, R. K., Prakash, K. R. (2018). Designing a Software Test Automation Framework for Windows Application using Coded UI in Visual Studio Tool and Page Object Design. i-manager's Journal on Software Engineering, 12(4), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.26634/jse.12.4.14703

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Providing Confidentiality using Bio Metrics

Tella Prameela* , Tejasree Samakoti**

* Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science, Siddhartha Educational Academy Group of Institutions, Andhra Pradesh, India. ** Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science, VEMU Institute of Technology, Pakala, Andhra Pradesh, India.

Prameela, T., Samakoti, T. (2018). Providing Confidentiality Using Bio Metrics i-manager's Journal on Software Engineering, 12(4), 7-11. https://doi.org/10.26634/jse.12.4.14670

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

An Empirical Study of Bad Smells during Software Evolution Using Designite Tool

Mamdouh Alenezi* , Mohammad Zarour**

* Chief Information & Technology Officer (CITO), Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. ** Faculty Member, Computer and Information Sciences, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Alenezi, M., Zarour, M.(2018). An Empirical Study of Bad Smells during Software Evolution Using Designite Tool. i-manager's Journal on Software Engineering, 12(4), 12-27. https://doi.org/10.26634/jse.12.4.14958

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Top Hill Method – A new Sorting Approach to Reduce Execution Time

Debabrat Bharali* , Sandeep Kumar Sharma**

* Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Asam Down Town University, Guwahati, Assam, India. ** Assistant Professor, Poornima University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Bharali, D., Sharma, S. K. (2018). Top Hill Method – A new Sorting Approach to Reduce Execution Time. i-manager's Journal on Software Engineering, 12(4), 28-31. https://doi.org/10.26634/jse.12.4.14588

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Performance Analysis of WRW Background Model Based GMM with other Algorithms for Tracking Humans in Surveillance Videos

Harihara Santosh Dadi* , Gopala Krishna Mohan Pillutla**, Madhavi Latha Makkena***

Santosh, H. D., Mohan, G.K., Makkena, M. L. (2018). Performance Analysis of WRW Background model based GMM with other algorithms for tracking humans in surveillance videos. i-manager's Journal on Software Engineering, 12(4), 32-42. https://doi.org/10.26634/jse.12.4.14827

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Manoj G.* , Johnson, K. R. Prakash*

* Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science, Siddhartha Educational Academy Group of Institutions, Andhra Pradesh, India.

** Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science, VEMU Institute of Technology, Pakala, Andhra Pradesh, India.

* Chief Information & Technology Officer (CITO), Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

** Faculty Member, Computer and Information Sciences, Prince Sultan University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

* Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Asam Down Town University, Guwahati, Assam, India.

** Assistant Professor, Poornima University, Jaipur, Rajasthan, India.

Harihara Santosh Dadi* , Gopala Krishna Mohan Pillutla, Madhavi Latha Makkena*