i-manager Publications

i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching (JELT)

Current Issue Vol. 13 Issue 4

Stephen Krashen's Theory of SLA: A Conceptual Framework
The Need for using English for Professional & Global Communication Today: A Critical Review
A Meta-Synthesis of Research on In-Service EFL Teachers' Needs for Inset Programs in Türkiye
A Study of Pre-Service English Language Teachers' Engagement with Faculty-School Collaboration at the English Fest
Assessing Self-Directed English Language Learning Strategies of YouTube Content Creators

Most Cited

Volume 3 Issue 2 April - June 2013

Article

M.A. Curriculum of TEFL in Iran: A Survey on the Courses

Parastou Gholami Pasand*

*M.A, Student of TEFL, University of Guilan, Guilan Iran.

Pasand, P. G. (2013). M.A. Curriculum Of TEFL In Iran: A Survey On The Courses. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 3(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.3.2.2293

Abstract

The M.A. level in Teaching English as a Foreign Language (TEFL) in Iran aims at training qualified persons for teaching English at universities or institutions of higher education and also fulfilling the needs of the society regarding experts in the field of research in language teaching issues, translating different English texts into Persian or vice versa and other related jobs. The present paper is a survey on the courses presented at the Masters level of TEFL in Iran. For this purpose, the lessons in each course together with their aims and objectives were delineated first and then, the M.A. syllabus of TEFL of one of the universities was compared to it with the aim of identifying and analyzing the strengths and weaknesses of the university M.A. syllabus. Furthermore, this survey aimed at finding the gaps in the proposed courses in the M.A. curriculum of Iran. The results of the analysis revealed that there are a number of deficiencies in the proposed courses and there is a need to modify the current curriculum in terms of the existing courses and lessons.

References

[1]. Brown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum: A systematic approach to program development. Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

[2]. Howard, J. (2007). Curriculum development, Department of Education, Elon University, Summer.

[3]. Johnson, F.R. (1996). The Second Language Curriculum, CUP

[4]. Moreno, P. (2000). The implications of curriculum design for a graduate of the English language program at Universidad Veracruzana. Unpublished dissertation. Mexico.

[5]. Nunan, D. (2000). Syllabus Design, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[6]. Richards, J. C., Platt, J. & Platt.H. (1993). Dictionary of Language Teaching & Applied Linguistics. London: Longman .

[7]. Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[8]. Van den Branden, K. (n.d.). Task-based education: from theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[9]. White, R. (1993). The ELT Curriculum, USA: Cambridge University Press.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Article

Lexicalisation and Discursive Expression of Power in Olusegun Obasanjo’s Speeches

Josephine Funke Oni*

* English Unit, National Open University of Nigeria, Victoria Island, Lagos.

Oni, J. F. (2013). Lexicalisation And Discursive Expression Of Power In Olusegun Obasanjo's Speeches. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 3(2), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.3.2.2294

Abstract

Although language is not power, it encodes power. This is the case with some speeches of former Nigerian President, Olusegun Obasanjo. This paper attempts to unravel the hidden ideological expression of power using critical discourse analysis (CDA) and systemic functional linguistics. Precisely, the paper draws on Fairclough(2001) members resources and Halliday (1970) system of mood and modality as theoretical basis. The data comprise Obasanjo addresses to public servants and the Nigerian Labour Congress (NLC) in 1978 and 2000 respectively. These are representative of the two political dispensations under which Obasanjo served. The findings show that Obasanjo deploys language as a strategy of suppression by exploiting lexical items with negative expressive values to stifle oppositions as well as make them unpopular. Also, the use of power as strategy of domination is mainly achieved through imperatives which allow the speaker to impose his opinion on others. In addition, declaratives are used to neutralise the asymmetrical power relation that exists between Obasanjo and the Nigerian Labour Congress. Obasanjo militaristic trait of suppression and domination lends credence to his raw manifestation of power

References

[1]. Aluede, O., Jimoh, B., Agwinede, B.O. and Omoregie, E.O. (2005). Student unrest in Nigerian universities: looking back and forward. Kamla-Raj: J. Soc. Sci.10.1:17-22.

[2]. Bloomer, A., Griffiths, P., and Morrison, A. J. (2005). Introducing language in use: a course book. London: Routledge.

[3]. Brockeriede, W.E. (1971). Dimension of the concept of rhetoric. Contemporary theories of rhetoric: selected readings. R.L. Johannesen. Ed. New York: Harper and Row. 311-326.

[4]. Butler, C.S. (1985). Systemic linguistics: theory and applications, London: Batsford Academic and Educational.

[5]. Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and social change. Cambridge: Polity Press.

[6]. Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical discourse analysis: the critical study of language. London: Longman.

[7]. Fairclough, N. (2001). Language and power. London: Pearson Education Ltd.

[8]. Habermas. (1977). Erkenntnis und Interesse. Suhrkamp.

[9]. Halliday, M.A.K. (1970). Functional diversity in language as seen from a consideration of modality and mood in English. Foundations of language 6.3:322-361.

[10]. Haliday M.A.K. (1978). Language as social semiotic, London: Edward Arnold.

[11]. Halliday, M.A.K. and Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

[12]. Halliday, M.A.K. (1985). An introduction to functional Grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

[13]. Haratyan, F. (2011). Halliday's SFL and Social Meaning. 2nd International Conference on Humanities, Historical and Social Sciences, IPEDR 17.

[14]. Labourdette, S. (2007). Social relations and power. Orientaciony Sociedad, 7:1-20.

[15]. Muir, J. (1972). A modern approach to English grammar: an Introduction to systemic grammar. London: Batsford.

[16]. Obasanjo, O. (1978). An address to public servants. Towards civil rule. FGP 1468/978/10,000.

[17]. Oha, O.(1994). Language in war situation: a stylistic study of the war speeches of Yakubu Gowon and Emeka Ojukwu. Ph.D. Thesis. Dept. of English. University of Ibadan. xxxiv + 341pp.

[18]. Ribeiro, B.T. (1996). Conflict talk in a psychiatric interview: struggling between personal and official footings. Texts and practices – readings in critical discourse analysis. Caldas-Coulthard, C.R. and Coulthard, M. Eds. London: Routledge. 179-193.

[19]. The Comet, Wednesday, May 3, 2000.

[20]. Thomas, L. And Wareing, S. (1999). Language, society and power: an introduction. London: Routledge.

[21]. van Dijk, T.A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4.2: 249-283.

[22]. van Dijk (1996). Discourse, power and access. Texts and practices: readings in critical discourse analysis. C.R. Caldas-Coulthard, and M. Coulthard. Eds. Londan Routledge. 84-104.

[23]. Ventola, E. (1988). Text analysis in operation: a multilevel approach. New developments in systemic linguistics, Vol. 2: theory and application. R.P. Fawcett and D. Young. Eds. London: Pinter Publishers. 52-77.

[24]. Wodak, R., de Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., and Liebhart, K. (1999). The discursive construction of national identity. Edinburgh: University Press.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

The effects of Semantic mapping, thematic clustering, and notebook keeping on L2 vocabulary recognition and production

Abbas Ali Zarei* , Saba Adami**

* Assistant Professor, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin.

** M.A. Islamic Azad University, Takestan.

Zarei, A. A., and Adami, S. (2013). The Effects Of Semantic Mapping, Thematic Clustering, And Notebook Keeping On L2 Vocabulary Recognition And Production. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 3(2), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.3.2.2295

Abstract

To investigate the effects of semantic mapping, thematic clustering, and notebook keeping on L2 vocabulary recognition and production, four groups of intermediate level learners in an EFL institute in Zanjan, Iran participated in the study. Three experimental groups consisted of semantic mapping, semantic feature analysis, and vocabulary notebook keeping. The fourth group served as the comparison group. During the treatment, the participants of the four groups were presented with the same vocabulary items but using different techniques. At the end of the experimental period, a multiple choice and a fill-in the-blanks posttest were administered. Data were analysed using two separate one-way ANOVA procedures. Results indicated that all three experimental conditions were more effective than the comparison condition on both vocabulary recognition and production. It also turned out that semantic feature analysis and vocabulary notebook keeping techniques were more effective than semantic mapping on Iranian EFL learners vocabulary recognition. Results also showed that semantic feature analysis was more effective than semantic mapping, which in turn, was more effective than vocabulary notebook keeping on Iranian EFL learners’ vocabulary production.

References

[1]. Barcroft, J. (2002). Semantic and structural elaboration in L2 lexical acquisition. Language Learning, 52 (2), 323-363.

[2]. Barcroft, J. (2009). Strategies and performance in intentional L2 vocabulary learning. Language awareness, 18 (1), 74-89.

[3]. Bromley, K. (2007). Nine things every teacher should know about words and vocabulary instruction. Journal of adolescence and adult literacy, 50 (7), 528-537.

[4]. Chu-chang, M., Johnson, D. D., Pittelman, S. D., & Toms-bronowski, S. (1982). Studies of vocabulary development in the United States of America and the Republic of China. ERIC document reproduction service, No. ED227679. Retrieved October 19, 2010 from http:// www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/recordDetail?Accno =Ed227679

[5]. Codesal, M. M. (2000). Learner centredness in vocabulary learning. Encuentro, Revista de Investigacion e Innovacion en la clase de idioms, 11, 174-183.

[6]. Cunningham, P. M. (1979). Teaching vocabulary in the content areas. NASSP Bulletin, 63, 112-116.

[7]. Fowle, C. (2002). Vocabulary notebook: Implementation and outcomes. ELT Journal, 56 (4), 380-388.

[8]. Gowdasiei, F., & Hashemi, M. R. (2005). An attribute- treatment interaction study: lexical set versus semantically unrelated vocabulary instruction. RELC Journal, 36 (3), 341-361.

[9]. Graves, M. F. (1986). Vocabulary learning and instruction. Review of Research in Education, 13, 49-89.

[10]. Hippner- page, T. (2000). Semantic clustering versus thematic clustering of English vocabulary words for second language instruction: which method is more effective? ERIC, document reproduction service, No. Ed315962.

[11]. Jia, S. (2006). An empirical research on learning strategies training in EFL classroom. US-China foreign language, 4 (5), 54-59.

[12]. Jiang, N. (2002). From-meaning mapping in vocabulary acquisition in a second language. SSLA, 24, 617-637.

[13]. Johnson, D. D., & Pittelman, S. D. (1985). Project on the investigation of the effectiveness of vocabulary instruction. ERIC, document reproduction service, No. Ed276988.

[14]. Johnson, D. D., Levin, K.M., & Pittelman, S. D. (1985). An investigation of two instructional settings in the use of semantic mapping with poor readers. Madison, Wisc.: Wisconsin Center for Education Research, University of Wisconsin.

[15]. Johnson, D.D., Levin, K.M., Pittelman, S. D., & Toms-bronowski, S. (1984). An investigation of the effects of prior knowledge and vocabulary acquisition on passage comprehension. ERIC, document reproduction service No. Ed254830.

[16]. Leeke, P., & Shaw, P. (2000). Learners' independent records of vocabulary. System, 28(2), 271-289.

[17]. Moir, J., & Nation, I. S. P. (2002). Learners' use of strategy for effective vocabulary learning. Prospect, 17 (1), 15-35.

[18]. Margosein, C. M., Pascarella, E. T., & Pflaum, S. W. (1982). The effect of instruction using semantic mapping on vocabulary and comprehension. The Journal of early adolescence, 2(2), 185-194.

[19]. Riazi, A., Sadighi, F., & Zare, S. (2005). The effect of EFL students' L2 proficiency and age on their overall patterns of vocabulary. IJAL, 8 (2), 87-106.

[20]. Sanchez, M. J. (2004). Effect of instruction with expert patterns on the lexical Learning of English as a foreign language. System, 32(1), 89-102.

[21]. Schmitt, N. (2008). Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language teaching research, 12 (3), 329-363.

[22]. Shapiro, A. M., & Waters, D. L. (2005). An investigation of the cognitive processes underlying the key word method of foreign vocabulary learning. Language teaching research, 9 (2), 129-146.

[23]. Tinkham, T. (1997). The effect of semantic and thematic clustering on the learning of second language vocabulary. Second language research, 13 (2), 138-163.

[24]. Waring, R. (1997). The negative effects of learning words in semantic sets: A replication. System, 25 (2), 261-274.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used by EAP Learners: The Case of the Students of Social Sciences

Eshrat Bazarmaj Haghi* , Parastou Gholami Pasand**

* M.A. Student of TEFL, University of Guilan, Guilan, Iran.

** M.A. Student of TEFL, University of Guilan, Guilan, Iran.

Haghi, E. B., and Pasand, P.G. (2013). Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used By EAP Learners: The Case Of The Students Of Social Sciences. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 3(2), 28-33. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.3.2.2296

Abstract

The significance of using language learning strategies in general and vocabulary learning strategies in particular is quite clear to both language learners and language specialists. Being familiar with and making use of a range of different vocabulary learning strategies is a great aid for EAP learners in dealing with unknown words. The present study deals with vocabulary learning strategies used by EAP students at Guilan University, and, it aims at investigating the most and the least frequently used vocabulary learning strategies among Iranian EAP students majoring in the field of Social Sciences. It also seeks to find out whether there are difference between male and females regarding their use of these strategies. Data collection was done using a modified version of Schmitt (1997) Vocabulary Learning Strategies taxonomy in the form of a questionnaire, and asking 55 students to complete it. The results indicate that the EAP learners who took part in this study use more or less the same kind of vocabulary learning strategies with a rather similar frequency of usage, and also the issue of gender makes no significant difference in their strategy use.

References

[1]. Akbary, Z. & Tahririan, M. H. (2009). Vocabulary learning strategies in an ESP context: The case of paramedical English in Iran. Asian EFL Journal, 11(1), 45-58.

[2]. Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[3]. Catalan, R. M. J. (2003). Sex differences in L2 vocabulary learning strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 54-77.

[4]. Dudley-Evans, T. & St. Johns, M. (1998). Development in English for specific purposes: A multi-disciplinary approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[5]. Griffiths, C. (2003). Patterns of language learning strategy use, System, 31, 367-383

[6]. Gu, Y. (2002). Gender, academic major, and vocabulary learning strategies of Chinese EFL learners. RELC Journal, 33(1),35-54.

[7]. Gu, P. Y. (2003). Vocabulary Learning in a Second Language: Person, Task, Context and Strategies. TESL-EJ Journal, 7, 1-25. Retrieved from http://www-writing.berkeley. Edu/TESl-EJ/ej26/a4.html#top

[8]. Jurkovic, V. (2006). Vocabulary learning strategies in an ESP context. Scripta Manent. 2(1), 23-32.

[9]. Lessard-Clouston, M. (1997). Language learning strategies: An overview for L2 teachers. Retrieved on December 6, 2012 from: http://iteslj.org/Articles/Lessard-Clouston/ strategies.html.

[10]. Nation, I.S.P. (2001). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[11]. O'Malley, J. M. & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[12]. Ruutmets, K. (2005). Vocabulary Learning Strategies in Studying English as a Foreign Language. Master's thesis. [online]. Retrieved from: http://www. utlib.ee/ ekollekt/ diss/mag /2005/ b17557100/ruutmets. pdf (30.4.2006)

[13]. Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary Learning Strategies. In Schmitt, N., and McCarthy, M. Vocabulary: Description, Acquisition and Pedagogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Joint Book reading: How do Blogs Foster Collaborative Comprehension?

Fatemeh Behjat*

* Department of English Language, Islamic Azad University, Abadeh Branch, Abadeh, Iran.

Behjat, F. (2013). Joint Book Reading: How Do Blogs Foster Collaborative Comprehension?. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 3(2), 34-42. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.3.2.2297

Abstract

A blog is an innovative web tool which has an immense potential to enhance language abilities. As one of the ways to enhance foreign language learning is collaboration and interaction, the present study is an attempt to find out if blogs can be used to foster language learners' comprehension through collaborative bookreading. To this end, 62 Iranian EFL students studying at the university were selected as the participants. After they were indicated to be homogeneous regarding their reading comprehension, they were divided into two groups. Both groups were instructed for three months. The control group read story books as their supplementary reading activity individually, but the experimental group used the teacher's blog to read the same short stories assigned to the control group but with collaboration of their peers in a virtual environment. The participants' performances in the reading comprehension post-test revealed that joint reading through blogs can foster language learners' comprehension. Besides, it was concluded that using blogs, females had more improvement in their reading comprehension than male students.

References

[1]. Adams, D., & Hamm, M. (1996). Cooperative learning. Critical thinking and collaboration across the curriculum (2nd ed.). Springfield, IL: Charles Thomas.

[2]. Barellet- Bragg, A. (2003). Blogging to learn. The Knowledge Tree, 4, 34-49.

[3]. Bauer, E. B., & O'Brien, D. G. (2005). New literacies and the institution of old learning. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(1), 120-131.

[4]. Blackstone, B., Spiri, J. & Naganuma, N. (n.d.). Blogs in English language teaching and learning: Pedagogical uses and students' responses. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 6(2), 1-20.

[5]. Block, C. C. & Pressley, M. (2002). Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices. New York: Guilford Press.

[6]. Brigham,R., Berkley,S., Simpkins, P., & Brigham, M. (2007). A focus on reading comprehension strategy instruction. Retrieved 20 February 2012 from http:// www. TeachingLD.org.

[7]. Boling, E., Castek, J., Zawilinski, L., Barton, K., & Nierlich, T. (2008). Collaborative literacy: Blogs and internet projects. Reading Teacher, 61(6), 504-506.

[8]. Carman, J. M. (2002). Blended learning design: Five key ingredients. In G. M. Billigmeier (n.d.). ended learning: Design and Implementation. Retrieved 20 February 2012 from imet.csus.edu/imet10/portfolio.

[9]. Chen, X. D. & Zhang, Z. P. (2003). The application of blogs on education: A phenomenology perspective. Retrieved 24 May 2012 from http//Building and bird. Blog. hexum.com/2546195_html.

[10]. Donato, R. (2004). Aspects of collaboration in pedagogical discourse, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 284-302.

[11]. Dougiama, M. T. & Peter, C. (2002). Interpretive analysis of an internet course constructed using a new courseware tool called MOODLE. Proceedings of HERDSA Conference, London, England.

[12]. Downes, S. (2004). Educational blogging. Education Review, 5(1), 14-26.

[13]. Fountas, I. C. & Pinnell, G. S. (1996). Guided reading: Good first teaching for all children. Portamouth: NH, Heinemann.

[14]. Fredig, R. E. & Trammell, K. D. (2004). Content delivery in the blogsphere. The Journal 2(1), 55-68.

[15]. Holmes, J. A. (2005). Web logs in the post secondary writing classroom: A study of purpose. Unpublished master's thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina.

[16]. Hsieh, P. H., Shouse, R. C., & Chen, W. F. (2007). Rationale of providing adaptive educational systems in enhancing different learning style students' reading comprehension abilities. Asian Journal of Health and Information Sciences, 1(4), 377-392.

[17]. Iwashita, N. (2001). The effect of learner proficiency on interactional moves and modified output in non-native-nonnative interaction in Japanese as a foreign language. System,27, 267-287.

[18]. Kavaliauskiene , G. (N.d.). Weblogs in language teaching and learning. Retrieved 4 May 2012 from www.tewtjournal.org

[19]. Kim, Y.J. (2009). The effects of task complexity on learner–learner interaction. System, 37, 254-268.

[20]. Kneser, C. & Ploetzner, A. (2001). Collaboration on the basis of complementary domain knowledge: Observed dialog structures and their relation to learning success. Learning and Instruction, 11, 53-83.

[21]. Kol, S. & Schcolnik, P. (2008). Enhancing screen reading strategies. CALICO Journal, 18. Retrieved on 15 May 2012 from http://www.calico.org/a-501/enhancing-screen-raeding-strategies-html.

[22]. Leverett, T. (2010). This is your class on weblogs. Retrieved 20 March 2012 from www.tewtjournal.org

[23]. MacBride, R. & Luehmann, A.L. (2008). Capitalizing on emerging technologies: A case study of classroom blogging. School Science and Mathematics, 173(11), 173-183.

[24]. Majhi, S. & Maharana, B. (2010). Familiarity of web 2.0 tools and its application in learning: A case of two Indian universities. International Journal of Library and Information Science, 3(6), 123-129.

[25]. Mills, K. A. (2010). Floating on a sea of talk: Reading comprehension through speaking and listening. The Reading Teacher, 63(4), 225-229.

[26]. Moterram, G. (2009). Social computing and teacher education: An agenda for course development. Innovation in Language Teaching and Learning, 3(1), 83-97.

[27]. Mullen, R., & Wedwick, L. (2008). Avoiding the digital abyss: Getting started in the classroom with YouTube, Digital Stories, and Blogs. Clearing House, 82(2), 66-69.

[28]. Peauroi, C. L. (2006). Using weblogs to support collaborative and reflective high school laboratory groups. Retrieved 18 March 2012 from www2. Cusd. claremont.edu: 16080/~cfiello/arp/arpreportpeauroi2 copy.pdf

[29]. Petrovsky, A. V. (1985). The collective and the individual. Moscow: Progress.

[30]. Pinkman, K. (2005). Using blogs in foreign language classrooms: Encouraging learner independence. The JALT CALL Journal, 1, 12-24.

[31]. Poorahmadi, M. (2010). The effect of employing scaffolding strategies and classroom tasks in teaching reading comprehension. The Journal of TEFLL, 1(3), 107-118.

[32]. Rahimi, A. & Behjat, F. (2011). On the screen or printed: A case of Iranan EFL students' raeding the press. i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching, 1(2), 5-26.

[33]. Rashtchi, M. & Moazezi Fardi Moghadam, S. (2011). Shared reading: A technique to enhance reading and writing abilities of Iranian EFL learners. Journal of Studies in Learning and Teaching English, 1(1), 161-181.

[34]. Renandya, W. A. & Jacobs, G. M. (2002). Extensive reading: why aren t we all doing it? In J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya (eds.). Methodology in language teaching: an athology of current practice Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[35]. Salimzadeh, R. & Mohammadi, M. (2009). The effect of cooperative learning strategy on reading comprehension of EFL learners. In the proceedings of the 7th International TELLSI Conference on New Horizons in Language Education, Yazd University, Iran.

[36]. Slavin, R. E. (1990). Research on cooperative learning: Consensus and controversy. Educational Leadership, 47(4), 52–54.

[37]. Smith, G. H. (2009). Learning English through interactive weblogs: Student experiences blogging in the secondary ESL classrooms. Retrieved 12 March 2012 from www.researchgate.net

[38]. Storch, N. (2002). Relationships formed in dyadic interaction and opportunity for learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 305-322.

[39]. Szimanska, A. & Kaczmarek, A. W. (2011). Reading efficiency in a blended learning context. Teaching English with technology, 11(2), 29-42.

[40]. Tseng, M. C. (2008). The use of blogs in English classes for medicine-related majors. Chang Gung Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, 1(1),167-187.

[41]. Tan, Y. H., Ow, J. E. G, & Tan, S. C. (2006). Audioblogging and oral skills in Chinese language. AECT Research Symposium, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana.

[42]. Tse, S. K., Yuen, A. H. K., Loh, E. K. Y., Lam, J. W. I., & Wai Ng, R. H. (2010). Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 26(2), 164-179.

[43]. Warschauer, M. (2006). Writing English into our technological world. Guardian Weekly Online. Retrieved 13 February 2012 from http//www.Guardian, co,uk/ education/2006/jan/20/tefl/olps.

[44]. Watanabe, Y. & Swain, M. (2007). Effects of pro?ciency differences and patterns of pair interaction on second language learning: collaborative dialogue between adult ESL learners. Language Teaching Research 11(2), 121-142.

[45]. Zare-ee, A., Shekarey , A., & Fathi Vajargah, K. (2009). The educational usefulness and use of blogging in higher education: Male and female Iranian undergraduate students' views. World Applied Sciences Journal, 7(2), 211-219.

[46]. Zeng, G. Z. & Takatsuka, S. (2009). Text-based peer–peer collaborative dialogue in a computer-mediated learning environment in the EFL context. System, 37, 434-446.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Lexical cohesion in students’ argumentative essay among a select group of Filipino college students

Josephine B. Alarcon*

* University of SantoTomas Research Cluster for Culture, Education and Social Issues.

Alarcon, B. J. (2013). Lexical Cohesion In Students' Argumentative Essay Among A Select Group Of Filipino College Students. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 3(2), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.3.2.2298

Abstract

This study analyzed the lexical devices used by undergraduate students in their argumentative text using Halliday and Hasan (1976) and Halliday(2004) taxonomy.One hundred forty-eight argumentative essays were analyzed. The essays underwent interrating by three independent raters using a 20-point rubric and were grouped according to rating. Repetition was the most frequently used lexical cohesive device among the three groups of essays. Antonyms, meronyms, and hyponyms followed respectively. Superordinates and collocation occurred less frequently in the essays. There was a low correlation between the frequency of lexical devices and writing quality. Therefore, there was no significant relationship between lexical cohesive devices and writing quality.times new roman Qualitative findings reveal that synonyms in the highly-rated essays were utilized by the students to denote the positive effects and to define technology. Antonyms were used for comparison and contrast and to denote the positive effects of technology in the low-rated essays. Unlike in the highly-rated essays where synonyms were used to give positive effects of technology, antonyms were used to denote positive effects of technology in the low-rated essays to achieve such communicative purpose. Other lexical devices assisted the students in fulfilling their writing requirement. Hyponyms were employed to explain how a particular concept contributes to or is a part of a bigger concept. Meronyms were used to give examples of a concept and to define a term. Superordinates were utilized to give a specific kind or brand of a more general idea.

References

[1]. Allard, L. & Ulatowska, H. (1991). Cohesion in written and procedural discourse of fifth-grade children. Linguistics and Education, 3 (1), 63-79. Retrieved from www.sciencedirect.com on July 24, 2010.

[2]. Brashi, A. (2009). Collocability as a problem in L2 production. Reflections on English Language Teaching, 8 (1), .22-23.

[3]. Carell, P. (1982). Cohesion is not coherence. TESOL Quarterly, 16(4).

[4]. Castro, C. (2004). Cohesion and social construction of meaning in L2. Asia Pacific Education Review, 5 (2), 215-225. Retrieved from www.sciencedirect.com on October 27, 2012.

[5]. Chen, H. & Yu, H. (2002). An analysis of lexical cohesion in high school students' compositions. Retrieved from http://nccur.lib.nccu.edu.twon October 29, 2010.

[6]. Chen, J. (2008). An investigation of EFL students' use of cohesive devices. Retrieved from nutnr.lib.nutn.edu.tw on August 18, 2010.

[7]. Halliday, M. A. K. and Hasan, R. (1976). Cohesion in English. London: Longman.

[8]. Halkiday M.A.K. And Hasan, R. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Arnold.

[9]. Hoey, M. (1991). Patterns of lexis in text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[10]. Jin, W. (2001). A quantitative study of cohesion in Chinese graduate students' writing: Variations across genres and proficiency levels. Research Report no.143.

[11]. Khalil, A. (1989). A study of cohesion and coherence in Arab EFL college students writing. System. 17, (3), 359-371. Retrieved from www.sciencedirect.com on July 24.

[12]. Liu, D. (2000). Writing cohesion: Using context lexical ties in ESOL. English Teaching Forum, 38(1), 28-33.

[13]. Mojica, L. (2006). Reiterations in ESL learners' academic papers: do they contribute to lexical cohesiveness? The Asia-Pacific Education Research, 15(1), 105-125.

[14]. Tierney, R & Mosenthal, J (1981). The Cohesion concept' relationship to the coherence of text. Center for Study for reading technical report 221. University of IllinoisUrbana-Champaign

[15]. Witte, S. and Faigley, L. (1981). Coherence, cohesion, and writing quality. College Composition and Communication, 32(2), 189-204.

[16]. Zhang, A. (2005). Use of Cohesive Ties in Relation to the Quality of Compositions by Chinese College Students. Journal of Cambridge Studies, 5 (2-3), 78-86.

[17]. Zhou, X.(2007). Application of English cohesion theory in the teaching of writing to Chinese graduate students US-China Education Review, 4 (7), 31-37.

i-manager's Journal on English Language Teaching (JELT)

Current Issue Vol. 13 Issue 4

Most Read

Most Cited

Volume 3 Issue 2 April - June 2013

M.A. Curriculum of TEFL in Iran: A Survey on the Courses

Parastou Gholami Pasand*

*M.A, Student of TEFL, University of Guilan, Guilan Iran.

Pasand, P. G. (2013). M.A. Curriculum Of TEFL In Iran: A Survey On The Courses. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 3(2), 1-8. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.3.2.2293

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Lexicalisation and Discursive Expression of Power in Olusegun Obasanjo’s Speeches

Josephine Funke Oni*

* English Unit, National Open University of Nigeria, Victoria Island, Lagos.

Oni, J. F. (2013). Lexicalisation And Discursive Expression Of Power In Olusegun Obasanjo's Speeches. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 3(2), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.3.2.2294

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

The effects of Semantic mapping, thematic clustering, and notebook keeping on L2 vocabulary recognition and production

Abbas Ali Zarei* , Saba Adami**

* Assistant Professor, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin. ** M.A. Islamic Azad University, Takestan.

Zarei, A. A., and Adami, S. (2013). The Effects Of Semantic Mapping, Thematic Clustering, And Notebook Keeping On L2 Vocabulary Recognition And Production. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 3(2), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.3.2.2295

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used by EAP Learners: The Case of the Students of Social Sciences

Eshrat Bazarmaj Haghi* , Parastou Gholami Pasand**

* M.A. Student of TEFL, University of Guilan, Guilan, Iran. ** M.A. Student of TEFL, University of Guilan, Guilan, Iran.

Haghi, E. B., and Pasand, P.G. (2013). Vocabulary Learning Strategies Used By EAP Learners: The Case Of The Students Of Social Sciences. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 3(2), 28-33. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.3.2.2296

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Joint Book reading: How do Blogs Foster Collaborative Comprehension?

Fatemeh Behjat*

* Department of English Language, Islamic Azad University, Abadeh Branch, Abadeh, Iran.

Behjat, F. (2013). Joint Book Reading: How Do Blogs Foster Collaborative Comprehension?. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 3(2), 34-42. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.3.2.2297

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Lexical cohesion in students’ argumentative essay among a select group of Filipino college students

Josephine B. Alarcon*

* University of SantoTomas Research Cluster for Culture, Education and Social Issues.

Alarcon, B. J. (2013). Lexical Cohesion In Students' Argumentative Essay Among A Select Group Of Filipino College Students. i-manager’s Journal on English Language Teaching, 3(2), 43-52. https://doi.org/10.26634/jelt.3.2.2298

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

* Assistant Professor, Imam Khomeini International University, Qazvin.

** M.A. Islamic Azad University, Takestan.

* M.A. Student of TEFL, University of Guilan, Guilan, Iran.

** M.A. Student of TEFL, University of Guilan, Guilan, Iran.