i-manager Publications

i-manager's Journal on Educational Psychology (JPSY)

Current Issue Vol. 18 Issue 2

Methods for Enhancing Memory Performance in a Type of Learning (Forgetting) of Categorized Mind States
Exploring Need for Enhancing Play Activity Time in School Settings for Holistic Development of Learners
A Survey Study on the Status of Life Skills of Secondary Students of Dakshina Kannada District
Effectiveness of Outdoor Teaching Activities on Basic Science Process Skills of Secondary School Students
Impact on Trainees Growth and Challenges during the Internship in B.Ed. Course
The Impact of the Lecture Approach on Students' Attitudes towards Chemistry: A Comparative Study of Overall, Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Dimensions

Most Cited

Volume 2 Issue 1 May - July 2008

Article

The Role Of Metacognition In The Language Teaching Profession

Mohammad Ali Salmani Nodoushan*

* English Department, College of Humanities, University of Zanjan, Iran.

Dr. Mohammad Ali Salmani Nodoushan (2008). The Role Of Metacognition In The Language Teaching Profession. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 2(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.2.1.352

Abstract

Metacognition is a concept in psychology that refers to a variety of self-awareness process that help learners learn better. It grew out of the developments over the past few decades of cognitive models of learning. This paper will present a brief overview of these models and discuss their main features. It begins with a discussion of behavioristic models of learning, will go on with a discussion of cognitive learning models and will end in an elaboration of constructivist, humanistic and social interactionist models of human learning. It will then link these learning models to language learning and discuss how they can be applied to help language learners achieve language competence.

References

[1]. Andersen, R. W. (1982). Determining the linguistic attributes of language attrition. In R. D. Lambert and B. F. Freed, (Eds.), The loss of language skills. Rowley, MA.: Newbury House Publishers.

[2]. Appel, G., & Lantolf, J. R (1994). Speaking as mediation: A study of Li and L2 test recall tasks. The Modern Language Journal, 78 (4), 437-452.

[3]. Atkins, M., Beattie, J., & Dockrell, B. (1992). Assessment issues in higher education. Newcastle School of Education, University of Newcastle.

[4]. Atkinson, R. C., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1968). Human memory: A proposed system and its controlled processes. In W. K. Spence and J. T. Spence (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory. New York: Academic Press.

[5]. Best, J. B. (1986). Cognitive psychology. St Paul, MN.: West.

[6]. Brown, H. D. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching (3^rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice Hall Regents.

[7]. Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. Cambridge, Mass. : Harvard University Press.

[8]. Curran, C. A. (1 972). Counseling learning: The whole person model for education. NewYork: Grune & Stratton.

[9]. Feuerstein, R., Klein, R. R S., & Tannenbaum, A. J. (1991). Mediated learning experience: Theoretical, psychological and learning implications. London: Freund.

[10]. Fisher, R. (2007). Dialogic teaching: Developing thinking and metacognition through philosophical discussion. Early Child Development and Care, “I 77 [6- 7). 615-631.

[11]. Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In Resnick, L. B. (Ed.), The nature of intelligence. Hillsdale, NJ.: Erlbaum.

[12]. Flavell, J. H. (1985). Cognitive development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.: Prentice Hall.

[13]. Freire, R (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Seabury Press.

[14]. Gardner, R. C. (1982). Social factors in language retention. In R. D. Lambert and B. F. Freed, (Eds.), The loss of language skills. Rowley, MA.: Newbury House Publishers.

[15]. Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.

[16]. Georghiades, R (2004). From the general to the situated: Three decades of metacognition research report. International Journal of Science Education, 26 (3), 365-383.

[17]. Gipps, C. V. (1994). Beyond testing: Towards a theory of educational assessment. London: The Falmer Press.

[18]. lssitt, J. (2007). Evidence and metacognition in the new regime of truth: Figures of the autonomous learner on the walls of Plato's cave. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 41 (3), 381-393.

[19]. Kelly, G. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. NewYork: Norton.

[20]. Klatzky, R. L. (1980). Human memory: Structure and processes. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.

[21]. Krashen, S. D. (1985). The input hypothesis. London: Longman.

[22]. Lambert, R. D., & Freed, B. F. (Eds.). (1982). Theloss of language skills. Rowley, MA.: Newbury House Publishers.

[23]. Livingston, J. A. (2003). Metacognition: An overview. ERIC Document [Ed474273].

[24]. Martini, R., &Shore, B. M. (2008). Pointing to parallels in ability-related differences in the use of metacognition in academic and psychomotor tasks. Learning and Individual Differences, ’l8 (2), 237-247.

[25]. Obler, L. K. (1982). Neurolinguistic aspects of language loss as they pertain to second language acquisition. In R. D. Lambert and B. F. Freed, (Eds.), The loss of language skills. Rowley, MA.: Newbury House Publishers.

[26]. Olshtain, E. (1989). Is second language attrition the reversal of second language acquisition? Studies in Second LanguageAcquisition, 1 1, 1 51 -1 65.

[27]. Omaggio Hadley, A. (2003). Teaching language in context. Boston, Mass.: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

[28]. Oxford, R. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York: Newbury House.

[29]. Piaget, J. (1974). Understand to invent. New York: Viking Press.

[30]. Rand, S. (2005). Metacognition in science. Science Scope, 29 (1 ), 59-61 .

[31]. Resnick, L. (1989). Introduction. In L. Resnick (Ed.], Knowing, learning and instruction: Essays in honor of R. Glaser. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[33]. Resnick, L. B. , & Resnick, D. R (1992). Assessing the thinking curriculum: New tools for educational reform. In B. Gifford and M. O'Connor (Eds.), Changing assessment: Alternative views of aptitude, achievement and instruction. London: KluwerAcademic Publishers.

[34]. Rogers, C. (1983). Freedom to learn for the eighties. Columbus, OH.: Charles E. Miller Publishing Company. [35]. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. New York: Appleton—Century—Crofts.

[36]. Shepard, L. (1991). Psychometricians' beliefs about learning. Educational Researcher, 20, 7.

[37]. Smith, F. (1975). Comprehension and learning: A conceptual framework for teachers. New York: Holt. Rinehartandwinston.

[38]. Sutherland, P (1992). Cognitive development today: Piagetand his critics. London: Paul Chapman.

[39]. Tempelaar, D. T. (2006). The role of metacognition in business education. Industry and Higher Education, 20 (5). 291-297.

[40]. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.

[41]. Weltens, B. (1987). The attrition of foreign language skills: A literature review. Applied linguistics, 8, 22-38.

[42]. Weltens, B., & Cohen, A. D. (1989). Language attrition research: An introduction. Studies in Second LanguageAcquisition, 4 1, 1 27-133.

[43]. Williams, M., & Burden, R. L. (1997). Psychology for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

[44]. Wittrock, M. C. (Ed.). (1986). Handbook of research on teaching. New York: Wiley.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

What engages students in MetaL-FrOG?A Triarchy Perspective on Meta-cognitive Learning in Free Online Groups

Ng Sen Fa* , Firuz Hussin Hussin**

*,**Departmentof Curriculum &Instructional Technology ,Faculty of Education ,University Malaya,50603,Lembah Pantai.KualaLumpur,Malaysia

Ng Sen Fa and Firuz Hussin Hussin (2008). What engages students in MetaL-FrOG? A Triarchy Perspective on Meta-cognitive Learning in Free Online Groups. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 2(1), 10-28. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.2.1.353

Abstract

This paper presents the central ideas of a grounded theory research by the name of Triarchy Perspective on Metacognitive Learning in Free Online Groups, or “TriP on MetaL-FrOG” for short. The research setting was online learner community on the platform of Free Online Group web (FrOG) intended for post-graduate students. The research examined the phenomenon of learning engagement through FrOG portals. It was concluded that three factors contributed to MetaL-FrOG: Motivation, Cognitive Resources and Pro-learning Behaviors. Further analysis revealed these three components to be desired learning outcomes themselves.

References

[1]. Andriessen, J. E. B., Baker, M., & Suthers, D. (Ed.) (2003). Arguing to learn. Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

[2]. Baker, M. (2003). Computer-mediated argumentative interactions for the co-elaboration of scientific notions. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker. & D. Suthers (Ed.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer supported collaborative learning environments (pp. 47-78). Dordrecht, NL: Kluwer.

[3]. Bell, R (2004). Promoting students' argument construction and collaborative debate in the science classroom. In M. C. Linn, E. A. Davis, & R Bell (Ed.), Internet environments for science education (pp. 115-143). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum

[4]. Bandura, A. (1962). Social learning through imitation. In M. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation (pp. 211 -269). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

[5]. Bianco, M. B., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (2002). Exploring qualitative methodologies in online learning environments. The quarterly review of Distance Education, Vol 3(3}, 2002,251-260

[6]. Borg, W. R., & Gall M. D. (1983). Chapter 12. The methods and tools of observational research, In Educational Research: An introduction (4th Edition). Longman: New York.

[7]. Bowers, C. A. (1999). The paradox of technology: What's gained and lost? Thought and Action, 14,49-57

[8]. Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a Theory of Instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

[9]. Clark, D. B., Sampson, V., Weinberger, A., & Erkens, G. (2007). Analytic framework for assessing dialogic argumentation in online learning environments. Educational Psychology Review (2007) 19,343-374.

[10]. Clift, R. T., Mullen, L., Levin, J., & Larson, A. (2001). Technologies in contexts: Implications for teacher education, Teaching and Teacher Education, 17,33-50.

[11]. Conrad, D. (2002). Inhibition, Integrity and etiquette among online learners: The art of niceness. Distance Education, Vol. 23, No. 2,2002,197-212.

[12]. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among the five traditions. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publication

[13]. Dahlan, Z., 8i Hussin, F. H. (2005). Inculcating Generic Skills Among Students at Universiti of Teknologi Malaysia City Campus through Technology Based Osmosis Learning. Proceedings of the 2005 Regional Conference on Engineering Education December 12-13,2005, Johor, Malaysia.

[14]. Driver, R., Newton, R, & Osborne, J. (2000). Establishing the norms of scientific argumentation in classrooms. Science Education, 84(3), 287-313.

[15]. Erikson, E. H. (1982). The life circle completed. New York: Norton.

[16]. Flavell, J. H. (1976). Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 231-236). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.

[17]. Glaser, B. G. (1992). Basics of grounded theory analysis. Mill Valley: Sociology Press.

[18]. Glaser B. G. (1998). Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions. Sociology Press.

[19], Glaser, B. G., 8i Strauss, A. (1967). Discovery of Grounded Theory. Strategies for Qualitative Research. Sociology Press.

[20]. Glasersfeld, E. V. (1987). The Construction of Knowledge. Seaside: Intersystems Publications.

[21]. Hedrick, W. B., McGee, R, & Mittag, K. (2000). Pre-service teacher learning through one-on-one tutoring: Reporting perceptions through e-mail. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16( 1), January 2000,47-63.

[22]. Herrington, J., Oliver, R., & Reeves, T. C. (2003). Patterns of engagement in authentic online learning environments. Australia journal of Educational Technology, 79(1), 59-71.

23]. Hodder, I. (1994). The interpretation of documents and material culture. In N. K. Denzin 8c Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.). Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp.393- 402),Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

[24]. Hogan, K., Nastasi, B., & Pressley, M. (2000). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction, 77(4), 379-432.

[25]. Huang, H. M. (2002). Toward constructivism for adult learners in online learning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33 (1), 27- 37.

[26]. Hussin, F. H. (2004). The osmosis project. Unpublished project paper submitted in partial fulfillment for the requirements of Masters in Instructional Technology. University of Malaya: Kuala Lumpur

[27]. Hussin, F. H. (2005). The Osmosis Project a.k.a. Instructional Architecture: Case Studies Exploring an Alternative Framework for ICT-Based In-Situ Learning. Seminar in Instructional Technology Research, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur

[28]. Hussin, F. H. (2006). ASK4HeLP: Acquisition of Skillsand Knowledge for Humanistic e-Learning Protocols. Invention & Innovation Malaysia Technology Expo (MTE 2006) at Putra World Trade Centre, Kuala Lumpur.

[29]. Hussin, F. H., & Dahlan, Z. (2005). Alternative Framework for On-Job Immersion Action Research: Case Studies in Technology Based Osmosis Learning. Proceedings Regional Conference on Engineering Education December 12-13. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor, Malaysia.

[30]. Hussin, F. H., Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2005). Coaching Meta-cognition: A comparative study of quantitative & qualitative longitudinal action research case studies. Conference proceedings from Diversity for Excellence: Engaged Pedagogies 29-31 May 2006, Singapore

31]. Hussin, F. H., & Salleh, U. K. (2006). LeaP-FrOG: Learning Protocols for Free Online Group webs. Invention & Innovation Expo 2006 University Malaya. University Malaya, Kuala Lumpur

[32]. Irlbecka, S., Kaysa, E., Jonesb, D., & Simsa, R. (2006). The Phoenix Rising: Emergent models of instructional design. Distance Education, 27(2), August 2006,171-185.

[33]. Johnson, S. D., & Aragon, S. R. (2003). An instructional strategy framework for online learning environments. New Directions For Adult And Continuing Education, no. 100, Winter 2003,31-43.

[34]. Joiner, R., & Jones, S. (2003). The effects of communication medium on argumentation and the development of critical thinking. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(8), 861 -971.

[35]. Ke, F. F., & Carr-Chellman, A. (2006). Solitary learner in online collaborative learning: A disappointing experience? The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, Volume 7(3), 2006,249-265

[36]. Kim, M. C., & Hannafin, M. (2004). Designing online learning environments to support scientific inquiry. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 5(1), 1 -10.

[37]. Kuhn, D., Shaw, V., & Felton, M. (1997). Effects of dyadic interaction on argumentative reasoning. Cognition and Instruction, 15(3), 287-315.

[38]. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press.

[39]. Leitao, S. (2000). The potential of argument in knowledge building. Human Development, 43,332-360.

[40], Lim, C. R (2004). Engaging learners in online learning environments. TechTrends, 48(4), 16-23.

[41]. Mann, S. J. (2005). Alienation in the learning environment: A failure of community? Studies in Higher Education, 30(1), February 2005,43-55,

[42]. Marohaini Yusoff (Ed) (2001a). Penyelldikan kualltatif: Pengalaman kerja lapangan kajlan. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit University Malaya.

[43]. Marohaini Yusoff (2001b). Pertimbangan kritikal dalam pelaksanaan kajian kes secara kualitatif dim Marohaini Yusoff (Ed), Penyelldikan kualltatif: Pengalaman kerja lapangan kajian (pp. 35-60). Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit University Malaya.

[44]. Marttunen, M., & Laurinen, L. (2001). Learning of argumentation skills in networked and face-to-face environments. Instructional Science, 29,127- 153.

[45]. Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivations and personality (2nd Ed). New York: Harper & Row.

[46]. McLoughlin, C. (2002). Learner support in distance and networked learning environments: Ten dimensions for successful design. Distance Education, 23(2), 149-162.

[47]. McLoughlin, C. &Luca, J. (2002). A learner-centered approach to developing team skills through web-based learning and assessing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(5), 571 -582.

[48]. Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research In education:Aqualitatlveapproach. California: Josey-Bass Inc.

[49]. Michalinos, Z., & Charalambos, V. (2007). Listening for silence in text-based, online encounters. Distance Education, 28(1), May 2007,5-24.

[50]. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

[51]. Mishra, S. (2002). A design framework for onlinelearning environments. British Journal of Educational Technology, 33(4), 493-496.

[52]. Noble, D. F. (1998). Digital diploma mills: The automation of higher education. Online publication: http ://www. f irstmonday. org/issues/issue3_ 1 /noble/

[53]. Scardamalia, M., 8i Bereiter, C. (1994). Computer support for knowledge-building communities. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 3(3), 265-283.

[54], Schellens, T., & Valcke, M. (2006). Fostering knowledge construction in university students through asynchronous discussion groups. Computers and Education, 46(4), 349-370.

[55]. Sheard, J., 8i Lynch, J. (2003). Accommodating learner diversity in web-based learning environments: Imperatives for future developments. International Journal of Computer Processing of Oriental Languages, 76(4), 243-260.

[56]. Spradley, J. R (1979). The ethnographic interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

[57], Stein, D. S., Wanstreet, C. E., Calvin, J., Overtoom, C. 8i Wheaton, J. E. (2005). Bridging the transactional distance gap in online learning environments. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 105-118,

[58]. Strauss, A. L., 8i Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research. Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

[59]. Swan, K. (2002). Building learning communities in online courses: The importance of interaction. Education, Communication & Information, 2(1), 23- 49.

[60]. Teasley, S. (1997). Talking about reasoning: How important is the peer in peer collaboration? In L. B. Resnick, R. Saljd, C. Pontecorvo & B. Burge (Ed.), Discourse, tools and reasoning: Essays on situated cognition (pp. 361 - 384). Berlin: Springer.

[61]. VanEekelen, I. M., Vermunt, J. D. & Boshuizen, H. RA. (2006). Exploring teachers' will to learn. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22(4), 408-423.

[62]. Veerman, A. L. (2003). Constructive discussions through electronic dialogue. In J. Andriessen, M. Baker, & D. Suthers (Ed.), Arguing to learn: Confronting cognitions in computer-supported collaborative learning environments (pp. 117-143), Amsterdam: Kluwer.

[63]. Waldeck, J., Kearney R, &Plax, T. (2001). Teacher e- mail message strategies and students' willingness to communicate online. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 29(1), February 2001,54-70.

[64]. Wanstreet, C. E. (2006). Interaction in online learning environments: A review of the literature. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, Volume 7(4), 2006, 399- 411.

[65]. Warschauer, M. (1997). Computer-mediated collaborative learning: Theory and practice. The Modern Language Journal, 81 (4), 470-481.

[66]. Williams, R. M. (1970). American Society: A sociological Interpretation (3rd Ed.). NewYork: Knopf.

[67]. Wolcott, H. F. (1987). On the ethnographic intent. In G. Spindler & L. Spindler, (Ed.). Interpretive ethnography of education at home and abroad (pp. 37- 57). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associate Publishers.

[68]. Woody, T. (1999). Academics rebel against an online future. Retrieved November 28, 2007, from Cable News Network, website:http://www.cnn.com/TECH/computing/9806/15/academics.idg/index.html

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Effectivity of Self-Regulated Learning In Psychology

G. Singaravelu*

*Reader, Academic Staff College, Bharathlar University, Coimbatore, TamllNadu.

Singaravelu G (2008). Effectivity of Self-Regulated Learning In Psychology. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 2(1), 29-33. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.2.1.355

Abstract

The present study illuminates the efficacy of self-regulated learning in learning psychology at Master of Education level in Bharathiar University,Coimbatore. Experimental method was adopted for the study. Qualitative and quantitative approach was adopted in the study. Twenty seven students were studying at M.Ed in Bharathiar University were involved as subjects for the study. Researcher self-made Achievement tests were used as tools for the study and validity and reliability were well established for the two tools. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used for the study. Single group Experimental method was followed in the study. After constructing an achievement test based on blue print, a pre-test was administered towards the 27 students and evaluated the answer scripts. The following Framed Activities were given to the students. Acivity1.Topic given and collect the information from the internet. Activity 2. Collecting information from the library. Activity 3.Searching the information related to the topic from given package. Activity 4. Collecting information on the topic from attending seminar. After involving the above mentioned activities, students were tested by using another achievement test which was considered as a post-test for the study. In the pre-test, students scored only 34 percentage of marks in lecture method but in self-regulated learning students scored 78 percentage of marks. It proves the efficacy of Self-regulated Learning is more effective by using self-activated activities. There is a significant difference in achievement mean score between pre-test and post-test in learning psychology. Self-regulated learning is more effective than lecture method in learning psychology at Master of Education in Bharathiar University,Coimbatore. Suggestions: the self regulated method may be implemented in Higher Education to revamp the quality of the learners.

References

[1]. Butler, D. L. & Winne, RH.(i995) Feedback and self- regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-281.

[2]. Dweck, C. S. [2002]. Beliefs that make smart people dumb. In R. J. Sternberg [Ed.), Whysmartpeople do stupid things. New Haven: Yale University Press.

[3]. Dweck, C.S., & Leggett, E.L. (1 988). Asocial-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256-273.

[4]. Perry. N.E.. Phillips, L.. & Hutchinson. L.R. [2006]. Preparing student teachers to support for self-regulated learning. ElementarySchoolJournaI, 106, 237- 254.

[5]. Pintrich, R R. &Schunk (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology , 92. 544-555.

[6]. Ravi.R, & Xavier.P (August-October 2007). Activity Based Learning as Self-Accessing strategy to Promote Learning Autonomy. i-manager's Journal on Educational Psychology, Vol 1 . No.2, 7-9.

[7]. Singaravelu,G[2006). Embellishment of Student Leadership in Learning Multiplication at Primary Level. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, Vol2. No.2, 40-43.

[8]. Winne. RH. & Perry, N.E. [2000]. Measuring self- regulated learning. In R Pintrich, M. Boekaerts, & M. Seidner [Eds.), Handbook of self—regulation (p. 531 -566). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.

[9]. Zimmerman, B.J. [T990]. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational Psychologist, 25, 3-1 7.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

Development Of Social Mediation And Emotional Regulation In Virtual Learning Environment Research

Milka Lehtonen* , Tom Page, Lence Miloseva*, Gisli Thorsteinsson****

Centre for media Pedagogy(CMP),Faculty of Education,University of Lapland,Rovaniemi,Finland,P.O.Box 122 EI-96101,Miika.Lehtonen@ulapland.fi

Deapartment of Design & Technology,Loughborough University,Loughborough,Leics.LE113TU,UK,T.Page@IBORO.AC.UK

Vice President for Academic affairs of the new state University:GoceDeicev,"Stip,Macedonia.

****Iceland University of Education,VIStakkahlid,105 Reykjavik,cdt@khi.is.

Milka Lehtonen, Tom Page, Lence Miloseva and Gisli Thorsteinsson (2008). Development Of Social Mediation And Emotional Regulation In Virtual Learning Environment Research. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 2(1), 34-47. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.2.1.357

Abstract

This paper puts forward a series of theoretical underpinnings and design considerations for embodying emotional and aesthetic aspects of virtual (reality) learning environments (VLEs) in support of ubiquitous teaching, studying and learning. The authors assert that a VLE should be considered an interactive and sensation-producing affordances and instruments, as well as a mediator of communication and learning. Furthermore, a VLE should be valued as a tool for emotional and socio-structural mediation, as well as for the psycho-social regulation and control over the communication situation that the environment makes possible by allowing users to regulate psycho-social distances.

Researchers in studying and learning have too often neglected emotional and aesthetic factors, especially in the context of network-based learning environments. These factors are examined here in terms of seven levels of observation forming a continuum from the individual subconscious/conscious interpersonal level to the social, cultural, cross- and transcultural levels. The continuum is mapped onto learning architectures, offering a greater understanding of their value as starting points and design considerations for VLEs in regulating learning. The most critical issue is to take into account the users — the human individual(s) — and the social nature(s) of using the technologies involved.

References

[1]. Alanen. P., M. Sintonen, M. Hyyppa, & T. Jarvilehto. (2003). Laaketiede ja tieteenteoria [Medicine and science theory]. Turku: Kirja-Aura.

[2]. Aulls, M. W. (2004). Students‘ experiences with good and poor university courses. Educational Research & Evaluation 10(46): 303-335.

[3]. Banos, R. M.. C. Botella, M.Alcaniz, V. Liano, , B. Guerrero, & B. Rey [2004]. Immersion and emotion: Their impact on the sense of presence. CyberPsychoIogy & Behavior, 7(6): 734-741 .

[4]. Banos, R. M., Botella, C., Garcia-Palacios. A., Villa, H., Perpina, C., & Alcaniz, M. (2000). Presence and reality judgment in virtual environments: A Unitary Construct’? Cyberpsychology& Behavior, 3(3): 327-335.

[5]. Bowers, D., R. M. Bauer & K.M. Heilman. (1993). The nonverbal affect lexicon: Theoretical perspectives from neuropsychological studies of affect perception. Neuropsychology 7(4): 433-444.

[6]. Brave, S., & C. Nass. (2002). Emotion in human- computer interaction. In Handbook of Human-Computer interaction, edited by J. Jacko & A. Sears, 251-271. New York: Lawrence Eribaum Associates.

[7]. Brod, J. C. (Ed). (2000). The neuropsychology of emotion. Oxford University Press, Oxford

[8]. Chayko, M. (2002). Connecting: how we form social bonds and communities in the Internet age. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

[9]. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1992). Flow: the psychology of happiness. London: Rider.

[10]. Damasio, A. R. (2000/1999“). Spinozaa etsimassa: lio, suruja tuntevat aivot [Looking for Spinoza: Joy, Sorrow and the Feeling Brain, K. Pietilainen, Trans. ] Helsinki: Terra Cognita.

[11]. Damasio, A. R. (2000/1999”). Tapahtumisen tunne. Miten tietoisuus syntyy [The Feeling of What Happens: Body, Emotion and the Making of Consciousness, K. Pietilainen, Trans] Helsinki: Terra Cognita.

[12]. Damasio, A. R. (2001/1994). Descartesin virhe. Emootio, jdrkija ihmisen aivot [Descartes' Error: Emotion, Reason and the Human Brain, K. Pietildinen, Trans.] Helsinki: Terra Cognita.

[13]. Erickson, K. & J. Schulkin. (2003). Facial expressions of emotion: A cognitive neuroscience perspective. Brain and Cognition 52: 52-60.

[14]. Foucault, M. (1984). Space, power and knowledge. In Space, power and knowledge, edited by 3. During, 161 - 169. NewYork: Routledge.

[15]. Galperin, P J. (1989). Organization of mental activity and effectiveness of learning. Soviet Psychology 27(3): 65-82.

[16]. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, MA.

[17]. Gredler, M. E. (2004). Games and simulations and their relationships to learning. In Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, edited. by D. H. Jonassen , 571-582. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[18]. Gunther, R., R. Kazman, & C. Macgregor (2004). Using 3D sound as a navigational aid in virtual environments. Behaviour& Information Technology, 23(6). 435-446.

[19]. Griffin, J. H. (2000). Inhibitions and related terms. Accessed at Oklahoma State University Web Site: http://home.okstate.edu/ on 12/04/05.

[20]. Hari, R. (2003). Sosiaalisen kognition hermostollinen perusta. Duodecim, 119(15): 1465-1470.

[21]. Hargreaves, A. (2000). Mixed emotions: teachers‘ perceptions of their interactions with students. Teaching and TeacherEducation 16(8): 811-826.

[22]. Hastings, W., & C. Sturt, (2004). Emotions and the practicum: The cooperating teachers‘ perspective. Teachers and Teaching 10(2): 56-78.

[23]. Hoffman, R. A. Robb & D. Stredney (Eds.) (1999). Medicine Meets Virtual Reality: The Convergence of Physical and Informational Technologies Options for a New Era in Healthcare (pp. 148-153). Amsterdam: IOS Press.

[24]. Huang, M. P., & N. E. Alessi (1999). Presence as an Emotional Experience. In J. D. Westwood, H. M.

[25]. llleris. K. (2003). Towards a contemporary and comprehensive theory of learning. International Journal of Lifelong Education 22(4): 396-406.

[26]. Jang, D. P., I. Y. Kim, S. W. Nam, , B. K. Wiederhold, M. D. Wiederhold, , & S. I. Kim. (2002). Analysis of Physiological Response to Two Virtual Environments: Driving and Flying Simulation. Cyberpsychoiogy & Behavior, 5(1),11-18.

[27]. Lanier, J. and F. Biocca. (1992) An Insider's View of the Future of Virtual Reality. Journal of Communication 42(4): 150-172.

[28]. Lehtonen, M. (2005) Simulations as mental tools for network-based group learning. In E-Training Practices for Professional Organisations. IFIP TC3 / WG3.3 Fifth working conference on eTrain practices for professional organizations [eTrain [2003],edited by P. Nicholson, B. J. Thompson, M. Ruohonen & J. Multisilta,11-18 Open Working Conference, 7-11 July, (2003) in Pori, Finland. Boston / Dordrecht/London: KIuwer Academic Publishers.

[29]. Lehtonen, M., T. Page & G. Thorsteinsson (2006). Simulations and virtual realities as modern tools in technology education: Looking for appropriate pedagogical models. In Proceedings of the HCT06 [Workshop on Human Centered Technology HCT06) ,11- 13.6.(2006, in Pori, Finland :Tampere University of Technology

[30]. Lehtonen, M.. T. Page, S. Vahtivuori - Hanninen & G. Thorsteinsson. (2005). Perspectives to emotionality in network-based environments. In INTERLEARN (2005): lnterlearn - Multidiciplinary Approaches to Learning [Programme & abstracts], edited by Karjamaa & H. Outinen, 106-107. Finlandia Hall, Helsinki, Finland: Helsinki University Press.

[31]. Lehtonen, M., P. Hyvonen, & H. Ruokamo .(2005). Learnt without joy, forgotten without sorrow! The significance of emotional experience in the processes of online teaching, studying and learning. In Proceedings of the 12th International NBE [2005] Conference: Teaching- Studying—Learning [TSL] Processes and Mobile Technologies: Multi—, lnter— and Transdisciplinary [MIT] Research Approaches, edited by H. Ruokamo, P. Hyvonen, M. Lehtonen & S. Tella , 153-163. Rovaniemi: Lapin yliopistopaino.

[32]. Lehtonen. M., P. Karppinen,T. Matikainen, R. Sakkinen & H. Ruokamo.(2005). Teknologiavalitteinen multimediaviestinta opetus-opiskelu-oppimisprosessin ja tutkimuksen osakomponenttina: Erilaisten kayttéiindikaatioiden tarkastelua MOMENTS - metamallin nakokulmasta. In Lapin tietoyhteiskuntaseminaarin tutkijatapaamisen artikkelrjulkaisu (2004) [Proceedings of the Lapland Information Society Seminar: Papers from the [2004] Researcher Workshop], edited by M. Lehtonen & H. Ruokamo 131-150 Rovaniemi: University of Lapland, Faculty of Education, Centre for Media Pedagogy (CMP), LapinYliopistopaino.

[33]. Lehtonen, M.. T. Page, G. Thorsteinsson. & H. Ruokamo, H. (2005‘‘). A Virtual Learning Environment for the Support of Teaching, Studying and Learning in Technology Education. In Proceedings of fourth IASTED International Conference on Web-Based Education WBE (2005), February 21-23, (2005), Grindelwald, Switzerland. edited by V. Uskov, 109-118. CA, USA: ACTA Press, Anaheim.

[34]. Lehtonen, M.. G. Thorsteinsson. T. Page, & H.Ruokamo. (2005"). A Virtual Learning Environment for the Support of Learning in Technology Education. Advanced Technology for Learning 2(3): 129-139.

[35]. Madell, D. E., & Muncer, S. (2007). Control oversocial interactions: An important reason for young people's use of the Internet and mobile phones for communication? Cyberpsychology& Behavior, 10(1), 137-140.

[36]. McLeIIan, H. (2004). Virtual realities. In Handbook of research for educational communications and technology, edited by D. H. Jonassen, 461-497. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[37]. McLuhan, M. (1997). War and peace in the global village / Marshall McLuhan, Quentin Flore. Hardwired, San Francisco, CA: Jerome Agel, Hardwired .

[38]. Mercer, N. (2000)/(2003). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.

[39]. Mikropoulos, T. A.. & Strouboulis, V. (2004). Factors That Influence Presence in Educational Virtual Environments. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 7(5). 582-591.

[40]. Nathanson, D. L. 1992). Shame and Pride: Affect, Sex, and the Birth of the Self. New York, NY: W.W Norton & Company.

[41]. Norman, D. A.. A. Ortony and D.M. Russell. (2003). Affect and machine design: Lessons for the development of autonomous machines. IBM Systems Journal 42(1): 38-44.

[42]. Oatley, K., & J.M. Jenkins. 1996. Understanding emotions. Blackwell, Cambridge, MA.

[43]. Page. T., M. Lehtonen & G.Thorsteinsson. (2006). The web-orientation agent (WOA) for simulated learning in technology education. International Journal of Learning Technology (IJLT) 2(1 ): 62-76.

[44]. Peltoniemi, T. (2004). Experiences and perspectives in using telematic prevention on sensitive health issues. In Establishing Telemedicine in Developing Countries: From Inception to Implementation [Studies in Health Technology and lnformatics],edited by R. Latifi , 99-105. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

[45]. Peltoniemi, T., and T. Tammi .(1999). Telematic drug & alcohol prevention: Guidelines and experiences from Prevnet Euro. Helsinki: A-Clinic Foundation & European Community.

[46]. Pena, J. & J.T. Hancock.(2006). An Analysis of Socioemotional and Task Communication in Online Multiplayer Video Games. Communication Research, 33(1):92-109.

[47]. Pitkdnen, A. (2003). Tunteiden neurobiologiaa. Duodecim,119(15): 1471-1478.

[48]. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital Game-Based Learning. NewYork, NY, USA: McGraw-Hill.

[49]. Riva. G., F. Mantovani. C. S. Capideville, Preziosa, A., F. Morganti, D. Villani, et al. (2007). Affective Interactions Using Virtual Reality: The Link between Presence and Emotions. Cyberpsychology & behavior, 10(1): 45-56.

[50]. Siegel, D. J. (1999). The Developing Mind: Toward a Neurobiology of Interpersonal Experience.New York: Guilford Press.

[51]. Simonov, P. V. E. (1981). Emotional brain. Moscow: Science.

[52]. Sinkkonen, J., & M. Kalland. (Eds.) .(2001. Varhaiset ihmissuhteet ja niiden hdiriintyminen:. Kiintymyssuhdeteoria — teoria yksilon kiin(nit]tymisestd tarkeisiin toisiin ihmisiin, kiintymyssuhteen katkoksista ja merkityksestd kehitykselle. Helsinki: WSOY.

[53]. Simonov, P. V. (1997). Brain mechanisms of emotions. Neuroscience and Behavioral Physiology 27(4): 405-413.

[54]. Slater, M. (2004). Presence and Emotions. CyberPsychology& Behavior, 7(1 ): 121 .

[55]. Steuer, J. (1992). Defining Virtual Reality: Dimensions Determining Tele presence. Journal of Communication 42(4): 73-93.

[56]. Sweller, J., & P. Chandler. (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cognition and Instruction 12: 185-233.

[57]. Tella, S.. M. Lehtonen, H. Ruokamo, V. Tissari. H. Ketamo, K. Kiili et al. (2004). MOMENTS-metamalli: Monitieteinen tulevaisuuden verkko-opetuksen, - opiskelun ja oppimisen rakentamisen tyévaline In Kulttuurit, erilaisuus ja kohtaamiset. Kasvatustieteen pdivien (2003, julkaisu, R. Mietola & H. Outinen (Eds.). 244-255 . Helsinki: Helsingin yliopiston kasvatustieteen laitos.

[58]. Tomkins, S. S. (1991). Affect, Imagery, Consciousness: The Negative Affects: Anger and Fear . NewYork, NY: Springer.

[59]. Tomkins, S. S. (1992). Affect Imagery and Consciousness: Cognition: Duplication and Transformation oflnformation, 4. NewYork, NY: Springer.

[60]. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: Identity in the age of the Internet. NewYork: Simon and Schuster

[61]. Uljens, M. (1997). School didactics and learning. Hove, East Sussex: Psychology Press.

[62]. Vastfjall, D. (2003). The Subjective Sense of Presence, Emotion Recognition, and Experienced Emotions in Auditory Virtual Environments. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 6(2): 181-188.

[63].Vastfjall, D., Larsson, P., & Kleiner. M. (2002). Emotion and Auditory Virtual Environments: Affect-Based Judgments of Music Reproduced with Virtual Reverberation Times. CyberPsychoIogy & Behavior, 5(1). 19-32.

[64]. Virsu, V. (1991). Aivojen muovautuvuus ja kuntoutuminen. Helsinki: Kuntoutussaatio.

[65]. Virsu, V. (1995). Muisti ja alykkyys aivojen hermoverkoissa. Psykologia 30: 266-277.

[66]. Virsu, V., & S. Haapasalo. (2001). Oppiminen ja aivojen muovautuvuus kuntoutumisen lahtékohtina. In Kuntoutus , edited by T. Kallanranta, P. Rissanen, P & I. Vilkkumaa, 72-85. Helsinki: Kustannus Oy Duodecim.

[67]. Vuorela, M. and L. Nummenmaa. (2004). Experienced emotions, emotion regulation and student activity in a web-based learning environment. European Journal of Psychology of Education 19(4): 423-436.

[68]. Waterworth, E. L.. &Waterworth, J. A. [2001]. Focus, Locus, and Sensus: The Three Dimensions of Virtual Experience. CyberpsychoIogy& behavior, 4(2): 203-213.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Research Paper

A Study of Effectiveness of Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI) over Class Room Lecture (CRL) at ICS Level

Tayyeba Kaousar* , Bushra Naoreen Choudhry, Aijaz Ahmed Gujjar*

Ex. student of Master of Education, Department of Education, G. C University Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Lecturer, Department of Education, G C University Faisalabad & Doctoral Scholar at Department of Education, The Islamia University of Bahawalpur, Pakistan.

Lecturer, Federal College of Education, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Tayyeba Kaousar, Dr. Bushra Naoreen Choudhry and Dr. Aijaz Ahmed Gujjar (2008). A Study of Effectiveness of Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI) over Class Room Lecture (CRL) at ICS Level. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 2(1), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.2.1.361

Abstract

This study was aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of CAI vs. classroom lecture for computer science at ICS level. The objectives were to compare the learning effects of two groups with class room lecture and computer assisted instruction studying the same curriculum and the effects of CAI and CRL in terms of cognitive development. Hypothesis of this research were based on six levels of blooms taxonomy as there was one major hypothesis: There is no significant difference exist for CAI student in gaining a high cognitive achievement than students of same level having Traditional CRL. The study was delimited to three colleges of Faisalabad city.The research was true- experimental in nature. The research design followed by researcher is The Pre-test - Post test Equivalent groups Deign. The software used for CAI group was basically the combination of Discovery environment and simulation soft wares, however, the time for drilling and practice was given to student. It was designed to cover all the levels of cognitive domain described by B. S. Blooms [1956]. A question paper containing 30 multiple choice test items was compiled from the curriculum, with a representative number of questions from each of the cognitive levels. Findings of this research indicate that total gain in cognitive domain by CAI was significantly superior to the total gain in cognitive domain by CRL teaching method. This study concluded that the skills of knowledge, analysis and synthesis assured significant increase. The CAI proved to be very much effective in increasing the evaluation and application skills of students to experimental group. Comprehension skill, however, not much affected by the CAI. According to the results of this study it was suggested that CAI as an effective teaching method should be applied to improve teaching quality and by using CAI it will be possible to eliminate lingual, regional and ethical biases between teacher and student.

References

[1]. Bergman, T., & Cheney, S. (1996). Delivering Cost Effective Services to Small and Mid-Sized Companies: A Guide for Workforce and Workplace Development Providers, http://searcheric.org/ericdb/ed402481.htm (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 402 481).

[2]. Bloom, B.S. (1956). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The classification of educational goals, Handbookl: Cognitive Domain. NY: David McKay Co.

[3]. Brahler, C. Jayne (2005). Developing on-line learning materials for higher education: An overview of current issues, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington. USA.

[4]. Brooks, D. W. (1997). Lecturing; multimedia classrooms. In: K. C. Cohen, Harvard (Ed.), Web-teaching: A Guide to designing interactive teaching for the World Wide Web, Cambridge, MA: Plenum Press, 165-171 . p. 21

[5]. Bui, KJ? (1999). Hyper Lexicon, a hypermedia—based lexicon for vocabulary acquisition. In H. Maurer (Ed.) Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Computer Assisted Learning (p. 14). Dallas, TX.

[6]. Chabay, R.W. & Sherwood, B.A. (T992). Computer-Assisted Instruction and Intelligent Tutoring Systems: Shared Goals and Complementary Approaches Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. (pp. 151-86).

[7]. Collier Ebenezer S. O. (2004), The Enhancement of the Teaching and the Learning of the Sciences in Secondary Schools Using Computer Assisted Instruction, http://members.aoI.com/esocoIIier/computer- assistedinstruction.htmI

[8]. Collis, B., Vingerhoets, J., & Moonen, J. (T 997]. Flexibility as a key construct in European training: experiences from the Telescopia Project. British Journal of Educational Technology, 28(3), 199-21 7. wvvw.concentric.net/~waI wpr/thesis /ref_list.html#collis

[9]. Cuoco, A., & Goldenberg, E. [T996]. A Role for Technology in Mathematics Education. Boston University Journal of Education, 178(2), http://wvvw.bu.edu/ education/news/jedi ndex.html. 15-32.

[10]. Jones, T. (1990). Towards a typology of educational uses of hypermedia. In D.H. Norrie & H.-W. Six (Eds.) Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Assisted Learning (pp. 265-276). Hagen, FRG.

[11]. Kearsley, G. (1990). Instructional Technology and Worker Learning Needs. http://www.concentric.net/ ‘ wa1 wpr/thesis/ref_list. html#kearsle

[12]. Keller, J. & Knopp, T. (1987). Instructional theories in action: lessons illustrating theories and models. Hillsdale,N.J: Erlbaum Associates.

[13]. Kommers, R, Grabinger, S., & Dunlap, J. C. (1996). Hypermedia Learning Environments Instructional design and integration, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. F’. 18

[14]. Lockard, J., Abrams, RD., & Many, W.A. (1987). Micro-computers for Educators. Boston: Little, Brown, & Co.

[15]. Mahmood, M.K (2004). A Comparison of Traditional Method and Computer—Assisted Instruction on Students Achievement in General Science. Ph.D., thesis [unpublished] University of the Punjab , Lahore.

[16]. Milheim,W.D. & Martin B.L. (1991). Theoretical bases for the use of learner control: three different perspectives. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 1 8(3), 99-105.

[17]. Porter, L. R. (1997). Funding a distance learning program: Determining the suitability of distance learning courses, and reconceptualizing education and training through distance learning. In: Theresa Hudson [Eds], Creating the virtual classroom: Distance learning with the Internet, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc, 41 -54: 85- 102; 191-205.R123

[18]. Shute. V.J. (1993). A comparison of learning environments: All that glitters....in S.R LaJoie & S.J. Derry (Eds.) Computers as cognitive tools. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. p. 1 25.

[19]. Spiro, R.J. & Jehng, J.-C. (1990). Cognitive flexibility and hypertext: Theory and technology for the non-linear and multi-dimensional traversal of complex subject matter. In D. Nix & R. Spiro (Eds.) Cognition, Education, & Multimedia (pp. 163-205). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

[20]. Whetzel, D., Felker, D., & Williams, K. (1996). A Real World Comparison of the Effectiveness of Satellite Training and Classroom Training. Educational Technology Research & Development, http://www.aect. org/publications /defaul t. htm. 44(3), p 5-18.

[21]. Wright, E.B. & Forcier, R.C. The Computer.'A Tool for the Teacher. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Practice Paper

ELM – Eye Light Monitor: Assessment in a World of Hybrid Values

Hanan Yaniv*

*Assistant Professor, University of Calgary.

Hanan Yaniv (2008). ELM – Eye Light Monitor: Assessment in a World of Hybrid Values. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 2(1), 60-69. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.2.1.363

Abstract

This paper is a instrumental case study of an alternative assessment method, using a tool called ELM (Eye Light Monitor). ELM proposes a way to keep a finger on the pulse of every child, being attentive to emerging transitions in various parameters of his/her wellbeing that might affect his/her classroom behaviour and work, and might assist in identifying problems before they become a deeper problem. The case study presented in this paper presents a visual method of weekly communication between a teacher and his students along a list of five to six criteria representing the student’s wellbeing. The visual representation provides the teacher with an efficient method for identifying developing individual difficulties that requires intervention or general trends in classroom atmospheric changes.

References

[1]. Aloni, N. (1998). For Human Sake, Ways of Humanistic Education. (Second). HakibbutzHameuchad.

[2]. Black, R, & William, D. (1998). Inside the Black Box: Raising Standards Through Classroom Assessment. Journal Assessment in Education: Principles, Po/icy & Practice, 5(1), 7-74.

[3]. Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (1994). Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta—analysis. Review ofEducationa/ Research, 64, 363-423.

[4]. Le Cornu, R., & Peters, J. (2005). Towards constructivist classrooms: the role of the reflective teacher. Journal of Educational Enquiry, é(1 ].

[5]. Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and SocialPsychology, 18, 105-1 15.

[6]. Deci, E. L., Richard Kostner, & Ryan, R. M. (2001). Extrinsic Rewards and Intrinsic Motivation in Education: Reconsidered Once Again. Review of Educational Research, 71(1).

[7]. Huitt, W. (2001). Humanism and open education. Educational Psychology Interactive. Valdosta, GA: Valdosta State University. Retrieved May, 08, 2008, from http://chiron.va|dosta.edu/whuitt/col/affsys/humed.html

[8]. Landa, Lev N. (1974). Algorithmizatlon in Learning and Instruction. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, U.S.A.

[9]. Landa, L. N. (1976). Instructional Regulation and Control: Cybernetics, Algorithmizatlon, and Heuristics in Education. Educational Technology Publications, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, U.S.A.

[10]. Papert, S. (1980). Mindstorms: Children, computers, andpowerful ideas. NewYork, NY: Basic Books.

[11]. Sherman, L. W. (1995). A Postmodern, Constructivist Pedagogy For Teaching Educational Psychology, Assisted by Computer Mediated Communications. In CSCL95' Conference. Bloomington, Indiana.

[12]. Tishman, S., Perkins, D. &Jay, E. (1995). The thinking classroom. Allyn and BaconNeedham Heights, MA

[13]. Yaniv, H. (1987). On—screen Design: The Computer as acourseware DeslgnTool. University of Michigan.

i-manager's Journal on Educational Psychology (JPSY)

Current Issue Vol. 18 Issue 2

Most Read

Most Cited

Volume 2 Issue 1 May - July 2008

The Role Of Metacognition In The Language Teaching Profession

Mohammad Ali Salmani Nodoushan*

* English Department, College of Humanities, University of Zanjan, Iran.

Dr. Mohammad Ali Salmani Nodoushan (2008). The Role Of Metacognition In The Language Teaching Profession. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 2(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.2.1.352

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

What engages students in MetaL-FrOG?A Triarchy Perspective on Meta-cognitive Learning in Free Online Groups

Ng Sen Fa* , Firuz Hussin Hussin**

*,**Departmentof Curriculum &Instructional Technology ,Faculty of Education ,University Malaya,50603,Lembah Pantai.KualaLumpur,Malaysia

Ng Sen Fa and Firuz Hussin Hussin (2008). What engages students in MetaL-FrOG? A Triarchy Perspective on Meta-cognitive Learning in Free Online Groups. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 2(1), 10-28. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.2.1.353

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Effectivity of Self-Regulated Learning In Psychology

G. Singaravelu*

*Reader, Academic Staff College, Bharathlar University, Coimbatore, TamllNadu.

Singaravelu G (2008). Effectivity of Self-Regulated Learning In Psychology. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 2(1), 29-33. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.2.1.355

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Development Of Social Mediation And Emotional Regulation In Virtual Learning Environment Research

Milka Lehtonen* , Tom Page**, Lence Miloseva***, Gisli Thorsteinsson****

Milka Lehtonen, Tom Page, Lence Miloseva and Gisli Thorsteinsson (2008). Development Of Social Mediation And Emotional Regulation In Virtual Learning Environment Research. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 2(1), 34-47. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.2.1.357

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

A Study of Effectiveness of Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI) over Class Room Lecture (CRL) at ICS Level

Tayyeba Kaousar* , Bushra Naoreen Choudhry**, Aijaz Ahmed Gujjar***

Tayyeba Kaousar, Dr. Bushra Naoreen Choudhry and Dr. Aijaz Ahmed Gujjar (2008). A Study of Effectiveness of Computer Assisted Instruction (CAI) over Class Room Lecture (CRL) at ICS Level. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 2(1), 48-59. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.2.1.361

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

ELM – Eye Light Monitor: Assessment in a World of Hybrid Values

Hanan Yaniv*

*Assistant Professor, University of Calgary.

Hanan Yaniv (2008). ELM – Eye Light Monitor: Assessment in a World of Hybrid Values. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 2(1), 60-69. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.2.1.363

Abstract

References

Full Article (HTML)

Pdf

Milka Lehtonen* , Tom Page, Lence Miloseva*, Gisli Thorsteinsson****

Tayyeba Kaousar* , Bushra Naoreen Choudhry, Aijaz Ahmed Gujjar*