A Matter of Preference - Lecturers vs. Teaching - Assistants in Tutorials

Nitza Davidovitch*, Dan Soen**
*College of Judea & Samaria, Ariel, Israel;
**College of Judea & Samaria, Ari'el, Israel; Kibbutzim School of Education, Tel-Aviv.
Periodicity:June - August'2005
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.1.1.939

Abstract

In many universities and colleges around the world, it is an accepted practice to supplement frontal lectures of courses with separate practice classes or tutorials. For this purpose lecturers may sometimes use the services of teaching-assistants to conduct the tutorials. Teaching-assistants conduct tutorials in many courses in Israel's academic institutions, especially where core classes and tutorials are separate.

The paper presents the results of a comprehensive instructors' assessments survey conducted in Israel's largest public college in 2004. In this survey, students in small tutorial groups, typically comprised of 15-35 participants each, rated their instructors. Students assessed the performance of two different types of instructors: fully accredited lecturers (including instructors, lecturers, senior lecturers and professors), who were also in charge of the core course, and teaching-assistants (usually Ph.D. candidates), who were formally responsible solely for the tutorials and accountable to the accredited lecturers.

The research explored the differences between students' assessments of lecturers in plenary (or core) classes and small-group tutorial settings, as well as the students' course grades in each tutorial setting (be it a core class conducted by the lecturer or a small-group tutorial conducted by the teaching-assistant). It also explored the differences between students' assessments of lecturers and teaching-assistants.

Contrary to expectations based on previous research done in the world, the findings of the present study fail to indicate differences in either students' assessments of the teachers in charge of the tutorials or in the students' course grades by tutor status (lecturer or teaching-assistant).

The findings of the present study indicate no academic justification for dividing course work between lecturers and teaching-assistants. Both lecturers and teaching-assistants were judged to be equally effective as tutors, and equally contributed to students' success as translated into grades. Such division does, however, have a major budgetary advantage. Teaching-assistants are much more cost-effective. Furthermore, this division provides teaching training opportunities and experience for junior faculty members functioning as tutors.

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

Nitza Davidovitch and Dan Soen (2005). A Matter of Preference - Lecturers vs. Teaching - Assistants in Tutorials,imanager’s Journal on School Educational Technology, 1(1), 57-65. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.1.1.939

References

Astin, A.W. (1993). What matters in College? Jossey- Bass, San Francisco.
Davidovitch, N. (2003) [in Hebrew].Teaching With Quality Study of instructors assessments as a derivative of students background data, curriculum, structure and instructor employment status. The Academic College of Judea and Samaria Research Authority, Ariel
Nevo, B. & Ben Shaul, B. (2002) [in Hebrew]. "What can we learn from an undergraduate instruction satisfaction survey at Haifa University?", Al Hagova: Journal for Teaching in Higher Education 1:25-2
Pundak, D. & Rosner, S. (2004) [in Hebrew]."Tutoring in academic online classes", Al Hagova: Journal for Teaching in Higher Education, 3:52-56
Cashin, W.E. (1990).” Students do rate academic fields differently,” in M. Theall & J. Franklin (eds.): Student ratings of instruction: Issues for improving practice New Directions for Teaching and Learning. 43, 113-121, Jossey Bass, San Francisco.
Condravy, J. (1995). “Tutors learning about learning: An assessment,” Research and Teaching in Developmental Education, 11, 2 (Spring).
Cuseo, Joe (2001). Evidence supporting the positive impact of peer tutoring, The Higher Education Peer Assistance and Coaching Resource Group. Internet: www.peerassistance.bigstep.com/listofservices.html
Dalziel, J. (1998). "Using marks to assess student performance: some problems and alternatives".Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 23 (4), 351-366.
Feldman, K.A. (1984). “Class size and college students' evaluations of teachers and courses: A closer look,” Research in Higher Education, 21 (1): 45-116.
Feletti, G.I., Doyle, E., Petrovic, A. & Sanson-Fisher, R. (1982). “Medical students' evaluation of tutors in a group-learning curriculum,” Medical Education, 16(6), Nov.: 319-325.
Gibbs, G., 1981: Teaching students to learn, Open University Press, Philadelphia, PA.
Griffiths S. (1999): “Teaching and learning in small groups”, In Fry, H., Ketteridge, S. & Marshall, S. (eds.): A Handbook for Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Kogan Page, London.
Guilherme, A. (2004). “Teaching formats for small group philosophy tutorials,” Philosophy Pathways Electronic Journal, 77, 8 Feb.
Hawley, K. (2002). “Project report: Using independent study groups with Philosophy students,” The PRS-LTSN Journal, 2, 1(summer).
Hawley, W.D. & Valli, L. (2000). “Learner-centered professional development,” Research Bulletin No. 27, August. Phi Delta Kappa Center for Evaluation, De v e l o pme n t a n d R e s e a r c h . I n t e r n e t : www.pdkintl.org/edres/resbul27.htm
Hativa, N. (1997) [in Hebrew]. The Right Teaching Practice at University: From Theory to Practice. Tel Aviv: Tel Aviv University, Ramot Publications.
McLean, J. (2001). Managing a large team of tutors in first year Psychology, Teaching Large Classes, AUTC Project. Internet: www.tedi.uq.edu.au/largeclasses/ case_studies/CaseStudy-05_McLean.html
Martin, E., Prosser, M., Benjamin, J., Trigwell, K. & Ramsden, P. (1995). Perceptions of leadership and management in the teaching of large first year university courses, Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Australian Association for Research in Education, Hobart, Tasmania. Internet: www.aare.edu.au/95pap/ marte95179.txt
McPherson, M.A. (2003). How do students evaluate teachers? Revisiting the determinants of student evaluation scores, Dept. of Economics, university of N o r t h T e x a s . I n t e r n e t : w w w . u t a . e d u / f a c u l t y / m i k e w a r d / mcpherson%20EVAL%20PAPER.doc
Menges, R. J. & Mathis, C. B. (1998). Key resources on teaching, learning, curriculum, and faculty development, Jossey-Bass Publishers, San Francisco.
Smith, A & Walpole, M. (1998). "An Australasian experience of the use of selected technologies in the delivery of a legal education program-Some Lessons for faculties and educational program planners", The Journal of Information, Law and Technology, 3. Internet: http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/98-3/smith.html
Selvanathan, A.E & Selvanathan, S. (n.d.). Teaching statistics to business students: Making it a success, IASE- the International Association for Statistical Education. Internet:
Ravens, U., Nitsche, I., Haag, C. & Dobrev, D. (2002). “What is a good tutorial from the student's point of view? Evaluation of tutorials in a newly published PBL block course 'Basics of drug therapy' “, Naunyn Schmiedebergs Archives of Pharmacology, 366
[25]Whitten, B.J. & Umble, M.M. (1980). “The relationship of class size, class level and core vs. non-core classification for class to student ratings of faculty: Implications for validity,” Educational and Psychological Measurement, 40: 419-423.
[26]Wigington, H., Tollefson, N. & Rodriguez, E. (1989). “Students' ratings of instructors revisited: Interactions among class and instructor variables,” Research in Higher Education, 30, 3: 331-344.
[27].Yirtue, M. & Terre Blanche, M. (n.d). An evaluation of a tutorial programme in Psychology. Internet: www.aseesa-edu.co.za/bulld.htm
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.