References
[ I ]. Antunez, B. 2000. When everyone is involved: Porents
ond communities in school reform~ In Framing effecHve
pracfice.' Topics and issues In educating Eng\\sh
ianguage iearners, ed.
[2]. B. Antunez, R A. DiCerbo, ond K. Menken, 5359.
Woshington, DC: Notionol Cieoringhouse for Bilinguoi
Educotion Avoiioble of:
wwwnceia.gwu.edu/pubs/tasynthesis/framing/6parents.
htm.
[3]. Barrero, J. 2002. An investigotion into potent
involvement strotegies employed by principois in
biiinguoi public schools. Ph,D. diss., Som Houston Stole
University, Huntsville, TX,
[4]. Chen, X. 2001. Efforts by public k8 schools to invo\ve
parents in children's education.' Do school and parent
reports agree? Stotistlcol onoiysis report. Woshington, DC:
NotionoiCouncHfor Educotlon Stotistics.
[5]. Comer, J. R, ond N. M. Hoynes. 1991. Porent
involvement in schools: An ecologicol opprooch. The
Elementary SchoolJournai 91(3): 27177.
[6]. Connors, L. J., ond J. L. Epstein. 1995. Porent ond
school portnerships. In Handbook of parenting, ed, M. H~
Bornstein, vol. 4: 43758. Mohwoh, NJ: Lowrence Eriboum.
[7]. Epstein, J. L. 1987. Whot principois should knowo
boutporent involvement. Principal 66(3).. 69 .
[8]. Henderson, A. T. , ed. 1987. The evidence continues to
gr ow.' Par ent Involv em ent Impr oves stud ent
achievement. Columbio, MD: Notionol Committee for
CitizensinEducotion.