References
[1]. Akbas, O. and Pektas, H. (2011). “The effects
of using an
Interactive Whiteboard on the Academic Achievement of
University Students”. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science
Learning & Teaching, Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 1-19.
[2]. Altin, H.M. and Kalelioglu, F. (2015). “Fatih
Projesiileilgili
Ögrencive Ögretmen Görüsleri”. Baskent
University Journal
of Education, Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 89-105
[3]. Amolo, S. and Dees, E. (2007). “The Influence
of
Interactive Whiteboards on Fifth-Grade Student
Perceptions and Learning Experiences”. Action Research
Exchange, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 1-9.
[4]. Bagci, H. (2013). Fatih Projesi
Çerçevesinde
Ortaögretim Ögrencilerinin Etkilesimli Tahtaya Yönelik
GörüslerininIncelenmesi (Yayimlanmamis Yüksek Lisans
Tezi). Okan Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimleri Enstitüsü,
Istanbul.
[5]. Beauchamp, G. (2004). “Teacher use of the
Interactive
Whiteboard in Primary Schools: Towards an Effective
Transition Framework”. Technology, Pedagogy and
Education, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 327- 348.
[6]. Beeland, W.D. (2002). “Student Engagement,
Visual
Learning and Technology: Can Interactive Whiteboards
Help?” Annual Conference of the Association of
Information Technology for Teaching Education, Dublin,
Trinity College.
[7]. Bransford, J.D., et al. (1990). “Anchored
Instruction: Why
we Need it and how Technology can Help”. In D. Nix & R.
Sprio (Eds), Cognition, Education and Multimedia.
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
[8]. Büyüköztürk, S.,
KiliçÇakmak, E., Akgün, Ö.E.,
Karadeniz, S., and Demirel, F. (2012). Bilimsel Arastirma
Yöntemleri (13. Baski). Ankara: PegemA.
[9]. Cogill, J. (2002). “How is the Interactive
Whiteboard
being used in the Primary School and how does this Affect
Teachers and Teaching”. Retrieved from URL:
http://mypad.northampton.ac.uk/13416667lc/files/2013/1
0/iwb-26igy0w.pdf
[10]. Demircioglu, G. and Yadigaroglu, M. (2014).
“Kimya
Ögretmenlerinin Fatih ProjesineIliskin Görüsleri”.
Egitimve
Ögretim Arastirmalari Dergisi, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 32 (ISSN:
2146-9199).
[11]. Dill, M.J. (2008). “A Tool to Improve Student
Achievement in Math: An Interactive Whiteboard”.
Doctorate Thesis, Ashland University.
[12]. Glover, D. Miller, D. Averis, D. and Door, V.
(2007). “The
Evolution of an Effective Pedagogy for Teachers using the
Interactive Whiteboard and Modern languages: An
Empirical Analysis from the Secondary sectors”. Learning,
Media and Technology, Vol. 32, No. 1, pp. 5-20.
[13]. Hall, I. and Higgins, S. (2005). “Primary
School
Students' Perceptions of Interactive Whiteboards”. Journal
of Computer Assisted Learning, Vol. 21, pp. 102-117.
[14]. Herbert, M. (2012). “Whiteboards Engage
Autistic Students in Social Learning”. District Administration,
Vol. 48,
No. 3, pp. 44.
[15]. Hersh C. W, Meng-Fen L. and Georgette M. M.,
(2003). “A Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Teaching
and Learning with Technology on Student Outcomes”.
Retrieved from http://treeves.coe.uga.edu/edit6900/meta
analysisNCREL.pdf
[16]. Higgins, S. Falzon, C. Hall, L. Moseley, D. Smith,
F.
Smith, H. and Wall, K. (2005). Embedding ICT in the Literacy
and Numeracy Strategies: Final Report. Project Report,
University of Newcastle, upon Tyne, Newcastle.
[17]. Kaya, Hüseyin; Aydin, Fatih (2011).
“Sosyal Bilgiler
Dersindeki CografyaKonularinin Ögretiminde AkilliTahta
UygulamalarinaIliskin ÖgrenciGörüsleri”.
Zeitschriftfür die
Welt der Türken, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 179-189.
[18]. Kayaduman, H., Sarikaya, M. and Seferoglu, S.S.
(2011). “Egitimde FATIH Projesinin Ögretmenlerin Yeterlik
Durumlari AçisindanIncelenmesi”. Akademik Bilisim 11 - XIII.
Akademik Bilisim Konferansi Bildirileri, Inönü
Üniversitesi,
Malatya, 2 - 4 Subat.
[19]. Kennewell, S. and Beauchamp, G. (2007). “The
“Features of Interactive Whiteboards and their Influence on
Learning”. Learning, Media and Technology, Vol. 32, No. 3,
pp. 227-241.
[20]. Kennewell, S. Tanner, H. Jones, S. and Beauchamp,
G. (2008). “Analysing the Use of Interactive Technology to
Implement Interactive Teaching”. Journal of Computer
Assisted Learning, Vol. 34, pp. 61-73.
[21]. Keser, H. Çetinkaya, L. (2013).
“Turkish Studies-
International Periodical for the Languages”. Literature and
History of Turkish or Turkic, Vol. 8, No. 6, pp. 377-403.
[22]. Korkmaz, A. Aktürk, C. and Karimi, O. (2013).
Fatih
Projesi Sürecinde Sinif Ögretmeni Adaylarinin Bilgisayara
Yönelik TutumlarininIncelenmesi: Kilis 7 Aralik Üniversitesi
Örnegi. Retrieved from http://inet-tr.org.tr/inetconf18/
bildiri/56.pdf (Erisim: 11.07.2016).
[23]. Kirbag Zengin, F. Kirilmazkaya, and G.
Keçeci, G.
(2011). “Akillitahtakullanimininilkögretimögrencilerinin
fen veteknolojidersindekibasarivetutumaetkisi”. 5th
International Computer & Instructional Technologies
Symposium, Firat Üniversitesi, Elazig.
[24]. Kim, (2005). “The Effects of a Constructivist
Teaching
Approach on Student Academic Achievement, Self-
Concept, and Learning Strategies”. Asia Pacific Education
Review, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 7-19.
[25]. Lai, H.J. (2010). “Secondary School
Teachers'
Perceptions of Interactive Whiteboard Training Workshops:
A Case Study from Taiwan”. Australasian Journal of
Educational Technology, Vol. 26, pp. 511-522.
[26]. Lau, I. (2011). “Teachers for "Smart
Classrooms": The
Extent of Implementation of an Interactive Whiteboardbased
Professional Development Program on Elementary
Teachers' Instructional Practices”. Interdisciplinary Journal
of E-Learning & Learning Objects, Vol. 7, pp. 275-289.
[27]. Lipton, M. and Lipton, L. (2010). “Enhancing
the
Radiology Learning Experience with Electronic Whiteboard
Technology”. American Journal of Roentgenology, Vol.
194, No. 6, pp. 1547-1551.
[28]. Manny-Ikan, E. Tikochinski, T.Zorman, R. and Dagan,
O. (2011). “Using the Interactive White Board in Teaching
and Learning - An Evaluation of the smart classroom Pilot
Project”. Interdisciplinary Journal of E-Learning & Learning
Objects, Vol. 7, No. 249-273.
[29]. Merriam, S.B. (2013). Nitel Arastirma :
Desenveuygulamaiçinbirrehber, (Çev. Ed. S. Turan) Ankara,
Nobel AkademikYayincilikEgitimDanismanlik Tic. Lmt. Sti.
[30]. Miles, M.B. and Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative
nd Data Analysis, (2 Ed). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
[31]. Onder, R. and Aydin, H. (2016). “The Effect
of the Use
of Smart Board in the Biology Class on the Academic
Achievement of Student”. i-manager's Journal on School
Educational Technology, 12(1), Jun-Aug 2016, Print ISSN:
0973-2217, E-ISSN: 2230-7133, pp.18-29.
[32]. Pamuk, S. Çakir, R. Ergun, M. Yilmaz, H.B.
and Ayas, C.
(2013). “Ögretmenve Ögrenci Bakis Açisiyla Tablet
PC ve
Etkilesimli Tahta Kullanimi: FATIH Projesi Degerlendirmesi”.
Kuramve Uygulamada Egitim Bilimleri, Vol. 13, No. 3, pp.
1799-1822.
[33]. Polat, S. and Özcan, A. (2014). “Akilli
Tahta Kullanimiyla
Ilgili Sinif Ögretmenlerinin Görüsleri”.
KastamonuEgitim
Dergisi, Vol. 22, No. 2pp. 439-455.
[34]. Roscoe, K. Derksen, A. and Curtis, K. (2013).
“Using Presentation Software to Integrate Formative Assessment
into Science Instruction”. Science Scope, Vol. 36, No. 5, pp.
48-57.
[35]. Schut, C.R. (2007). “Student Perceptions of
Interactive
Whiteboards in a Biology Classroom”. Master Thesis,
Cedarville University, B.A. Life Science Education.
[36]. Shenton, A. and Pagett, L. (2007). “From
'Bored' to
Screen: The use of the Interactive Whiteboard for Literacy in
Six Primary Classrooms in England”. Literacy, Vol. 41, No. 3,
pp. 129-136.
[37]. Smith, H, J. Higgins, S. Wall, K. and Miller, J.
(2005).
“Interactive Whiteboards: Boon or Bandwagon? A Critical
Review of the Literature”. Journal of Computer Assisted
Learning, Vol. 21, pp. 91-101.
[38]. Sahin, Ö, Gökkurt, B. veSoylu, Y. (2013).
“Matematik
ögretmeni adaylarinin kesirlerle ilgili pedagojik alan bilgilerinin
ögrenci hatalari baglaminda incelenmesi”. 4th
International Conference on New Trends in Education and
their Implications, konferansinda sunulan sözlü bildiri,
Antalya.
[39]. Turner, R.C. and Carslon, L. (2003). “Indexes
of Item- Objective Congruence for Multidimensional items”.
International Journal of Testing, Vol. 3, No. 2, pp. 163-171.
[40]. Wall, K. Higgins, S. and Smith, H. (2005).
“'The Visual
Helps me understand the Complicated Things': Pupil Views
of Teaching and Learning with Interactive Whiteboards”.
British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 36, No. 5, pp.
851–867.
[41]. Xu, H.L. (2011). “It makes the whole Learning
Experience Better”: Student Feedback on the use of the
Interactive Whiteboard in Learning Chinese at Tertiary
Level”. Asian Social Science, Vol. 7, No. 11, pp. 20-34.
[42]. Yildirim, A. and Simsek, H. (2003). Sosyal
Bilimlerde
Nitel Arastirma Yöntemleri. Ankara: SeçkinYayinlari.
[43]. Yildizhan, Y. H. (2013). “Temel Egitimde
Akilli Tahtanin
Matematik Basarisina Etkisi”. Middle Eastern and African
Journal of Education Research, Vol. 5, pp. 110-121.
[44]. Yilmaz, H. veUsta, E. (2015).
“Ögretmenlerin Akilli Tahta Kullanimi Konusunda
GörüslerininIncelenmesi”. 9th International
Computer & Instructional Technologies
Symposium - ICITS2015. Afyonkarahisar, 20-22 Mayis.
