i-manager Publications

A Kernel SVM Classifier for Classification of Brain Tumors in Magnetic Resonance Images

T. Chandra Sekhar Rao*, G.Sreenivasulu**

* Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Loyola Institute of Technology and Management, Sattenapalli, India.

** Professor, Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, SVU College of Engineering, Tirupati, India.

Periodicity:July - September'2016

Abstract

The term Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) broadly encompasses the use of computer algorithms to aid in the process of image interpretation. CAD is also now used in general to categorize and computerize the extraction of quantitative measurements from medical images. CAD system has become the most important research subject in the domain of medical imaging and diagnostic radiology. CAD systems act as a credible secondary opinion thereby improving the accuracy and the consistency of radiological diagnosis. In this work a classifier based on Support Vector Machine (SVM) has been designed and presented for the classification of brain tumors in images from Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). The SVM classifier uses a kernel in the form of Gaussian Radial Basis function kernel (GRB kernel) to enhance the classifier performance. The result of the classifier performance has been validated with the help of expert clinical opinion. The results demonstrate the suitability of the proposed classifier in the classification of brain tumors.

Keywords

CAD, SVM, Kernel, MRI, GRB.

How to Cite this Article?

Rao, T. C. S., and Sreenivasulu, G. (2016). A Kernel SVM Classifier for Classification of Brain Tumors in Magnetic Resonance Images. i-manager's Journal on Image Processing, 3(3), 34-41.

References

[1]. Kandel, Eric R., Schwartz, James Harris, and Jessell, Thomas M, (2000). Principles of Neural Science. New York: McGraw-Hill.

[2]. Globocan, (2012). The Globocan Project. Retrieved from http://globocan.iarc.fr/Default.aspx

[3]. Prince JL, and Links JM, (2006). Medical Imaging Signals and System. Pearson Education.

[4]. C. Cortes and V. Vapnik (1995). “Support-vector networks”. Machine Learning, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 273-297.

[5]. Pearson, K. (1901). “On Lines and Planes of Closest Fit to Systems of Points in Space”. Philosophical Magazine, Vol. 2, No. 11, pp. 559-572.

[6]. Akansu, Ali N., Haddad, and Richard A. (1992). Multiresolution Signal Decomposition: Transforms, Subbands, and Wavelets. Boston, MA: Academic Press.

[7]. T. Nakai, et al., (2004). “Application of independent component analysis to magnetic resonance imaging for enhancing the contrast of gray and white matter”. Neuroimage, Vol. 21, No. 1, pp. 251-260.

[8]. Baron, JA (1994). “Too bad it isn't true.....”. Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, Vol. 14, No. 2, pp. 107.

[9]. Fawcett, Tom (2006). “An Introduction to ROC Analysis”. Pattern Recognition Letters, Vol. 27, No. 8, pp. 861–874

[10]. Hanley, James A., and McNeil, Barbara J. (1982). “The Meaning and use of the Area under a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve”. Radiology, Vol. 143, No. 1, pp. 29–36

[11]. Hajian-Tilaki, Karimollah, (2013). “Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) Curve Analysis for Medical Diagnostic Test Evaluation.” Caspian Journal of Internal Medicine, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 627–635. Print.

[12]. Hsueh, Y.W., and Yang, C.Y. (2009). “Tool breakage diagnosis in face milling by support vector machine”. Journal of Material Processing Technology, Vol. 209, pp. 145-152.

A Kernel SVM Classifier for Classification of Brain Tumors in Magnetic Resonance Images

Abstract

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

References

If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Options for accessing this content:

	North Americas,UK, Middle East,Europe		India	Rest of world
	USD	EUR	INR	USD-ROW
Pdf	35	35	200	20
Online	35	35	200	15
Pdf & Online	35	35	400	25