The Effect of the Use of Smart Board in the Biology Class on the Academic Achievement of Student

Recep Onder*, Halil Aydin**
*Research Scholar, Anadolu University, Eskisehir, Turkey.
** Professor, Department of Biology Education, Dokuz Eylul University, Izmir, Turkey.
Periodicity:June - August'2016
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.12.1.8080

Abstract

The objective of this study is to reveal the effect of the use of smart board in the biology class at the tenth grade of the secondary education on the academic achievements of students. The study used the quasi-experimental model with pre-test and posttest control groups and semi-structured interviews were made with the students. The study group of the research consists of the 50 students at the tenth grade in an Anatolian High School in the Buca District of the izmir province. The lessons with the students in the test group included the contents which were prepared by the methods and techniques based on the constructive learning approach and taught by using the smart board. The students in the control group were instructed with the activities that were specified in the current curriculum. As a result of the study, a significant difference was found between the achievements of the test group and control group students. The achievement of the test group students was found to be higher than the control group students. In addition, the interviews with the test group students provided comprehensive opinions on the use of smart board.

Keywords

Smart Board, Academic Achievement, Constructive Approach, Biology Teaching.

How to Cite this Article?

Onder, R., and Aydin, H. (2016). The Effect of the Use of Smart Board in the Biology Class on the Academic Achievement of Student. i-manager's Journal on School Educational Technology, 12(1), 18-29. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.12.1.8080

References

[1]. Akbas O., and Pektas, M. H. (2011). “The Effects of using an Interactive Whiteboard on the Academic Achievement of University Students”. Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Vol. 12, No. 2. Retrieved from http://www.ied.edu.hk/apfslt/download/v12_issue2_files/ak bas.pdf
[2]. Akpinar, E., and Ergin, O. (2005). “The Role of Science Teacher in Constructivist Theory”. Ilkogretim Online, Vol. 4, No. 2, pp. 55-64.
[3]. Akgül, B. (2013). “Effects of Smart board to the Student Success in the Elementary Art Lessons”. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
[4]. Akkoyunlu, B. (1996). “The Effect of integration of Computer Literacy Skills into Curriculum Primary Pupils' Achievements and Attitudes Toward Computers”. Journal of Hacettepe Education Faculty, Vol. 12, pp. 127-134.
[5]. Altincelik, B. (2009). “The Teachers' Views about interactive Whiteboards that Provide Learning Permanence and Motivation in Primary Level”. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Sakarya University, Institude of Social Science, Sakarya.
[6]. Aydin, H. (2000). “Turkish Students Understanding of Some Concepts of Heredity”. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Leeds University.
[7]. Aypay, A., and Ozbasi’, D. (2008). “Investigating Teacher Attitudes Towards Computers”. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, Vol. 55, No. 55, pp. 339-362.
[8]. Basibuyuk, K., Sahin, O., Gokkurt, B., Erdem, and E. ve Soylu, Y. (2013). “Overview of the Smart Board with st Mathematics Education”. 1 Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education Symposium, (20-22 June 2013). Trabzon: Karadeniz Teknik University.
[9]. Buyukozturk, S. (2011). Data Analysis Handbook for Social Sciences. Ankara: Pegem Akademi Publishing.
[10]. Beeland, W. D. (2002). Student Engagement, Visual Learning and Technology: Can Interactive White boards Help?” Retrieved from http://chiron.valdosta.edu/are/Artm anscrpt/vol1no1/beeland_am.pdf
[11]. Cogill, J. (2002). How is the Interactive Whiteboard Being used in the Primary School and How does this affect Teachers and Teaching. Retrieved from http://districts. teachade.com/resources/support/5035b24fab097.pdf
[12]. Dhindsa, H. S. and Emran, S. H. (2006). “Use of The Interactive Whiteboard in Constructivist Teaching for Higher Student Achievement”. In Proceedings of the Second Annual Conference for the Middle East Teachers of Science, Mathematics, and Computing, pp. 175-188. Retrieved from http://www.teachade.com/resources/support/5035b25 00c1cb.pdf
[13]. Ekici, F. (2008). “Effects of Smart Board Usage on Primary School Maths Students' Success”. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Marmara University, Institude of Educational Sciences, Istanbul.
[14]. Emre, I., Kaya, Z., Ozdemir, T.Y. and Kaya, O.N. (2011). “Effects of using Interactive Whiteboard on Pre-Service Science Teachers' Achievement in Topic of Structure of Cell Membrane and Attitudes Toward Information Technology”. th 5 International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium, (22-24 September 2011). Elazig: Firat University.
[15]. Ermis, U. F. (2012). “The Effect of the Use of Interactive Whiteboard on Students' Achievement and Motivation in Science and Technology Classrooms”. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Gazi University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Ankara.
[16]. FATIH (2014). Increasing Opportunities and Improvement of Technology (FATIH). Retrieved from http://fatihprojesi.m eb.gov.tr/proje-hakkinda/
[17]. Karasar, N. (1994). Scientific Research Method. Ankara: 3A Research Training Consultancy.
[18]. Glover, D. and Miller, D. (2001). “Running with Technology: The Pedagogic Impact of The large-Scale Introduction of Interactive Whiteboards in One Secondary School”. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 257-276.
[19]. Kennewell, S. (2006). “Reflections on the Interactive Whiteboard Phenomenon: A Synthesis of Research from the UK”. AARE Conference, (26-30 Kasim 2006), Avustralya, Adelaide. Retrieved from http://www.ore.org.pt/filesobser vatorio/pdf/KENNEWELL.pdf
[20]. Kirschner, P., and Selinger, M. (2003). “The State of Affairs of Teacher Education with Respect to Information and Communications Technology ”. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, Vol. 12, No. 1, pp. 5-17.
[21]. Kose, S., Ayas, A. and ve Tas, E. (2003). “The Effects of Computer-Based Instruction on Misconceptions: Photosynthesis”. Journal of Education, Vol. 2, No. 14, pp. 106-112.
[22]. Lopez, O. (2010). “The Digital Learning Classroom: Improving English Language Learners Academic Success in Mathematics and Reading using Interactive Whiteboard Technology”. Computers & Education, Vol. 54, pp. 901-915.
[23]. Marmaroti, P. and Galanopoulou, D. (2006). “Pupils' Understanding of Photosynthesis: A Questionnaire for the Simultaneous Assessment of all Aspects”. International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 383-403.
[24]. Marzano, R. J. (2009). “Teaching with Interactive Whiteboards”. Educational Leadership, Vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 80-82.
[25]. Kathryn Min and Christine Siegel (2011). “Integration of Smart Board Technology and Effective Teaching”. imanager's Journal on School Educational Technology, Vol. 7, No. 1, Jun-Aug 2011, Print ISSN: 0973-2217, E-ISSN: 2230- 7133, pp. 38-47.
[26]. Onder, R. (2015). “The Effect of the Interactive Whiteboard use in Biology Lesson on Students' Achievements and Attitudes Towards the Course and the Interactive Whiteboard”. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Dokuz Eylul University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Izmir.
[27]. Recep Onder and Halil Aydin, (2016). “Students' Views towards the Usage of Smart Board in Biology Lessons”. imanager's Journal on School Educational Technology, Vol. 11, No. 3, Dec 2015-Feb 2016, Print ISSN: 0973-2217, EISSN: 2230-7133, pp.18-28.
[28]. Ozkanan, A. and ve Erdogan, A. (2013). “The Contribution of Learning Environment Acceptance and Community Feeling to Learner Satisfaction in Distance Education”. Journal of Süleyman Demirel University Institute of Social Sciences, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 209-220.
[29]. Oztan, A. Y. (2012). “The Effect of using Active Board on th Academic Success of Primary 7 Grade Students on Science and Technology Teaching”. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Necmettin Erbakan University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Konya.
[30]. Schut, C. R. (2007). “Student Perceptions of Interactive Whiteboards in a Biology Classroom”. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Cedarville University, B.A. Life Science Education. http://digitalcommons.cedarville.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi ?article=1015&context=education_theses (09.05.2016).
[31]. Solak, M. (2012). “The Analysis of the Teacher's Attitudes Towards the Usage of the Smart boards According to the Technology Acceptance Model”. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Sakarya University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Sakarya.
[32]. Tercan, I. (2012). “The Effects of Interactive Whiteboard use on Achievement, Attitude and Motivations on Science and Technology Course of Students”. Unpublished Master's Thesis, Necmettin Erbakan University, Institute of Educational Sciences, Konya.
[33]. Turnuklu , A. (2000). “Education Science Research Qualitative Research Techniques that can be used as Effective: Interview”. Educational Administration: Theory and Practice, Vol. 24, No. 6, pp. 543-559.
[34]. Wall, K., Higgins, S., and Smith, H. (2005). “The Visual helps me understand the complicated things: Pupil views of teaching and learning with interactive whiteboards”. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 851–867.
[35]. Wood, R. and Ashfield, J. (2008). “The use of the Interactive Whiteboard for Creative Teaching and Learning in Literacy and Mathematics: A Case Study”. British Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 39, No. 1, pp. 84-96.
[36]. Yildirim, A. and Simsek, H. (2006). Qualitative Research Methods in Social Sciences. Ankara: Seckin Publishing.
[37]. Zengin K. F., Kirilmazkaya, G., and Kececi, G. (2011). “Elementary Students Use of Smart Board the Effect of Achievement and Attitude in Science and Technology th Course”. 5 International Computer & Instructional Technologies Symposium. pp. 22-24.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.