One of the possible techniques for collecting empirical data is video recordings of a computer screen with specific screen capture software. This method for collecting empirical data shows how students use the BSCWII (Be Smart Cooperate Worldwide - a web based collaboration / groupware environment) to coordinate their work and collaborate in developing their work.

In order to collect data and gain an understanding for using software Camtasia for collecting empirical data when students were using the BSCWII platform, in the Fiste Comenius 2.1 project (Future Innovative in-service Teacher Education), the author piloted the software. Using this remote observation software to make recordings of the screen allowed collection of a rich record of actual computer work activity in its natural work setting. The conclusions, from this pilot study could later be used to support action research based approach to improve in-service teacher education in Europe. The nature of this remote observation tool made it easy to follow the users' activity in the Managed Learning setting of the BSCWII system. However, the invasiveness of seeing all of the user's interactions with and through the computer has raised ethical concerns about the privacy of the participants that have to agree to participate in this type of detailed study. Techniques needed to develop trust with researchers are considered. Advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of the data collection method are also discussed.

">

Empirical Data Collection And Analysis Using Camtasia And Transana

Gisli Thorsteinsson*, Tom Page**
* Assistant Professor, Department of Design and Craft, University of Iceland, Iceland.
** Lecturer, Department of Design and Technology, Loughborough University, Loughborough
Periodicity:July - September'2009
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.6.2.804

Abstract

One of the possible techniques for collecting empirical data is video recordings of a computer screen with specific screen capture software. This method for collecting empirical data shows how students use the BSCWII (Be Smart Cooperate Worldwide - a web based collaboration / groupware environment) to coordinate their work and collaborate in developing their work.

In order to collect data and gain an understanding for using software Camtasia for collecting empirical data when students were using the BSCWII platform, in the Fiste Comenius 2.1 project (Future Innovative in-service Teacher Education), the author piloted the software. Using this remote observation software to make recordings of the screen allowed collection of a rich record of actual computer work activity in its natural work setting. The conclusions, from this pilot study could later be used to support action research based approach to improve in-service teacher education in Europe. The nature of this remote observation tool made it easy to follow the users' activity in the Managed Learning setting of the BSCWII system. However, the invasiveness of seeing all of the user's interactions with and through the computer has raised ethical concerns about the privacy of the participants that have to agree to participate in this type of detailed study. Techniques needed to develop trust with researchers are considered. Advantages, disadvantages, and limitations of the data collection method are also discussed.

Keywords

Screen Recording, Remote Observation, Managed Learning Environment, Communication

How to Cite this Article?

G. Thorsteinsson and Tom Page (2009). Empirical Data Collection and Analysis Using Camtasia And Transana. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 6(2), 41-49. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.6.2.804

References

[1]. Allen, J. G. and Jin, J. S., (2001). Enhancing Screen Teleconferencing with Streaming SIMD Extensions. Pan- Sydney Workshop on Visual Information Processing, Sydney, Australia, 11: 143-149, ACS.
[2]. Carmichael P. and Honour L. (2000). Open Source as appropriate technology for global education. International Journal of Educational Development 22 (2002) 47-53.
[3]. Crook C. (1994). Computers and the collaborative experience of learning. London: Routledge.
[4]. Creswell, J. W. (1998). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five traditions. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
[5]. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). (Eds). Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
[6]. Ellis, C. A., S. J. Gibbs, and G. L. Rein (1991): Groupware: Some i s sues and exper iences. Communications of the ACM, Vol. 34, No. 1, January 1991, pp. 38-58.
[7]. Goodwin S., (2005). Using screen capture software for web site usability and redesign buy-in. Library Hi Tech Vol. 23 No. 4, 2005 pp. 610-621. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Texas University.
[8]. Ivory J. Y., Hearst M. A. (2001). "The State of the Art in Automating Usability Evaluation of User Interfaces." ACM Computing Surveys 33, no. 4 (Dec. 2001): 470-516.
[9]. Janice, R. & Dennis D., W., (2003). “Task Analysis”, chapter in The Human Computer Interaction Handbook, Jacko J. A. and Sears A. (Eds.), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 922-940. ISBN: 0-8058-4468-6.
[10]. Redish J. & Wixon D. (2003). “Task Analysis”, in The Human Computer Interaction Handbook, Jacko J. A. and Sears A. (Eds.), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2003, pp. 922-940.
[11]. Ruhleder, K., & Jordan B. (1997) “Capturing Complex, Distributed Activities: Video-Based Interaction Analysis as a Component of Workplace Ethnography”, in Information Systems and Qualitative Research, A.S. Lee, J. Liebenau, and J.I. DeGross (Eds.), London: Chapman and Hall, 1997, pp. 246-275.
[12]. Smith M., & Benjamin C. A. (1989). “Electronic monitoring at the Workplace: Implications for Employee Control and Job Stress,” in Job Control and Work Health, L. Sauter et al. (Eds.), Wiley, 1989, pp 275-289.
[13]. Tang J. C., Liu S., Muller M., Drews C., (2006). Lin J. Unobtrusive but Invasive: Using Screen Recording to Collect Field Data on Computer-Mediated Interaction. CSCW 2006 - Computer-Supported Cooperative Work. ACM, May 2006.
[15]. Wendy M., (1995). “Ethics, Lies, and Videotape”, Proc. of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '95), Denver, May 1995, pp.138-145.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Online 15 15

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.