References
[1]. Bahr, C. M., & Reith, H. J. [1989]. The effects of
instructional computer games and drill and practice
software on learning disabled students‘ mathematics
achievement. Computers in the schools, 6(3/4), 1987.
[2]. Bahr, C. M., & Reith, H. J. [1991]. Effects of
cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goals on
student achievement using computer-based driil-and-
practice. Journal of special education technology, 11(1),
33-48.
[3]. Boltge, B. A. (1999). Effects of computerized math
instruction on problem solving of average and below-
average achieving students. The Journal of Special Education, 33(2), 81-92.
[4]. Bottge, B. A. & Hasselbring, T.S. [1993]. A comparison
of two approaches for teaching complex, authentic
mathematics problems to adolescents in remedial math
classes. Exceptional children, 59(6), 556-566.
[5]. Bottge, B. A., Reuda, E., Larouque, R T., Serlin, R. C., &
Kwon, j. (2007). Integrating reform—oriented math instruction
in special education settings. Learning disabilities research
&practice, 22(2), 96-] 09.
[6]. Bost, l., & Riccomini, F J. (2006). Effective instruction: an
inconspicuous strategy for dropout prevention. Remedial
and special education, 27(5), 301-311 .
[7]. Chiang, B. (1986). Initial learning and transfer effects of
Microcomputer drills on LD students‘ multiplication skills.
Learning disability quarterly, 9, 118-123.
[8]. Christensen, C. A., & Gerber, M. M. [1 990]. Effectiveness
of computerized drill and practice games in teaching basic
math facts. Exceptionality, 1, 149-165.
[9]. Friedman, S. G., & Hofmeister, A. M. (1984). Matching
technology to content and learners: a case study.
exceptional children, 5 4(2), 130-134.
[10]. Gersten, R. (1985). Direct instruction with special
education students: a review of evaluation research. The
Journal of special education, 4 9(1), 41 -58.
[11]. Gersten, R., Carnine, D., &woodward, J. (1987]. Direct
Instruction research: the third decade. Remedial and
Special education, 8(6), 48-56.
[12]. Gleason, M., Carnine, D., & Boriero, D. (1990).
Improving CAI effectiveness with attention to instructional
design in teaching story problems to mildly handicapped
students. Journal of special education technology, 10(3),
129-136.
[13]. Hasselbring, T. S., Goin, L.I., & Bransford, J. D. (1988).
Developing math automaticity in learning handicapped
children: the role of computerized drill and practice. Focus
on exceptional children, 20 (6), 1-7.
[14]. Hughes, C. A. & Maccini, P. (1997]. Computer-assisted
mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities:
A research review. Learning disabilities, 8(3), 1 55-166.
[15]. Jitendra A., & Xin, Y. R (1997). Mathematical word-
Problem-solving instruction for students with mild disabilities
And students at riskfor math failure: a research synthesis. The
Journal ofspecial education, 20(4), 41 2-438.
[16]. Kelly, B., Carnine, D., Gersten, R. and Grossen. B.
(1986). The effectiveness of videodisc instruction in
teaching fractions to learning-disabled and remedial
high school students. Journal of special education
Technology, 8(2), 5-17.
[17]. Koscinski, S. T., & Gast, D. L. (1993). Computer-
Assisted instruction with constant time delay to teach
multiplication facts to students with learning disabilities.
Learning disabilities research & practice, 8(3), 157-168.
[18]. Lieber. J., 8: Semmel. M. I. (1987). The relationship
between group size and performance on a
microcomputer problem solving task for learning
handicapped and non handicapped students. Journal
of educational computing research, 3(2), 171 -187.
[19]. Lin, A., podell, D. M., &tournaki-rein, N. (1994). CAI
and the development of automaticity in mathematics
skills in students with and without mild mental handicaps.
Computer in the schools, 11(1), 43-60.
[20]. Maccini, R, & Gagnon, C. (2000). Best practices for
teaching mathematics to secondary students with
special needs. Focus on exceptional children, 32(5), 1-
22.
[21]. Maccini, R, & hughes, C. (1997) Mathematics
interventions for adolescents with learning disabilities.
Learning disabilities research and practice, 12(3), 168-
176.
[22]. Mastropieri, M. A., & scruggs, T. E. (1987). Effective
instruction for special education. Austin, tx: pro-ed.
[23]. Mastropieri, M. A., scruggs, T. E., & shiah, R. (1997).
Can computers teach problem-solving strategies to students with mild mental retardation? A case study.
Remedial and special education, 18(3),
[24]. Mcdermott, P. A., & Watkins, M. (1983).
Computerized vs. Conventional remedial instruction for
Learning-disabled pupils. Journal of special education,
17(1), 81-88.
[25]. Mercer, C. D., & miller, S. R (1991). Strategic math
Series: Multiplication facts 0-81. Lawerence, ks: edge
Enterprises.
[26]. Mercer, S.C., & Miller, N.l. (1992). Teaching students
With learning problems in math to acquire, understand. and apply basic math facts. Remedial and special
Education, 13(3), 19-25.
[27]. Miller, S. C., & cooke, N. L. (1989). Mainstreaming
Students with learning disabilities for videodisc math instruction. Teaching exceptional children, spr., 57-60.
[28]. Miller, S. C., & mercer, C. (1993). Using a graduated
Word problem sequence to promote problem-solving
Skills. Learning disabilities research and practice, 8(3),
169-174.
[29]. Moore, B. M. (1988). Achievement in basic math skills
For low performing students: a study of teachers‘ affects and CAI. Journal of experimental education, 57(1), 38-44.
[30]. National center for educational statistics. (2005).
National assessment of educational progress: the
Nation's report card [report no. 23-st02). Washington, dc:
Author.
[31]. Okolo, C. M. (1992a). The effects of computer-
Based attribution retraining on the attributions.
Persistence, and mathematics computation of students
With learning disabilities. Journal of disabilities, 25, 327-
334.
[32]. Okolo, C. M. (1992b). The effect of computer-
Assisted instruction format and initial attitude on the
Arithmetic facts proficiency and continuing motivation of
Students with learning disabilities. Exceptionality, 3, 195-
211.
[33]. Podell, D. M., tournaki-rein, N., & lin, a. (1992).
Automatization of mathematics skills via computer-
Assisted instruction among students with mild mental
Handicaps. Education and training in mental
Retardation, 27(3), 200-206.
[34]. Rosenshine, B., & stevens, R. (1986). Teaching
Functions. In m.c. whittrock (editor), the handbook of
Research and teaching (pp. 376-391). New york:
Macmillan.
[36]. Shiah, R., Mastropieri, M. A., Scruggs, T. E., & fulk, B.
J. M. [1995]. The effects of computer-assisted instruction
On the mathematical problem solving of students with
Learning disabilities. Exceptionality 5(3), 1 31-160.
[37]. Trifiletti, J. J., frith, G. H., & Armstong, S. [1984].
Micro-computers versus resource rooms for ld students: a
Preliminary investigation of the effects on math skills.
Learningdisabilityeuarterly 7, 69-76.
[38]. Watkins, M. W, & webb, C. (1981). Computer
Assisted instruction with learning disabled students.
Educational computer magazine, 1(3), 24-27.
[39]. Wilson, R., Majsterek, D., & Simmons, D. [t 996]. The
Effects of computer-assisted versus teacher—directed
Instruction on the multiplication performance of
Elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of
Learning disabilities, 29(4), 383-390.
[40]. Witzel, B.S. & Riccomini, R J., (2007). Optimizing
Math curriculum to meet the learning needs of students.
Preventing school failure, 52(1 ), 13-1 8.
[41]. Woodward, J., Carnine, D., Gersten, R., Gleason,
M., Johnson, G., & Collins, m. [1986]. Applying
Instructional design principles to CAI for mildly