References
[1]. Barron, B. , Martin, C. K. , & Roberts, E. , (2007). &parking
self-sustained learning: report on a design experiment to
build technological fluency and bridge divides.
International Journal of Technology and Design
Education, 17( I ), 75-105.
[2]. BebeII, D., O'Dwyer, L., Russell, M., & 5eeley, K.,
(2004). Estimating the effect of computer use at home
and in school on student achievement, Paper presented
at the National Educational Computing Conference
2004 (NECC 2004), New Orleans, LA.
[3]. Chisholm, I. M. , C I 995). Computer use In a
multicultural classroom~ Journal of Research on
ComputinglnEducation,28(2), 162-178.
[4]. Cohen, J., (2005). Am 5tatistical 5oftware (Version
0.06.00 ). [Computer 5oftware]. Washington, DC: The
American Institute for Research.
[5]. Cummins, J., & 5ayers, D. , (1995). Brave new schools.'
Challeng\ng cultural illiferacy through global learnlng
networks, NewYork: 5t. Martin's Press.
[6]. DeBell, M., & Chapman, C., (2006). Computer and
Internet use by studenfs in 2003. Washington, DC:
NationalCenterforEducation5tatistics.
[7]. Driessen, G. W. J., (2001). Ethnicity, forms of capital,
and educational achievement. /nternational Rev/ew of
Education, 47(6), 513-538.
[8]. Duncan, G. J., & Aber, J. L., (1997). Neighborhood
models and measures. In J. Brooks-Gunn, J. G~ Duncan &
J. L. Aber (Eds.), Neighborhood poverty: Context and
consequences for ch/\dren (VOL I ). NewYork: Russell 5age
Foundation.
[9]. Erstad, O., (2006). A new direction? Educat\on and
lnformationTechnolog\es, 11(3), 415-429,technology (pp~ 355-396). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
ErlbaumAssociates,
[10]. Freedman, K. , & Liu, M. , ( I 996). The importance of
computer experience, learning processes, and
communication patterns in multicultural networking.
Educational Technology Research and Deve\opment,
44(1), 43-59.
[1 I ]. Fuchs, T., & W"6ssmann, L., (2004). Computers and
student learning .. bivariate and mulflvarlate evldence on
the availability and use of computers at home and at
school. Munich: CES: CESifo working papers, No. 1321 :
Category 4, Labour markets.
[12]. Gerhard, F., (2001). User modeling in
human- computer interaction. User Modellng and User-
Adapted Interactlon, 11( I ), 65-86.
[13]. Gorski, R C., (2003). Privilege and repression in the
digital era: rethinking the sociopolitics of the digital divide,
Race,Gender & Class, 10(4), I 45- I 76.
[14]. Gunawardena, C. N., & Mclsaac, M. S., (2003 ). Distance education Handbook of research for educational communlcatiMahwah, NJ: Lawrence
ErlbaumAssociates,
ons technology (pp~ 355-396).
[15]. Hannafin, M. J., & Land, S. M., (1997). The
foundations and assumptions of technology-enhanced
student-centered learning environments, Instructional
Sc/ence, 25(3), I 67-202,
[I 6]. Heemskerk, I. , 8rink, A., Volman, M. , & ten Dam, G . ,
(2005). Inclusiveness and ICT in education: a focus on
gender, ethnicity and social class. Journal of Computer
Assisted Learning, 21( I ), I - I 6.
[17]. Hess, F. M., & Leai, D. L., (2001). A shrinking "Digital
Divide"? The provision of classroom computers across
urban school systems. Socia/ Sc/ence Quarterly, 82(4),
765-778.
[18]. Hill, J. R., Wiley, D., Nelson, L. M., & Han, S., (2003 ).
Exploring research on Internet-based learning: from
infrastructure to interactions, In D, H. Jonassen (Ed.),
Handbook of research for educational communicatlons
and technology (pp. 433-460). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
ErlbaumAssociates,<
[I 9]. Kerr, S. T., (2003). Toward a sociology of educational
technology, in D. H, Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of
research for educational communicatlons and
technology (pp. I I 3- I 42), Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
Erlbaum Associates.
[20]. Koohang, A., (2004). Students' perceptions toward
the use of the digital library in weekly web-based distance
[2 I ]. Messineo, M. , & DeOllos, I. Y., (2005). Are we
assuming too much? Exploring students' perceptions of
their computer competence. Co//ege Teaching, 53(2),
50-55.
[22]. Nachmias, R., Mioduser, D., & Shemla, A., (2001).
information and communication technologies usage by
students in an Israeli high school: Equity, gender, and
inside/outside school learning issues. Educatlon and
InformatlonTechnologies, 6( I ), 43-53.
[23]. NCES. (2004). English language learner students In
Distance education. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of U.S. public schools: 1994 and 2000. Jessup, MD: National
[24]. Cry, J., 8ullock, C., & 8umaska, K., (1997). Gender
similarity in the use of computers and attitudes about ALN
in a university setting, Journal of Asynchronous Learning
Networks, 1( I ), 39-5 I .
[25]. Romiszowski, A., & Maso, R., (2003). Computer-
mediated communication. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed,),
Handbook of research for educational communications
and technology (pp. 397-432)~ Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence
ErlbaumAssociates.
[26]. Volman, M., & Van Eck, E., (2001). Gender equity
and information technology in education: the Second
decade. Review of Educational Research, 71(4), 6 1 3-
634.
[27]. Warschauer, M., (2000). Technology & school
reform: a view from both sides of the tracks. [Electronic
Version]~ Educatlon po/icy analysis archives, 8 . Retrieved
June 28, 2007 from htfp: //Epaa~asu.edu/Epaa/v8n4.
html.
[28]. Weaver, G. C., (2000). An examination of the
National Educational Longitudinal Study (NELS:88)
database to probe the correlation between computer
use in school and improvement in test scores, Journal of
Sclence Education andTechnology 9(2), I 2 I - I 33.
[ 2 9 ] . Wenglinsky, H. , (200 6) . Technology and
achievement: the bottom line Educatlonal Leadership,
63(4), 29-32.
