This paper provides a brief understanding of the educational technology in the teaching and learning of mathematics to the Form Two students (equivalent to the eighth-graders) in Malaysia. In particular, it attempts to understand the relationships between educational technology and mathematics achievement in both the urban and rural schools. The study draws its findings solely from the Trend in Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2003 which includes 5,314 students from 150 schools. The technology discussed in this paper is confined to the use of calculator and computers in mathematics learning and teaching. The use of computer for academic purpose was scarce among the Form Two students, which is reflective of our current curriculum that lacks of the technological approach. However, we found that students who owed computers, used computers at home, library or friend’s home performed relatively better in the TIMSS mathematics test compared to those who did not. The findings also show that students in rural areas were less likely to own home computers but are more likely to use calculator as compared to their urban counterpart but their achievement in TIMSS mathematics scores were significantly lower and were more likely from schools that had greater shortage of computer facilities. Although the findings implicated that the use of computers help in achieving higher mathematics scores, it was not conclusive since students’ socio-economics status, motivation and other factors related to achievement were not considered in this study. This study also found that teachers’ pedagogical style do not encourage mathematical creativity. However, the instructional approach of the teachers did not seem to affect students’ performance in mathematics.

">

Adoption of Technology in Malaysian Educational System

Chris Fook Sheng NG*, Noor Azina Ismail**
* Department of Applied Statistics Faculty of Economics and Administration University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur
** Department of Applied Statistics Faculty of Economics and Administration University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur
Periodicity:January - March'2007
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.3.4.675

Abstract

This paper provides a brief understanding of the educational technology in the teaching and learning of mathematics to the Form Two students (equivalent to the eighth-graders) in Malaysia. In particular, it attempts to understand the relationships between educational technology and mathematics achievement in both the urban and rural schools. The study draws its findings solely from the Trend in Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) 2003 which includes 5,314 students from 150 schools. The technology discussed in this paper is confined to the use of calculator and computers in mathematics learning and teaching. The use of computer for academic purpose was scarce among the Form Two students, which is reflective of our current curriculum that lacks of the technological approach. However, we found that students who owed computers, used computers at home, library or friend’s home performed relatively better in the TIMSS mathematics test compared to those who did not. The findings also show that students in rural areas were less likely to own home computers but are more likely to use calculator as compared to their urban counterpart but their achievement in TIMSS mathematics scores were significantly lower and were more likely from schools that had greater shortage of computer facilities. Although the findings implicated that the use of computers help in achieving higher mathematics scores, it was not conclusive since students’ socio-economics status, motivation and other factors related to achievement were not considered in this study. This study also found that teachers’ pedagogical style do not encourage mathematical creativity. However, the instructional approach of the teachers did not seem to affect students’ performance in mathematics.

Keywords

Educational Technology, Mathematics Achievement, TIMSS, Urban, Rural.

How to Cite this Article?

Chris Fook Sheng NG and Noor Azina Ismail (2007). Creativity In Technology Education Facilitated Through Virtual Reality Learning Environments – A Case Study. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 3(4), 66-73. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.3.4.675

References

[1]. Azman, M.S. (2005). Technology in mathematics: students' perspective. Proceedings of the 1st IMT-Gt Regional Conference on Mathematics, Statistic and Their Applications (IRCMSA 2005), Vol.II, Lake Toba Indonesia, 13- 15 June, 89-101.
[2]. Barton, S. (2000). What does the research say about achievement of students who use calculator technologies and those who do not? Electronic proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual International Conference on Technology in Collegiate Mathematics (ICTCM 2000). Atlanta, GA.
[3]. Looker, E.D. & Thiessen, V. (2003). The digital divide in Canadian schools: factors affecting student access to and use of information technology. Research Data Centres. Ottawa, Canada.
[4]. Haylock, D.W. (1987). A framework for assessing mathematical creativity in school children. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 18(1), 59-74.
[5]. Kassim, S., Ali, R.M., Seth, D.L., Zainuddin, Z., & Ismail, M. (2002). Addressing the issue underlying hand-held technology used in the classroom. Proceeding of the Seventh Asian Technological Conference in Mathematics (ATCM 2002), Melaka, Malaysia, 274-283.
[6]. Koh, T.S., Koh, I.Y.C. & Wu, W.T. (2004). Integration of information technology in Singapore school mathematics curriculum. Proceeding of the Ninth Asian Technology Conference in Mathematics (ATCM 2004), Singapore, 17- 25.
[7]. Mergendoller, J.R. (1997). Technology and learning: the research. The Education Digest, 62(8), 12-15. Ministry of Finance Malaysia. (2006). The 2007 Budget.
[8]. Papanastasiou, E.C., Zembylas, M. & Vrasidas, C. (2003). Can computer use hurt science achievement? The USA results from PISA. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 12(3), 325-332.
[9]. Papanastasiou, E.C., Zembylas, M. & Vrasidas, C. (2004). Reexamining patterns of negative computer-use and achievement relationships. Where and why do they exist? Paper presented at the first IEA International Research Conference. University of Cyprus, Lefkosia, Cyprus.
[10]. Papanastasiou, E.C. & Ferdig, R.E. (2006). Computer use and mathematical literacy. An analysis of existing and potential relationship. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 25(4), 361-371.
[11]. Ravitz, J., Mergendoller, J. & Rush, W. (2002). Cautionary tales about correlations between student computer use and academic achievement. Paper presented at annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA
[12]. Wilson, J.W. (2006). Technology in mathematics teaching and learning. Avai lable onl ine at http://jwilson.coe.uga.edu/Texts.Folder/Tech/Technology.P aper.html. Accessed on 18 December 2006.
[13]. Young, D.J. (1998). Rural and urban differences in student achievement in science and mathematics: a multilevel analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 9(4), 386-418.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.