There has been much literature published about concern over high attrition of students in doctoral programs.  Denecke (2005) published that Pfizer, Inc., is sponsoring a $2 million, three-year study to investigate how to reduce doctoral attrition and increase completion rates. Malmberg (2000) published that approximately 65, 400 doctoral candidates will be lost to attrition across the United States during 2000-2005. Low completion rates of doctoral students’ results in tuition losses to the educational institution, and the doctoral dropout may experience psychological pain of failure and reduced life time earnings (Smallwood, 2004). The nation also receives reduced contributions in the form of tax revenues when doctoral students fail to complete their programs. While some attrition is expected and needed in all educational programs, The Washington Post (2006) published the attrition of students in doctorate programs is estimated to be between 50-60%.  Given the perquisites required to meet admissions standards for acceptance into a doctoral program, this number is high.

Attrition of doctoral students at the rate of 50-60% of those who enter the program, suggests the need to examine alternative strategies within educational institutions in working with doctoral students. The focus this paper is to suggest how incorporating Internet technology might be one alternative in reducing attrition in doctoral programs.

">

Using Technology To Reduce Attrition Of Doctoral Students

Freda Turner*, Godwin Igein**
*Dean of Graduate Studies, Grand Canyon University.
**Dean of Academic Services, Grand Canyon University
Periodicity:January - March'2007
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.3.4.662

Abstract

There has been much literature published about concern over high attrition of students in doctoral programs.  Denecke (2005) published that Pfizer, Inc., is sponsoring a $2 million, three-year study to investigate how to reduce doctoral attrition and increase completion rates. Malmberg (2000) published that approximately 65, 400 doctoral candidates will be lost to attrition across the United States during 2000-2005. Low completion rates of doctoral students’ results in tuition losses to the educational institution, and the doctoral dropout may experience psychological pain of failure and reduced life time earnings (Smallwood, 2004). The nation also receives reduced contributions in the form of tax revenues when doctoral students fail to complete their programs. While some attrition is expected and needed in all educational programs, The Washington Post (2006) published the attrition of students in doctorate programs is estimated to be between 50-60%.  Given the perquisites required to meet admissions standards for acceptance into a doctoral program, this number is high.

Attrition of doctoral students at the rate of 50-60% of those who enter the program, suggests the need to examine alternative strategies within educational institutions in working with doctoral students. The focus this paper is to suggest how incorporating Internet technology might be one alternative in reducing attrition in doctoral programs.

Keywords

Doctoral Programs, Reducing Attrition.

How to Cite this Article?

Freda Turner and Godwin Igein (2007). Using Technology To Reduce Attrition Of Doctoral Students. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 3(4), 48-50. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.3.4.662

References

[1]. Denecke, D. (2005, November). Ph,.D. Completion Project: Preliminary results from baseline data. Retrieved June 10, `, from www.cgsnet.org/
[2].Lovitts, B. (2000). Leaving the Ivory Tower: The Causes and Consequences of Departure from Doctoral Study. Retrieved on June 3, 2006, from http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3860/is_2000 11/ai_n8922845/pg_11
[3]. Malberg, E. (2000). Retention and attrition of doctoral candidates in higher education. Ed.D. dissertation, University of North Texas. Dissertation Abstracts International 63(02A) (2002); AAT 3041915.
[4]. Smallwood, S. (2004, January 16). Doctor Dropout: High Attrition from Ph.D. Programs Is Suckin Away Time, Talent, and Money and Breaking Some Hearts, Too. Chronicle of Higher Education, 50 (19), A10.
[5]. The Dieringer Research Group (2004, September 2). Work at home grows in past year by 7.5% in the U.S. Use of broadband for work at home grows by 84%. Retrieved January 2, 2005, from Http://www.workingfromanywhere.org/news/pr090204.ht
[6]. The Washington Post (2006). As many dropouts as degrees. Retrieved on June 2, 2006, from Http://www.washingtonpost.com/wpDyn/content/article/2 006/04/17/AR2006041701123.html
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Online 15 15

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.