References
[1]. Alexonder, S. ond Hedberg, J. G. 1994. Evaluating
technology-based learning: Which model?. In
Proceedings of the IFlP Tc3/Wg3.2 Working Conference
on the Seign, Implementation and Evaluation of
interacHve Multimedia in University Settings.' Designing
For Change inTeaching and Learning (July 06 - 08, I 994),
pp. 233-244. K Beattie, C. McNaught, and S~ Wills, Eds, IFIP
Transactions, vol. A-59 . Elsevier Science, NewYork, NY.
[2]. Bielefelt, T. (2001). Technology in teacher education:
A closer look, Journal of Technology in Teacher
Education, I 7(4), 40-46.
[3]. Brush, T., Igoe, A., Brinkerhoff, J., Glozewski, K., Ku, H.
& Smith, T. C. (2001). Lessons from the field: Integrating
technology Into preservlce teacher education. Journal
of Computing inTeacher Education, 17(4}, 1620.
[4]. Dolton, S.S. ( I 998) Pedagogy Matters.. Standards for
EffectiveTeaching Practice. University of California, Santa
Cruz: Center for Research on Education, Diversity &
Excellence.
[5]. de Castell, S., Bryson, M., & Jason, J. (2002). Object
lessons: Towards an educational theory of technology.
First Monday, 7(I). Retrieved Oct. 24, 2006 from
htfp://firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_I/casteH/index.htmL
[6]. Dexter, S~ & Riedel, E. (2003). Why improving pre-
service teacher educational technology preparation
must go beyond the college's walls. Journal of Teacher
Education, 54(4), p.p, 334-346.
[7]. Evans, B.R & Gunter, G.A. (2004). A catalyst for
change: Influencing preservice teacher technology
proficiency. Journal of Educational Media & Library
Sciences, 41 (3), 325-336 .
[8]. Faseyitan, J.J. & Hirschbuhl, S.O. (1994). Faculty uses
of computers: Fears, facts and perceptions. THE Journal
21(9), 64-65.
[9]. Gahala, J. (2001). Critical issue: Promoting
technology use in schools. Retrieved Oct. 29, 2006, from
htfp://www,ncrel.org/sdrs/areas/issues/methods/technlgy
/te200.htm
[10]. Garcia, V., Chen, I. (2002). Digital video technology
clips provide a snapshot of urban school settings for
students in teacher preparation programs. Technoiogy
andTeacher EducationAnnual, I , 377-381 .
[11 ]. Goidberg, M.L. (2000). Educational technology and
distance education at UW Bothell:
Initial findings, observations, and recommendations.
Retrieved Oct 30, 2006 from
http://faculty,uwb.edu/mgoldberg/edtech/report,htmL
[12]. Hinds, M.deC. (2002). Teaching as a clinical
profession.' A new challenge for education. New York:
Carnegie,
[13]. Karnes, M. Ray (1999) Technology education in
prospect: Perceptions, change, and the survival of the
profession. Journa/ of Technoiogy Studies, 25(1), I 1-35 .
[14]. Kerr, S. T. (I 996). Toward a sociology of educational
technology. In Jonassen, D.H. (Ed.), Handbook of
research for educational communications and
technoiogy, (pp. 1 43- I 69). NewYork: Simon & Schuster.
.
[15]. Lee, K.T. (2001) Information technology integration in
teacher education: Supporting the paradigm shift in
Hong Kong Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education &
Development, 4( I ), 157-78
[I 6]. Leh, A. (2002). Action research on hybrid courses
and their onHne communities. Educationai Media
international. 39(1), 31-8.
[17]. Leh, A. {2005) Lessons learned from service learning
and reverse mentoring in faculty development: A case
study in technology training Journal of Technology and
Teacher Education, I 3(1), 57-63.
[18]. Levine, A. (2005). Educating school leaders.
Washington, DC: Education Schools Project.
[19]. Liddle, K. (2000, March). Data driven success.
Eiectronic Schooi, I 87(3), 302,
[20]. Marchionini, G. (2003). Video and learning redux:
new capabilities for practical use. Educational
Technoiogy, 43 (2), 36-41
[21]. McCurry, D. (2004). Teacher's self-perception and
self-efficacy of technology integration and professional
development: A qualitative longitudinal study using video
data. In C. Crawford et aL (Eds,), Proceedings of Society
for Information Technoiogy and Teacher Education
int ernati onal Con f er en ce 2 004 , 2 4 8 4 - 2 4 8 9 .
Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
[22]. Moore, J. C. (2002) E/ements of quality: The Sioan-C
framework, Needham, MA: Sloan-Consortium.
[23]. Mortensen, M. & Pemberton, J. (2003). Digital video:
an old medium learns some new tricks. Technoiogy and
Teacher Education Annual, 2, 1 503- 1509.
[24]. Newton, R. (2003). Staff attitudes to the
development and delivery of e-learning, New Library
World, 104(10), 412-425.
[25]. Queitzsch, M. {I 997). The Northwest Regional
Profile.~ Integration of technoiogy in preservice teacher
education programs. Portland, OR: Northwest
EducationalTechnologyConsortium,
[26]. Rossifer, D. & Walters, J.J. (2000). Techno/ogical
literacy: foundations for the 2lst century. Brisbane:
QueenslandUniversityofTechnology.
[27]. Roth, D. and Swail, WS. (2000). Cert!ficat!on and
teacher preparat/on in theUn!ted Stat es. Washington,
DC: Education Schools Project.
.
[28]. Showers, 8. , & Joyce, 8. (1 9 96). The evolution of peer
coaching. Educationa/Leadership, 54 (6), 12- 16
[29]. Stahlke, H.F.W and Nyce, J.M. (I 9 9 6) Reengineering
higher education: Reinventing teaching and learning
CAUSE/EFFECT 19(4), 44-51.
[30]. Sun, J.R. (2004). Turning a regular {face-to-face)
course into a more engaging blended (hybrid) course,
Paper presented at the Ohio Commons for Digital
Education 2004 - The Convergence of Libraries, Learning
andTechnology Conference March 8-9, 2004.
[31]. Surry, D.W & Land, S.M. (2000). Strategies for
motivating higher education faculty to use technology.
/nnovat!ons in Educat!on and Teach/ng Internat/ona/,
37(2), 145 - 153.
[32]. Tharp, R. G. (1997). From at-risk to exce/lence.'
/?esearch, theory and principles for practice. University
of California, Santa Cruz: Center for Research on
Education, Diversity & Excellence.
[33]. Trinkle, D.A. (2005). The 36 I Model for transforming
teaching and learning with technology. Educause
Quarterly, 28(4), 18-25.
[34]. Willis, E. M. (1997). Technology: Integrated into, not
added onto, the curriculum experiences in pre-service
teacher education. Computers in the Schools, I 3(1-2),
I 41 -53.
