References
[1]. Abrohom, R. G. (19 83). Relationship between the use
of the strategy of monitoring and the cognitive style,
Studlesln Second LanguageAcqulsitlon. 6, 17-32.
[2]. Alderson, J. C. (1991). Language testing in the I 9905:
How far have we come? How much further do we have to
go? lnAnivan, I991
[3]. Alptekin, C. , & Atokon, S. (I 990). Field dependence-
independence and hemisphericity as variables in L2
achievement, Second Language Research~ 6(2), I 35-
149 .
[4].Anivon, S. (Ed.). (1991). Current developments in
language testing. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional
LanguageCenter.
[5].8ochmon, L. F. (1990). Fundamental conslderations In
language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press,
[6].8eon, R. E. (1990). Cognit|ve slyles of Korean and
Japanese adulfs learning English in the U.S~ Unpublished
Haters Thesis. [ERIC # : Ed32 I 530]
[7].8iolystok, E., & Fr"6hlich, M. (1978). Variables of
classroom achievement in second language learning.
Modern LanguageJournal. 62(7), 327-336.
[8].8renner, J. (1997). An analysis of students' cognitive
styles in asynchronous distance education courses.
Inquiry, 1( I ), 37-44.
[9].8rown, H. D. (2000). Prlnc\p\es of language learning
and teaching (4th ed.). White Plains, NY.: Addison Wesley
(10).grown, J. D. (1987). Princlples and practices in
second language teaching and learning. Rowley, Mass,:
Prentice Hall.
[11].COnOIe, M. , & Swoin, M. (1980). Theoretical bases of
communication approaches to second language
teaching and testing. Applled L\ngulstics. I ( I ), 47.
[12].Cone, J., Gorton, 8. L., & Roven, M. R. (1992).
Learning styles, teaching styles and personality styles of
preservice teachers of agricultural education. Journa/ of
Agriculfural Educaflon, Spring 1992, 46-52.
[13].Cono, J. , & Gorton, 8. L. (1994). The relationship
between agriculture preservice teachers' learning styles
and performance in a methods of teaching agriculture
course. Journalof Agricultural Education, 35(2), 6- 10.
[14].Cono, J. (1999). The relationship between learning
style, academic major, and academic performance of
college students, Journalof Agricultura\Education,40(1),
30-37.
[15].Correll, R , Prince, M. , & Astiko, G . (1 99 6). Personality
type and language learning in an EFL context.
Language Learning, 46{ I ), 75-99.
[16].Corfer, E. F. (1988). The relationship of field-
dependent/independent cognitive style to Spanish
language achievement and proficiency: a preliminary
report. Modern LanguageJournal. 72, 21-30.
[I7].Chopelle, C. , & Roberts, C. (1986). Ambiguity
tolerance and field independence as predictors of
proficiency in English as a second language, Language
Learnlng. 36, 27-45,
[I8]. Choppelle, C . A. ( I 99 2). Disembedding
"Disembedded figures in the landscape": An appraisal of
Griffiths and Sheen's "Reappraisal of L2 research on field
dependence/independence." App/led Linguistics, 13(4),
375-384.
[19].Choppelle, C. A., & Green, R (I 992). Field
independence/dependence in second-language
acquisition research. LanguageLearning, 42{ I ), 47-83,
[20].Cohen, J. (1988). Stafistlcal power analysis for the
behavioral sciences, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum,
