References
[1]. Anderson, R. E., & Dexter, S. (2005). School
Technology leadership: An empirical investigation of
prevalence and effect, Educational Administration
Quarterly, 41(1), 49-82
[2]. Becker, H. J. (2001, April). How are Teachers using computers in instruction. Paper presented at the meeting
of the American Education Research Association. Retrieved April 3, 2004 From http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/
FINDINGS/special3/How_Are_Teachers_Using.pdf.
[3]. Becker, H. J., & Riel, M. M. (2000). Teacher
professional engagement and constructivist—compatible
computer use. [Report no. 7). Irvine, CA: Teaching,
Learning, and Computing.Retrieved October 25, 2004
from www.crito. uci.edu/tlc/finds/report_7/.
[4]. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L., &Cocking, R. R. (2000).
How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
[5]. Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). In search of understanding: The case for constructivist classrooms.
Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and
Curriculum Development.
[6]. Brown, J. S., & Duguid, R (2000). The social life of information. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
[7]. Burns, M. (2002, December). From compliance to
commitment: Technology as a catalyst for communities
of learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(4), 295-302.
[8]. Business-Higher Education Forum. (2005, January).A
commitment to America's future.' Responding to the
Crisis in Mathematics and Science Education.
Washington, DC.
[9]. Capra, E (1996). The web of life. New York: Anchor
Book by Doubleday.
[10]. Cafe, J. M., Vaughn, C. A., &O' Hair, M. J., (January,
2006). A 17-year case study of an elementary school's
journey: From traditional school to learning community to
democratic school community. Journal of School
Leadership, 16, 86-111 .
[11]. CEO Forum on Education & Technology. (2001,
March). Education Technology must be included in
comprehensive education legislation. Washington, DC:
CEO Forum on Education & Technology.
[12]. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the
behavioral sciences. (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Lawrence
Erlbaum
[13]. Cradler, J., McNabb, M., Freeman, M., & Burchell,
R., (2002). How does technology influence student
learning? Learning & Leading with technology, 29(8), 46-
49.
[14]. Cuban, L. (2001). Oversold and underused:
Computers in the classroom. United States: President and
Fellows of Harvard College.
[15]. Culp, K. M., Honey, M., & Mandinach, E. (2003). A retrospective on twenty years of education technology
policy (ED—01-CO—0026/0017). Washington, DC: Office of
Educational Technology.
[16]. DeBell, M., & Chapman, C. (2006). Computer and
internet use by students in 2003 (NCES 2006065). U.S.
Department of Education. Washington, DC: National
Cenfer for Education Statistics.
[17]. Dwyer, D., Ringstaff, C., & Sandholtz, J. (1991 , May).
Changes in teachers‘ beliefs and practices in technology-rich classrooms. Educational Leadership,
48(8), 45-52.
[18]. Edtech report: The sustainability challenge. (2003,
March). Digital divide network. Washington, DC: Benton
Foundation.
[19]. Education Oversight Board. (2003). Oklahoma
educational indicators program: School report card.
Oklahoma City, OK: Office of Accountability Retrieved on
February 10, 2005 from http://schoolreportcard.org.
[20]. Education Oversight Board. (2004). Oklahoma
educational indicators program: School report card.
Oklahoma City, OK: Office of Accountability. Retrieved on
February 10, 2005 from http://schoolreportcard.org.
[21]. Elmore, R. F. (2000). Building a new structure for
school leadership. Washington, DC: Albert Shanker
Institute.
[22]. Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a culture of change.
San Francisco, CA: Jossey—Bass.
[23]. Fullan, M. (2003). Changing forces with a
vengeance. NewYork: FoutledgeFalmer.
[24]. Hall, G., & Hord, S. (1987). Change in schools:
Facilitating the process. Albany, NY: State University of
New York Press.
[25]. Hall, G., & Hord, S. (2001). Implementing change.
Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
[26]. Hamlin, G. (2007). An evaluation report to the
Oklahoma Educational Technology Trust concerning
sustainability of Grants to Schools. Oklahoma City, OK:
OETT.
[27]. Hord, S. (2004). Professional learning communities:
An overview. In Hord, S.M. (Ed), Learning together leading
together: Changing schools through professional
learning communities. (pp.5—14). New York: Teachers
College Press.
[28]. Hord, S. M., Meehan, M. L., Orletsky, S., & Sattes, B.
(1999). Assessing a school staff as a community of
professional learners. Issues About Change, 7(1). Austin,
TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
[29]. King, M. B., & Newmann, F. M. (2000). Will teacher
learning advance school goals? Phi Delta Kappan, 81 (8),
576-580.
[30]. Knapp, M. S., Copland, M. A., Ford, B. Markholt, A.
McLauglin, M., Milliken, M., et al. (2003). Leading for learning sourcebook: Concepts and examples.
Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and
Improvement.
[31]. Ladner, M.D. (2001). Comparison of web-based and
traditional paper based survey methodologies. Starkville,
MS: Mississippi State University.
[32]. Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1994). Restructuring high
schools for equity and excellence: What works. New York:
Teachers College Press.
[33]. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry.
Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
[34]. Loucks-Horsley, 8., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., &
Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional
development for teachers of science and mathematics.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press, Inc.
[35]. Meehan, M. L., Orletsky, S. R., & Sattes, B. (1997).
Field test of an instrument measuring the concept of
professional learning communities in school.
Charleston, WV: Appalachia Educational Laboratory.
[36]. Middleton, B. M., & Murray, R. K. (1999). The impact
of instructional technology on student academic
achievement in reading and mathematics. [Electronic
version]. International Journal of Instructional Media,
26(1),109-117.
[37]. Morrissey, M. S. (2000). Professional learning
communities: An ongoing exploration. Austin, TX:
Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
[38]. National Center for Education Statistics [NCES].
(2000, September). Teachers‘ tools for the 24" century,
(NCES 2000-102). U.S. Department of Education.
Washington, DC: Notional Center for Education Statistics.
[39]. Newmann, F. M., King, M. B., & Youngs, p. (2000,
August). Professional development that addresses school
capacity: Lessons from urban elementary schools.
American Journal of Education, 108, 259-299.
[40]. Newmann, F. M., & Wehlage, G. G. (1995).
Successful school restructuring: A report to the public and
educators. Madison, WI: Center on Organization and
Restructuring of Schools. University of Wisconsin Systems.
[41]. O'Hair, M.J., McLaughlin, H. J., & Reitzug, U. C.
(2000). Foundations of democratic education. Orlando,
FL: Harcourt, Inc.
[42]. Porter. P (2005, June). A vision for school
improvement. SEDL Letter. Austin, TX: Southwest
Educational Development Laboratory.
[43]. Printy, S. M. (2004, Winter). The professional impact
of communities of practice. UCEA Review, XLVI (1 ), 20-23.
[44]. Punch, K. F. (2003). Survey research: The basics.
Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications, Inc.
[45]. Riel, M., & Fulton, K. (2001, March). The role of
technology in supporting learning communities. Phi Delta
Kappan,82(7), 518-526.
[46]. Roschelle, J., Pea, R., Hoadley, C., Gordin, D., &
Means, B. (2000, Fall/Winter). Changing how and what
children learn in school with computer—based
technologies [Electronic version]. The Future of Children
Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 76-97.
[47]. Ross, J. D., McGraw, T. M., & Burdette, K. J. (2003).
Towards an effective use of technology in education: A
summaryofresearch. Charleston, WV: AEL.
[48]. Schacter, J. (1999). The impact of education
technology on student achievement: What the most
current research has to say. Milken Exchange on
Education Technology. Santa Monica, CA: The Milken
FamilyFoundation.
[49]. Senge, F: M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and
practice of the learning organization. New York:
Currency Doubleday.
[50]. Senge, P M. (2000). Schools that learn: A fifth
discipline fieldbook for educator, parents, and everyone
who cares about education. New York: Doubleday
Currency.
[51]. Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
(2003). Technology integration. Austin, TX: Southwest
Educational Development Laboratory.
[52]. Sparks, D., & Hirsh, S. (1997). A new vision for staff
development. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development
Council.
[53]. Spillane, J. Fr, Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (1999).
Toward a theory of leadership practice: A distributed
perspective (A working pa per). Northwestern University.
[54]. Sun, P. Y. T., & Scott, J. L. (2003). Exploring the
divide—organizational learning and learning organization.
The Learning Organization. Evanston, IL: 10(4), 202-216.
[55]. Technology counts 2001 : The new divides. (May 5,
2002) [Electronic version]. Education Week. Bethesda,
MD: Editorial Projects in Education Research Center.
[56]. Technology Standards for School Administrators
Collaborative [TSSA Collaborative]. (2001). Naperville, IL:
North Central Regional Technology in Education
Consortium.
[57]. U.S. Department of Labor. (2006-2007). Computer
Scientists and Database Administrators. [Electronic
version]. Bureau of Labor Statistics Occupational Outlook
Handout. Washington, DC: Office of Occupational
Statistics and Employment Projections.
[58]. Waters, T., Marzano, R. J., & McNulty, B. (2003).
Balanced leadership: What 30 years of research tells us
about the effect of leadership on student achievement (A
working paper). Mid—continent Regional Education
Laboratory.
[59]. Waxman, H. C., Lin, M. F., & Michko, G. M. (2003). A
meta-analysis of the effectiveness of teaching and
learning with technology on student outcomes (Gov
contract No. ED—01-CO—0011). Naperville, IL: Learning
Point Associates. U. S. Department of Education.
[60]. Weick, K. (1979). The social psychology of
organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley Publishing
Company.
[61]. Wenglinsky, H. (2005, December/2006, January).
Technology and achievement: The bottom line.
Educational Leadership, 63 (4), 29-32.
[62]. Williams, L. A. Atkinson, L.C., Cate, J.M., &
O’Hair, M. J. (2008). Mutually supportive relationships
between learning community development and
technology integration: The impact on school practices
and student achievement. Theory into Practice.