References
[I ]. Ames, C. (I 992). Classrooms: Gools, structures, ond
student mofivofion. Journal of Educational Psychology,
84, 261-271.
.
[2]. Ames, C. , & Archer, J. ( I 988). Achievement goois in
the clossroom: Gools, structures, ond student mofivofion.
Journal of Educational Psychology 80, 260-267
[3]. 8lood, E., & Neel, R. (2008). Using student response
systems In lecture-bosed instruction: Does it chonge
student engogemenf ond looming? Journal of
Technology andTeacher Education, 16(3), 375-383,
[4]. 8oekarfs, M. , Pinfrich, R R. , & Zeidner, M. {Eds.) (2000).
Handbook of se/f-regulation. Son Diego, CA: Academic
Press.
[5]. Dick, W., Carey, L. M., & Carey, J. O. (2005). The
sysfemofic design of instruction. (6th Ed,) New Research,
53(4), 445-459.
[6]. Draper, S. W., & grown, M. I. (2004). Increosing
inferocfivify in lectures using on electronic voting system.
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(2), 8 I -94.
[7]. Dweck, C. S., & Leggeff, E. L. (1988). A sociol-
cognitive opprooch to moffvoflon ond personolify,
PsychologicalReview, 95, 256-273
,
[8]. Foster, A. L. {2005, June 24). Mork essoys
elecfronicolly: A professor uses fob|et PC's in o
composition course. The Chronicle of Higher Education,
p. 818.
[9]~ Gagne, R. M. {I 985). Condifions of /earning, (4th Ed.)
NewYork: Holt, Rinehort, ond Winston.
[ I 0]. Gray, R. (2002). Assessing students' written projects,
NewDirections forTeachingandLearning, 91, 37-42.
[ I I ]. Helme, S. , & Clarke, D. J. (2001). Cognitive
engogemenf in the mofhemoflcs ciossroom, In D~ Clorke
(Ed.), Perspectives on practice and meaning in
mathematics and science c/assrooms (pp, I 31- I 54).
Dordrechf : Kluwer.
[12]. Jdrveld, S., Veermans, M., & Leinonen, R (2008).
Invesfigofing student engogemenf in compufer-
supported inquiry: A process-oriented onolysls, Socia/
Psychology of Educafion, 11(3), 299-322~
[13]. Jennings, S. E. , & McCuller, M~ Z. (2004). Meeting the
challenges of grading online business communication
assignments. Poper presented of the 69h Annuol
Convention: Associofion for 8uslness Communlcoflon,
Combridge, Mossochuseffs. Retrieved July 24, 2008,
from hff p:/ /www. businesscommunicof ion, org
/convenfions/ Proceedings/ 2004/ PDFs/02A8C04.PDF
[ I 4]. Klinger, T., & Connef, E. (I 992). Designing disfonce
looming courses for crlficol thinking. TH.E. Journal, 20(3).
[ I 5]. Lopez-Herrejon, R., & Schulman, M. (2004). Using
inferocfive technology in o short jOvO course: An
experience report. ACM S/GCSE Bulletin, Proceedings of
the 91h Annual SIGCSE Conference on Innovation and
Technology in Computer Science Education,
(pp. 203-207), Leeds, UK.
[ I 6]. Montgomery, H. , Sharon, R , & Haman, L. (2004).
Engoging In ocfivifies involving informofion technology:
Dimensions, modes, ond flow. Human Factors, 46,
334-348.
[ I 7]. Morris, L. V. , Finnegan, C. , & Wu, S. (2005). Trocking
student behovior, persistence, ond ochievemenf in
online courses. /nternet and Hlgher EducaHon, 8,
221-231
[I 8]. Nachmias, R. (2002). Research framework for the
study of a campus-wide web-based academic
instruction project. /nternet and Hlgher Educat!on, 5,
213-229,
[I 9]. Nachmias, R., & Segev, L. (2003). Students' use of
content in Web-supported academic courses. /nternet
and Hlgher Education, 6, 145-157,
[20]. Poled, A., & Rashly, D. (1999). Logging for success:
Advancing the use of WWW logs to improve computer
mediated distance learning Journal of Educatlonal
ComputingResearch, 21, 413-431~
[2 I ]. Pintrich, R , & De Groot, E. (1990). Motivated and self-
regular ed learning com ponents of academic
performance~ Journal of Educational Psychology 82,
33-40.
[22]. Reed, J~ L., Hagen, A. S. , Wicker, F W , & Schallerf, D.
L. ( I 996). Engagement as a temporal dynamic: Affective
factors in studying for exams. Journal of Educat!onal
Psychology 88( I ), 101-109 .
[23]. Reed, J. H., Schallert, D. L., & Deithloff, J. F. (2002).
Investigating self-regulation and engagement
processes~ Educational Psycholog!st, 37(1), 53-57~
[24]. Skinner, E. A., & Belmont, M. J. (I 993). Motivation in
the classroom: Reciprocal effects of teacher behavior
and student engagement across the school year~ Journa/
of Educational Psychology 85, 57 I -58 I .
[25]. Sloan Consortium (2006). Making the grade.' Onl!ne
educatlon in theUnited States, 2006 ,
[26]. Smialek, T., & Boburka, R. R. (2006). The effects of co-
operative listening exercises on the critical listening skills of
college music-appreciation students, Joumal of
Research in Music Educat!on, 54(1), 57-72.
[27]. Steinweg, S. 8~, Williams, S. C., Warren, S~ H. (2006).
Reaching through the screen: Using a tablet PC to provide
feedback in oniine classes. Rural Speclal Education
Quarterly, 25(2), 8-12.
[28]. Wallace, T., Grinnell, L., Carey, L., & Carey, J. (2006).
Maximizing learning from rehearsal activity in web-based
distance learning. Journal of lnteracHve Learning
Research, 17(3), 319-327.
[29]. Zaiane, O. R., Luo, J. (2001). Towards evaluating
learners' behavior in a web-based distance learnlng
env!ronment, Available online at http://www~cs.uaiberta
.ca/~zaiane/postscript/icalt.p.
