References
[1]. Bennett, R.E. (2002). Using Electronic Assessment to
Measure Student Performance. State Education
Standard, Washington, DC: National State Boards of
Education. Retrieved Februar y 1, 2005 from
http://www.nasb.org/standard/10_summer2002/bennett.
pdf.
[2]. Bridgeman, B., Lennon, M.L., & Jackenthal, A. (2001).
Effects of Screen Size, Screen Resolution, and
Display Rate on Computer-Based Test Performances (ETS
RR-01-23). Educational Testing Service, Princeton, NJ.
[3]. 25th Annual Report to congress on the
Implementation of the Individuals with Disabilities
Education Act to Ensure the Free Appropriate Public
Education of All Children with Disabilities. (2005).
Washington, DC: Office of Special Education and
Rehabilitative Services.
[4]. Editors (Ed.). (2003). Tech's Answer to Testing.
Education Week, 22(35).
[5]. Glassnapp, D.R., Poggio, J., Poggio, A., & Yang, X.
(2005) . Student Attitudes and Perception
Regarding Computerized Testing and the
Relationship to Performance in Large-Scale Assessment
Programs. Paper presented at Annual meeting of
National Council on Measurement in Education,
Montreal, Canada.
[6]. Hasselbring, T. S., & Bausch, M. E. (2006). Assistive
Technologies for Reading. Educational Leade r s h ip,
63, 72-75.
[7]. Higgins, J., Russell, M., & Hoffman, T. (2005).
Examining the Effect of Computer-Based Passage
Presentation on Reading Test Performance. Journal of
Technology, Learning and Assessment 3(4).
[8]. Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, PL 101-476.
(1990). Title 20, U.S.C. 1400 et seq,:U.S. Statutes at Large
(pp. 1103-1151). Washington, DC: U.S. Government
Printing Office.
[9]. Ito, K. & Sykes, R.C. (2004). Comparability of Scores
from Norm-Referenced Paper-and-Pencil and webbased
linear tests for grades 4-12. Paper presented at
Annual meeting of American Educational Research
Association, San Diego, Ca.
[10]. Johnson, M. & Green, S. (2004). On-Line Assessment:
The Impact of Mode on Students' Strategies, Perceptions
and Behaviors. Paper presented at Annual meeting of
British Educational Research Association, Manchester,
Great Britain.
[11]. McHenry, B., Griffith, L., & McHenry, J. (2004). The
Potential Pitfalls and Promises of Computerized Testing. T H
E Journal, 31(9), 28-31.
[12]. National Joint Committee on Learning Disabilities.
(1991). Learning Disabilities: Issues on Definition. ASHA,
33(5), 18-20.
[13]. National Assistive Technology Research Institute
(NATRI). (2005). [Assistive Technology State Case Studies].
Unpublished raw data.
[14]. Olson, A. (2001). Data-Based Change: Using
Assessment Data to Improve Education. MultiMedia
Schools, 8(3): 38-43.
[15]. O'Malley, K. J., Kirkpatrick, R., Sherwood., Burdick,
H. J., Hsieh, M.C., Sanford, E.E. (2005). Comparability of a
Paper-Based and Computer-Based Reading Test in Early
Elementary Grades. Paper presented at American
educational Research Association Division D Graduate
Student Seminar, Montreal Canada.
[16]. Richardson, M., Baird, J., Rudgway, J. Ripley, M.,
Shorrocks-Taylor, D., & Swan, M. (2002). Challenging
Minds? Students' Perceptions of Computer-Based World
Class Tests of Problem-Solving. Computers and Human
Behavior, 18(6), 633-649.
[17]. Sim, G. & Horton, M. (2005). Performance and
Attitude of Children in Computer Based Versus Paper
Based Testing. Available at http://www.uclan.
ac.uk/facs/destech/compute/staff/read/publish/chici/ref
erences/performanceand attitude.pdf.
