Parent Perceptions of the Efficacy of Electronic School-Home Communication Methods Used by the Faculty and Administration of a Rural High School in Southern Georgia

Arlie Parker III*, Dana Sparkman**
* Secondary Mathematics Teacher, Berrien County School system.
** Assistant Professor in Early childhood Education, Georgia Southern University.
Periodicity:September - November'2008
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.4.2.621

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine parent perceptions of the efficacy of the use of three forms of electronic school-home communication used by faculty and staff in a rural high school in southern Georgia - e-mail, PowerSchool, and School Messenger. An anonymous survey instrument containing Likert scale questions, yes/no questions, and open-ended questions was completed by parents of students in the school. Surveys were returned by 354 of the 879 potential participants. Data were analyzed descriptively, and open-ended responses were analyzed qualitatively to identify common themes. Respondents gave overall favorable reviews to School Messenger, but found accessibility to current grades in PowerSchool to be lacking. Participants also indicated that e-mail was effective and appropriate, but cited that teachers in the school rarely used this medium of communication.

Keywords

Educational Technology,Home-School Communication,Parent Involvement.

How to Cite this Article?

Arlie Parker III and Dana Sparkman (2008). Parent Perceptions of the Efficacy of Electronic School-Home Communication Methods Used by the Faculty and Administration of a Rural High School in Southern Georgia. i-manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology. 4(2), 40-54. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.4.2.621

References

[1]. Bauch, J.P. (1994). Voice-based technology for parent involvement: Results and effects. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University.
[2]. Bauch, J.P. (1997). Dialogue and communication between school and home. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. Ed416981)
[3]. Beghetto, R.A. (2001, September-October). Virtually in the middle: Alternative avenues for parental involvement in middle-level schools. The Clearing House, 75 (1), 21.
[4]. Beverly, D. (2003). Making the connection with parents. School Business Affairs, 69(4), 15-17.
[5]. Bird, K. (2006). Student information systems: how do you spell parental involvement? S-I-S. T.H.E. Journal 33(7), 38-42.
[6]. Bushweller, K. (2005). Got mail? Teacher Magazine, 17(3), 49.
[7]. Cameron, C.A. & Lee, K. (1997). Bridging the gap between home and school with voice-mail technology. Journal of Education Research, 90, 182-190.
[8]. Center for the Study of Educational Policy (2004). School-home Communication: Using Technology to Enhance Parental Involvement. Normal, IL: Illinoise State University, Author.
[9]. D'Orio, W. (2000). Moving the classroom into the living room. Curriculum Administrator, 36(8), 44-47.
[10]. Epstein, M.H., Munk, D.D., Bursuck, W.D., Polloway, E.A., & Jayanthi, M. (1999). Strategies for improving home-school communication about homework for students with disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 33, 166-176.
[11] . Freytag, C. E . (2001) . Teacher -parent communication: Starting the year off right. Orlando: University of Central Florida.
[12]. Goals 2000: Educate America Act, Pub. L. No. 103- 227, § 2, 108 Stat. 128 (1994).
[13]. Hartman, D.M. & Chesley, G. (1997). When problems arise at school: How schools and parents can work together. NASSP Bulletin, 81(591), 81-84.
[14]. Jacobsen, L. (2005). E-mail opens lines of communication for teachers. Education Week, 24(30), 8.
[15]. Johnson, K.F. (1999). Parents as partners: Building positive home-school relationships. The Educational Forum, 63(2), 121-126.
[16]. Nelms, E.L. (n.d.). The effects of a teacher-created web page on parent communication: An action research study. Retrieved May 29, 2006, from http://classkey.com/classkey/documentation/nelms.pdf.
[17]. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425-1516 (2002)
[18]. Plevyak, L.H., & Heaston, A. (2001). The communicat ions t r iangle of parent s, school administrators, and teachers: A workshop model. Education 121(4), 768-772.
[19]. Ramirez, F. (2001). Technology and parental involvement. The Clearing House, 75 (1), 30-31.
[20]. Rogers, R.R.H. & Wright, V.H. (2007, June). You've got mail: using technology to communicate with parents. Paper presented at the National Educational Computing Conference, Atlanta, GA.
[21]. Strom, P.S. & Strom, R.D. (2002-2003). Teacherparent communication reforms. High School Journal, 86(2), 14-21.
[22]. The benefits of School Messenger. (n.d.). Retrieved May 23, 2006, from http://school messenger. Com/ benefits.html
[23]. Trejos, N. (2000). Internet makes kids' grades and open book: Web sites help parents track students' progress. The Washington Post, p.C1.
[24]. Vaden-Kiernan, N., McManus, J., & Chapman, C. (2005). Parent and family involvement in education: 2002-03. United States Department of Education, National Center for Educational Statistics.
[25]. Web-based student information system simplifies records management. (2000). THE Journal, 27(10), 92-93.
[26]. Williams, S.M. (n.d.). Technology and communitycentered learning. Retrieved November 18, 2007 from http://www.indiana-etc.org/pdfs%5CEngaging-the- Community-and-Families-through-EdTech.pdf
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.