Feelings of Challenge and Threat among Pre-Service Teachers Studying in Different Learning Environments - Virtual Vs. Blended Courses

Orit Zeichner*, Gila Cohen Zilka**
* Lecturer and Researcher, Department of Educational Technology, Kibbutzim College of Education Technology and the Arts, Bar Ilan University, Israel.
** Director, Department for Teaching Social Studies and Communication, Bar-Ilan University, Israel.
Periodicity:April - June'2016
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.13.1.6014

Abstract

This study focused on feelings of threat and challenge among pre-service teachers in different learning environments – virtual and blended courses. The two goals of this study were (1) to define the subjects' feelings in virtual and blended learning environments, and the relationship between them, and (2) to examine how their feelings changed between the beginning and end of either type of course. A sense of ‘threat and challenge’ points to the pre-service teachers' reaction to their learning environment and its characteristics, and reflects their ability to cope with the learning process, satisfaction, and perseverance. This quantitative study included 578 participants, who filled out questionnaires at the beginning and end of each course. Three major factors were found to describe their perception of the situation: negative feelings, sense of threat, and sense of challenge. A positive relationship was found between sense of threat and negative feelings, and a negative relationship was found between sense of challenge and negative feelings. Significant interactions were found for situation perceptions of both learning environments. Participants in the virtual course exhibited less negative feelings at its end. A similar result was found for sense of threat. In contrast, the students' sense of challenge increased by the end of the virtual course. These findings support the view that negative feelings and threat among students in virtual courses can be improved by means of cognitive strategies and meaningful effectiveness.

Keywords

Threat, Challenge, Distance Learning, Online Learning, Virtual Course, Blended Course, Pre-Service Teachers

How to Cite this Article?

Zeichner, O., and Zilka, G. (2016). Feelings of Challenge and Threat among Pre-Service Teachers Studying in Different Learning Environments - Virtual Vs. Blended Courses. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, 13(1), 7-19. https://doi.org/10.26634/jet.13.1.6014

References

[1]. Allen, I.E., & Seaman, J. (2011). Going the Distance: Online Education in the United States. Wellesley, MA: Babson Survey Research Group.
[2]. Ames, C. (1992). “Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation”. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 84, pp. 261-271.
[3]. Anderson, M.D. (2001). “Individual characteristics and web-based courses”. In C. R. Wolfe (Ed.), Learning and Teaching on the World Wide Web, pp. 45-72. San Diego: Academic Press.
[4]. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). “Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context”. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, Vol. 5(2), pp. 1-17.
[5]. Muntajeeb Ali Baig (2011). “A Critical Study of Effectiveness of Online Learning on Students' Achievement”. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 7(4), Jan-Mar 2011, Print ISSN 0973-0559, E-ISSN 2230-7125, pp.28-34.
[6]. Baran, E., Correia, A.P., & Thompson, A. (2011). “Transforming online teaching practice: Critical analysis of the literature on the roles and competencies of online teachers”. Distance Education, Vol. 32(3), pp. 421-439.
[8]. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A.L., & Cocking, R.R. (1999). How People Learn: Brain, Mind, Experience, and School. National Academy Press.
[9]. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). “Feedback and Selfregulation Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis”. Review of Educational Research, Vol. 65(3), pp. 245-281.
[10]. Chauhan, S., Naseem, A., & Rashwan, E. (2016). “Developing a Quality Checklist for Designing Blended Learning Course Content”. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, Vol. 6(3), pp. 224.
[11]. Chen, Y. J., & Willits, F. K. (1998). “Dimensions of educational transactions in a videoconferencing learning environment”. American Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 13(1), pp. 1-21.
[12]. Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1999). “Development and adaptations of the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education”. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, Vol. 80, pp. 75-81.
[13]. Gina Cicco (2015). “Virtual Learning and Instructional Tools: Perfecting the Weekly Roadmap”. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 12(2), Jul-Sep 2015, Print ISSN: 0973-0559, E-ISSN: 2230-7125, pp.1-6.
[14]. Compton, L., Davis, N., & Correia, A. P. (2010). “Pre-service teachers' preconceptions, misconceptions, and concerns about virtual schooling”. Distance Education, Vol. 31 (1), pp. 37-54.
[15]. Dweck, C.S. (2006). Mindset. New York: Random House.
[16]. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2001). “Critical thinking, cognitive presence and computer conferencing in distance education”. American Journal of Distance Education, Vol. 15(1), pp. 50-71.
[17]. Garrison, R., & Kanuke, H. (2004). “Blended learning: Uncovering its transformative potential in higher education”. The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 7, pp. 95-105.
[18]. Angela M. Gibson, Lori Kupczynski and Phil Ice (2010). “Student Success in Top 20 Courses of an Online Institution: Demographic Differences in a Multi-Semester Cross-Curricular Study ”. i-manager ’s Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 7(2), Jul-Sep 2010, Print ISSN 0973-0559, E-ISSN 2230-7125, pp.18-27.
[19]. Groen, J., & Li, Q. (2005). “Achieving the benefits of blended learning within a fully online learning environment: A focus on synchronous communication”. Educational Technology, Vol. 45(6), pp. 31-37.
[20]. Herold, F., & Waring, M. (2016). “An investigation of pre-service teachers' learning in physical education teacher education: Schools and university in partnership”. Sport, Education and Society, pp. 1-13.
[21]. Holmberg, B. (1989). Theory and Practice of Distance Education. London: Routledge.
[22]. Irani, T., Telg, R., Scherler, C., & Harrington, M. (2003). “Personality type and its relationship to distance education student's course perceptions and performance”. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, Vol. 4(4), pp. 445-453.
[23]. Jacka, L. (2015). “Virtual worlds in pre- service teacher education: the introduction of virtual worlds in pre-service teacher education to foster innovative teaching-learning processes”. (Doctoral Dissertation, Southern Cross University Lismore, NSW).
[25]. Keegan, D. (2000). Distance Training [Electronic Resource]: Taking Stock at a Time of Change. London: Routledge.
[26]. Keller, J.M., & Kopp, T.W. (1987). “An application of the ARCS model of motivational design”. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Instructional Designs for Computer Courseware (pp. 289-320). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum Publisher.
[28]. Koehn, P.H., & Rosenau, J.N. (2015). Transnational Competence: Empowering Curriculums for Horizon-rising Challenges. Routledge.
[29]. Kramarski, B. & Zeichner, O. (2001). “Using technology to enhance mathematical reasoning: Effects of feedback and self-regulation learning”. Educational Media International, Vol. 38(2/3), pp. 77-82.
[30]. Lori Kupczynski, Marie-Anne Mundy and Alberto Ruiz, (2013). “A Comparison Of Traditional And Cooperative Learning Methods In Online Learning”. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, Vol.10(2), Jul-Sep 2013, Print ISSN 0973-0559, E-ISSN 2230-7125, pp.21-28 .
[31]. Lazarus, R. S. (2000). “Toward better research on coping”. American Psychologist, Vol. 55(6), pp. 665-673.
[32]. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal and Coping. New York: Springer.
[33]. Linnenbrink, E. A. (2006). “Emotion research in education: Theoretical and methodological perspectives on the integration of affect, motivation, and cognition”. Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 18, pp. 307-314.
[34]. Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and Personality. New York: Harper and Row.
[35]. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). “Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning”. Educational Psychologist, Vol. 38(1), pp. 43-52.
[36]. McGuire, L. (2005). “Assessment using new technology”. Innovation in Education and Teaching International, Vol. 42(3), pp. 265-276.
[37]. McLinden, M., McCall, S., Hinton, D., & Weston, A. (2006). “Participation in online problem-based learning: Insights from postgraduate teachers studying through open and distance education”. Distance Education, Vol. 27(3), pp. 331-353.
[38]. McLoughlin, C., & Lee, M. J. (2007). “Social software and participatory learning: Pedagogical choices with technology affordances in the Web 2.0 era”. In ICT: Providing Choices for Learners and Learning, Proceedings Ascilite Singapore 2007, pp. 664-675.
[39]. Moore, J. L., Dickson-Deane, C., & Galyen, K. (2011). “E-Learning, online learning, and distance learning environments: Are they the same?” The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 14(2), pp. 129-135.
[40]. Moore, M. G. (1993). “Theory of transactional distance”. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical Principles of Distance Education, pp. 22-38. London, New York: Routledge.
[41]. Moore, M.G. (2007). “The Theory of Transactional Distance”. In M.G. Moore (Ed.) (2007) The Handbook of Distance Education, Second Edition. Mahwah, N.J. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 89-108.
[42]. Moore, M.G. (Ed.) (2012). The Handbook of Distance Education. Third Edition. New York: Routledge.
[43]. Moore, M.G., & G. Kearsley, (2012). Distance rd Education: A Systems View, 3 Edition. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.
[44]. Mory, E. H. (1996). “Feedback Research”. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology, Chap. 32, pp. 919-955. New York: Simon & Schuster MacMillan.
[45]. Offir, B., Barth, I., & Zeichner, O. (2009). “Online Collaborative Learning: The Challenge of Change”. Personality Assessment: New Research Editor, In L. B. Palcroft & M. V Lopez (Eds.), Lauren B. Palcroft and Melissa V. Lopez ISBN: 978-160692-796-02009, pp. 335-345. New York: Nova Science Research Grants.
[46]. Melissa A. Parenti (2013). “Student Perceptions of Asynchronous and Synchronous Web Based Tools and Perceived Attainment of Academic Outcomes”. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 9(4), Jan-Mar 2013, Print ISSN 0973-0559, E-ISSN 2230-7125, pp. 8-14.
[48]. Pintrich, P. R. (2000). “Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement”. Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 92, pp. 544-555.
[49]. Platt, C. A., Raile, A. N. W., & Yu, N. (2013). “Virtually the same? Student perceptions of the equivalence of online classes vs. face-to-face classes”. Paper presented at The Annual Conference of the National Communication Association, Washington, DC.
[50]. Rhonda Puckett (2013). “Educational Technology and its Effective Use”. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, Vol.10(3), Oct-Dec 2013, Print ISSN 0973-0559, E-ISSN 2230-7125, pp. 6-11.
[51]. Ringler, I., Schubert, C., Deem, J., Flores, J., Friestad- Tate, J., & Lockwood, R. (2015). “Improving the Asynchronous Online Learning Environment Using Discussion Boards”. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, Vol.12(1), Apr-Jun 2015, Print ISSN: 0973-0559, E-ISSN: 2230-7125, pp.15-27.
[52]. Rocca, K. A. (2010). “Student participation in the college classroom: An extended multidisciplinary literature review”. Communication Education, Vol. 59, pp. 185-213.
[53]. Schrum, L., Davis, N. E., Jacobsen, M., Lund, A., Ferhan Odabasi, H., Voogt, J., & Way, J. (2015). “A Global st Perspective: Current Trends and Issues in ICT for 21 Century Education”. Paper presented at The Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, 16-20 April, 2015, Chicago, USA.
[54]. Squires, D. R. (2014). “M-Learning: Implications in Learning Domain Specificities, Adaptive Learning, Feedback, Augmented Reality, and the Future of Online Learning”. i-manager's Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 11(3), pp. 1.
[55]. Suprabha. K and G. Subramonian, (2015). “Blended Learning Approach for Enhancing Students Learning Experiences in a Knowledge Society”. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 11(4), Jan-Mar 2015, Print ISSN: 0973-0559, E-ISSN: 2230-7125, pp. 1-7.
[56]. Raji Swaminathan and Thalia M. Mulvihill, (2013). “Graduate Students' Perceptions of Online Discussions: Implications For Instructors”. i-manager’s Journal of Educational Technology, Vol. 10(3), Oct-Dec 2013, Print ISSN 0973-0559, E-ISSN 2230-7125, pp. 27-34.
[57]. Van Rooij, S. W., & Zirkle, K. (2016). “Balancing pedagogy, student readiness and accessibility: A case study in collaborative online course development”. The Internet and Higher Education, Vol. 28, pp. 1-7.
[58]. Whipp, J. L., & Lorentz, R. A. (2009). “Cognitive and social help giving in online teaching: An exploratory study”. Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 57(2), pp. 169-192.
[59]. Zilka, G. (2014). Empowering Educators and Mentors in the Social Media Age – The Three Element Way. Butan- Galim (Hebrew).
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.