References
[1]. Bærentsen, K. B. & J. Trettvik (2002). An Activity Theory
Approach to Affordance. Proceedings of the second
Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction. ACM Press, pp. 51-60.
[2]. Benyon, D., Crerar, A., & Wlkinson, S. (2001). Inclusive
differences and Inclusive Design. In C. Stephanidis (Eds.),
User Interfaces for All – Concepts, Methods and Tools (Vol.
1, pp. 21-46). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
[3]. Bertelsen, O.W., & Bodker, S. (2003). Activity Theory. In
Carroll, J.M. (ed.). HCI Models, Theories, and Frameworks.
Morgan Kaufman Publishers, pp. 291-324.
[5]. Bodker, S. (1991). Through the interface: A Human
Activity Approach to User Interface Design. Hillsdale, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[6]. Brooks, R. (1991), Comparative task analysis: an
alternative direction for Human-computer interaction
science, Designing interaction: psychology at the
human-computer interface, Cambridge University Press,
New York, NY.
[7]. Buyukkokten, O., Garcia-Molina, H. & Paepcke A.
(2001). Seeing the Whole in Parts: Text Summarization for
Web Browsing on Handheld Devices. Proceedings of the
Tenth International World Wide Web Conference, New
York, NY: ACM,.
[8]. Chernobilsky, E., Nagarajan, A., Hmelo-Silver, C. E.
(2005). Problem-based learning online: Multiple
perspectives on collaborative knowledge construction. In
T. Koschmann, D. Suthers, & T-W. Chan (Eds.), Proceedings
of CSCL (pp. 63-52).
[9]. Cold, J (2006). Using Really Simple Syndication (RSS) to
enhance student research. ACM SIGITE Newsletter. Vol. 3
Issue 1, pp.6 -9.
[10]. Dey, A and Abowd G. (2001). Towards a Better
Understanding of Context and Context Awareness. GVU
Technical Report GIT-GVU-99-22. College of Computing,
Georgia Institute of Technology.
[11]. Engeström, Y. (1990). Activity theory and individual
nd and social transformation. Opening address at 2
InternationalCongress for Research on Activity Theory,
Lahti, Finland, May, pp. 21–25.
[12]. Hertzum, M., & Jacobsen, N. E. (2001). The evaluator
effect: A chilling fact about usability evaluation methods.
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction,
13(4), pp. 421-443.
[13]. Kaptelinin V. (1996). Computer-Mediated Activity:
Functional Organs in Social and Developmental
Contexts. In B.A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness:
Activity Theory and Human–Computer Interaction,
(pp.17–44). Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
[14]. Kaptelinin, V., Nardi, B. A. & Macaulay, C. (1997).
The Activity Checklist: a Tool for Representing the Space of
Context. Interaction, pp.27–39.
[15]. Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a Potential
Framework for Human– Computer Interaction Research.
In B.A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity
Theory and Human–Computer Interaction, (pp.17–44).
Cambridge, MA: MIT press.
[16]. Leontjev, A. (1978): Activity, Consciousness and
Personality. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall
[17]. Lewis, C. (1997). Cognitive Walkthrough. In M.G.
Helander, et al., (eds.) Handbook of Human Computer
Interaction (pp. 717-732). Elsevier.
[19]. Monk, A. F. & Wright, P. C. (1991) Observations and
Inventions: New Approaches to the Study of Human-
Computer Interaction. Interacting with Computers, No.3,
pp.204-216.
[20]. Nardi, B. A., (ed). (1996). Context and
Consciousness: Activity Theory and Human-Computer
Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[21]. Nardi, B. (1997). Studying context: A comparison of
activity theory, situated action models, and distributed
cognition. In B. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness:
Activity theory and human computer interaction.
Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[22]. Norman, D. (2006). Words Matter. Talk about People:
Not customers, not consumers, not users. Interactions Vol.
13, No. 5, pp. 49 - 63.
[23]. Nielson, J. & Molich, R. (1990). Heuristic Evaluation of
User Interfaces. In Proc. of CHI 90: Human Factors in Computer Systems. Seattle, WA: April 1-5, pp 249-256.
New York, ACM/SIUGCHI.
[24]. Page, T., Lehtonen, M. and Thorsteinsson, G. (2006)
'The web-orientation agent (WOA) for simulated learning
in technology education. International Journal of
Learning Technology, 2(1), pp 62-76.
[25]. Preece, J., Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., Benyon, D.,
Holland, S., & Carey, T. (1994). Human-computer
interaction. Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, UK.
[26]. Quek, A. and Shah, H. (2004) The Activity Theoretical
Iterative Evaluation Method. In Proceedings of 1st
International Workshop on Activity Theory Based Practical
Methods for IT Design, part of the 3rd Nordic Conference
on Cultural and Activity Research, Copenhagen,
Denmark.
[27]. Ryu, T., (2006). Walkthroughs in Web Usability in
Zaphiris and Kurnaiwan (eds), Human Computer
Interaction Research in Web Design and Evaluation pp.
229 -257.
[28]. Suchman, L. (1987). Plans and Situated Actions.
Cambridge University Press.
[29]. Uden, L. (2007). Activity theory for designing mobile
learning. International Journal of Mobile Learning and
Organisation. Vol. 1, Number 1, 29 October 2006, pp. 81-
102(22).
