References
[1]. Austin, J. L., Lee, M., &Carr, J. E. (2004). The effects of
guided notes on undergraduate students‘ recording of
lecture content. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 30,
314-320.
[2]. Austin, J., Gilbert Lee, M., Thibeault, M. D.. Carr, J., &
Bailey, J. (2002). Effects of Guided Notes on University
Students‘ Responding and Recall of Information. Journal
ofBehavioral Education, 14(4), 243-254.
[3]. Brame, R B. (2001). Making sustained silent reading
[SSR] more effective: Effects of a story recall game on
students‘ off task behavior during 83R and retention of
story facts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Ohio
State University, Columbus.
[4]. Bunce, D. M., Van den Plas, J. R., & Havanki, K. L.
(2006). Comparing the effectiveness on student
achievement of a student response system versus online
WebCT quizzes. J. Chem. Educ., 83(3), 488493.
[5]. Caldwell, J. E. (2007). Clickers in the large classroom:
Current research and best practice tips. CBE Life Sciences
Education, 6 (1), 9-20.
[6]. Cooper, J. 0., Heron, T. E., & Heward, W. L. (1987).
Appliedbehavioranalysis. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
[7]. Greenwood, C.R., Delquadri, J., & Hall, R.\/. (1984).
Opportunity to respond and student academic
achievement. In W.L. Heward, T.E. Heron, D.S. Hill, &J. Trap-
Porter (eds). Focus on behavior analysis in education (pp.
58-88). Columbus, OH:Merrill.
[8]. Hatch, J. Jensen, M., & Moore, R. (2005). Manna
from heaven or “Clickers“ from hell: Experiences with an
electronic response system. Journal of College Science
Teaching 34 (7), 36-42.
[9]. Heward, W. L. (T 994). Three “low—tech“ strategies for
increasing the frequency of active student response
during group instruction. In R. Gardner lll, D. M. Sainato, J.
0. Cooper, T. E. Heron, W. L. Heward, J. Eshleman, & T. A.
Grossi (Eds.), Behavior analysis in education: Focus on
measurablysuperior instruction (pp. 283-320). Monterey,
CA: Brooks/Cole.
[10]. Jackson, M. H., and Trees, A. R. (2003). Clicker
implementation and assessment.
http://Comm.colorado.edu/mjackson/clickerreport.htm
[accessed 29 April 2008).
[11]. Judson, E. & Sawada, D. (2002). Learning from past
and present: Electronic response systems in college
lecture halls. Journal of Computers in Mathematics and
ScienceTeaching2'l[2): 167-181
[12]. Lazarus, B. D. (1993). Guided notes: Effects with
secondary and post—secondary students with mild
disabilities. Education and Treatment of Children, 16.
272-289.
[13]. Martyn, M. (2007). Clickers in the classroom: An
active learning approach. Educause Quarterly, 30(2), 71 -
74.
[14]. Narayan, J. S., Heward, W. L., Gardner III, R.
Courson, F. H., &Omness, C. (1990). Using response cards
to increase student participation in an elementary
classroom. Journal ofAppIied BehaviorAnalysis, 23, 483-
490
[15]. Neef, N. A., McCord, B. E., & Ferreri, S. J. (2006).
Effects of using guided notes versus completed notes
during lectures on college students‘ quiz performance.
Journal ofAppIiedBehaviorAnalysis, 39, 123-130.
[16]. Randolph, J. J. (2007) Meta-analysis of the research on response cards: effects on test achievement, quiz
achievement, participation, and off-task behavior.
Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 9 (2), p. 113-
128.
[17]. Robertson, L. J. (2000). Twelve tips for using a
computerized interactive audience response system,
Medical Teacher, 22, (3), pp. 237-239.
[18]. Saville, B. K., Zinn, T. E., Neef, N.A., Van Norman, R., &
Ferreri, S. J. (2006). A comparison of inter - teaching and
lecture in the college classroom. Journal of Applied
BehaviorAnalysis, 39, 49-61 .
[19]. Shabani, D. B., & Carr, J. E. (2004). An evaluation of
response cards as an adjunct to standard instruction in
university classrooms: A systematic replication and
extension. North American Journal of Psychology, 6(1 ), p.
85-100.
[20]. Stowell, J.R. & Nelson, J.M. (2007). Benefits of
electronic audience response systems on student
participation, learning, and emotion. Teaching of
Psychology, 34 (4), 253-258.
[21]. Tincani, M., Ernsbarger, S. C., Harrison, T. J., Heward,
W. L. (2005). The effects of fast and slow-paced teaching
on participation, accuracy, and off-task behavior of
children in the Language for Learning program. Journal
of Direct lnstruction, 5,97-109.
