20 Ways to Facilitate Learning Experiences through Differentiated Instructional Strategies

Paul Riccomini*, Sharon Sanders**, Kimberly Bright***, Bradley S. Witzel****
* Associate Professor, Eugene T Moore School of Education, Clemson University
** Program Manager, Clemson LIFE, Clemson University
*** Associate Professor of Educational Leadership and Special Education, Shippensburg University Pennsylvania.
**** Associate Professor of Special Education, Winthrop University South Carolina.
Periodicity:March - May'2009
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.4.4.528

Abstract

The challenges teachers face everyday in effectively teaching ALL students along a pre-determined path, usually with pre-determined curricula, towards a goal of adequate yearly progress is overwhelming to say the least. Classrooms are comprised of more and more diverse students in terms of ability, background and experiences, learning preferences, and instructional needs. In order to effectively facilitate learning experiences for their diverse classrooms, teachers must differentiate their daily instruction. This article offers four broad categories of strategies to consider when designing and differentiating instruction to better facilitate learning for all students: (a) instructional organization, (b) instructional delivery and methods, (c) student progress monitoring, and (d) organizational supports. Additionally, implications for practicing teachers and preservice teachers are highlighted.

Keywords

Instructional Strategies, Differentiated Instruction, Strategy, Effective, Instruction, Instructional Organization, Instructional Delivery, Progress Monitoring.

How to Cite this Article?

Paul Riccomini, Sharon Sanders, Kimberly Bright and Bradley S. Witzel (2009). 20 Ways to Facilitate Learning Experiences through Differentiated Instructional Strategies. i-manager’s Journal on School Educational Technology. 4(4), 7-14. https://doi.org/10.26634/jsch.4.4.528

References

[1]. Bost, L. W., & Riccomini, F! J. (2006). Effective instruction: An inconspicuous strategy for dropout prevention. Remedial and Special Education, 27(5), 301 — 311.
[2]. Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. (2004) (reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1 990).
[3]. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 , 20 U.S.C. 70 § 6301 etseq.
[4]. Riccomini, R J. (2005). Identification and remediation of systematic error patterns in subtraction. Learning Disabiliiyauarterly, 28(3), 1 -1 0.
[5]. Ruzi, R., & O'Connell, K. (2001). Concept maps. Retrieved January 15, 2007, from the National Centeron Accessing the General Curriculum Web site: http://udl.cast.org/ncac/ ConceptMaps1 669.cfm
[6]. Stecker, R M., Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (2005). Supporting learners with diverse needs in general education settings. Psychology in the Schools, 42(8), 795- 819.
[7]. Witzel, B. S. (2005). Using CRA to teach algebra to students with math difficulties in inclusive settings. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal, 3(2), 49- 60.
[8]. Witzel, B. S., & Riccomini, R J. (2007). OPTIMIZE your math curriculum to meet the learning needs of students. Preventing School Failure, 52(1 ), 1 3-1 8.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Online 15 15

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.