References
[1]. AIMSweb (2009). AlMSweb Pro Complete. Retrieved
on March 1 1, 2009 fromhttp://wvvw.aimsweb.com/produ
cts/aimsweb—systems/slp/aimsweb—pro—complete/.
[2]. Coyne, M. D., Kame'enui, E. J., & Simmons, D. C.
(2004). Improving beginning reading instruction and
intervention for students with LD: Reconciling ‘‘all’' with
“each”. Journal of LearningDisabilities, 37, 231 -239.
[3]. Dynamic Measurement Group (2009). DIBELS
overview. Retrieved on March 11, 2009 from
http://dibels.org/dibels.html.
[4]. Fairbanks, S., Sugai, G., Guardino, D., & Lathrop, M.
(2007). Response to intervention: Examining classroom
behavior support in second grade. Exceptional Children
73(3), 288-310.
[5]. Filter, K.J. McKenna, M. K., Benedict, E. A., Horner, R.
H., Todd, A. W., &Watson, J. (2007). Check in/checkout: A
post—hoc evaluation of an efficient, secondary—leve|
targeted intervention for reducing problem behaviors in
schools. Education and Treatment of Children, 30[1 ), 69-
84.
[6]. Good, R. H., III, Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J.
(2001). The importance of decision—making utility of a
continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational
reading skills for third—grade high stakes outcomes.
Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 25 7 288.
[7]. Headsprout. (2009). Headsprout early reading for
school. Retrieved on March 24, 2009 from http://
wvvw.headsprout.com/school/index.cfm.
[8]. Hupert, N. & Heinze, C. (2006). Results in the palms of
their hands: Using handheld computers for data—driven
decision making in the classroom. In M. van't Hooft & K.
Swan [Eds.), Ubiquitous computing in education: Invisible
technology, visible impact [pp.211—229). Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
[9].Hupert, N., Heinze, J., Gunn, G., & Stewart, J. (2008).
Using technology-assisted progress monitoring to drive
improved student outcomes. In E. B., Mandinach & M.
Honey, [Eds.], Data-driven school improvement: Linking
data and learning (pp.130—150). New York: Teachers
College Press.
[10]. Imagination Station. (2009). Overview. Retrieved on
March 24, 2009, from http://wvvw2.istation.com/en/corpsi
te/program/overview.asp?sm=overview. Individuals with
Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C.
1400 (2004).
[11]. IRIS Center for Training Enhancements. [n.d.). RTI (part 3 ): Reading instruction. Retrieved on March 1 1 , 2009
fromhttp://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/rti03_reading/chalcycle.htm.
[12]. Layng, T. V., Twyman, J. S., &Stikeleather, G. (2004).
Selected for success: How Headsprout Reading Basics
teaches beginning reading. In Moran, Malott, & Malott
(Eds.) Evidence-based educational methods. St. Louis:
Elsevier Science and Technology Books.
[13]. Mathes, R (2007). ISIP concurrent and predictive
validity study. Institute for Reading Research: Southern
Methodist University.
[14]. Mclntosh, K., Horner, R. H., Chard, D.J., Boland,J. B.,
& Good, III, R. H. (2006). The use of reading and behavior
screening measures to predict nonresponse to school-
wide positive behavior support: A longitudinal analysis.
School PsychologyReview, 35(2), 275-291 .
[15]. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, 20 U.S.C. 70
Section 6301 etseq. (2002).
[16]. Office of Special Education Programs Center on
Positive Behavior Support. (2004). School—wide positive
behavior support: lmplementers blueprint and self
assessment. University oforegon, Eugene.
[17]. Pearson (2009). AlMSweb. Retrieved on March 24,
2009, from http://pearsonassess.com/haiweb/Culture
s/en-US/Site/Community/Psychology/AlMSweb.htm.
[18]. Richards, C., Pavri, 5., Golez, F., Canges, R., &
Murphy, J. (2007). Response to intervention: Building the
capacity of teachers to serve students with learning
difficulties. Issues in TeacherEducation, 16(2), 55-64.
[19]. SWIS (2009). Overview of SWIS. Retrieved on March
11,2009 from htlp://www.swis.org/index.php?page=over
view#q1.
[20]. Tomlinson, C. A. (2005). The differentiated classroom:
Responding to the needs of all learners. Upper Saddle River,
NJ:Pearson.
[21]. Vaughn, 3., Linan-Thompson, S., & Hickman, P
(2003). Response to instruction as a means of identifying
students with reading/learning disabilities. Exceptional
Children, 69, 391 -409.
[22]. Wireless Generation (2009). mCLASS.'DIBELS &
mCLASS:lDEL. Retrieved on March 11 , 2009 from http://wir
elessgeneration.com/solutions/mclass—dibels.html.
[23]. Wright, J. (2009). Intervention central. Retrieved
March 11, 2009, from http://www.interventioncentral.org.
[24]. Ysseldyke, J. E. & McLeod, S. (2007). Using
technology tools to monitor response to intervention. In
S.R. Jimerson, M.K. Burns & A. M. VanDerHeyden [Eds.),
Handbook of response to intervention: The science and
practice of assessment and intervention (pp. 396-407).
NewYork: Springer.
