Combining XML, Web Services, and the Semantic Web to Bind Document

Balasubramanian D*, Boopathy R.**, Jeyabalaraja V***, Thirumal S****
Periodicity:April - June'2008
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jse.2.4.492

Abstract

A paradigm for uniting the diverse strands of XML-based Web technologies by allowing them to be in-corporated within a single document. This overcomes the distinction between programs and data to make XML truly self-describing.” A  proposal  for  a  lightweight yet  power- ful functional XML vocabulary called \Semantic f XML” is detailed, based on the well-understood functional program-ming paradigm and resembling the embedding of Lisp di-rectly in XML. Infosets are made \dynamic,” since docu-ments can now directly embed local processes or Web Ser-vices into their Infoset. An optional typing regime for info-sets is provided by Semantic Web ontologies. By regarding Web Services as functions and the Semantic  Web as pro-viding types, and tying it all together within a single XML vocabulary, the Web can compute. In this light, the real Web 2.0 can be considered the transformation of the Web from a universal information space to a universal computation space.

Keywords

Pipelining, Semantic Web, Web Services, XML, Functional Programming

How to Cite this Article?

Balasubramanian D, Boopathy R, Jeyabalaraja V and Thirumal S (2008). Combining XML, Web Services, and the Semantic Web to Bind Document. i-manager’s Journal on Software Engineering, 2(4), 13-25. https://doi.org/10.26634/jse.2.4.492

References

References

[1 ]. J. Barwise and J. Perry, Sifuafions and Alfifudes. MIT Press, BosTon, MassachuseTTs, 1983.
[2]. T. Berners-Lee, Weaving The Web. Harper, San Francisco, 1 999.
[3]. H. Boley and S. TabeT, Design RaTionale for RuleML: A Markup language for Semantic Web Rules. In Proceedings of Semantic Web Working Symposium, 2001.
[4]. E. Bruchez and A. Vernet, XML Pipeline Language (XPL)Version T .0. Membersubmission,W3C, 2005.
[5]. A. Church, A note on the Entscheidungsproblem. Journal of Symbolic Logic, 1 :40-41, 1936.
[6]. A. Clark, Natural Born Cyborgs. Oxford University Press. 2004.
[7]. F. Curbera, M. Duftler, R. Khalaf, W. Nagy and N. Mukhi. Unraveling the Web Services Web: An introduction to SOAP, WSDL, and UDDI. IEEE Internet Computing, 6, 2002.
[8]. F. Curbera, R. Khalaf, N. Mukhi, 3. Tai and S. Weerawarana, The next step in Web Services. Communications of theACM, 6(l 0):29-34, 2003.
[9]. R. Fielding and R. Taylor, Principled design of the modern Web architecture. In Proceedings of International Conference on Software Engineering, Toronto, Canada, 2004 .
[10]. H. Halpin, The Semantic Web: The origins ofAl redux. In the Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on the Philosophy and History of Mathematics and Computation, San Sebastien, Spain,2004.
[11]. S. Hawke and S. Tabet, Workshop for Rule Languages for Interoperability. Report, W3C, 2005.
[12]. D. Hazael-Massieux and D. Connolly, Gleaning resource descriptions from dialects of language. In Proceedings ofXTech, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2005.
[13]. I. Horrocks, R Patel-Schneider, H. Boley, S. Tabet, B. Grosof, and M. Dean, SWRL: A Semantic Web rule language combining OWL and RuleML. Member submission, W3C. 2004.
[14]. J. Hunter and F. Nack, Combining RDF and XML Schemas to enhance interoperability between metadata application profiles. In Proceedings of International World Wide Web Conference, 2004.
[15]. A. Krupnikov and H. Thompson, Data binding using W3C XML Schema Annotations. In Proceedings of the XML Conference, Orlando, USA, 2001 .
[16]. S. McGrath, XML Pipelines. In Proceedings of XML Open, Cambridge, UK, 2004.
[17]. S. Narayanan and S. Mcllrath, Simulation, verification and automated composition of web services. In Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference, Honolulu, USA, 2002.
[18]. R Patel-Schneider and J. Simeon, The Yin-Yang web: XML syntax and RDF semantics. In Proceedings of the World Wide Web Conference, Honolulu, USA, 2002.
[19]. B. Pierce, Types and Programming Languages. MIT Press, Boston, USA, 2002.
[20]. J. Reynolds, Types, abstraction, and parametric polymorphism. In Proceedings of Information Processing Conference, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, T 983.
[21]. F! Rodgers, Service—oriented—deveIopment on netkernel. In Web Services Edge East, Boston, USA, 2005.
[22]. J. Simeon and R Wadler, The essence of XML. In Proceedings of ACM Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages, New Orleans. USA, 2002.
[23]. K. Sivashanmugam, K. Verma, and A. Sheth, Discovery of Web Services in a federated registry environment. Proceedings of IEE Second International Conference on Web Services, 2004.
[24]. B. C. Smith, The Correspondence Continuum. In Proceedings of the Sixth Canadian Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Montreal, Canada, 1 986.
[25]. G. Steele and G. Sussman, Lambda: The Ultimate Imperative. Al Lab memo aim—353, MIT, 1976.
[26]. H. Thompson, FunctionalXML. Member submission, W3C,2005.
[27]. N. Walsh and E. Maler, XML Pipeline Definition Language. Note, W3C. 2002.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Online 15 15

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.