References
[1]. Becher, T. (1989). Academic Tribes and Territories:
Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines, SRHE /
OU Press, p 200.
[2]. Johnson, D.VlI., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson,
D., and Skon, L. (1981). Effects of cooperative,
competitive, and individualistic goal structures on
achievement: A meta—analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 89,
47-62.
[3]. Cohen, E. (1994). Restructuring the classroom:
Conditions for productive small groups. Review of
Educational Research, 64, 1-35.
[4]. Cohen, E., and Lotan, R., (Eds.) (1997). Working for
equity in heterogeneous classrooms: Sociological theory
in practice. NewYork: Teachers College Press.
[5]. Coleman, J. (1961). The Adolescent Society. NewYork:
FreePress.
[6]. Crozier, W. R. (1997). Individual learners. Personality
differences in education. London: Routledge.
[7]. Deutsch, M. (1962). Cooperation and trust: Some
theoretical notes. In M. R. Jones (Ed.), Nebraska
symposium on motivation (DD. 275-319). Lincoln, NE:
University of Nebraska Press.
[8]. Donald, J. G. (2002). Learning to think: Disciplinary
perspectives. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[9]. Donald, J. G., and Dubuc, P (1999). Report on
students‘ conceptualizations of learning, 1994-1995.
Centre for University Teaching and Learning, McGill
University.
[10]. Dressel, P, and Mayhew, L. (1974). Higher education
as a field of study. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
[11]. Knutson, E. M. (2001). Fostering student—student
interaction in a whole group setting The French review, 74,
1 138-1151.
[12]. Fry, H., S. Ketteridge, Marshall, (Ed) (2003). A
Handbook forTeaching and Learning in Higher. Education
Enhancing Academic Practice. S. Taylor & Francis: 2
edition, p. 416.
[13]. Heffler, B., (2001). Individual Learning Style and the
Learning Style Inventory Educational Studies, Volume 27,
Issue 3 September, p. 307-316.
[14]. James, W. B. and Gardner, D. L. (1995). Learning
styles; Implications for distance learning (ERIC Document
reproduction Service no. EJ 51 4356).
[15]. Johnson, C. (1993). Influences of Gender and
Academic Achievement on Learning Preferences of
Middle Grade Students. Paper presented at the Annual
Meeting of the Mid South Educational Research
Association (November 10-12, 1993).
[16]. Johnson, D. W., Maruyama, G., Johnson, R., Nelson,
D., and Skon, L. (1981). Effects of cooperative,
competitive, and individualistic goal structures on
achievement: A meta—analysis. Psychological Bulletin,
89,47-62.
[17]. Johnson, C., and Engelhard, G. (1992). Gender,
academic achievement, and preferences for
cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning
among African—American adolescents. Journal of
Psychology, 1 26 (4), 385-392.
[18]. Johnson, D. and Johnson, R. (1998). Cooperative
learning and social interdependence theory. In R. Scott
(Ed). Theory and Research on Small Groups. New York:
Plenum Press.
[19]. Johnson, D. W, Johnson, R. T., Tiffany, M., and
Zaidman, B. (1983). Are low achievers disliked in a
cooperative situation? A test of rival theories in a mixed
ethnic situation. Contemporary Educational Psychology,
8,189-200.
[20]. Johnson, D. W. (1991). Human relations and your
career (3rd. Ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
[21]. Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., and Holubec, E. J.
(1993). Cooperation in the Classroom (6th ed.). Edina,
MN: Interaction Book Company.
[22]. Johnson, D. W, and Johnson, R. (1974). Instructional
goal structure: Cooperative, competition, or
individualistic. Review of Educational Research, 44, 213-
240.
[23]. Johnson, D. W., and Johnson, R. (1979). Conflict in
the classroom: Controversy and learning. Review of
Educational Research, 49, 51 -70.
[24]. Johnson, D. W., and Johnson, R. (1989).
Cooperation and competition: theory and research.
Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.
[25]. Johnson, D. W, and Johnson, R. (1999). Human
relations: Valuing diversity. Edina, MN: Interaction Book
Company.
[26]. Kohn, A. (1992). No contest (2nd ed.). Boston:
Houghton Mifflin.
[27]. Montagu, A. (1965). The human revolution New York:
World Pub Co.
[28]. Neumann, R. (2001): ‘Disciplinary differences and
university teaching‘, Studies in Higher Education, 26 (2),
135-146.
[29]. Owens, L., and Barnes, J. (1992). Learning
Preference Scales: Handbook and test master set.
Melbourne: Australian Council for Education Research
Ltd.
[30]. Owens, L., and Straton, R. (1980). The development
of a co-operative, competitive and individualized
learning preference scale for students. British Journal of
Educational Psychology, 50, 147-161 .
[31]. Riding, R. and Rayner, S. (1998). Cognitive styles and
learning strategies: Understanding style differences in
learning and behavior London: David Fulton Publishers. p.
217.
[32]. Reid, J. M. (1987). The Learning Style Preferences of
ESL Students, TESOL Quarterly, 21 (1 ), p. 87-111.
[33]. Smeby, J. C., (1996). Disciplinary differences in
university teaching, Journal of Higher Education.
Education, Norwegian Institute for Studies in Research
and Higher Education, Norway, Volume 21 (1), p. 69 79.
[34]. Smeby, J-C. (1996). Disciplinary differences in
university teaching, Studies in Higher Education, 21 (1),
69-79.
[35]. Sharan, S. (1980). Cooperative learning in small
groups: Recent methods and effects on achievement.
attitudes, and ethnic relations. Review of Educational
Research, 50 (2), 241-271.
[36]. Sharan, S., and Sharan, Y. (1992). Group
investigation: Expanding cooperative learning. New York:
Teacher's College Press.
[37]. Slavin, R. (1977). Classroom reward structure: An
analytical and practical review. Review of Educational
Research, 47, 633-650.
[38]. Slavin, R. (1991). Group rewards make groupwork.
Educational Leadership, 5, 89-91.
[39]. Smith, A. (1759). The theory of moral sentiments.
Reprint. Edited by D. Raphael and A. Maclie. (1976).
Oxford: Clarendon.
[40]. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The
development of higher psychological processes.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[41]. Yoram, H. (2005). Teaching and Learning in a
Community of Thinking. Journal of Curriculum and
Supervision, 20, 136-157.
