Gender Perceptions of Globalization: A Comparative Survey Study

Z.S. Demirdjian*
*Professor of Marketing, California State University.
Periodicity:June - August'2006
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jmgt.1.1.426

Abstract

In today’s business world, globalization has become a hotly debated topic.  Internationally oriented corporations are rushing to stake their claims of the 21st century’s gold rush.  While globalization has many economic benefits to offer, its long-term effect on the people and the places of this planet are often overlooked. In the landscape of globalization, there are many obvious green spots and some have hailed it as leading the world into a new era of prosperity and peace. In spite of all the exuberance, there are many deep concerns expressed regarding the invasive process of homogenization of national education, language, culture, and consumption of products and services with an eventual consequence of social disintegration. To what extent male and female business students, our future executives, are aware of the implications of globalization? A survey study based on 400 respondents was conducted to determine how male and female university students’ perceptions of the effect of globalization differ from each other. Results of this survey study have shown interesting convergent and divergent perceptions of the positive and negative aspects of globalization, as one of the most invasive concepts of the new millennium.

Keywords

How to Cite this Article?

Z.S. Demirdjian (2006). Gender Perceptions of Globalization: A Comparative Survey Study. i-manager’s Journal on Management, 1(1), 44-51. https://doi.org/10.26634/jmgt.1.1.426

References

1. Arnold, David (2004). The Mirage of Global Markets. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, FT Prentice Hall, pp. 229.
2. Akhter, Syed H. (1995). Global Marketing: Concepts, Strategies, and Practice. Cincinnati, Ohio: South- Western College Publishing, pp. 634.
4. Canary, Daniel J. and Kathryn Dindia (1998), editors. Sex Differences and Similarities in Communication. Mahwah, New Jersey, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 468.
5. Demirdjian, Z. S. (2005). “Differential Perceptions of the Dynamics of Globalization: A Survey Study,” Journal of Problems and Perspectives in Management, February 2005, p. 5-16.
6. Friedman, Thomas L. (1999). The Lexus and the Olive Tree: Understanding Globalization. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus, Giroux, pp. 394.
7. Hines, Colin and Tim Lang 1996), “In Favor of a New Protectionism,” in Mander, Jerry and Edward Goldsmith, Eds. (1996). The Case Against the Global Economy and for a Turn Toward the Local. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books, pp. 485-493.
8. Goldsmith, Edward (1996), “The Last Word: Family, Community, Democracy,” in Mander, Jerry and Edward Goldsmith, Eds. (1996). The Case Against the Global Economy and for a Turn Toward the Local. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books, pp. 501-514.
9. Lorber, Judith (1994). Paradoxes of Gender. New Haven and London, Yale University Press, p. 5.Mander, Jerry and Edward Goldsmith, Eds. (1996). The Case Against the Global Economy and for a Turn Toward the Local. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books, pp. 550.
10. Norberg-Hodge, Helena (1996). “The Pressure to Modernize and Globalize,” in Mander, Jerry and Edward Goldsmith, Eds. (1996). The Case Against the Global Economy and for a Turn Toward the Local. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books, pp. 33-46.
11. Ritchie, Mark (1996), “Cross-Border Organizing,” in Mander, Jerry and Edward Goldsmith, Eds. (1996). The Case Against the Global Economy and for a Turn Toward the Local. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books, pp. 494- 500.
12. Sachs, Wolfgang (1996), “Neo-Development:'Global Ecological Management,”in Mander, Jerry and Edward Goldsmith, Eds. (1996). The Case Against the Global Economy and for a Turn Toward the Local. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books, pp. 239-252.
13. Sale, Kirkpatrick 1996), “Principles of Bioregionalism,” in Mander, Jerry and Edward Goldsmith, Eds. (1996). The Case Against the Global Economy and for a Turn Toward the Local. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books, pp. 471- 484.
14. The Harvard Working Group on New and Resurgent Diseases (1996). “Globalization, Development, and the Spread of Disease,” Mander, Jerry and Edward Goldsmith, Eds. (1996). The Case Against the Global Economy and for a Turn Toward the Local. San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books, pp. 160-170.
15. Weidenbaum, Murray (2002) “Globalization: Wonder Land or Waste Land?” Society, July/August, pp. 36-40.
16. Yeung, Yue-man (1998), “The Promise and Peril of Globalization,” Progress in Human Geography, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp. 475-477.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.