Marketing Constructs: A Critical Analysis and Theory Construction

Deb Sircar*
Lecturer in Business & Management, The Robert Gordon University, Aberdeen.
Periodicity:June - August'2006
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jmgt.1.1.411

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to highlight a knowle dge gap and conceptualise a knowledge domain in the marketing context. It is argued that marketing as a concept has become a diluted management practice. All the more, it has not become a theoretically respected function within organisations. In most of the cases it is related with only sales.  It is found that marketing has several interpretations created by marketing authors. However, all these interpretations are not complementary to each other. Kotler’s multiply marketing concept come close to modern marketing than other interpretation. But this concept falls short of methodological explanation. Therefore, a post modern construct is required that takes a relavist position. This concept may involve the whole organisation and direct towards customers.

Keywords

Marketing, change, post modern construct, customer satisfaction.

How to Cite this Article?

Deb Sircar (2006). Marketing Constructs: A Critical Analysis and Theory Construction. i-manager’s Journal on Management, 1(1), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.26634/jmgt.1.1.411

References

[1]. Anderson, P, F (1986), One method in consumer research: a critical relativist perspective, Journal of Consumer Research, pp 155-73, Vol.13.
[2]. Brown, S (1993), Postmodern Marketing? European Journal of Marketing, pp 19-34, Vol.27, No.4.
[4]. Brown, S (2001), Marketing The Retro Revolution, Sage, London.
[5]. Burrell, G (1994), Modernism, postmodernism and organisational analysis 4: the contribution of Jiirgen Habermass, Organization Studies, pp 1-19, Vol.15, No.1.
[6]. Fielding, H (1992). Teach yourself postmodernism, The Sunday Independent, 15 November.
[7]. Foucault, M (1980), Power/ Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings1972-1977, Edited by C. Gordon, Harvester Wheatsheaf, Hemel Hempstead.
[8]. ht tp: / /www. sagepub.com/book.aspx?pid=7171, 10/04/06
[9]. Hunt, S, D (1994), On rethinking marketing: our discipline, our practice, our methods, European Journal of Marketing, pp13-25, Vol.13, No.3.
[10]. Jencks, C (1989), What is Postmodernism? Academy, London.
[11]. Kaldor, G, A (1971), Imbricative Marketing, Journal of Marketing, pp 19-25, Vol.35.
[12]. Kotler, P (1967), Marketing Management, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
[13]. Kuhn. T, S (1970), The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,2 Edition, Chicago University Press, Chicago.
[14]. Levitt, T (1960), Marketing myopia, Harvard Business Review, pp 45-56, Vol.38, No.4.
[15]. Ottesen, G, G & Gronhaug, K (2002), Managers' understanding of theoretical concepts: the case of market orientation, European Journal of Marketing, pp 1209-1224, Vol.36, No.11/12.
[16]. Rorty, R (1980), Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature, Blackwell, Oxford.
[17]. Sheth, J.N; Gardner, D.M & Garrett, D.E (1988), Marketing Theory: Evolution and Evaluation, John Wiley, New York.
[18]. Smart, B (1993), Post modernity, Routledge, London.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.