A Study of Gauge Repeatability and ReproducibilityCharacteristics on Critical Parameters ofA Cylinder Liner

K. Prakash Babu*, A.Chandini Priyanka**, K.Sahithi***, K.kavyasri****
* Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, V.R Siddhartha Engineering College, Vijayawada, India.
**-**** UG Scholars, Department of Mechanical Engineering, V.R Siddhartha Engineering College, Vijayawada, India.
Periodicity:August - October'2015
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jic.3.4.3724

Abstract

Measurement data are used more often and in more ways than ever before. The decision to adjust a manufacturing process is nowadays mostly based on the measurement data. Hence, the decision to change a process is purely dependent on the quality of data we acquire. Higher the quality of data, greater is its reliability. A change in process which relies on the low quality data would obviously produce defective components which are a result of wastage of capital, labour, and time. Hence, the need for data with reasonable quality levels is felt. In the present work, the authors have assessed the validity of some measuring instruments which are used to measure some of the critical parameters of cylinder liners making use of certain gage characteristics like Repeatability and Reproducibility which capture the precision of a measuring instrument. The work was carried out at Kusalava International Limited which is currently one of the largest, leading International manufacturers of Centrifugal Cast Cylinder Liners. This study helped to make necessary modifications in the measuring equipment, so that the measurement data obtained from measuring instrument will be reliable.

Keywords

Gauge Repeatability, Reproducibility, Cylinder Liner.

How to Cite this Article?

Babu, K.P., Priyanka, A.C., Sahithi, K., and Kavyasri, K. (2015). A Study of Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility Characteristics on Critical Parameters of A Cylinder Liner. i-manager’s Journal on Instrumentation and Control Engineering, 3(4), 36-50. https://doi.org/10.26634/jic.3.4.3724

References

[1]. Jiri Plura, and Pavel Klaput, (2012).“Influence of the Interaction Between Parts and Appraisers on the Results of Repeatability and Reproducibility Analysis”, Kvalita Inovácia, Prosperita/Quality Innovation Prosperity xvi/1, pp. 25-36.
[2]. Rathel R. (Dick) Smith, Steven W. McCrary and R. Neal, (2007). “Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility Studies and Measurement System Analysis: A Multimethod Exploration of the State of Practice”, Callahan Journal of Industrial Technology, Vol. 23, No. 1.
[3]. C.M. Simion, (2005). “The Study of a Measurement th System Precision”, 13 International Scientific Conference in Mechanical and Materials Engineering.
[4]. Jeh-Nan Pan, (2006). “Evaluating the Gauge Repeatability and Reproducibility for Different Industries”, Quality & Quantity , Vol. 40, pp. 499–518.
[5]. Georgia A. Louka, and George J. Besseris, (2010). “Gauge R&R for an Optical Micrometer Industrial Type Machine”, International Journal for Quality Research, Vol.4, No.4, pp.241-248.
[6]. Louis A. Johnson, (2013). “Implementing Expanded Gage R&R Studies to Improve Quality and Productivity”, th ASQ & 5 Continual Improvement & Innovation Symposium.
[7]. J Payne, and V Cariapa, (2010). “A Fixture Repeatability and Reproducibility Measure to Predict the Quality of Machined Parts”, International Journal of Production Research.
[8]. David W. Hoffa, and Chad M. Laux, (20007). “Gauge R&R: An Effective Methodology for Determining the Adequacy of a New Measurement System for Micron-level Metrology”, Lowa State University Digital Repository @ Iowa State University Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering, Conference Proceedings and Presentations, Retrived from: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ abe_eng_conf/347 10-2007.
[9]. M. Dudek-Urlikowska, (2011). “Using Control Charts X-R in Monitoring a Chosen Production Process”, Journal of Achievements in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering, Vol. 49, No. 2 .
[10]. Jeroen De Mast and Albert Trip, (2005). “Gauge R&R Studies for Destructive Measurements”, Journal of Quality Technology, Vol. 37, No. 1.
[11]. AIAG Reference manual, (2010). Measurement th Systems Analysis. MSA. 4 Edition., AIAG, Southfield.
[12]. Burdick, R. K, Borror, C. M, and Montgomery, D. C. (2005). Design and Analysis of Gauge R&R Studies: Making Decisions with Confidence Intervals in Random and Mixed ANOVA Models, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
[13]. Kazerouni, A, M. (2009). “Design and Analysis of Gauge R&R Studies: Making Decisions Based on ANOVA Method”, in Proceedings of World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, Vol. 40, No.4, pp. 31 – 35.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Online 200 35 35 200 15
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.