References
[1]. Carrell, P. (1984). “The effects of rhetorical organization
on ESL readers”. TESOL Quarterly, Vol.18,No.3 pp.441-469.
[2]. Carrel, P. L, & Eisterhold, J. C. (1983). “Schema theory and ESL reading pedagogy”. TESOL Quarterly, Vol.17,No.4
pp.553-573.
[3]. Celce-Murcia, M. (2001). Teaching English as a second
rd or foreign language (3 ed.). Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
[4]. Clarke, M. A, & Silberstein, S. (1979). “Toward a
realization of psycholinguistic principles in the ESL reading
class”. In R. Mackay, B. Barkman, & R. R. Jordan (Eds).
Reading in a second language (pp. 48-65). Rowerley, MA:
Newbury House Publishers.
[5]. Cliburn, J. W. (1990). “Concept maps to promote
meaningful learning”. Journal of College Science
Teaching, Vol.19,No.4 pp.212-217.
[6]. Fisk, C., & Hurst, B. (2003). “Paraphrasing for
comprehension”. The Reading Teacher, Vol.57(2), pp.182-
185.
[7]. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing
process work: Strategies for composition and self-regulation.
Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
[8]. Harvey, S., & Goudvis, A. (2000). Strategies that work.
Portland, MN: Stenhouse.
[9]. Heinze-Fry, J., & Novak, J.D. (1990). “Concept
mapping brings long-term movement toward meaningful
learning”. Science Education, Vol.74,No.4, pp.461-472.
[10]. Jacobs-Lawson, J. M., & Hershey, D. A. (2002).
“Concept maps as an assessment tool in Psychology
courses”. Teaching of Psychology, Vol.29, No.1, pp.25-29.
[11]. Johnstone, A. H., & Otis, K. H. (2006). “Concept
mapping in problem based learning: A cautionary tale”.
Chemistry Education Research and Practice, Vol.7, No.2,
pp.84-95.
[12]. Katims, D. S., & Harris, S. (1997). “Improving the
reading comprehension of middle school students in
inclusive classrooms”. Journal of Adolescent and Adult
Literacy, Vol.41(2), pp.116-123.
[13]. Kinchin, I. M. (2003). “Effective teacher-student
dialogue: A model from biological education”. Journal of
Biological Education, Vol.37(3), pp.110-113.
[14]. Mintzes, J., Wandersee, J., & Novak, J. (2001). Assessing
science understanding. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
[15]. Munro, J. (2004). “The use of reading comprehension
strategies at multiple levels of text processing”.
International Journal of Learning, Vol.11, pp.7-16.
[16]. Novak, J. D. (1990). “Concept maps and Vee
diagrams: Two metacognitive tools to facilitate meaningful
learning”. Instructional Science, Vol.19, No.1,pp. 29-52.
[17]. Novak, J. D. (1998). Learning, creating, and using
knowledge: Concept maps as facilitative tools in and
corporations schools. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates.
[18]. Novak, J. D., Gowin, D. B., & Johansen, G. T. (1983).
“The use of concept mapping and knowledge Vee
mapping with junior high school science students”.
Science Education, Vol.67, No.5,pp.625-645.
[19]. Novak, J. D., & Gowin, D. B. (1999). Learning how to learn. New York: Cambridge University Press.
[20]. Okebukola, P. A., & Jegede, O. J. (1988). “Cognitive
preference and learning model as determinants of
meaningful learning through concept mapping”. Science
Education, Vol.72, No.4, pp.489-500.
[21]. Pritchard, R. (1990). “The effects of cultural schemata
on reading processing strategies”. Reading Research
Quarterly, Vol.25, No.4, pp.273-295.
[22]. Schumaker, J. B., Denton, P. H., & Deshler, D. D. (1984).
Learning strategies curriculum: The paraphrasing strategy.
Lawrence: University of Kansas.
[23]. Swanson, H. L. (1996). “A selective synthesis of
intervention research for students with learning disabilities”.
School Psychology Review, Vol.25, pp.370-390.
[24]. Trochim, W. M. K. (1989). “An introduction to concept
mapping for planning and evaluation”. Evaluation and
Program Planning, Vol.12, No.1, pp.1-16.
[25]. Yalcin, S. K., & Sengel, M. (2004). “A model proposal
prepared for developing reading and comprehension
skills”. Journal of National Education, Vol.164, pp.134-150.
