Tracking Concept Development through Semiotic Evolution

Ilana Ronen*
Senior Lecturer, Science Faculty, Kibbutzim College of Education, Technology and Art, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Periodicity:May - July'2015
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.9.1.3522

Abstract

A qualitative research focused on a case study aiming to monitor emergent knowledge in a discourse group by tracking the development of the concept 'goal'. The analysis, based on 'Semiotic Evolution' methodology facilitates the description of interactions between personal perceptions in the group discourse, illustrating the change process and signs development. It is suggested that knowledge was emerged from a free, self-organized discourse interaction which was encouraged by a constructivist leadership. The new knowledge was manifested by expanding the boundaries of the concept 'goal' and it changed the members' behavior. Understanding emergent knowledge is useful in teaching and Teacher Education processes as well as in Adult Education.

Keywords

Discourse Community; Emergent Knowledge; Semiotic Evolution; Complex System.

How to Cite this Article?

Ronen, I. (2015). Tracking Concept Development through Semiotic Evolution. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 9(1), 13-24. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.9.1.3522

References

[1]. Armstrong, J.S. (2012). “Natural Learning in Higher Education”. Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning, pp.2426-2433.
[2]. Avriel-Avni, N., & Keiny, S. (2010). “Analysis of a group discourse according to the methodology of 'semiotic evolution”, In: L. Kassan & M. Kromer-Nevo (Eds.), Data Analysis in Qualitative Research, Beer-Sheba: Ben-Gurion University of the Negev. [Hebrew].
[3]. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age, London. Lawrence- Erlbaum.
[4]. Burbules N.C. & Bruce, B.C. (1993). “Theory and research on teaching as dialogue”. Research on Teaching. 4th ed., Washington D.C.
[5]. Dewey, G. (1969). Democracy and Education, Tel Aviv: Bialik Institute. [Hebrew]
[6]. Diotaiuti, P, Marco-Zona, A., & Rea, L. (2015). “Influence of emotional induction and free or forced affiliation on in-group and out-group trust attitude”. IAFOR Academic Review. Vol. 1(1), pp. 31-38.
[7]. Goldenfeld, N., & Kadanoff, L.P. (1999). “Simple lessons from complexity”, Science. DOI: 10.284.5411.87
[8]. Kauffman, S. (1993). The Origins of Order, Oxford University Press, New York.
[9]. Keiny, S. (2002). Ecological thinking: A new approach to educational change, UPA, University Press of America.
[10]. Kim, K. L. (1996). Caged in our signs: A book about semiotics, Norwood. NJ: Albex Publishing.
[11]. Kress, G. (2001). “Sociolinguistics and social semiotics”, In: P. Cobley, (Ed.), Companion to semiotics and linguistics, London. New York: Routledge, pp. 66-82.
[12]. Lambert. L., Walker, D., Zimmerman, D.P., Cooper, J.E., Lambert, M.D., Gardner, M.E. & Ford Slack, P.J. (1995). The Constructivist Leader, New York: Teacher College Press.
[13]. Lansing, J.S. (2003). “Complex Adaptive Systems”. Annu. Rev. Antropol, Vol. 32, pp. 183-204.
[14]. Mitchell, C., & Sackney, L. (2009). “Sustainable improvement: Building Learning Communities that Endure”, Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publishers.
[15]. Paul, R. (1990). Critical thinking, Rohaert Park, Calf: Center for critical thinking and Moral Critique.
[16]. Peirce, C. S. (1960). Collected papers, Vol. II, Elements of logic, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
[17]. Perkins, D. (2000). “What is understanding? In: D. Perkins, Landscapes of thinking: Articles about Education for Good Thinking”, Jerusalem: Branco Weiss Institute, [Hebrew].
[18]. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Towards a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66 (2), 211–227
[19]. Pikkarainen, E. (2011). “The Semiotics of Education: A new vision in an old landscape”. Educational Philosophy and Theory, Vol. 43, pp. 1135–1144.
[20]. Ronen, I. (2015). Challenges and Opportunities of Community Ser vice Learning. Scholars ’ Press, Saarbrücken, Germany
[21]. Strand, T. (2012). “Peirce's Rhetorical Turn: Conceptualizing education as semiosis”. Educational Philosophy and Theory, Norway: Østfold University College.
[22]. Simon, A.L. (2002). “Complex adaptive systems: Exploring the known, the unknown and the unknowable”, American Mathematical Society, Vol. 40 (1).
[23]. Sterman, J.D., (1994). “Learning in and about complex systems”, System Dynamics Review, Vol. 10(2), pp. pp. 291-330.
[24]. Taborsky, E. (1997). The Textual Society, Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
[25]. Teubert, W. (2010). Meaning, Discourse and Society. Cambridge Univ. Press.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.