Comparison of Regression and Artificial Neural Network Models for Prediction of Surface Roughness in Creep Feed Grinding

D. Afshari*, V. Rahmani**
* Assistant Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Zanjan, Iran.
** Student, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Iran.
Periodicity:May - July'2015
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jme.5.3.3440

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to compare Regression Method with Artificial Neural Network Method in prediction of surface roughness in creep feed grinding. Data used in this paper has been extracted from creep feed grinding of a cobalt based superalloy (MAR-M-509) turbine blade. The input parameters for surface roughness prediction are Wheel Speed (m/sec), Feedrate (mm/min) and Depth of Cut (mm). In this work, Surface Roughness average R was considered a to evaluate surface roughness quality. Result shows amongst the input parameters, the interaction between wheel speed and feed rate has the highest influence on the surface roughness (R ) and depth of cut has the least effect on R a a and so its effect can be neglected in regression method. Comparison of the results of two models with experiments was satisfactory. In addition, the results of Neural Network and Regression Models were compared to each other and Neural Network was found to be more precise than Regression Model in predicting surface roughness.

Keywords

Artificial Neural Network, Creep Feed Grinding, Regression Method, Surface Roughness

How to Cite this Article?

Afshari, D., and Rahmani, V. (2015). Comparison of Regression and Artificial Neural Network Models for Prediction of Surface Roughness in Creep Feed Grinding. i-manager’s Journal on Mechanical Engineering, 5(3), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.26634/jme.5.3.3440

References

[1]. C. A. Trevor, D. Howes and T. R. Pearce, (1985). Creep Feed Grinding. Holt Reinhart & Winston U.K.
[2]. J. J. Govinhasamy, S. F. Mcloone, G. W. Irwin, J. J. French and R. P. Doyle, (2005). “Neural Modeling Control and Optimization of an Industrial Grinding Process,” Control Engineering Practice, Vol. 13, No. 10, pp. 1243-1258.
[3]. S. Kumar and S. K. Choudhury, (2007). “Prediction of Wear and Surface Roughness in Electro-Discharge Diamond Grinding,” Journal of Materials Processing Technology, Vol. 191, No.1, pp. 206-209.
[4]. M. Nalbant, H. Gokkaya and I. Toktas, (2007). “Comparison of Regression and Artificial Neural Network Models for Surface Roughness Prediction with the Cutting Parameters in CNC Turning,” Modelling and Simulation in Engineering,Vol. 2007, pp.1-14.
[5]. I. Mukherjee and S. Routroy, (2012). “Comparing the Performance of Neural Networks developed by using Levenberg–Marquardt and Quasi-Newton with the Gradient Descent Algorithm for Modelling a Multiple Response Grinding Process”, Expert Systems with Applications”, Vol. 39, No.3, pp. 2379-2407.
[6]. R. N. Yadav and V. Ydava, (2013). “Multi objective Optimization of Slotted Electrical Discharge Abrasive Grinding of Metal Matrix Composite using Artificial Neural Network and Non dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm,” Journal of Engineering Manufacture, Vol. 227, No.10, pp. 1442-1452.
[7]. M. Chandrasekaran and D. Devarasiddappa, (2014). “Artificial Neural Network Modeling for Surface Roughness Prediction in Cylindrical Grinding of Al-SiCp Metal Matrix Composites and ANOVA Analysis”, Advances in Production Engineering & Management, Vol. 9, No.2, pp. 59-70.
[8]. S. Prabhu, M. Uma and B. K. Vinayagam, (2015). “Surface Roughness Prediction using Taguchi-Fuzzy Logic- Neural Network Analysis for CNT Nanofluids Based Grinding Process,” Neural Computing and Applications, Vol. 26, No. 1, pp. 41-55.
[9]. M. Sedighi and D. Afshari, (2010). “Creep Feed Grinding Optimization by an Integrated GA-NN System,” Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Vol. 21, No.6, pp. 657- 663.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.