Cohesion, Instructional Time and Reading Performance at MUGC Summer Enrichment Program

Sandra S. Stroebel*, Brenda S. Harvey**, Stephen O'keefe***
*Assistant Professor,Marshall University Graduate College
** School Psychologist,Marshall University Graduate College
***Professor,Marshall University Graduate College
Periodicity:August - October'2008
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.2.2.341

Abstract

As schools attempt to improve the services to struggling readers, teachers are encouraged to work collaboratively to enhance instruction. Studies are needed to examine the effects of teaming on student performance. The purpose of this study was to determine if team cohesion and/or instructional time at the Marshall University Graduate College Summer Enrichment Program (MUGCSEP) would be correlated with measures of reading performance for students who attended the program.  Statistical analyses yielded a statistically significant correlation between cohesion, instructional time and reading performance during the 2006 program. While in 2007, instructional time was not significantly correlated, cohesion results yielded a mildly inverse statistically significant correlation with reading performance.  Due to differences in assessment procedures between the years, this finding supports the possibility that team cohesion may be an important factor in the assessment of children’s reading performance.

Keywords

Team Cohesion, Reading Performance Instructional Time Cohesion, and Reading Performance.

How to Cite this Article?

Sandra S. Stroebel, Brenda S. Harvey and Stephen O'keefe (2008). Cohesion, Instructional Time and Reading Performance at MUGC Summer Enrichment Program. i-manager’s Journal on Educational Psychology, 2(2), 26-33. https://doi.org/10.26634/jpsy.2.2.341

References

[1]. Costello, R. B., et al. (1993). The American Heritage College dictionary. (3rd ed,). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
[2]. Dorn, S. M., Papalewis, R., & Brown, R. (1995). Educators Earning Their Doctorates: Doctoral Student Perceptions Regarding Cohesiveness and Persistence. Education, 116,305-315.
[3]. Fleming, J. L., & Monda-Amaya, L. E. (2001). Process Variables Critical for Team Effectiveness. Remedial & Special Education, 22,158-172.
[4]. Good.R. H„ Gruba, J., & Kaminski, R. A. (2002). Best Practices in Using Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS) in an Outcomes-Driven Model. In A. Thomas, & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology IV (pp. 699-720). Bathesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
[5]. Good, R.H., Kaminski, R. A., & Dill, S. (2002). Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills 6th Edition: Administration and Scoring Guide. Retrieved July 17, 2008, from University of Oregon: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement Website: https://dibels.uoregon.edu/measures/files/admin_and_s coring_6th_ed.pdf
[6]. Good, R. H., Simmons, D. C., & Kame'enui, E. J., (2001). The importance and decision making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third grade outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5 (3), 257-288.
[7], Gravois, T. A., &Gickling, E. E. (2002). Best Practices in Curriculum-Based Assessment. In A. Thomas, & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology IV (pp. 657-669). Bathesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
[8]. Harlarr, N., Dale, R S., & Plomin, R. (2007). Reading Exposure; A(largely) Environmental Risk Factor with Environmentally-Mediated Effects on Reading Performance in the Primary School Years. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48,1192-1199.
[9]. Ham, B. A., Linan-Thompson, S., & Roberts, G. (2008). Intensifying Instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(2), 115-125.
[10]. Iverson, A. M. (2002). Best Practices in Problem- Solving Team Structure and Process. In A. Thomas, & J. Grimes (Eds.), Best Practices in School Psychology IV (pp. 657-669). Bathesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
[11 ]. Krieg, F. J., Meikamp, J., O'Keefe, S. & Stroebel, S. S. (2006). Field-based Experience in Light of Changing Demographics. Trainers' Forum, 25,15-17.
[12], Mullen, B„ 8i Copper, C. (1994). The Relation Between Group Cohesiveness and Performance: An Integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 210-228
[13]. No Child Left Behind Act of 2001: Reauthorization of the elementary and secondary education act legislation and policies. Retrieved April 1, 2007 from http://www.ed. Gov/offices/OESE/esea/.
[14]. Reutzel, D. R., & Cooter, R. B., Jr. (2004). Teaching Children to Read: Putting the Pieces Together (4” ed.). New Jersey: Pearson.
[15]. Simmons, D. C., Kame'Enui, E. J., Harn, B., Coyne, M. D., Stoolmiller, M., Santoro, L. E., etal. (2007). Attributes of Effective and Efficient Kindergarten Reading Intervention: An Examination of Instructional Time and Design Specificity. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(4), 331- 347.
[16]. United States Department of Education, Office of Elementary and Secondary Education. (2002), No Child Left Behind: A Desktop Reference., Washington, D. C.
[17]. U.S. Department of Education, (2006) Institute of Education Science ,National Center for Educational Statistics,National Assessment of Educational Progress(NAEP)selected years,1971-2004.Long term trend Reading and Mathematics assessments.
.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.