References
[1]. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W.,
& Lipman,
D. J. (1990). Basic local alignment search tool. Journal of
Molecular Biology, Vol. 215(3), pp. 403-410.
[2]. Boyle, M. D. (2010). “Shovel–ready”
Sequences as a
stimulus for the next generation of life scientists. Journal of
Microbiology & Biology Education, pp. 38–41.
[3]. Campbell, A. M. (2003). Public access for teaching
genomics, proteomics, and bioinformatics. Cell Biology
Education, Vol. 2(2), pp. 98-111.
[4]. Caruso, S. M., Sandoz, J., & Kelsey, J. (2009).
Non-STEM
undergraduates become enthusiastic phage-hunters.
CBE-Life Sciences Education, Vol. 8(4), pp. 278-282.
[5]. National Research Council (2003). Biology
2010:Transforming undergraduate education for future
research biologists. Washington D.C.: The National
Academies Press.
[6]. Cresawn, S. G., Bogel, M., Day, N., Jacobs-Sera, D.,
Hendrix, R. W., & Hatfull, G. F. (2011). Phamerator: a
bioinformatic tool for comparative bacteriophage
genomics. BMC bio-informatics, Vol.12(1), pp.395.
[7]. Desai, K. V., Gatson, S. N., Stiles, T. W., Stewart,
R. H.,
Laine, G. A., & Quick, C. M. (2008). Integrating research
and education at research-extensive universities with
research-intensive communities. Advances In Physiology
Education, Vol. 32(2), pp. 136-141.
[8]. Hanauer, D. I., Jacobs-Sera, D., Pedulla, M. L.,
Cresawn, S. G., Hendrix, R. W., & Hatfull, G. F. (2006).
Teaching Scientific Inquiry. Vol. 314(5807), pp. 1880,
Education Forum.
[9]. Harrison, M., Dunbar, D., Ratmansky, L., Boyd, K.,
&
Lopatto, D. (2011). Classroom-based science research at
the introductory level: changes in career choices and
attitude. CBE-Life Sciences Education, Vol. 10(3), pp. 279-
286.
[10]. Hatfull, G. F., Jacobs-Sera, D., Welkin, H.
P.,Russell, D.
A., &Cresawn, S. G. (2013). Annotation and bioinformatic
analysis of bacteriophage genomes: A user guide to DNA
Master. DNA Master software by Dr. Jeffrey Lawrence, of the
University of Pittsburgh.
[11]. Hatfull, G. F., Pedulla, M. L., Jacobs-Sera, D.,
Cichon,
P. M., Foley, A., Ford, M. E., & Hendrix, R. W. (2006). Exploring the
mycobacteriophage metaproteome: phage
genomics as an educational platform. PLoS genetics,Vol.
2(6), pp. e92.
[12]. Hippel, W. V., Lerner, J. S., Gregerman, S. R.,
Nagda, B.
A., & Jonides, J. (1998). Undergraduate student-faculty
research partnerships affect student retention. The Review
of Higher Education, Vol. 22(1), pp. 55-72.
[13]. Hofstein, A. and Lunetta, V. (2003). The Laboratory
in
science education: Foundations for the twenty–first
century. Wiley Periodicals, pp. 28–54.
[14]. Hofstein, A. and Lunetta, V. (1982). The Role of
the
laboratory in science teaching: Neglected aspects of
research. Review of Educational Research. pp. 201–217.
[15]. Lopatto, D., Alvarez, C., Barnard, D.,
Chandrasekaran, C., Chung, H. M., Du, C., & Elgin, S. C. R.
(2008). Under Graduate Research: Genomics Education
Partnership. Science (New York, NY), Vol. 322(5902), pp.
684.
[16]. Osler, J. E. (2010). Visualus™ ©:
visioneering
volumetrically: The mathematics of the innovative
problem–solving model of inventive instructional design.
Durham, NC: Publishing Division, OSI.
[17]. Osler, J. E., Hollowell, G. P., & Palmer, C. E.
(2008).
Technology Engineering Science Instruction in the
Information Age: Integrating Instructional Technology in
K–12 Education. i-manager’s Journal on School
Educational Technology. 4(1) June-Aug, 2008 Print ISSN
0973-2217, E-ISSN 2230-7133, pp.12-17.
[18]. Osler, J. E. (2008). Technology engineering
educational solutions for the hurricane katrina Region. The
aftermath of hurricane katrina: educating traumatized
children prek through college. University Press of America.
Dorothy Singleton.
[19]. Osler, J. E. (2006). Technology engineering: A
paradigm shift to promote academic freedom in the
information age. The South Atlantic Philosophy of
Education Society 51st Annual Yearbook
[20]. PKAL (Project Kaleidoscope) (2006). Transforming
America's scientific and technological infrastructure. PKAL
Report on Reports II: Recommendations for Urgent Action.
Washington D.C.: Project Kaleidoscope.
[21]. Shaffer, C. D., Alvarez, C., Bailey, C., Barnard,
D.,
Bhalla, S., Chandrasekaran, C.,& Buhler, J. (2010). The
Genomics Education Partnership: successful integration of
research into laboratory classes at a diverse group of
undergraduate institutions. CBE-Life Sciences Education,
Vol. 9(1), pp. 55-69.
[22]. Suits, J. (2004). Assessing investigative skill
development in inquiry based and traditional college
science laboratory course. School Science and
Mathematics, pp. 248–257.
[23]. Temple, L., Cresawn, S. G., & Monroe, J. D.
(2010).
Genomics and bioinformatics in undergraduate curricula: contexts for
hybrid laboratory/lecture courses for entering
and advanced science students. Biochemistry and
Molecular Biology Education, Vol. 38(1), pp. 23-28.
[24]. University of Maryland, Baltimore County (2005).
UMBC: The Meyerhoff Scholars Program. Retrieved
October 5, 2012, from The Meyerhoff Scholars Program:
http://www.umbc.edu/meyerhoff
[25]. Wood, W.B. (2003). Inquiry based undergraduate
teaching in the life sciences at large research universities: A
perspective on the Boyer Commission report. Cell Biology
Education, pp. 112–116.
