Applying Six Sigma Tools to the Business School Accreditation Process

Jeanne D. Maes*, Kelly C. Woodford**, Alan F. Chow***
* Professor,Mitchell College of Business, University of South Alabama .
**Associate Professor ,Mitchell College of Business, University of South Alabama .
*** Instructor Mitchell College of Business, University of SouthAlabama.
Periodicity:March - May'2008
DOI : https://doi.org/10.26634/jmgt.2.4.304

Abstract

Six Sigma philosophy and methods have extended beyond the manufacturing arena. Like many industries, the quality of higher education is “controlled” through accreditation organizations. These organizations develop requirements with which all institutions must comply to become and remain accredited. Though applying continuous improvement to the development of courses and curriculums is not new, the application to accreditation compliance is a newer concept.

With accreditation groups requiring quality management principles and concepts, business schools must establish and maintain systems of continuous improvement that will keep them ahead of the ever-changing requirements. Accreditation compliance can provide a school with credentials that potential students, and their future employers, will value. In addition, the implementation of continuous improvement principles will achieve the related goal of defining and meeting the needs of the university’s customers — both the students being educated and, importantly, the companies for which they go to work. In practicing what we preach, business schools must meet these customer requirements and provide value for their educational dollars to remain competitive in the higher education industry.

While this paper focuses on compliance to university accreditation standards, the application of six sigma continuous improvement methods can be adapted and used for achieving compliance in any regulated industry.

Keywords

Six Sigma, Accreditation, Business Schools.

How to Cite this Article?

Jeanne D. Maes, Kelly C. Woodford and Alan F. Chow (2008). Applying Six Sigma Tools to the Business School Accreditation Process. i-manager’s Journal on Management, 2(4), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.26634/jmgt.2.4.304

References

[I ]. AACSB International - The Association to Advance Collegiate Schools Of Business, (2008), Eligibility procedures and accreditation standards for business accreditation~Tampa,FL
[2]. Bailey, A.R., Chow, C.W, & Haddad, K.M. (1999). Continuous improvement in business education: Insights from the for-profit sector and business school deans. Journal of EducaHon for Buslness, 74:3, I 65-180,
[3]. Benbow, D. W , & Kubiak, T. M. (2005). The Certified Six Sigma Black Belt Handbook. Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press.
[4]. Bier, I. and Comesky, R. (2001). Using QFD to construct a higher education curriculum: Quality tool ensures meeting of customer and accreditation needs, Quality Progress, 34:4, 64-68.
[5]. Brennan, LL. & Austin, WW (2003). Addressing the need for management processes for higher education accreditation. lnnovaHveHigher Education, 28: I , 49-62.
[6]. Burgar, R (1994). Applying QFD to course design in higher education. Annual Quality Congress Proceedings, American Society for Quality, Las Vegas NV, Vol, 48, 257- 263,
[7]. Conic, M.J. & McCarthy, RM. (2000). Service quality and higher education do mix, Quality Progress, 33:9, 41- 46,
[8]. Chang, O.H. & Chow, C.W (1999). The balanced scorecard: A potential tool for supporting change and continuous improvement in accounting education. issues inAccountingEducation, I 4:3, 395-412.
[9]. Chiti, J. & Karlen, J.M. (2001). Best practices and accreditation issues in distance education. Paper prepared for the American Association for Hlgher EducationTeachingLearningTechnologyRoundtable.
[I 0]. Chow, A.F. (2007). Compliance requirements matrix. Qualify Progress, 2007, VoI. 40:12, 80.
[l1]. Chow, A.F., Bowman, R., Wiffenberg, LC. (2007). Achieve compliance through CI. Qua/ity Progress, 40: I O, 28-33,
[I 2]. Ewell, RT. (2000). Continuous improvement in the accreditation arena, Assessment Update, I 2:4, 3-5~
[I 3]. Gillespie, T., Woodford, K. , and Chow, A. (2008). Improved job analysis using six sigma methods, Proceedlngs of Southwest Academy of Managemenf, Houston,TX
[I 4]. Goldstein, I. L and Ford, J. K. (2002). Training in organlzatlons.' Needs assessment, development. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth~ .
[15]. Grygoryev, K. & Karapefrovic, S. (2005). Tracking classroom teaching and learning: An SPC application. Quallity Engineering, I 7, 405-4 I 8
[I 6]. Jeffery, A. and Bratfon-Jeffery, M. (2004). Integrated training requires integrated design and business models, in Instructional design In the real world: A view from the trenches, Armstrong, A. ed. Hershey, PA,: Information Science Publishing.
[I 7]. Maes, J. D. and Jeffery, A. (2005). "Organizational development: A needed ally in six-sigma appllcatlons". Presented to the 35th Annual Information Exchange, Organization Development Institute, Chicago, iL.
[I 8]. Maguad, B.A. (2003). Using total quality to achieve continuous improvement in the classroom. Education, I 24:2, 4 I 2-4 I 7 .
[1 9]. Miles, M.R , Haze|dine, M.F. , & Munilla, LS, (2004). The 2003 AACSB accreditation standard and implications for business faculty: A short note. Journal of EducaHon for Buslness, 80: I , 29-34~
[20]. Murgatroyd, S. ( I 99 I ). Strategy, structure and quality service: Developing school wide quality improvement. Schoo/ OrganizaHon, I I : I , 7- I 9 ,
[21]. Murgatroyd, S. (1993). Implementing total quality management in the school: Challenges and opportunity, Schoo/ OrganlzaHon, I 3:3, 269-28 I .
[22]. ReVelle, J. (2003). Safety process analysis Improving safety results with process flowcharts and maps, Professional Safety, 48, I 9-27.
[23]. ReVeiie, J. (2004). Qua/ity EssenHals: A Reference Gulde from A toZ. Milwaukee, WI: ASQ Quality Press.
[24]. Stimson, W (2003). Better public schools with ISO 9000:2000. QuallityProgress, 36:9, 38-45.
[25]. Temponi, C. (2005). Continuous improvement framework: implications for academia, Qua/ity Assuranceln Educafion, I 3: I , I 7-36 .
[26]. Witkin, B. and Aitschuld, J. (1995). Planning and conductlng needs assessments.' A practical gulde. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
If you have access to this article please login to view the article or kindly login to purchase the article

Purchase Instant Access

Single Article

North Americas,UK,
Middle East,Europe
India Rest of world
USD EUR INR USD-ROW
Pdf 35 35 200 20
Online 35 35 200 15
Pdf & Online 35 35 400 25

Options for accessing this content:
  • If you would like institutional access to this content, please recommend the title to your librarian.
    Library Recommendation Form
  • If you already have i-manager's user account: Login above and proceed to purchase the article.
  • New Users: Please register, then proceed to purchase the article.